Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

I shared 10 Jev use cases for marketers. Here are 10 more: 11. Ad creative scoring - Feed it 100 ad variations. Jev can score which hooks, headlines, or angles are most worth testing first. 12. Social post filtering - Monitor thousands of posts. Jev can flag the ones...

yuhasbeentaken's profile picture

Yum⋆₊˚

6,338 subscribers

673,524 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

FinansEğitimBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

JEV is INSANE. We gave it 400 companies and one candidate profile. In 12 seconds, it predicted which jobs the candidate had the highest chance of getting, assigned a confidence score and detected job-candidate mismatches. All for just $0.0005 It can also score companies, analyse your experience, match you with the right roles and identify the opportunities you’re most likely to get based on your profile. Coming soon to Backdoor Comment “JEV” for early access.
0:11

JEV is INSANE. We gave it 400 companies and one candidate profile. In 12 seconds, it predicted which jobs the candidate had the highest chance of getting, assigned a confidence score and detected job-candidate mismatches. All for just $0.0005 It can also score companies, analyse your experience, match you with the right roles and identify the opportunities you’re most likely to get based on your profile. Coming soon to Backdoor Comment “JEV” for early access.

Sarvagya Kulshreshtha

152,527 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I built a thing using Jev. Have you ever been annoyed by not finding an old Claude Code or Codex chat? => Now you can just describe what it was about and Jev finds it in milliseconds. Open Source:
0:12

I built a thing using Jev. Have you ever been annoyed by not finding an old Claude Code or Codex chat? => Now you can just describe what it was about and Jev finds it in milliseconds. Open Source:

Florian S

85,808 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This is absolutely f*cking insane. you can put a $0.042-per-million-token model in front of Claude and let it decide what Claude ever has to see. that's Jev signal routing, and the trick is stupidly simple: Jev takes the first look at everything. Claude only gets the hard cases. instead of: data -> Claude -> tokens burnt $ it's: data -> Jev -> only the unsure ones -> Claude and here's the part people miss. every Jev answer comes with a probability. that's your router: -> Jev is sure? its answer is final -> Jev hesitates? the case goes up to Claude set the cutoff once, by testing on your own data, not by guessing. 3 repos that already do the routing for you: -> duckdb-jev: route your data. Jev labels every row straight from SQL, up to 1,000 calls in one request -> quicksilver: route your files. Jev checks all 187 files in parallel and Claude gets the 4 that matter. ~2.4k tokens instead of ~26k -> jev-router: route your models. before every message Jev decides simple or hard and sends it to the fast model or the strong one. works with your normal Claude login where this pays off right away: -> support tickets -> your inbox -> lead lists -> messy spreadsheets -> comment moderation on a public benchmark Jev labeled 1,000 rows for $0.015. Claude charged $0.80 for the same job. faster. cheaper. way fewer tokens burned. Jev sorts the mail so the genius only opens what matters. Claude thinks. Jev routes. code does the job.
0:19

This is absolutely f*cking insane. you can put a $0.042-per-million-token model in front of Claude and let it decide what Claude ever has to see. that's Jev signal routing, and the trick is stupidly simple: Jev takes the first look at everything. Claude only gets the hard cases. instead of: data -> Claude -> tokens burnt $ it's: data -> Jev -> only the unsure ones -> Claude and here's the part people miss. every Jev answer comes with a probability. that's your router: -> Jev is sure? its answer is final -> Jev hesitates? the case goes up to Claude set the cutoff once, by testing on your own data, not by guessing. 3 repos that already do the routing for you: -> duckdb-jev: route your data. Jev labels every row straight from SQL, up to 1,000 calls in one request -> quicksilver: route your files. Jev checks all 187 files in parallel and Claude gets the 4 that matter. ~2.4k tokens instead of ~26k -> jev-router: route your models. before every message Jev decides simple or hard and sends it to the fast model or the strong one. works with your normal Claude login where this pays off right away: -> support tickets -> your inbox -> lead lists -> messy spreadsheets -> comment moderation on a public benchmark Jev labeled 1,000 rows for $0.015. Claude charged $0.80 for the same job. faster. cheaper. way fewer tokens burned. Jev sorts the mail so the genius only opens what matters. Claude thinks. Jev routes. code does the job.

kiosa

11,388 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

I built JevSearch, search the web & validate your results with Jev. Give a query and selection criteria, use Browserbase search to get the t25 results, then Jev scores and returns the t5 results. Jev often chooses urls outside of the initial top 5 as more relevant.
0:17

I built JevSearch, search the web & validate your results with Jev. Give a query and selection criteria, use Browserbase search to get the t25 results, then Jev scores and returns the t5 results. Jev often chooses urls outside of the initial top 5 as more relevant.

Kyle Jeong

60,133 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Running Jev to see how fast it can remove negative comments from chat
0:13

Running Jev to see how fast it can remove negative comments from chat

Dev Ed

396,277 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

best coding agent use case for Jev: enforcing rules a linter can't coding agents tend to break rules and some rules can't be codified Jev can now score every turn against such rules and tell the agent what to fix asap open-source:
0:12

best coding agent use case for Jev: enforcing rules a linter can't coding agents tend to break rules and some rules can't be codified Jev can now score every turn against such rules and tell the agent what to fix asap open-source:

Ohans Emmanuel

118,833 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Jev is INSANE 😳 you can use Jev for FREE on OpenRouter it scanned 471 news stories in 31.9 seconds and picked 15 brands worth jumping on - 471 headlines scanned - 15 brand opportunities found - 31.9 seconds - $0.0065 total cost > Claude Opus 5: 17/471 > cost: $0.386 > roughly 1,650x cheaper per headline try Jev here:
0:11

Jev is INSANE 😳 you can use Jev for FREE on OpenRouter it scanned 471 news stories in 31.9 seconds and picked 15 brands worth jumping on - 471 headlines scanned - 15 brand opportunities found - 31.9 seconds - $0.0065 total cost > Claude Opus 5: 17/471 > cost: $0.386 > roughly 1,650x cheaper per headline try Jev here:

K2S

15,167 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I couldn't f*cking believe this Stanford AI research team gave Grok Bot a human brain setup. JEV is the fast gut brain. It scans everything in milliseconds and makes the easy calls. Grok is the slow thinking brain. It only wakes up for the hard ones. Here are the commands that wire the two together: /plugin marketplace add rashedInt32/jev-mcp /plugin install jev@jev-mcp → Grok gets Jev as tools: classify, score, check npm install -g @dzhng/jevgrep jg "how are payments retried?" ./my-project → ask what the code does, get the right files back. the author measured ~30% lower cost on the same tasks npx skills add altryne/jevify --skill jevify → teaches your agent to hand the bulk yes/no work to Jev on its own > and fast-jev-compaction swaps Grok bot’s summary for Jev decisions: it drops stale tool calls and keeps everything else word for word. Faster runs, smaller bills, barely any compute wasted. Save this before your next session, then read the full guide below:
0:12

I couldn't f*cking believe this Stanford AI research team gave Grok Bot a human brain setup. JEV is the fast gut brain. It scans everything in milliseconds and makes the easy calls. Grok is the slow thinking brain. It only wakes up for the hard ones. Here are the commands that wire the two together: /plugin marketplace add rashedInt32/jev-mcp /plugin install jev@jev-mcp → Grok gets Jev as tools: classify, score, check npm install -g @dzhng/jevgrep jg "how are payments retried?" ./my-project → ask what the code does, get the right files back. the author measured ~30% lower cost on the same tasks npx skills add altryne/jevify --skill jevify → teaches your agent to hand the bulk yes/no work to Jev on its own > and fast-jev-compaction swaps Grok bot’s summary for Jev decisions: it drops stale tool calls and keeps everything else word for word. Faster runs, smaller bills, barely any compute wasted. Save this before your next session, then read the full guide below:

rody

13,649 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

Jev + Kimi K3 for fraud detection! TLDR: Jev classified 100 emails in 1.42 seconds, then I routed the uncertain cases to Kimi K3. The full pipeline got 96/100 correct for only ~$0.07. Video is not sped up, check out the live run! Here was my process: I gave Jev 100 emails to classify (a mix of 50 legit & 50 fraudelent emails). It classified all of them in 1.42 seconds. An underrated feature about Jev is it will give you the confidence score for a classification, so I routed any prediction under 95% confidence to Kimi K3 to be fully sure. 31 emails fell below that threshold. After routing those to Kimi K3, the combined pipeline reached 96% accuracy. The full run took 16 seconds & ~$0.07 in inference costs: - $0.068 from Kimi K3 on Together AI - $0.003 (1/3 of a cent) from Jev on TypeSafe AI. I think this is a really interesting pattern: use a fast specialized model like Jev for the narrow task, then route the uncertain cases to a larger LLM. I feel like this kind of approach could be a game changer for use cases like fraud or anything realtime. You can use the speed & low cost of Jev while having a larger LLM as a fallback to ensure high accuracy.
0:12

Jev + Kimi K3 for fraud detection! TLDR: Jev classified 100 emails in 1.42 seconds, then I routed the uncertain cases to Kimi K3. The full pipeline got 96/100 correct for only ~$0.07. Video is not sped up, check out the live run! Here was my process: I gave Jev 100 emails to classify (a mix of 50 legit & 50 fraudelent emails). It classified all of them in 1.42 seconds. An underrated feature about Jev is it will give you the confidence score for a classification, so I routed any prediction under 95% confidence to Kimi K3 to be fully sure. 31 emails fell below that threshold. After routing those to Kimi K3, the combined pipeline reached 96% accuracy. The full run took 16 seconds & ~$0.07 in inference costs: - $0.068 from Kimi K3 on Together AI - $0.003 (1/3 of a cent) from Jev on TypeSafe AI. I think this is a really interesting pattern: use a fast specialized model like Jev for the narrow task, then route the uncertain cases to a larger LLM. I feel like this kind of approach could be a game changer for use cases like fraud or anything realtime. You can use the speed & low cost of Jev while having a larger LLM as a fallback to ensure high accuracy.

Hassan

61,281 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Jev dropped and people immediately started doing stupid sh*t with it people gave this thing trading bots, browsers, Doom, drones, dinosaurs and tax forms and basically said: “you decide.” here’s what happened: > jev-trader Jev gets a new Monad block every ~300ms and decides whether to place a live limit order. no essay. just the decision. 1,911 stars ▸ ⁠ > jev-ultrafast a browser agent where Jev decides every click. the text model only wakes up when something actually needs to be written. 16,758 stars ▸ ⁠ > jev-doom-agent someone compiled actual Chocolate Doom to WebAssembly and let Jev make the tactical decisions every frame. yes. Doom. ▸ ⁠ > jev-t-rex-runner remember that stupid Chrome dinosaur? now Jev plays it. jump → duck → run → repeat ▸ ⁠ > typesafe-chess Jev went against a real chess search engine. two games. colors swapped. the search engine won both — and overruled Jev’s first instinct on roughly half the moves. ▸ ⁠ > jev-drone camera → Jev → drone. a simulated quadrotor has to clear five stations while Jev looks at the situation twice a second and decides what happens next. ▸ ⁠ > tax-doc-classifier then someone gave it IRS forms. 261 documents. 100% strict accuracy. roughly $0.001/page. ▸ ⁠ > killmyidea this one is evil lol tell it your startup idea. Jev looks at it from different angles and gives you: KILL / FIX / SHIP ▸ ⁠ > jev-curate throw huge Parquet / JSONL datasets at it. Jev judges 1,500+ rows/sec and keeps only the stuff that passes your rules. ▸ ⁠ > pg-jev and now it’s inside PostgreSQL. ask questions about your own tables in plain English → get the decision back. ▸ ⁠ and this is the weird part: none of these need Jev to write you a beautiful paragraph. they need it to look at a situation and pick: BUY / WAIT CLICK A / CLICK B JUMP / DUCK KILL / FIX / SHIP KEEP / DROP that’s basically the whole Jev idea. LLMs think and write. Jev decides. code does. full setup + my three-question Jev test below
0:18

Jev dropped and people immediately started doing stupid sh*t with it people gave this thing trading bots, browsers, Doom, drones, dinosaurs and tax forms and basically said: “you decide.” here’s what happened: > jev-trader Jev gets a new Monad block every ~300ms and decides whether to place a live limit order. no essay. just the decision. 1,911 stars ▸ ⁠ > jev-ultrafast a browser agent where Jev decides every click. the text model only wakes up when something actually needs to be written. 16,758 stars ▸ ⁠ > jev-doom-agent someone compiled actual Chocolate Doom to WebAssembly and let Jev make the tactical decisions every frame. yes. Doom. ▸ ⁠ > jev-t-rex-runner remember that stupid Chrome dinosaur? now Jev plays it. jump → duck → run → repeat ▸ ⁠ > typesafe-chess Jev went against a real chess search engine. two games. colors swapped. the search engine won both — and overruled Jev’s first instinct on roughly half the moves. ▸ ⁠ > jev-drone camera → Jev → drone. a simulated quadrotor has to clear five stations while Jev looks at the situation twice a second and decides what happens next. ▸ ⁠ > tax-doc-classifier then someone gave it IRS forms. 261 documents. 100% strict accuracy. roughly $0.001/page. ▸ ⁠ > killmyidea this one is evil lol tell it your startup idea. Jev looks at it from different angles and gives you: KILL / FIX / SHIP ▸ ⁠ > jev-curate throw huge Parquet / JSONL datasets at it. Jev judges 1,500+ rows/sec and keeps only the stuff that passes your rules. ▸ ⁠ > pg-jev and now it’s inside PostgreSQL. ask questions about your own tables in plain English → get the decision back. ▸ ⁠ and this is the weird part: none of these need Jev to write you a beautiful paragraph. they need it to look at a situation and pick: BUY / WAIT CLICK A / CLICK B JUMP / DUCK KILL / FIX / SHIP KEEP / DROP that’s basically the whole Jev idea. LLMs think and write. Jev decides. code does. full setup + my three-question Jev test below

kiosa

67,916 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Why is nobody posting about this? This is hands down the BEST way to run Jev right now. You can use the new Jev Playground to start running decisions with Jev for FREE. You're welcome. →
0:12

Why is nobody posting about this? This is hands down the BEST way to run Jev right now. You can use the new Jev Playground to start running decisions with Jev for FREE. You're welcome. →

Miles Deutscher

37,131 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

holy sh*t. Jev's founder Diogo Almeida dropped a Google Doc on coding agents one of these PDFs has the map everyone needs: where Jev sits in an agent loop ↓ agents do the work, Jev makes the calls, the LLM only writes: 1 → task in: one Noul before anything runs. in scope, or does a human need to see it first? 2 → dispatch: a Choice picks who takes the step (research, write or review). act at 0.85+, everything below goes to review 3 → act: Jev gates the tool call (allow, confirm or block). the LLM only writes the arguments 4 → check: a Score decides what comes back (drop, summary or keep). whatever Jev is unsure of goes to a human 5 → finish: Jev says done above 0.8, then code proves the file actually exists the LLM shows up in 2 of 5 stages. everything else is a typed answer, plain code or a person. don't refactor your agent. hand Jev the one fork it hits most (usually the tool gate or dispatch) and watch 3 numbers for a week: cost per completed task, time per completed task, and how often escalation fired and whether it was right. if escalation never fires, the threshold is too loose and your agent is quietly running unsupervised.
0:18

holy sh*t. Jev's founder Diogo Almeida dropped a Google Doc on coding agents one of these PDFs has the map everyone needs: where Jev sits in an agent loop ↓ agents do the work, Jev makes the calls, the LLM only writes: 1 → task in: one Noul before anything runs. in scope, or does a human need to see it first? 2 → dispatch: a Choice picks who takes the step (research, write or review). act at 0.85+, everything below goes to review 3 → act: Jev gates the tool call (allow, confirm or block). the LLM only writes the arguments 4 → check: a Score decides what comes back (drop, summary or keep). whatever Jev is unsure of goes to a human 5 → finish: Jev says done above 0.8, then code proves the file actually exists the LLM shows up in 2 of 5 stages. everything else is a typed answer, plain code or a person. don't refactor your agent. hand Jev the one fork it hits most (usually the tool gate or dispatch) and watch 3 numbers for a week: cost per completed task, time per completed task, and how often escalation fired and whether it was right. if escalation never fires, the threshold is too loose and your agent is quietly running unsupervised.

Archive

33,524 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

laugh now, screenshot this for later: grok bot + jev will make more people money in 2026 than every memecoin season combined. idea → grok bot → jev picks the route → grok bot executes → profit 77 jobs on autopilot, just 16 handed to a human, and jev decided all of it in 182ms. saw this on your feed? it's not an accident. drop this article into grok bot. hook it up to jev. you'll thank me in a month.
0:16

laugh now, screenshot this for later: grok bot + jev will make more people money in 2026 than every memecoin season combined. idea → grok bot → jev picks the route → grok bot executes → profit 77 jobs on autopilot, just 16 handed to a human, and jev decided all of it in 182ms. saw this on your feed? it's not an accident. drop this article into grok bot. hook it up to jev. you'll thank me in a month.

rody

32,021 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

You can now use Jev right inside Claude Code 🤯 It's called jev-model-router, an early access mod built on Claude Code's new function hooks. Before every turn, it checks in with Jev and asks: > how mechanical the task is > how much reasoning it needs > whether it's risky Then it routes: → it'll move up to a stronger model on weak evidence, and only drops to a cheaper one when it's confident the task is simple → every decision gets logged in your transcript → if the call fails, your request runs untouched Setup: 1. copy the install command: npx claude-code-templates@latest --mod productivity/jev-model-router 2. paste it inside Claude Code 3. run claude with CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_FUNCTION_HOOKS=1 set 4. accept the trust prompt on first launch Link: Also works with no api key, it just falls back to a built-in classifier with no confidence score. For real jev routing, add your typesafeApiKey or gatewayApiKey to ~/.claude/settings.json. Follow me for more AI workflows and tutorials.
0:15

You can now use Jev right inside Claude Code 🤯 It's called jev-model-router, an early access mod built on Claude Code's new function hooks. Before every turn, it checks in with Jev and asks: > how mechanical the task is > how much reasoning it needs > whether it's risky Then it routes: → it'll move up to a stronger model on weak evidence, and only drops to a cheaper one when it's confident the task is simple → every decision gets logged in your transcript → if the call fails, your request runs untouched Setup: 1. copy the install command: npx claude-code-templates@latest --mod productivity/jev-model-router 2. paste it inside Claude Code 3. run claude with CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_FUNCTION_HOOKS=1 set 4. accept the trust prompt on first launch Link: Also works with no api key, it just falls back to a built-in classifier with no confidence score. For real jev routing, add your typesafeApiKey or gatewayApiKey to ~/.claude/settings.json. Follow me for more AI workflows and tutorials.

Alvaro Cintas

44,575 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

you can call me crazy but.. it's now obvious: grok bot + jev is going to create more millionaires in 2026 than crypto ever did. idea → grokbot → jev decisions → grokbot execution → $$$$$ don’t scroll past this if it hits your timeline. just send this article to grok bot. connect it to jev. thank me later.
0:14

you can call me crazy but.. it's now obvious: grok bot + jev is going to create more millionaires in 2026 than crypto ever did. idea → grokbot → jev decisions → grokbot execution → $$$$$ don’t scroll past this if it hits your timeline. just send this article to grok bot. connect it to jev. thank me later.

