Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

I reviewed Epstein file redactions today. One redacted document is an email from Epstein’s attorneys recounting a conversation with Trump in 2009. The email includes no mention of victims and should not have been redacted. There were many other inexplicable redactions.

Rep_Walkinshaw's profile picture

Rep. James Walkinshaw

10,958 subscribers

387,949 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Rep. Raskin on Epstein file redactions: "[They] are filled with redactions of names and information about people who clearly are not victims…I saw the names of lots of people who were redacted for mysterious or baffling or inscrutable reasons."
0:50

Rep. Raskin on Epstein file redactions: "[They] are filled with redactions of names and information about people who clearly are not victims…I saw the names of lots of people who were redacted for mysterious or baffling or inscrutable reasons."

Home of the Brave

27,950 views • 4 months ago

Epstein Survivor: We've watched the Trump administration botch redactions so badly that victims' images were exposed while predators' identities were kept hidden or redacted. That does not feel like an accident
0:54

Epstein Survivor: We've watched the Trump administration botch redactions so badly that victims' images were exposed while predators' identities were kept hidden or redacted. That does not feel like an accident

Headquarters

97,638 views • 4 months ago

I reviewed a redacted Epstein file saying that Trump never kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago—despite years of saying he did. Why did he lie? And why was this document redacted?
0:21

I reviewed a redacted Epstein file saying that Trump never kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago—despite years of saying he did. Why did he lie? And why was this document redacted?

Rep. James Walkinshaw

351,278 views • 4 months ago

Mockler: They didn't release all the files. They're drip feeding them. And redactions weren't reasonable. It was redacted in some parts. And as we just saw under redacted in other parts, and victims were exposed.
0:37

Mockler: They didn't release all the files. They're drip feeding them. And redactions weren't reasonable. It was redacted in some parts. And as we just saw under redacted in other parts, and victims were exposed.

Acyn

144,930 views • 6 months ago

Today, I exposed an unredacted email that clearly shows Trump has been lying about his connections to Jeffrey Epstein. There's no reason this should have been redacted, which is exactly why I showed it. Pam Bondi and Donald Trump: The gig is up. Release all the files. Now.
1:00

Today, I exposed an unredacted email that clearly shows Trump has been lying about his connections to Jeffrey Epstein. There's no reason this should have been redacted, which is exactly why I showed it. Pam Bondi and Donald Trump: The gig is up. Release all the files. Now.

Daniel Goldman

615,994 views • 3 months ago

🚨WTF: Karoline Leavitt was asked if Trump “spent hours” at Epstein’s house with one of his sex trafficking victims, as Epstein wrote in the released email. Her answer: Go ask the "Democratic Party" why they redacted the victim's name. They do not give a shit about victims.
1:03

🚨WTF: Karoline Leavitt was asked if Trump “spent hours” at Epstein’s house with one of his sex trafficking victims, as Epstein wrote in the released email. Her answer: Go ask the "Democratic Party" why they redacted the victim's name. They do not give a shit about victims.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

3,102,361 views • 7 months ago

Very few lock in to Trump’s mindset like Jimmy Kimmel, who amplified the redacted Epstein document I made public this week. There was no basis to redact the email, other than to protect Trump. What else are they hiding?
0:58

Very few lock in to Trump’s mindset like Jimmy Kimmel, who amplified the redacted Epstein document I made public this week. There was no basis to redact the email, other than to protect Trump. What else are they hiding?

Daniel Goldman

33,338 views • 3 months ago

Epstein’s victims making a list of abusers. No redactions!
1:24

Epstein’s victims making a list of abusers. No redactions!

Santa Trump.. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

12,998 views • 4 months ago

There’s a huge block of text redacted around a conversation that Trump had a lawyer for one of the victims. Why is it redacted and why don’t we know what he knows about Epstein?
0:21

There’s a huge block of text redacted around a conversation that Trump had a lawyer for one of the victims. Why is it redacted and why don’t we know what he knows about Epstein?

Tara Palmeri

34,644 views • 4 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: 90% of the released Epstein files are REDACTED. ALL 119 pages of the Epstein grand jury testimony are REDACTED. The Epstein Files Transparency Act, required the DOJ to release ALL unclassified Epstein records by today, Dec 19, 2025, with LIMITED REDACTIONS allowed only for victim info or active investigations. WHY IS TRUMP'S DOJ MAKING ILLEGAL REDACTIONS TO PROTECT POLITICIANS & GOVT OFFICIALS?
0:33

🚨 BREAKING: 90% of the released Epstein files are REDACTED. ALL 119 pages of the Epstein grand jury testimony are REDACTED. The Epstein Files Transparency Act, required the DOJ to release ALL unclassified Epstein records by today, Dec 19, 2025, with LIMITED REDACTIONS allowed only for victim info or active investigations. WHY IS TRUMP'S DOJ MAKING ILLEGAL REDACTIONS TO PROTECT POLITICIANS & GOVT OFFICIALS?

Publius

503,723 views • 6 months ago

🇺🇸 EPSTEIN FILES: THE “BUYING A BABY” EMAIL Nick Bryant points to an email from a redacted woman telling Epstein, “You offered to buy a baby six months into our relationship.” Epstein reportedly replied to other parts of the email but ignored that line. Nick says other documents mention “black market babies” tied to the New Mexico ranch, and multiple women have claimed Epstein asked them to have his child. Full interview with Nick Bryant below
3:47

Sensitive content

🇺🇸 EPSTEIN FILES: THE “BUYING A BABY” EMAIL Nick Bryant points to an email from a redacted woman telling Epstein, “You offered to buy a baby six months into our relationship.” Epstein reportedly replied to other parts of the email but ignored that line. Nick says other documents mention “black market babies” tied to the New Mexico ranch, and multiple women have claimed Epstein asked them to have his child. Full interview with Nick Bryant below

Mario Nawfal

53,450 views • 4 months ago

BOMBSHELL! After House Republicans and the White House claimed that Democrats redacted Virginia Giuffre's name from the Epstein / Maxwell email, Democratic Congresswoman Melanie Stansbury says that's not true! It came to Democrats from the Epstein Estate already redacted. So this means the name in the email may not have been Giuffre, and Republicans are lying to cover up the truth!
0:23

BOMBSHELL! After House Republicans and the White House claimed that Democrats redacted Virginia Giuffre's name from the Epstein / Maxwell email, Democratic Congresswoman Melanie Stansbury says that's not true! It came to Democrats from the Epstein Estate already redacted. So this means the name in the email may not have been Giuffre, and Republicans are lying to cover up the truth!

Ed Krassenstein

939,159 views • 7 months ago

BREAKING Congressman Ro Khanna — who co-authored the Epstein bill with Congressman Thomas Massie — says the Trump Department of Justice’s Epstein files release today DOES NOT comply with federal law. Khanna says, among other issues, that the DOJ is not explaining its redactions and has completely redacted a 119-page grand jury file, even though the judge ordered it released. Khanna says he and Massie are exploring their legal options.
1:18

BREAKING Congressman Ro Khanna — who co-authored the Epstein bill with Congressman Thomas Massie — says the Trump Department of Justice’s Epstein files release today DOES NOT comply with federal law. Khanna says, among other issues, that the DOJ is not explaining its redactions and has completely redacted a 119-page grand jury file, even though the judge ordered it released. Khanna says he and Massie are exploring their legal options.

Yashar Ali 🐘

476,623 views • 6 months ago

Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna says he is "very disappointed" with the Justice Department's partial release of the Epstein files. "One of the documents, 119 pages that a federal judge wanted released, is totally redacted and there is no explanation for the redactions," he tells Elizabeth Landers.
0:53

Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna says he is "very disappointed" with the Justice Department's partial release of the Epstein files. "One of the documents, 119 pages that a federal judge wanted released, is totally redacted and there is no explanation for the redactions," he tells Elizabeth Landers.

PBS News

25,052 views • 6 months ago

By law, the only redactions are supposed to be the victims and the DOJ has redacted names of the perpetrators ‼️ #DemsUnited #ReleaseAllTheEpsteinFiles
0:49

By law, the only redactions are supposed to be the victims and the DOJ has redacted names of the perpetrators ‼️ #DemsUnited #ReleaseAllTheEpsteinFiles

Sammi🦋

11,105 views • 6 months ago

Heartbreaking testimony today of one of the Epstein victims, Roza 💔 "The rich have their names redacted. Mine was not"
3:51

Heartbreaking testimony today of one of the Epstein victims, Roza 💔 "The rich have their names redacted. Mine was not"

Elizabeth

37,703 views • 1 month ago

I saw so many illegal redactions in the Epstein files. Authors of his sweetheart deal, a close associate who likely knew of crimes, a private investigator who allegedly hid evidence - all their names, illegally redacted. That's not transparency. It’s more Trump DOJ coverup.
1:27

I saw so many illegal redactions in the Epstein files. Authors of his sweetheart deal, a close associate who likely knew of crimes, a private investigator who allegedly hid evidence - all their names, illegally redacted. That's not transparency. It’s more Trump DOJ coverup.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

10,712 views • 3 months ago

Reporter: Some of the victims were protesting that too many of the Epstein Files were redacted. Trump: I know. There are lot of people that are angry about all of the pictures of other people. I think it's terrible.
1:24

Reporter: Some of the victims were protesting that too many of the Epstein Files were redacted. Trump: I know. There are lot of people that are angry about all of the pictures of other people. I think it's terrible.

Acyn

283,715 views • 6 months ago

Another bombshell! This email found in the files is entitled Epstein co-conspirators, and it is redacted
1:16

Another bombshell! This email found in the files is entitled Epstein co-conspirators, and it is redacted

MAGA Cult Slayer🦅🇺🇸

52,201 views • 6 months ago

Wow someone didn’t redact Trump’s name on this Epstein file #EFTA 02332441 where it says that Donald Trump along with others were sent pages to fill out for Epstein’s birthday book which Trump swore he knew nothing about! The names of who this actual email went to were redacted!
2:02

Wow someone didn’t redact Trump’s name on this Epstein file #EFTA 02332441 where it says that Donald Trump along with others were sent pages to fill out for Epstein’s birthday book which Trump swore he knew nothing about! The names of who this actual email went to were redacted!

Suzie rizzio

36,258 views • 3 months ago