Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 I KNEW THE BOT PROBLEM WAS BAD. I DIDN’T REALIZE IT WAS THIS BAD. According to Y Social Network , up to 43% of online activity in major conversations during previous U.S. elections came from bots. And that was before generative AI exploded. Think about what that means...

30,167 просмотров • 19 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 6

Фото профиля @JudeanGeneral ll 🇺🇸 🇮🇱
@JudeanGeneral ll 🇺🇸 🇮🇱19 дней назад

@YSocialAi So maybe the world doesn’t really hate the Jewish people ?

Фото профиля Eli Goldman | אלי גולדמן
Eli Goldman | אלי גולדמן19 дней назад

@YSocialAi It means im arguing with bots most of the time 😭😂

Фото профиля sarcastic deer
sarcastic deer19 дней назад

@YSocialAi Almost anytime you see someone being antisemitic or supporting hamas and groups like it the accounts are in south asia or Pakistan.

Фото профиля one hundred watt 🇺🇦
one hundred watt 🇺🇦19 дней назад

@YSocialAi Social media is here (now) to generate income for their shareholders. It is not a town square nor is it a reliable source of news. They trade in clicks and they know discourse generates outrage and clicks. Use your local newspapers to source information. Use the AP. Not Twitter

Фото профиля Dvora-Ilona Lidovsky🇮🇱💙🇮🇱✡️♥️🇮🇱
Dvora-Ilona Lidovsky🇮🇱💙🇮🇱✡️♥️🇮🇱19 дней назад

@YSocialAi 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️😱😱😡😡😡

Фото профиля Solomon Abiodun
Solomon Abiodun19 дней назад

@YSocialAi No matter their propaganda reality says otherwise

Похожие видео

Phuwin talking about how him and Pond felt after yesterday’s event 😭🥹 ANTIDOTES PHUWIN GRAND OPENING #AntidotesNewScentxPhuwin #PondPhuwin #ปอนด์ภูวินทร์ 🐼: i thought that since this time it was a franchise event that was already happening upstairs, we had already seen some images online. Some of the staff behind the scenes also came to tell us and show us a bit of what it looked like, so i was able to prepare myself a little beforehand but honestly, pictures can’t compare to seeing it in real life. 👤: At first, did you have an estimate in mind of how many people there would be? 🐼: At first, when we talked about it, we thought that there would be quite a lot of people, but probably not as many as last time. So I never expected that there would actually be more than before, and this many people. I’m veryyy very happy that everyone came to meet us. 👤: Did u talk with Pond after that? 🐼: Yes, we talked. Actually, we just met today, and we were talking about how all the fans and everyone who came to see us are really strong and very dedicated. Many people were waiting outside while it was still very hot. And right now it’s april, which is actually the hottest period of the year. So we’re really very grateful to everyone who came to see us. We talked about it and said that from now on we’ll do our very best, because of how much everyone loves us. We want to give that love back to everyone.

Narawins 🇧🇷

49,232 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development. “I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’ I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’ When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible. And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’ I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’ I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.” ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

79,111 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I went to the University of Alberta to talk about Alberta independence, Ottawa, the Constitution, economics, and whether young people even care about this issue. What surprised me most was that one of the biggest topics that came up was immigration. And it wasn’t brought up by some “far right” guy. It was brought up by a young University of Alberta student who told me he is an immigrant. That matters. Because the conversation around immigration in Canada has become so dishonest that people are afraid to even say the obvious out loud. But this student said it plainly: Canada is bringing in too many people too quickly, without enough control, without enough planning, and without enough respect for the people who came here properly and honestly. We talked about the difference between immigration and uncontrolled immigration. We talked about student visas, overstays, crime, fraud, cost of living, inflation, housing pressure, and how bad policy creates resentment that gets unfairly aimed at entire immigrant communities. And this is exactly why Alberta needs control. Not because immigration is bad. Not because immigrants are bad. But because Alberta should be able to decide who comes here, how many come here, under what rules, and what kind of country we are trying to build. The most interesting part of this conversation was that this young man wasn’t hostile. He wasn’t angry. He was thoughtful, honest, and clearly wrestling with the same questions a lot of Albertans are asking. That’s the kind of conversation we need more of. Watch the full video on my YouTube Channel:

Jon Alberta Patriot

23,376 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

David Friedberg: The Eric Swalwell allegations were widely known about by California insiders, but held back for the perfect moment. Was this a hit job to clear the path for a preferred candidate in California? “Back in December, when it was first rumored that Swalwell was going to run for governor, I started making some calls to various folks to be like, ‘Hey, what do we think of this guy? Is he going to be a good candidate?’ I spoke to several people who independently told me that there's knowledge about this guy sending pics to employees, and that this guy has a bunch of stuff that's going to come out about him. And I largely kind of dismissed it, because I was like, if this is true, this would've all come out already. If multiple people are telling me about this, then I've got to assume that it's a rumor that's being used to block him from running for governor. And then everything that I had been told started to come out in the last week. So the striking aspect of all of this for me was how much knowledge there was about these various incidents with the guy, how so many people had this knowledge, and how no one had actually brought the knowledge to bear. Which begs the question, why did they not do what was right by the victims? Or, why did the victims sit on the sidelines waiting for the right moment to all come out together? These were all being held back purposefully and deliberately for a very particular moment in time when they were all brought forward to be used. And that's what was so striking to me is just how coordinated all of this was. My sense of it is that there are certain insiders, and he's not an insider. Katie Porter, I think, is who the Democratic establishment wants to be governor. She's an insider to national Democrats, she's an insider to California Democrats, and I think that she's the preferred candidate.”

The All-In Podcast

35,455 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 🗣 Mikel Arteta on the decision to award Sunderland a penalty: "Look, the first question we have to discuss is that this is NOT ACCEPTABLE at this level. "It was a beautiful game of football, with two teams and an atmosphere in the stadium that was unbelievable, with Sunderland they are so organised; they are so good in so many phases, they have great players, they created a lot of issues we had to cope with. "We had to cope with all of that, it was a lot in a really difficult week after Chelsea and Napoli, and on top of that we have to go through what we've done today that in my opinion is NOT ACCEPTABLE. "I watched it 20 times, and I CANNOT find a way to understand how they even think to give a penalty in that situation, or the way the VAR has to intervene. "So I don't know what to think, but I'm SAD that we have to discuss in such a beautiful game something at this level that has the gravity of that, because that CHANGES the course of the season and can cost you the championship. "At this level, with all the work that we put in, this cannot happen. I cannot find an explanation - that's why I'm going to try and find an explanation now. "I want to be talking about how good we were, how good Sunderland were, and the level of the league and how beautiful this is - we should not be talking about that. "I cannot find an explanation - that's why I'm going to try and find an explanation now." 🗣️ On a very important victory: "I want to be talking about how good we were, how good Sunderland were, and the level of the league and how beautiful this is - we should not be talking about [refereeing decisions]." 🗣️ on whether the referee gave an explanation: No! (shakes head)

Connor Humm

129,720 просмотров • 13 дней назад