rody

182,277 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

Jev + SERV is actually insane. We already showed you can increase Jev's performance with SERV Reasoning. Now we're taking it further, bringing Jev-powered Decision nodes into Graph Sharding with the upcoming SERV v3. Here's a breakdown of how it works: Jev is a decision-making model. Given a task and a set of options, it predicts which path is more likely. Think of the octopus that predicted World Cup results. Jev does that for your business, except it's not luck. It weighs every option and tells you how sure it is. It does this by assigning probabilities to outcomes. It doesn't generate text on its own, so you can't expect it to create a new outcome for you. But that's also what enables it to be lightning fast and dirt cheap. For example, in customer service you can ask Jev how to triage an incoming query and route it to the correct department. It can only select from the list of departments you provide it. This also means it can't hallucinate a new outcome outside the options it's given, which makes it incredibly interesting for OpenServ. In Graph Sharding, we take a single system prompt and break it down into multiple LLM steps with deterministic input and output shapes. Some of these steps require an LLM to produce new output, while others are simply decision routers that determine the next possible path. Traditionally, LLMs are slow and expensive. Breaking a single prompt into multiple steps increases accuracy and reliability by a ton, but it also introduces latency. Jev takes on those decision nodes, which are the backbone of a business process and therefore SERV graphs, and makes them super consistent and lightning fast, lowering the overall cost and latency of graph execution. SERV Reasoning on its own is a great force multiplier for Jev because, like all other models, it works by interpreting input instructions. The clearer those instructions are, the better the model performs. That's where SERV Reasoning comes into play. Just like amplifying any other model, we also amplify the accuracy and consistency of Jev's responses. And now we're bringing Jev-powered Decision nodes into Graph Sharding with SERV v3.
0:13

Jev + SERV is actually insane. We already showed you can increase Jev's performance with SERV Reasoning. Now we're taking it further, bringing Jev-powered Decision nodes into Graph Sharding with the upcoming SERV v3. Here's a breakdown of how it works: Jev is a decision-making model. Given a task and a set of options, it predicts which path is more likely. Think of the octopus that predicted World Cup results. Jev does that for your business, except it's not luck. It weighs every option and tells you how sure it is. It does this by assigning probabilities to outcomes. It doesn't generate text on its own, so you can't expect it to create a new outcome for you. But that's also what enables it to be lightning fast and dirt cheap. For example, in customer service you can ask Jev how to triage an incoming query and route it to the correct department. It can only select from the list of departments you provide it. This also means it can't hallucinate a new outcome outside the options it's given, which makes it incredibly interesting for OpenServ. In Graph Sharding, we take a single system prompt and break it down into multiple LLM steps with deterministic input and output shapes. Some of these steps require an LLM to produce new output, while others are simply decision routers that determine the next possible path. Traditionally, LLMs are slow and expensive. Breaking a single prompt into multiple steps increases accuracy and reliability by a ton, but it also introduces latency. Jev takes on those decision nodes, which are the backbone of a business process and therefore SERV graphs, and makes them super consistent and lightning fast, lowering the overall cost and latency of graph execution. SERV Reasoning on its own is a great force multiplier for Jev because, like all other models, it works by interpreting input instructions. The clearer those instructions are, the better the model performs. That's where SERV Reasoning comes into play. Just like amplifying any other model, we also amplify the accuracy and consistency of Jev's responses. And now we're bringing Jev-powered Decision nodes into Graph Sharding with SERV v3.

Armagan Amcalar

366,601 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Drop this into Grok Bot before bed and let Jev pick your next viral post while you sleep... Grok Bot writes 24 hooks. Jev scores all 24 in parallel. The winner did 1.24M views. Here's the full setup: 1. Grok Bot drafts. Writes 24 hooks on one topic in under 20 seconds. 2. Jev scores the hook. Rates every draft 1 to 10 on hook strength. 3. Jev checks bookmarks. Answers yes or no on whether people would save it. 4. Jev checks your voice. Scores how close each draft sounds to your best posts. 5. Jev ranks the top 3. 21 drafts get cut, 3 make it to the final. 6. Grok Bot ships the winner. The 9.6 hook went out and pulled 18.1K likes and 9.6K saves. 24 drafts, 1 winner, 38 seconds. Hit views like this every week and $10k a month from X is on the table. Try this setup, then read the full breakdown in the article below
0:14

Drop this into Grok Bot before bed and let Jev pick your next viral post while you sleep... Grok Bot writes 24 hooks. Jev scores all 24 in parallel. The winner did 1.24M views. Here's the full setup: 1. Grok Bot drafts. Writes 24 hooks on one topic in under 20 seconds. 2. Jev scores the hook. Rates every draft 1 to 10 on hook strength. 3. Jev checks bookmarks. Answers yes or no on whether people would save it. 4. Jev checks your voice. Scores how close each draft sounds to your best posts. 5. Jev ranks the top 3. 21 drafts get cut, 3 make it to the final. 6. Grok Bot ships the winner. The 9.6 hook went out and pulled 18.1K likes and 9.6K saves. 24 drafts, 1 winner, 38 seconds. Hit views like this every week and $10k a month from X is on the table. Try this setup, then read the full breakdown in the article below

winkle.

