Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
"I really feel for Southampton, I think it should have been a goal" Ref watch discuss Southampton's disallowed goal vs Wolves after the referee looked at the foul eight times from the same angle on the monitor 💬
192,166 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
9 Yorum

That cunt Semedo stayed down all the time the ref was at the screen as well, only getting up when the goal was overturned, any time we had any momentum in the game a wolves player dropped to the ground to receive treatment, Sa was on his arse more than his feet!

At what point do we accept VAR doesn’t do its job? If anything it creates more anger, frustration and debate than we ever had before while it simultaneously removed the joy from watching a football match

It’s about time Wolves had some luck with VAR but yeah I have to agree it wasn’t a foul at all. Goal should have stood

If it’s really that close, then you’re reofficiating the game.

Your clubs voted for it, 2 in 2 games now we've gotten away with one, just another 98 to make up for the past 6 seasons 🤪

If anything it’s a foul on Fernandez. Semedo sticks his leg out not the other way around. I’m biased ofc but I cannot understand how anyone is calling that a foul

He's shielding the ball to then kick it away, but before he can kick it away, he is fouled.

When a striker "steps across his man" it is claimed he is clever (ie once he does that the defender can't touch him). Why is it different when it's a defender? Or is it that it's because it's Wolves and nobody can quite believe we have had VAR for in our favour for once

Tough break for Southampton—sometimes the monitor just doesn’t tell the whole story












