Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

I reviewed Epstein file redactions today. One redacted document is an email from Epstein’s attorneys recounting a conversation with Trump in 2009. The email includes no mention of victims and should not have been redacted. There were many other inexplicable redactions.

Rep_Walkinshaw's profile picture

Rep. James Walkinshaw

10,958 subscribers

387,949 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Rep. Raskin on Epstein file redactions: "[They] are filled with redactions of names and information about people who clearly are not victims…I saw the names of lots of people who were redacted for mysterious or baffling or inscrutable reasons."
0:50

Rep. Raskin on Epstein file redactions: "[They] are filled with redactions of names and information about people who clearly are not victims…I saw the names of lots of people who were redacted for mysterious or baffling or inscrutable reasons."

Home of the Brave

27,950 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Today, I exposed an unredacted email that clearly shows Trump has been lying about his connections to Jeffrey Epstein. There's no reason this should have been redacted, which is exactly why I showed it. Pam Bondi and Donald Trump: The gig is up. Release all the files. Now.
1:00

Today, I exposed an unredacted email that clearly shows Trump has been lying about his connections to Jeffrey Epstein. There's no reason this should have been redacted, which is exactly why I showed it. Pam Bondi and Donald Trump: The gig is up. Release all the files. Now.

Daniel Goldman

616,359 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨WTF: Karoline Leavitt was asked if Trump “spent hours” at Epstein’s house with one of his sex trafficking victims, as Epstein wrote in the released email. Her answer: Go ask the "Democratic Party" why they redacted the victim's name. They do not give a shit about victims.
1:03

🚨WTF: Karoline Leavitt was asked if Trump “spent hours” at Epstein’s house with one of his sex trafficking victims, as Epstein wrote in the released email. Her answer: Go ask the "Democratic Party" why they redacted the victim's name. They do not give a shit about victims.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

3,102,951 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

The Epstein file with the subject line “Trump” is redacted. I have what’s behind the black box — and it tells the real story of Trump and Epstein’s relationship. Read about it at
3:04

The Epstein file with the subject line “Trump” is redacted. I have what’s behind the black box — and it tells the real story of Trump and Epstein’s relationship. Read about it at

Tara Palmeri

51,515 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Very few lock in to Trump’s mindset like Jimmy Kimmel, who amplified the redacted Epstein document I made public this week. There was no basis to redact the email, other than to protect Trump. What else are they hiding?
0:58

Very few lock in to Trump’s mindset like Jimmy Kimmel, who amplified the redacted Epstein document I made public this week. There was no basis to redact the email, other than to protect Trump. What else are they hiding?

Daniel Goldman

33,338 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

There’s a huge block of text redacted around a conversation that Trump had a lawyer for one of the victims. Why is it redacted and why don’t we know what he knows about Epstein?
0:21

There’s a huge block of text redacted around a conversation that Trump had a lawyer for one of the victims. Why is it redacted and why don’t we know what he knows about Epstein?

Tara Palmeri

34,644 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 EPSTEIN FILES: THE “BUYING A BABY” EMAIL Nick Bryant points to an email from a redacted woman telling Epstein, “You offered to buy a baby six months into our relationship.” Epstein reportedly replied to other parts of the email but ignored that line. Nick says other documents mention “black market babies” tied to the New Mexico ranch, and multiple women have claimed Epstein asked them to have his child. Full interview with Nick Bryant below
3:47

Sensitive content

🇺🇸 EPSTEIN FILES: THE “BUYING A BABY” EMAIL Nick Bryant points to an email from a redacted woman telling Epstein, “You offered to buy a baby six months into our relationship.” Epstein reportedly replied to other parts of the email but ignored that line. Nick says other documents mention “black market babies” tied to the New Mexico ranch, and multiple women have claimed Epstein asked them to have his child. Full interview with Nick Bryant below

Mario Nawfal

53,450 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

BOMBSHELL! After House Republicans and the White House claimed that Democrats redacted Virginia Giuffre's name from the Epstein / Maxwell email, Democratic Congresswoman Melanie Stansbury says that's not true! It came to Democrats from the Epstein Estate already redacted. So this means the name in the email may not have been Giuffre, and Republicans are lying to cover up the truth!
0:23

BOMBSHELL! After House Republicans and the White House claimed that Democrats redacted Virginia Giuffre's name from the Epstein / Maxwell email, Democratic Congresswoman Melanie Stansbury says that's not true! It came to Democrats from the Epstein Estate already redacted. So this means the name in the email may not have been Giuffre, and Republicans are lying to cover up the truth!

Ed Krassenstein

939,159 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

BREAKING Congressman Ro Khanna — who co-authored the Epstein bill with Congressman Thomas Massie — says the Trump Department of Justice’s Epstein files release today DOES NOT comply with federal law. Khanna says, among other issues, that the DOJ is not explaining its redactions and has completely redacted a 119-page grand jury file, even though the judge ordered it released. Khanna says he and Massie are exploring their legal options.
1:18

BREAKING Congressman Ro Khanna — who co-authored the Epstein bill with Congressman Thomas Massie — says the Trump Department of Justice’s Epstein files release today DOES NOT comply with federal law. Khanna says, among other issues, that the DOJ is not explaining its redactions and has completely redacted a 119-page grand jury file, even though the judge ordered it released. Khanna says he and Massie are exploring their legal options.

Yashar Ali 🐘

476,672 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna says he is "very disappointed" with the Justice Department's partial release of the Epstein files. "One of the documents, 119 pages that a federal judge wanted released, is totally redacted and there is no explanation for the redactions," he tells Elizabeth Landers.
0:53

Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna says he is "very disappointed" with the Justice Department's partial release of the Epstein files. "One of the documents, 119 pages that a federal judge wanted released, is totally redacted and there is no explanation for the redactions," he tells Elizabeth Landers.

PBS News

25,052 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I saw so many illegal redactions in the Epstein files. Authors of his sweetheart deal, a close associate who likely knew of crimes, a private investigator who allegedly hid evidence - all their names, illegally redacted. That's not transparency. It’s more Trump DOJ coverup.
1:27

I saw so many illegal redactions in the Epstein files. Authors of his sweetheart deal, a close associate who likely knew of crimes, a private investigator who allegedly hid evidence - all their names, illegally redacted. That's not transparency. It’s more Trump DOJ coverup.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

10,712 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Reporter: Some of the victims were protesting that too many of the Epstein Files were redacted. Trump: I know. There are lot of people that are angry about all of the pictures of other people. I think it's terrible.
1:24

Reporter: Some of the victims were protesting that too many of the Epstein Files were redacted. Trump: I know. There are lot of people that are angry about all of the pictures of other people. I think it's terrible.

Acyn

283,715 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Wow someone didn’t redact Trump’s name on this Epstein file #EFTA 02332441 where it says that Donald Trump along with others were sent pages to fill out for Epstein’s birthday book which Trump swore he knew nothing about! The names of who this actual email went to were redacted!
2:02

Wow someone didn’t redact Trump’s name on this Epstein file #EFTA 02332441 where it says that Donald Trump along with others were sent pages to fill out for Epstein’s birthday book which Trump swore he knew nothing about! The names of who this actual email went to were redacted!

Suzie rizzio

36,258 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

After reviewing some of the UN-REDACTED Epstein files at the DOJ today, Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna say at least six men are implicated in the files, with one of them being a "prominent person" and another being "pretty high up" in a foreign government. Khanna pointed out that they found the six names by just reviewing files for two hours. Massie says he will discuss the names on the floor of the House of Representatives where he has legal protections. DOJ set up a room where members of Congress can review the Epstein files without redactions; however, members have already complained today that there are only four computers and that some of the files remain redacted. Khanna and Massie also noted that some of the files arrived at the DOJ from the FBI with redactions already applied, and that their legislation requires the FBI to remove those redactions; the FBI operates under the Department of Justice. Massie also said that the "algorithm" the DOJ used to process redactions over-redacted the names of women.
1:18

After reviewing some of the UN-REDACTED Epstein files at the DOJ today, Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna say at least six men are implicated in the files, with one of them being a "prominent person" and another being "pretty high up" in a foreign government. Khanna pointed out that they found the six names by just reviewing files for two hours. Massie says he will discuss the names on the floor of the House of Representatives where he has legal protections. DOJ set up a room where members of Congress can review the Epstein files without redactions; however, members have already complained today that there are only four computers and that some of the files remain redacted. Khanna and Massie also noted that some of the files arrived at the DOJ from the FBI with redactions already applied, and that their legislation requires the FBI to remove those redactions; the FBI operates under the Department of Justice. Massie also said that the "algorithm" the DOJ used to process redactions over-redacted the names of women.

Yashar Ali 🐘

139,509 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Rep. Jamie Raskin says he saw an unredacted email that was released by Trump's DOJ with redactions that shows that Epstein’s lawyers were talking with Trump’s Lawyers, saying that Epstein was a guest at Mar-a-lago and never had been asked to leave. This contradicts what Trump has repeatedly said. Why did the DOJ redact this information? Why does it appears Trump may have been lying about asking Epstein to leave?
0:43

BREAKING: Rep. Jamie Raskin says he saw an unredacted email that was released by Trump's DOJ with redactions that shows that Epstein’s lawyers were talking with Trump’s Lawyers, saying that Epstein was a guest at Mar-a-lago and never had been asked to leave. This contradicts what Trump has repeatedly said. Why did the DOJ redact this information? Why does it appears Trump may have been lying about asking Epstein to leave?

Ed Krassenstein

1,138,590 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Democrats releasing a redacted email trying to implicate Trump in Epstein-related activities is just another overinflated smear attempt. Virginia Giuffre already exonerated Trump in her book and testimony, while successfully accusing Prince Andrew. Democrats had all the evidence on Epstein and now they wanna come forward with all this redacted crap.
3:33

Democrats releasing a redacted email trying to implicate Trump in Epstein-related activities is just another overinflated smear attempt. Virginia Giuffre already exonerated Trump in her book and testimony, while successfully accusing Prince Andrew. Democrats had all the evidence on Epstein and now they wanna come forward with all this redacted crap.

ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

10,780 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Thomas Massie: “Leslie Wexner should go to court.” “He’s listed in the FBI’s documents as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein in the sex trafficking ring.” “The DOJ is still covering up files, or over-redacting files.” “This week, I had a chance to go to the DOJ and look at the un-redacted files.” “There’s a very troubling email in the Epstein files where somebody sends Epstein a torture video, and he says, ‘I really enjoyed the torture video.’” “They had redacted who it came from.” “I went in there, I got the email that it came from, and I was able to use the DOJ’a own computers to match the email up with an individual.” “It’s a sultan from overseas that Jeffrey Epstein interacted with quite frequently.” “So just in the last two days, we have released more names.” Thomas Massie
1:43

Thomas Massie: “Leslie Wexner should go to court.” “He’s listed in the FBI’s documents as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein in the sex trafficking ring.” “The DOJ is still covering up files, or over-redacting files.” “This week, I had a chance to go to the DOJ and look at the un-redacted files.” “There’s a very troubling email in the Epstein files where somebody sends Epstein a torture video, and he says, ‘I really enjoyed the torture video.’” “They had redacted who it came from.” “I went in there, I got the email that it came from, and I was able to use the DOJ’a own computers to match the email up with an individual.” “It’s a sultan from overseas that Jeffrey Epstein interacted with quite frequently.” “So just in the last two days, we have released more names.” Thomas Massie

Holden Culotta

189,921 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

NEW: Epstein’s former lawyer Alan Dershowitz says there’s NO ‘client list’.....but confirms there is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers. During an interview with Chris Cuomo, Dershowitz pushed back on the idea of a hidden list of trafficked clients...but admitted there is a sealed government document naming names. Chris Cuomo: “Is the government hiding a client list or anything that the Trump administration could release tonight?” Alan Dershowitz: “No, there's no client list and never has been a client list.” “A client list suggests that Jeffrey Epstein made a list of people to whom he trafficked do women.” “What there is, is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers and there are several of them, from accusers that accuse Jeffrey—that accuse various people of having improper sex.” “And that has been redacted. The names of the people accuse have been blacked out. Now, of course, because as lawyer and I did only investigations, I know who all these people are.”
2:02

NEW: Epstein’s former lawyer Alan Dershowitz says there’s NO ‘client list’.....but confirms there is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers. During an interview with Chris Cuomo, Dershowitz pushed back on the idea of a hidden list of trafficked clients...but admitted there is a sealed government document naming names. Chris Cuomo: “Is the government hiding a client list or anything that the Trump administration could release tonight?” Alan Dershowitz: “No, there's no client list and never has been a client list.” “A client list suggests that Jeffrey Epstein made a list of people to whom he trafficked do women.” “What there is, is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers and there are several of them, from accusers that accuse Jeffrey—that accuse various people of having improper sex.” “And that has been redacted. The names of the people accuse have been blacked out. Now, of course, because as lawyer and I did only investigations, I know who all these people are.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

221,014 просмотров • 1 год назад

This is verifiable proof that all Democrats showed with their email release is that Epstein was an intelligence operation targeting President Trump. Let's break it down: - Democrats just released an email claiming Trump spent time with an Epstein victim and redacted the victim’s name to imply wrongdoing. - The unredacted version shows it was Virginia Roberts, who exposed Epstein’s network, and stated under oath that Trump never touched her and always treated her with respect. - Trump was the one who banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after learning what he was doing. - Trump told the FBI about Epstein and helped prosecutors take him down in 2008. What did Democrats actually prove with this email? Epstein and his network were worried because Trump wasn’t part of their operation. They didn’t expose President Trump, they exposed the truth: Epstein was being used by intelligence to blackmail the powerful, and Trump was the one man they couldn’t control.
8:38

This is verifiable proof that all Democrats showed with their email release is that Epstein was an intelligence operation targeting President Trump. Let's break it down: - Democrats just released an email claiming Trump spent time with an Epstein victim and redacted the victim’s name to imply wrongdoing. - The unredacted version shows it was Virginia Roberts, who exposed Epstein’s network, and stated under oath that Trump never touched her and always treated her with respect. - Trump was the one who banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after learning what he was doing. - Trump told the FBI about Epstein and helped prosecutors take him down in 2008. What did Democrats actually prove with this email? Epstein and his network were worried because Trump wasn’t part of their operation. They didn’t expose President Trump, they exposed the truth: Epstein was being used by intelligence to blackmail the powerful, and Trump was the one man they couldn’t control.

Benny Johnson

481,384 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Wait, you mean the redactions were protecting traffickers who claimed to be victims? And wait, you mean we were all right about Trump being one of the first to turn Epstein in? No.... who didn't see that coming?
2:37

Wait, you mean the redactions were protecting traffickers who claimed to be victims? And wait, you mean we were all right about Trump being one of the first to turn Epstein in? No.... who didn't see that coming?

PatriotDadEV2.0

23,046 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад