正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

I read $NVDA partnering with $GM to develop autonomous vehicles most bullish for $UBER. People thought $TSLA robo-taxi would be proprietary. Now, most OEMs will have that through $NVDA. Where tech is commoditized, distribution wins. $UBER controls the distribution.

383,926 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

alex 的头像
alex1 年前

I feel like you might be missing a few important points.

Investors.com 的头像
Investors.com1 年前

With industry-leading AI stock coverage, expert analysis and proprietary 1-99 ratings for every stock, IBD Digital makes it easy to pinpoint top-notch AI stocks––join today and save over $45.

V Runner 🏃‍♂️ 的头像
V Runner 🏃‍♂️1 年前

If autonomy is truly a commodity technology, then why did GM and Apple both throw in the towel after spending over $10 billion?

Soul_Of_Wit 的头像
Soul_Of_Wit1 年前

Since when is the solution HW? It's a SW/Real AI issue and you don't automatically get Autonomy by gluing a chip down. I see a Lot of vaporware here.

Dan Town 的头像
Dan Town1 年前

$TSLA is cooked

TheDukeofYork 的头像
TheDukeofYork1 年前

So GM is going to build a competitive RoboTaxi to what Tesla will be producing off an assembly line later this year? 🤔 OK, timeframe? 3 to 5 years? Maybe! Electric or Combustion Engines 🤔 Sonics or Escalades? And Uber controls the “distribution”? Really?

Varun Malhotra 的头像
Varun Malhotra1 年前

I think Google will win here if they can figure out how to use maps for distribution

Gregg A 的头像
Gregg A1 年前

And $TSLA controls the software

Rex 的头像
Rex1 年前

Uber doesn't own any vehicles though.

RetiredLife 的头像
RetiredLife1 年前

Tesla has bigger issues that robots and taxis or tech; if crazy people keep harassing Tesla owners and dealers.

James McKnight 的头像
James McKnight1 年前

Great point! $NVDA's tech could definitely level the playing field for many automakers, but $UBER's distribution model puts them in a prime position to dominate the ride-sharing space.

相关视频

the biggest advantage in business used to be money. then it became distribution. now it's speed. a year ago, building an app (even with ai) was a headache. you needed developers. designers. weeks of work. and a budget that most indie devs don't have. which means you had to spend more time - learning, trying, fixing. today, i can have an app live in minutes with superapp ai. then create ads for it with arcads a few minutes later. not mockups. not concepts. actual assets ready to ship. that's a pretty crazy change when you stop and think about it. for the first time, building software is starting to feel easy. the hard part isn't creating the product anymore. it's getting people to care. which means the game is changing. the winners won't be the people who can build. soon almost everyone will be able to build. the winners will be the people with the best ideas and the best distribution. the people who can test faster. learn faster. and ship faster. when one founder is running 50 experiments while another is still planning the first one, you know who will fail faster and get up and this is the worst these tools will ever be. next year's models will be smarter. faster. cheaper. building apps will get easier. creating ads will get easier. distribution will get easier. things that feel crazy today will feel normal. and things that feel impossible today will probably become a button. i don't think most people have fully processed how big this shift is. we're moving into a world where turning an idea into a product is becoming a cakewalk. from there, everything comes down to execution. and speed compounds.

Kritarth Mittal | Soshals

40,735 次观看 • 2 个月前