16,428 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

Top 12 agentic use cases for Jev: (bookmark this) Jev handles semantic decisions that ordinary code cannot express reliably. It returns typed answers and probabilities, while code continues to cover the workflow. Here are 12 practical use cases for Jev: 1. Browser next action > Convert the current DOM state into a bounded action such as click, type, or stop. Code executes only valid operation-target pairs. There are already several open-source Jev web agents. 2. Context compaction > Decide which events from a long agent trace should remain. The selected text stays verbatim instead of being replaced with a generated summary. 3. Skill and context loading > Compare the current user turn against the available skills. Load only the instructions needed for that turn instead of filling the context window with every skill. 4. Typed tool-call compilation > Map a natural-language request to a function and fill its typed arguments. Each argument is evaluated separately before code allows execution. 5. Citation verification > Check whether a quoted passage exists and whether the surrounding evidence supports the claim. The output can be supported, unsupported, or contradicted. 6. Extraction verification > Run a cheap extractor first, then use Jev to verify questionable fields. Clean records stay on the fast path while uncertain ones reach a reasoning model. 7. Agent trace evaluation > Turn raw trajectories into queryable labels such as progress and repetition. This avoids asking another LLM to write a full review of every run. 8. Semantic regression tests > Replay a trace suite against a new agent build. Semantic checks can then pass or block prompt, model, tool, and policy changes in CI. 9. Jevgrep code search > Search a codebase by what the code does rather than its exact words. Jev scores candidate snippets and returns the most relevant code first. 10. Entity alignment > Compare two candidate records and decide whether to merge, review, or keep them separate. Candidate generation remains deterministic while Jev handles semantic identity. 11. Retrieval reranking > Let embeddings retrieve a broad candidate set, then use Jev to reorder passages by relevance. The generation model receives the most useful evidence first. 12. Memory promotion gate > Capture a completed agent trace, then judge whether its corrections contain a reusable lesson. Trace-backed lessons can be promoted while task-specific noise is discarded. If you want to see the final pattern in practice, it is already implemented in the Beacon open-source project. Beacon captures full sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, and 20+ agent harnesses, and then Jev identifies which workflows and corrections are worth learning from, so that a lesson discovered by one agent can become available to the others. GitHub repo: (don’t forget to star it ⭐) If you want to dive deeper, I also wrote about a similar mechanism in a hands-on guide. It covers building a Jev-style decision path with open models, entirely locally. Read it below.
0:16

Top 12 agentic use cases for Jev: (bookmark this) Jev handles semantic decisions that ordinary code cannot express reliably. It returns typed answers and probabilities, while code continues to cover the workflow. Here are 12 practical use cases for Jev: 1. Browser next action > Convert the current DOM state into a bounded action such as click, type, or stop. Code executes only valid operation-target pairs. There are already several open-source Jev web agents. 2. Context compaction > Decide which events from a long agent trace should remain. The selected text stays verbatim instead of being replaced with a generated summary. 3. Skill and context loading > Compare the current user turn against the available skills. Load only the instructions needed for that turn instead of filling the context window with every skill. 4. Typed tool-call compilation > Map a natural-language request to a function and fill its typed arguments. Each argument is evaluated separately before code allows execution. 5. Citation verification > Check whether a quoted passage exists and whether the surrounding evidence supports the claim. The output can be supported, unsupported, or contradicted. 6. Extraction verification > Run a cheap extractor first, then use Jev to verify questionable fields. Clean records stay on the fast path while uncertain ones reach a reasoning model. 7. Agent trace evaluation > Turn raw trajectories into queryable labels such as progress and repetition. This avoids asking another LLM to write a full review of every run. 8. Semantic regression tests > Replay a trace suite against a new agent build. Semantic checks can then pass or block prompt, model, tool, and policy changes in CI. 9. Jevgrep code search > Search a codebase by what the code does rather than its exact words. Jev scores candidate snippets and returns the most relevant code first. 10. Entity alignment > Compare two candidate records and decide whether to merge, review, or keep them separate. Candidate generation remains deterministic while Jev handles semantic identity. 11. Retrieval reranking > Let embeddings retrieve a broad candidate set, then use Jev to reorder passages by relevance. The generation model receives the most useful evidence first. 12. Memory promotion gate > Capture a completed agent trace, then judge whether its corrections contain a reusable lesson. Trace-backed lessons can be promoted while task-specific noise is discarded. If you want to see the final pattern in practice, it is already implemented in the Beacon open-source project. Beacon captures full sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, and 20+ agent harnesses, and then Jev identifies which workflows and corrections are worth learning from, so that a lesson discovered by one agent can become available to the others. GitHub repo: (don’t forget to star it ⭐) If you want to dive deeper, I also wrote about a similar mechanism in a hands-on guide. It covers building a Jev-style decision path with open models, entirely locally. Read it below.

Avi Chawla

129,417 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Found a great production use case for Jev. I used Jev to organize ~2.3K AI research papers. The total cost was $0.14, and it took about 83 seconds. The process: The papers already had old tags, which I ran through a previous open model (DeepSeek V4 Flash). However, I wasn't confident in the classifications, and I didn't want to spend more on tokens unless I spent time tuning it into a good LLM classifier via few-shot (more expensive). Too tedious, too costly, and unsustainable. Luckily for us, we now have Jev to help us with organizing papers better. So Jev first went through all the papers and retagged them. It agreed with 75% of the previous tags. Jev found about 579 high-confidence topic changes. I evaluated reliability by manually labeling 30 disagreements and accepted all of them. I was astonished by Jev's classification capabilities. We applied and verified all changes in production. I'm much more satisfied with the classifications, but I think there is still room for improvement. Check out the papers here: I will experiment with Jev more. The takeaway is that pipelines can be significantly improved by carefully combining System One and System Two models. Jev clearly unlocks more interesting ways to organize papers and offer a more useful discovery layer for research papers. More updates on that soon.
0:13

Found a great production use case for Jev. I used Jev to organize ~2.3K AI research papers. The total cost was $0.14, and it took about 83 seconds. The process: The papers already had old tags, which I ran through a previous open model (DeepSeek V4 Flash). However, I wasn't confident in the classifications, and I didn't want to spend more on tokens unless I spent time tuning it into a good LLM classifier via few-shot (more expensive). Too tedious, too costly, and unsustainable. Luckily for us, we now have Jev to help us with organizing papers better. So Jev first went through all the papers and retagged them. It agreed with 75% of the previous tags. Jev found about 579 high-confidence topic changes. I evaluated reliability by manually labeling 30 disagreements and accepted all of them. I was astonished by Jev's classification capabilities. We applied and verified all changes in production. I'm much more satisfied with the classifications, but I think there is still room for improvement. Check out the papers here: I will experiment with Jev more. The takeaway is that pipelines can be significantly improved by carefully combining System One and System Two models. Jev clearly unlocks more interesting ways to organize papers and offer a more useful discovery layer for research papers. More updates on that soon.

elvis

17,775 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

i used Jev to classify a youtubers last 100 videos based on how likely it is to sell me something... it analyzed & assigned a sales intent score to each video within 12 seconds & cost about $0.02 i haven't done a deep dive into how accurate the score is yet, but from a quick glance it looks like a super promising classifier model
0:18

i used Jev to classify a youtubers last 100 videos based on how likely it is to sell me something... it analyzed & assigned a sales intent score to each video within 12 seconds & cost about $0.02 i haven't done a deep dive into how accurate the score is yet, but from a quick glance it looks like a super promising classifier model

EP

14,596 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce