正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

i merged all my AI agents into one brain Claude Code, Codex, Gemini: one team, one memory, zero re-briefing result: 8+ hours a week back, and every agent already knows my projects, my clients and how i think here's the setup with Jarvix: 1. dump your context once: projects,...

DeRonin_'s profile picture

Ronin

110,844 subscribers

15,071 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚀 Global Launch: Jarvix, Your Context OS is now live! Meet the next generation of personalized AI built around your context, your taste, and your way of thinking. #JarvixOS transforms how you work with AI by understanding your patterns, carrying your context across agents, and helping you move from ideas to action. Step into a new era of AI collaboration: • Discover your AI-native archetype • Build your personal AI model from your evolving AI interactions • Never start from zero - your context moves with you across sessions • Coordinate Codex, Claude Code, Gemini, Hermes, OpenClaw, and more as one connected AI team. • Turn insights into your next move, with you always in control Instead of adapting yourself to every agent, Jarvix carries the context you choose, helps you understand what it reveals, and brings the right agents together when you decide to act. Your AI tools shouldn’t work like separate assistants. They should work like one team. That’s the future of AI: Not more agents. One shared context. One Jarvix.
1:34

🚀 Global Launch: Jarvix, Your Context OS is now live! Meet the next generation of personalized AI built around your context, your taste, and your way of thinking. #JarvixOS transforms how you work with AI by understanding your patterns, carrying your context across agents, and helping you move from ideas to action. Step into a new era of AI collaboration: • Discover your AI-native archetype • Build your personal AI model from your evolving AI interactions • Never start from zero - your context moves with you across sessions • Coordinate Codex, Claude Code, Gemini, Hermes, OpenClaw, and more as one connected AI team. • Turn insights into your next move, with you always in control Instead of adapting yourself to every agent, Jarvix carries the context you choose, helps you understand what it reveals, and brings the right agents together when you decide to act. Your AI tools shouldn’t work like separate assistants. They should work like one team. That’s the future of AI: Not more agents. One shared context. One Jarvix.

Jarvix

1,690,981 次观看 • 1 个月前

I’ve been waiting for something like this. Using multiple AI agents sounds great until you have to keep giving each one the same context. Jarvix Jarvix is built to solve that： It carries your selected context across the AI tools you already use and brings everything together in one place. #JarvixOS You can use Jarvix Home to see your context and connections, Jarvix Search to find past information without remembering exact file names, and Self Reflection to spot patterns in the way you work. There’s also Jarvix Radio for personalized content discovery and Next Move to surface a useful direction based on your context. And the part I find most interesting: Agent Team Mode. Give Jarvix one goal, choose the agents you want to use, and it divides the work while keeping everyone on the same project context. You can watch the progress, review the result, and approve what happens next. No need to keep briefing every agent from scratch. One goal. Shared context. Multiple agents. You stay in control. That’s a much cleaner way to work with AI.
0:59

I’ve been waiting for something like this. Using multiple AI agents sounds great until you have to keep giving each one the same context. Jarvix Jarvix is built to solve that： It carries your selected context across the AI tools you already use and brings everything together in one place. #JarvixOS You can use Jarvix Home to see your context and connections, Jarvix Search to find past information without remembering exact file names, and Self Reflection to spot patterns in the way you work. There’s also Jarvix Radio for personalized content discovery and Next Move to surface a useful direction based on your context. And the part I find most interesting: Agent Team Mode. Give Jarvix one goal, choose the agents you want to use, and it divides the work while keeping everyone on the same project context. You can watch the progress, review the result, and approve what happens next. No need to keep briefing every agent from scratch. One goal. Shared context. Multiple agents. You stay in control. That’s a much cleaner way to work with AI.

Aaliya

23,225 次观看 • 1 个月前

I've spent 2 months teaching my AI how I work again and again Claude Code knows one thing. Cursor knows another. Codex starts from scratch. OpenClaw has its own memory. None of them remember what the others learned. Memmy brings those histories into one local, user-controlled memory—so you can switch agents without re-explaining your projects, decisions, and preferences. Switch agents without rebuilding your context. Let every AI remember the same you. GitHub: ProductHunt:
1:13

I've spent 2 months teaching my AI how I work again and again Claude Code knows one thing. Cursor knows another. Codex starts from scratch. OpenClaw has its own memory. None of them remember what the others learned. Memmy brings those histories into one local, user-controlled memory—so you can switch agents without re-explaining your projects, decisions, and preferences. Switch agents without rebuilding your context. Let every AI remember the same you. GitHub: ProductHunt:

Priyank Ahuja

13,228 次观看 • 2 个月前

If you use Cursor for coding, Claude Code for debugging, and local agents for automation, you almost certainly have a context problem. Every tool acts like an isolated employee. One assistant forgets what the other just learned. The biggest bottleneck in multi-agent workflows right now isn’t reasoning. It’s collective amnesia, combined with zero communication between agents. Memmy just launched a smart fix for this: a local, cross-agent memory layer. Instead of re-pasting your context everywhere, Memmy gives your stack a shared memory hub: → accumulate knowledge once, then use it across Cursor, Codex, and OpenClaw → automatically scan and import your existing agent history, so you don’t have to start from zero → keep your memory local, while model usage depends on your chosen provider or BYOK setup And it isn’t just a memory plugin. It’s a complete personal AI runtime with both MCP and a CLI. Memmy officially launched on Product Hunt, and the team is giving early users experiencing context fragmentation a free trial with 2M GPT tokens. Check it out and support the team with an upvote: → Best part? It’s also open-source for devs who want to build their own agents 🔥 Repo in 🧵↓
3:29

If you use Cursor for coding, Claude Code for debugging, and local agents for automation, you almost certainly have a context problem. Every tool acts like an isolated employee. One assistant forgets what the other just learned. The biggest bottleneck in multi-agent workflows right now isn’t reasoning. It’s collective amnesia, combined with zero communication between agents. Memmy just launched a smart fix for this: a local, cross-agent memory layer. Instead of re-pasting your context everywhere, Memmy gives your stack a shared memory hub: → accumulate knowledge once, then use it across Cursor, Codex, and OpenClaw → automatically scan and import your existing agent history, so you don’t have to start from zero → keep your memory local, while model usage depends on your chosen provider or BYOK setup And it isn’t just a memory plugin. It’s a complete personal AI runtime with both MCP and a CLI. Memmy officially launched on Product Hunt, and the team is giving early users experiencing context fragmentation a free trial with 2M GPT tokens. Check it out and support the team with an upvote: → Best part? It’s also open-source for devs who want to build their own agents 🔥 Repo in 🧵↓

Charly Wargnier

203,456 次观看 • 2 个月前

AI agents are powerful. They're also isolated. Switch fixes that. Here's the thing about most AI agents: they work alone. They don't see what your team is discussing. They don't share context across conversations. Every new chat is a fresh start. If you've ever tried to actually integrate an agent into your team's workflow, you know the friction. Then I found 𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵. It brings AI agents into Slack, Teams, Discord, and Telegram as named participants. They sit in the same rooms as your team, with the same context, history, and participants. What I actually like about it: → Agents join as real participants in channels — not bots you have to Mention every time → Each room carries its own context, history, and rules → Works with Claude Code, OpenAI, LangChain, Google ADK, and custom agents → Open source and self-hostable. Running in minutes. No migration. No lock-in. Just agents where your team already works. Knowledge lives in the room, not in the agent. Switch keeps people, agents, decisions, and work history together so context survives handoffs. It's from Flint AI. Open source. Runs in minutes. 👉 Human + agent teams, actually working together. 📌 Download 𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵 Console → 🚀𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵 is live on Product Hunt: 🔄 Repost if you've ever wished your AI agent could just join the Slack channel. — #AI #Agents #Slack #Teams #Switch #ProductHunt
0:22

AI agents are powerful. They're also isolated. Switch fixes that. Here's the thing about most AI agents: they work alone. They don't see what your team is discussing. They don't share context across conversations. Every new chat is a fresh start. If you've ever tried to actually integrate an agent into your team's workflow, you know the friction. Then I found 𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵. It brings AI agents into Slack, Teams, Discord, and Telegram as named participants. They sit in the same rooms as your team, with the same context, history, and participants. What I actually like about it: → Agents join as real participants in channels — not bots you have to Mention every time → Each room carries its own context, history, and rules → Works with Claude Code, OpenAI, LangChain, Google ADK, and custom agents → Open source and self-hostable. Running in minutes. No migration. No lock-in. Just agents where your team already works. Knowledge lives in the room, not in the agent. Switch keeps people, agents, decisions, and work history together so context survives handoffs. It's from Flint AI. Open source. Runs in minutes. 👉 Human + agent teams, actually working together. 📌 Download 𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵 Console → 🚀𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵 is live on Product Hunt: 🔄 Repost if you've ever wished your AI agent could just join the Slack channel. — #AI #Agents #Slack #Teams #Switch #ProductHunt

Anuj

337,509 次观看 • 23 天前

9 out of 10 multi-agent projects never leave demo mode Not because the model is bad. Because the structure is missing. Most people who try to build [ a team of AI agents ] end up with one agent talking to itself in five tabs. The agents don't share context → Don't divide work → Don't know what the others are doing. > stage 1: if your agent doesn't have a real loop, observe, act, iterate, you have a long prompt, not an agent > stage 2: subagents need isolated context, the orchestrator never reads their raw transcript, only the summary > stage 3: the orchestrator plans and delegates, the moment it executes, it drowns in details that belong inside subagents > stage 4: without a shared task list it's not a team, it's five agents duplicating each other's work in parallel > stage 5: a permissions file is what lets you sleep, the model cannot bypass it because the rule lives outside the model a team of AI agents is not more model, it is more structure the most ignored stage in every demo that died: - durability... when a 50-step task crashes at step 47 and starts from zero, that's not a model failure. that's a missing write-to-disk call
1:07

9 out of 10 multi-agent projects never leave demo mode Not because the model is bad. Because the structure is missing. Most people who try to build [ a team of AI agents ] end up with one agent talking to itself in five tabs. The agents don't share context → Don't divide work → Don't know what the others are doing. > stage 1: if your agent doesn't have a real loop, observe, act, iterate, you have a long prompt, not an agent > stage 2: subagents need isolated context, the orchestrator never reads their raw transcript, only the summary > stage 3: the orchestrator plans and delegates, the moment it executes, it drowns in details that belong inside subagents > stage 4: without a shared task list it's not a team, it's five agents duplicating each other's work in parallel > stage 5: a permissions file is what lets you sleep, the model cannot bypass it because the rule lives outside the model a team of AI agents is not more model, it is more structure the most ignored stage in every demo that died: - durability... when a 50-step task crashes at step 47 and starts from zero, that's not a model failure. that's a missing write-to-disk call

Shadow Nick

14,714 次观看 • 4 个月前

THIS GUY TURNED ONE OBSIDIAN VAULT INTO A SHARED BRAIN FOR 5 CLAUDE AGENTS BUILT TO HANDLE 80% OF A SOLO DEVELOPER’S WORK. 00:03 he zooms out and hundreds of connected notes appear on screen. it is the perfect visual for Claude working from one shared project memory instead of starting from zero every session. most developers give Claude 1 file and 1 prompt. this setup gives it the architecture, coding rules, tests, client briefs, and previous decisions before it writes anything. obsidian becomes the memory layer, storing everything in markdown files Claude can read alongside the codebase. every agent works from the same context instead of repeating the same questions. then 5 specialists split the job. one researches, one plans, one codes, one reviews, and one deploys while the developer only controls the important decisions. one vault, 5 agents, 2 model tiers, and a $50 to $150 monthly stack can turn Claude from a chatbot into a small development team.
0:30

THIS GUY TURNED ONE OBSIDIAN VAULT INTO A SHARED BRAIN FOR 5 CLAUDE AGENTS BUILT TO HANDLE 80% OF A SOLO DEVELOPER’S WORK. 00:03 he zooms out and hundreds of connected notes appear on screen. it is the perfect visual for Claude working from one shared project memory instead of starting from zero every session. most developers give Claude 1 file and 1 prompt. this setup gives it the architecture, coding rules, tests, client briefs, and previous decisions before it writes anything. obsidian becomes the memory layer, storing everything in markdown files Claude can read alongside the codebase. every agent works from the same context instead of repeating the same questions. then 5 specialists split the job. one researches, one plans, one codes, one reviews, and one deploys while the developer only controls the important decisions. one vault, 5 agents, 2 model tiers, and a $50 to $150 monthly stack can turn Claude from a chatbot into a small development team.

Gipp 🦅

10,799 次观看 • 3 个月前

Everyone wants agent swarms. Very few people are talking seriously enough about the context layer that makes swarms useful. Even with one agent, context is fragile. Too little context and the agent guesses. Too much context and it wastes tokens, loses focus, or reasons over irrelevant noise. The sweet spot is precise context: the right knowledge, in the right structure, at the right moment. With many agents, that challenge explodes. Each agent produces decisions, assumptions, findings, summaries, risks, and partial conclusions. Unless that knowledge becomes shared, structured, and reusable, every new agent is forced to rediscover what another agent already learned. That is not a swarm. That is a crowd. Shared context graphs are what turn agent activity into agent collaboration, and OriginTrail DKG V10 brings them to life. Was just playing with some final polishing for the V10 release, and it is really powerful to see shared context graphs where multiple agents contribute knowledge into the same connected memory, with attribution visible directly in the graph ui. That matters for three reasons. First, agents can access and build on one shared memory instead of staying trapped in isolated sessions. Second, the graph structure helps them retrieve the exact context they need, instead of stuffing everything into a prompt and hoping the model sorts it out. Third, verifiability of provenance. You can see which agent contributed each piece of knowledge, trace the source, and decide what to trust. Tokenmaxxing starts with fewer tokens, but the deeper story is coordination - agents stop reloading the world and start building on shared, verifiable context. That is the foundation for serious multi-agent work across software engineering, research, finance, operations, project management, and far beyond. The future is not more agents, it is agents working from shared, verifiable context. But the more the merrier, of course.
0:22

Everyone wants agent swarms. Very few people are talking seriously enough about the context layer that makes swarms useful. Even with one agent, context is fragile. Too little context and the agent guesses. Too much context and it wastes tokens, loses focus, or reasons over irrelevant noise. The sweet spot is precise context: the right knowledge, in the right structure, at the right moment. With many agents, that challenge explodes. Each agent produces decisions, assumptions, findings, summaries, risks, and partial conclusions. Unless that knowledge becomes shared, structured, and reusable, every new agent is forced to rediscover what another agent already learned. That is not a swarm. That is a crowd. Shared context graphs are what turn agent activity into agent collaboration, and OriginTrail DKG V10 brings them to life. Was just playing with some final polishing for the V10 release, and it is really powerful to see shared context graphs where multiple agents contribute knowledge into the same connected memory, with attribution visible directly in the graph ui. That matters for three reasons. First, agents can access and build on one shared memory instead of staying trapped in isolated sessions. Second, the graph structure helps them retrieve the exact context they need, instead of stuffing everything into a prompt and hoping the model sorts it out. Third, verifiability of provenance. You can see which agent contributed each piece of knowledge, trace the source, and decide what to trust. Tokenmaxxing starts with fewer tokens, but the deeper story is coordination - agents stop reloading the world and start building on shared, verifiable context. That is the foundation for serious multi-agent work across software engineering, research, finance, operations, project management, and far beyond. The future is not more agents, it is agents working from shared, verifiable context. But the more the merrier, of course.

Jurij Skornik

11,180 次观看 • 4 个月前

You can spin up an AI workforce with one prompt. Here's why it works: it pulls the context the AI needs to lay the foundation. Give it: - your role - team size - the goals you want to hit. Then say "interview me." After that, build it out in four steps: 1) Start with 1 agent. - What does it feel like to work with one? 2) Make that agent proactive. - Now it's doing things on your behalf before you ask. 3) Expand to 2 agents. - One directs the other, or routes to it. - This is where you learn how context gets passed. 4) Scale the workforce. - A mission control where you watch it all move around. - Now you see what has to run in parallel, which agent never needed that tool, which one runs fine on a smaller model. - Not everything needs Opus. Sub-agents are haiku and sonnet. The catch: the prompt gets you agents with markdown files doing some stuff. Getting to the 90% plus level is iteration, and that part is specific to each person. Nobody can hand it to you. Start with one agent. Spin up one agent this week. The rest is discovery.
3:10

You can spin up an AI workforce with one prompt. Here's why it works: it pulls the context the AI needs to lay the foundation. Give it: - your role - team size - the goals you want to hit. Then say "interview me." After that, build it out in four steps: 1) Start with 1 agent. - What does it feel like to work with one? 2) Make that agent proactive. - Now it's doing things on your behalf before you ask. 3) Expand to 2 agents. - One directs the other, or routes to it. - This is where you learn how context gets passed. 4) Scale the workforce. - A mission control where you watch it all move around. - Now you see what has to run in parallel, which agent never needed that tool, which one runs fine on a smaller model. - Not everything needs Opus. Sub-agents are haiku and sonnet. The catch: the prompt gets you agents with markdown files doing some stuff. Getting to the 90% plus level is iteration, and that part is specific to each person. Nobody can hand it to you. Start with one agent. Spin up one agent this week. The rest is discovery.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

18,006 次观看 • 1 个月前

You probably don’t use just one AI agent anymore. Maybe Codex for coding. Claude Code for research. Cursor for quick edits. Hermes for the rest. Each one is great at something different. But every time you switch, you have to start over — re-explaining your project, preferences, and the way you like to work. Your agents know how to help you. They just don’t share a memory of you. memU just shipped an update that fixes this. One personal memory, shared across every agent and device you use. What Codex learned last night, Claude Code can remember this morning. 🧵
0:34

You probably don’t use just one AI agent anymore. Maybe Codex for coding. Claude Code for research. Cursor for quick edits. Hermes for the rest. Each one is great at something different. But every time you switch, you have to start over — re-explaining your project, preferences, and the way you like to work. Your agents know how to help you. They just don’t share a memory of you. memU just shipped an update that fixes this. One personal memory, shared across every agent and device you use. What Codex learned last night, Claude Code can remember this morning. 🧵

Hasan

22,362 次观看 • 2 个月前

The reason your AI gives generic answers isn't the model. It's that your company's knowledge lives in 12 different tools and your agent can't see any of it. So here's how to build a context database your agents can actually use: 1) Pull it in: - Slack, email, meetings, docs, tickets - Auto-collected on a schedule into one place. 2) Clean it up. - An agent files what matters and drops the noise, so your brain doesn't bloat. 3) Store it as memory. - Folders of files your agents read from and write back to as they learn. 4) Point your agents at it. - Now they draft, build, and ship with full context instead of guessing. Same model. Same agent. The difference is whether it can understand your company or not. Build the database once. Everything downstream gets smarter.
8:17

The reason your AI gives generic answers isn't the model. It's that your company's knowledge lives in 12 different tools and your agent can't see any of it. So here's how to build a context database your agents can actually use: 1) Pull it in: - Slack, email, meetings, docs, tickets - Auto-collected on a schedule into one place. 2) Clean it up. - An agent files what matters and drops the noise, so your brain doesn't bloat. 3) Store it as memory. - Folders of files your agents read from and write back to as they learn. 4) Point your agents at it. - Now they draft, build, and ship with full context instead of guessing. Same model. Same agent. The difference is whether it can understand your company or not. Build the database once. Everything downstream gets smarter.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

13,666 次观看 • 3 个月前

Glen is building the organizational learning and context layer for agents. Every agent session your team runs produces reasoning worth keeping, and nearly all of it is discarded the moment the window closes. Glen is the layer that unifies every agent and model your company run. Glen pulls in agent sessions from Claude Code, Codex and Cursor, plus Slack messages, GitHub prs, tickets, docs and calls. When a new agent picks up a task, Glen finds relevant prior context and injects it in the agents context window to steer it, producing knowledge work that is significantly higher quality, faster and cheaper than ever before. 29% less context and 21% faster to be exact. And Glen does more... > query the original agent behind any line of code > search every session your org has ever run > dynamic skill distillation > multiplayer agents > unified transcripts you can hand between Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor mid-task, > a company brain in Slack. Glen is in early access, sign up for the waitlist below.
2:29

Glen is building the organizational learning and context layer for agents. Every agent session your team runs produces reasoning worth keeping, and nearly all of it is discarded the moment the window closes. Glen is the layer that unifies every agent and model your company run. Glen pulls in agent sessions from Claude Code, Codex and Cursor, plus Slack messages, GitHub prs, tickets, docs and calls. When a new agent picks up a task, Glen finds relevant prior context and injects it in the agents context window to steer it, producing knowledge work that is significantly higher quality, faster and cheaper than ever before. 29% less context and 21% faster to be exact. And Glen does more... > query the original agent behind any line of code > search every session your org has ever run > dynamic skill distillation > multiplayer agents > unified transcripts you can hand between Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor mid-task, > a company brain in Slack. Glen is in early access, sign up for the waitlist below.

Nikos

19,883 次观看 • 1 个月前

Introducing October, the world's most advanced agent orchestrator Claude? Codex? Grok? Cursor? Which model? Which harness? How much quota is left? You shouldn't have to care Give October a task. It builds the team, connects the agents with native agent agent comms, and orchestrates the work based on the task, your taste, budget and remaining usage (or build the team yourself) And it's multiplayer: your team's agents can work with yours, live on the same canvas
1:46

Introducing October, the world's most advanced agent orchestrator Claude? Codex? Grok? Cursor? Which model? Which harness? How much quota is left? You shouldn't have to care Give October a task. It builds the team, connects the agents with native agent agent comms, and orchestrates the work based on the task, your taste, budget and remaining usage (or build the team yourself) And it's multiplayer: your team's agents can work with yours, live on the same canvas

Harsh Savergaonkar

22,996 次观看 • 14 天前

Opus 5.5 makes this AI stack look f…cking illegal 10 GitHub repos for building everything around the model 01 zen-mcp-server ▸ → your agent debates Gemini, GPT and local models mid-task 02 claude-context ▸ → semantic code search so the agent stops grepping blind 03 wshobson/agents ▸ → a roster of subagents, each with one narrow job 04 mcp-agent ▸ → workflow patterns built around MCP tools, not around chat 05 Backlog.md ▸ → tasks live in git, so the agent and you read the same board 06 Claude Code Development Kit ▸ → hooks, subagents and MCP wired for context at scale 07 agent-rules ▸ → shared guardrails the agent inherits in every repo 08 Agent Skills ▸ → one file that teaches the agent a job, portable across tools 09 agent-scan ▸ → scans your agents, MCP servers and skills for what leaks 10 awesome-claude-code-toolkit ▸ → the map: agents, skills, commands, hooks, MCP configs the architecture: rules → context → subagents → tools → state → review → scan I'd split the stack like this: context: claude-context → Development Kit work: wshobson/agents → mcp-agent → zen-mcp-server state: Backlog.md safety: agent-rules → Agent Skills → agent-scan everyone posts the SDK and the CLI the layer that decides whether your agent survives a week is this one the model is one folder in the stack ⭣
0:24

Opus 5.5 makes this AI stack look f…cking illegal 10 GitHub repos for building everything around the model 01 zen-mcp-server ▸ → your agent debates Gemini, GPT and local models mid-task 02 claude-context ▸ → semantic code search so the agent stops grepping blind 03 wshobson/agents ▸ → a roster of subagents, each with one narrow job 04 mcp-agent ▸ → workflow patterns built around MCP tools, not around chat 05 Backlog.md ▸ → tasks live in git, so the agent and you read the same board 06 Claude Code Development Kit ▸ → hooks, subagents and MCP wired for context at scale 07 agent-rules ▸ → shared guardrails the agent inherits in every repo 08 Agent Skills ▸ → one file that teaches the agent a job, portable across tools 09 agent-scan ▸ → scans your agents, MCP servers and skills for what leaks 10 awesome-claude-code-toolkit ▸ → the map: agents, skills, commands, hooks, MCP configs the architecture: rules → context → subagents → tools → state → review → scan I'd split the stack like this: context: claude-context → Development Kit work: wshobson/agents → mcp-agent → zen-mcp-server state: Backlog.md safety: agent-rules → Agent Skills → agent-scan everyone posts the SDK and the CLI the layer that decides whether your agent survives a week is this one the model is one folder in the stack ⭣

rody

11,358 次观看 • 1 天前

Buzz is Slack where the agents are teammates instead of integrations. Here's what that unlocks: Agents: - The ones you start with are just defaults - Edit them, add your own, write their instructions like a system prompt Swappable Harness: - This is the killer feature - Swap Claude Code, Codex, Goose under the same agent Context: - Every chat you've had with that agent carries over to the new harness - Global skills and skill files come too Think: Slack = the shape Agents = the teammates Harness = the engine you can change without losing anything "I get model fatigue" is a real thing. Buzz sits one layer above it.
3:58

Buzz is Slack where the agents are teammates instead of integrations. Here's what that unlocks: Agents: - The ones you start with are just defaults - Edit them, add your own, write their instructions like a system prompt Swappable Harness: - This is the killer feature - Swap Claude Code, Codex, Goose under the same agent Context: - Every chat you've had with that agent carries over to the new harness - Global skills and skill files come too Think: Slack = the shape Agents = the teammates Harness = the engine you can change without losing anything "I get model fatigue" is a real thing. Buzz sits one layer above it.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

43,523 次观看 • 2 个月前

THIS IS HOW A SENIOR ENGINEER ACTUALLY SCALES THEMSELVES WITH CLAUDE CODE the biggest change with AI isn't coding faster. it's where you actually spend your time now. more detailed prompts, more code review, more planning, less typing, etc. here's the workflow: this guy has been shipping code since the days of cgi and perl. he uses a compound engineering plugin that runs 5 separate agents on every task. one brainstorms, one plans the technical implementation, one executes, one reviews, one checks different verticals. every step is documented in markdown files. it's slow and way more waiting. but the output quality is way higher because each agent is focused on one thing. then the REAL multiplier is in git worktrees if Claude Code made you 10x faster, worktrees multiplies that again depending on how many agents you can manage in parallel his team runs 4-8 Claude Code sessions at the same time across different worktrees with each one working on a separate task. the skill is managing multiple AI agents in parallel without losing track, that's the next evolution of engineering
0:56

THIS IS HOW A SENIOR ENGINEER ACTUALLY SCALES THEMSELVES WITH CLAUDE CODE the biggest change with AI isn't coding faster. it's where you actually spend your time now. more detailed prompts, more code review, more planning, less typing, etc. here's the workflow: this guy has been shipping code since the days of cgi and perl. he uses a compound engineering plugin that runs 5 separate agents on every task. one brainstorms, one plans the technical implementation, one executes, one reviews, one checks different verticals. every step is documented in markdown files. it's slow and way more waiting. but the output quality is way higher because each agent is focused on one thing. then the REAL multiplier is in git worktrees if Claude Code made you 10x faster, worktrees multiplies that again depending on how many agents you can manage in parallel his team runs 4-8 Claude Code sessions at the same time across different worktrees with each one working on a separate task. the skill is managing multiple AI agents in parallel without losing track, that's the next evolution of engineering

Om Patel

159,776 次观看 • 5 个月前

AI AGENTS 101 (58 minute free masterclass) send this to anyone who wants to understand ai agents, claude skills, md files, how to get the most out of AI etc in plain english: 1. chat vs agents - chat models answer questions in a back and forth while agents take a goal, figure out the steps, and deliver a result 2. agents don’t stop after one response. they keep running until the task is actually finishedno babysitting required 3. everything runs on a loop. they gather context, decide what to do, take an action, then repeat until done 4. the loop is the system. they look at files, tools, and the internet. decide the next step. execute and then feed that back into the next step. over and over until completion 5. the model is just one piece. gpt, claude, gemini are the reasoning layer. the key is model + loop + tools + context 6. mcp is how agents use tools. it connects things like browser, code, apis, and your internal software. once connected, the agent decides when to use them to get the job done 7. context beats prompt all day. you don't need to write perfect prompts. load your agent with context about your business, style, and goals and then simple instructions work 8. claude.md or agents.md is the onboarding doc it tells the agent who it is, how to behave, what it knows, and what tools it can use. this gets loaded every time before it starts 9. memory.md is how it improves. agents don’t remember by default. this file stores preferences, corrections, and patterns you tell the agent to update it, and it gets better over time 10. skills + harnesses make it usable. skills are reusable tasks like writing, research, analysis the harness is the environment like claude code or openclaw that runs everything. basiclaly, different interfaces, same system underneath this episode with remy on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 was one of the clearest ways of understanding a lot of the core concepts of ai agents could be the best beginners course for ai agents 58 mins. all free. no advertisers. i just want to see you build cool stuff. im rooting for you. send to a friend watch
58:55

AI AGENTS 101 (58 minute free masterclass) send this to anyone who wants to understand ai agents, claude skills, md files, how to get the most out of AI etc in plain english: 1. chat vs agents - chat models answer questions in a back and forth while agents take a goal, figure out the steps, and deliver a result 2. agents don’t stop after one response. they keep running until the task is actually finishedno babysitting required 3. everything runs on a loop. they gather context, decide what to do, take an action, then repeat until done 4. the loop is the system. they look at files, tools, and the internet. decide the next step. execute and then feed that back into the next step. over and over until completion 5. the model is just one piece. gpt, claude, gemini are the reasoning layer. the key is model + loop + tools + context 6. mcp is how agents use tools. it connects things like browser, code, apis, and your internal software. once connected, the agent decides when to use them to get the job done 7. context beats prompt all day. you don't need to write perfect prompts. load your agent with context about your business, style, and goals and then simple instructions work 8. claude.md or agents.md is the onboarding doc it tells the agent who it is, how to behave, what it knows, and what tools it can use. this gets loaded every time before it starts 9. memory.md is how it improves. agents don’t remember by default. this file stores preferences, corrections, and patterns you tell the agent to update it, and it gets better over time 10. skills + harnesses make it usable. skills are reusable tasks like writing, research, analysis the harness is the environment like claude code or openclaw that runs everything. basiclaly, different interfaces, same system underneath this episode with remy on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 was one of the clearest ways of understanding a lot of the core concepts of ai agents could be the best beginners course for ai agents 58 mins. all free. no advertisers. i just want to see you build cool stuff. im rooting for you. send to a friend watch

GREG ISENBERG

377,783 次观看 • 6 个月前

EVERYTHING you NEED to know about Jack Dorsey's AI agent "Slack killer" Buzz (set up, use-cases etc in 38 mins) What we get into: 1. What Buzz actually is and should founders switch from Slack? 2. How to swap the model under any agent and keep all your context? 3. How to talk to your agents live with audio huddles? 4. How to get agents to build and deploy real apps for you, like a full CRM from one ask? 5. How to set up the context loop that feeds your live app data back to your agents? 6. How to share compute so a few people split one machine running a local model? 7. Who it's actually for right now, and what's still rough? Full breakdown on the pod The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃. Thanks to Vinny for jumping on and clearly explaining jack and team's latest product. My TLDR take is Buzz is a glimpse into the future of work. Some of you will roll your eyes at that, and I get it, it's alpha software and it's slow in places. But the core idea, that your context is the foundation and agents build out from there, is right, and that's worth seeing early. Watch Curious what you think
38:43

EVERYTHING you NEED to know about Jack Dorsey's AI agent "Slack killer" Buzz (set up, use-cases etc in 38 mins) What we get into: 1. What Buzz actually is and should founders switch from Slack? 2. How to swap the model under any agent and keep all your context? 3. How to talk to your agents live with audio huddles? 4. How to get agents to build and deploy real apps for you, like a full CRM from one ask? 5. How to set up the context loop that feeds your live app data back to your agents? 6. How to share compute so a few people split one machine running a local model? 7. Who it's actually for right now, and what's still rough? Full breakdown on the pod The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃. Thanks to Vinny for jumping on and clearly explaining jack and team's latest product. My TLDR take is Buzz is a glimpse into the future of work. Some of you will roll your eyes at that, and I get it, it's alpha software and it's slow in places. But the core idea, that your context is the foundation and agents build out from there, is right, and that's worth seeing early. Watch Curious what you think

GREG ISENBERG

559,725 次观看 • 2 个月前

Google just dropped a free 1-hour course On building complete agent systems from scratch: 07:02 - Build your first AI agent 13:34 - Give every agent a specialized skill 23:08 - Engineer the right context 32:56 - Connect agents into graphs 54:11 - Run 1,000 agents in autonomous loops One agent saves you an hour A thousand agents replace the team you cannot afford to hire Most people are still learning how to prompt one chatbot Google is already teaching how to build entire agent systems Agent → Skills → Context → Graphs → Loops Single agents are the old workflow Agent swarms are the new one This free 1-hour course is worth more than most paid agent engineering programs Bookmark it before everyone starts building the same thing Then build your first agent with the guide below
1:05:19

Google just dropped a free 1-hour course On building complete agent systems from scratch: 07:02 - Build your first AI agent 13:34 - Give every agent a specialized skill 23:08 - Engineer the right context 32:56 - Connect agents into graphs 54:11 - Run 1,000 agents in autonomous loops One agent saves you an hour A thousand agents replace the team you cannot afford to hire Most people are still learning how to prompt one chatbot Google is already teaching how to build entire agent systems Agent → Skills → Context → Graphs → Loops Single agents are the old workflow Agent swarms are the new one This free 1-hour course is worth more than most paid agent engineering programs Bookmark it before everyone starts building the same thing Then build your first agent with the guide below

rari

28,241 次观看 • 2 个月前

Found a setup that replaces a team of researchers with 300 AI agents and one shared graph. the interesting part is what happens after all 300 come back with different pieces of the answer. because now you don’t have 300 agents. you have: 300 outputs → hundreds of sources → repeated entities → overlapping claims → contradictions → thousands of possible relationships and all of that has to collapse into one structure. that’s what the context graph is doing. instead of: agent → report you get: agents → sources → entities → edges → contradictions → verification → one graph every source becomes a node. every shared entity creates a connection. 300 agents can create information. the graph is what turns that information into memory the next agent can actually use. that’s the anatomy behind the setup ↓
0:33

Found a setup that replaces a team of researchers with 300 AI agents and one shared graph. the interesting part is what happens after all 300 come back with different pieces of the answer. because now you don’t have 300 agents. you have: 300 outputs → hundreds of sources → repeated entities → overlapping claims → contradictions → thousands of possible relationships and all of that has to collapse into one structure. that’s what the context graph is doing. instead of: agent → report you get: agents → sources → entities → edges → contradictions → verification → one graph every source becomes a node. every shared entity creates a connection. 300 agents can create information. the graph is what turns that information into memory the next agent can actually use. that’s the anatomy behind the setup ↓

Ricker

19,652 次观看 • 27 天前