Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

I spent 6 months studying Polymarket. Yesterday I realized I was playing chess against people who know my moves in advance. It all started with a simple question: why are some wallets consistently in profit and I'm not? I read the same news. Watched the same debates. Analyzed the... same statistics. But they entered the market hours before the news became news. I found a cluster of 12 wallets. They share one thing: they buy when the price hasn't moved yet. And sell when the crowd is just starting to enter. One of them started with $288. Now the account has $666K. No loud trades. No screenshots all over Twitter. Just methodical work. Entry after entry. Week after week. I scrolled through his history and didn't find a single heroic trade. Not one bet that made half the profit. The capital curve is almost a straight line up. While everyone is looking for one trade that will change their life this wallet quietly collects bit by bit. And bit by bit turned into $666K. I started breaking down where they get their information. And realized: they don't predict. They're just closer to the source. Three levels of the food chain on Polymarket: First circle. People who know the journalist personally. Know the article comes out tomorrow morning. Position opened tonight. Second circle. People who see the first circle's activity. Notice that large wallets started moving. Enter right behind. Still before the news. Third circle. You. Read the headline on Twitter. Open Polymarket. Price already moved 40%. Think maybe it'll go higher. Buy at the peak. Guess who's selling you that position? The first two circles. Platform statistics: 84% of traders lose money. That money doesn't disappear. It flows to the remaining 16%. I spent six months trying to get into that 16% through analysis and research. Then I looked at my P&L. And realized the obvious: I will never be in the first circle. I don't have journalist friends. No sources in candidate teams. No insider info. But I can be in the second. You don't need to know what will happen. You need to see who already started moving. Their wallets are public. Their positions are visible to everyone. Their entries can be tracked in real time and copied automatically → Copy the winners: They spend years building connections. You spend seconds copying their trade. They risk reputation and money. You only risk time on setup. I deleted all my indicators. Closed all news tabs. Stopped watching debates. Now I only watch one thing: where the wallets that don't lose are moving. On this market there are two places: Either you're the liquidity being drained. Or you're the shadow of the one draining. Stop being the third circle.show more

Blaze

5,011 subscribers

11,624 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

In 2026 there are 3 types of people left on Polymarket. I have been all 3 and only one of them stopped losing money. Type 1: programmers. They write bots, make $11K to $120K a month. They are 2% of the platform. I tried to become one of them. Lasted two weeks and one broken script. Type 2: people who found type 1 and copy their trades. No code, no servers, no sleepless nights. They are 5%. Type 3: everyone else. Trading by hand, trusting their gut, and steadily handing money to the first two types. They are 93%. I sat here for 4 months and lost $1,800. The most frustrating part is that all the information is right there. The blockchain shows every trade from every wallet. I stared at it for 4 months and kept trading on my own. To become type 1 you need months of coding. To become type 2 you need to stop believing you are special. The team at PMX built a tool that copies the best wallets automatically: I did not get smarter. I just stopped being type 3.

In 2026 there are 3 types of people left on Polymarket. I have been all 3 and only one of them stopped losing money. Type 1: programmers. They write bots, make $11K to $120K a month. They are 2% of the platform. I tried to become one of them. Lasted two weeks and one broken script. Type 2: people who found type 1 and copy their trades. No code, no servers, no sleepless nights. They are 5%. Type 3: everyone else. Trading by hand, trusting their gut, and steadily handing money to the first two types. They are 93%. I sat here for 4 months and lost $1,800. The most frustrating part is that all the information is right there. The blockchain shows every trade from every wallet. I stared at it for 4 months and kept trading on my own. To become type 1 you need months of coding. To become type 2 you need to stop believing you are special. The team at PMX built a tool that copies the best wallets automatically: I did not get smarter. I just stopped being type 3.

Blaze

22,760 views • 6 months ago

How did a gambling addict with -$6.8M in losses make $6.12M in one day? He stopped using his brain. Yesterday user destroyed Polymarket. Three perfect bets zero losses. I dug into the blockchain to understand his secret. And you know what I found? He has NO secret. And no strategy of his own. Check for yourself: For 90 days straight he was losing money like crazy. He guessed right only 1 out of 3 times. A typical retail loser. But 48 hours ago he suddenly started copying a cluster of 7 anonymous wallets. Not approximately. Step by step. Same markets. Same side. Entry in the same minute. The result of these 7 wallets? 79% win rate for the quarter. These are not bots and not lucky people. These are real insiders. These are wallets of people who get information by phone not from newspapers. They know the team starting lineup 15 minutes before it's published on Twitter. They know poll results before the journalist hits Publish. While the whole world guesses on coffee grounds this group of people simply monetizes access to information that others don't have. That guy just found their trail. He stopped trying to be smart. He attached himself as a tail to those who know the script in advance. In Polymarket the winner is not the one who is smarter. But the one who sits closer to the source.

How did a gambling addict with -$6.8M in losses make $6.12M in one day? He stopped using his brain. Yesterday user destroyed Polymarket. Three perfect bets zero losses. I dug into the blockchain to understand his secret. And you know what I found? He has NO secret. And no strategy of his own. Check for yourself: For 90 days straight he was losing money like crazy. He guessed right only 1 out of 3 times. A typical retail loser. But 48 hours ago he suddenly started copying a cluster of 7 anonymous wallets. Not approximately. Step by step. Same markets. Same side. Entry in the same minute. The result of these 7 wallets? 79% win rate for the quarter. These are not bots and not lucky people. These are real insiders. These are wallets of people who get information by phone not from newspapers. They know the team starting lineup 15 minutes before it's published on Twitter. They know poll results before the journalist hits Publish. While the whole world guesses on coffee grounds this group of people simply monetizes access to information that others don't have. That guy just found their trail. He stopped trying to be smart. He attached himself as a tail to those who know the script in advance. In Polymarket the winner is not the one who is smarter. But the one who sits closer to the source.

Blaze

10,927 views • 7 months ago

$i made $83,000 by looking at one number not the price not the volume the spread α = Δ / (V_h − μ) α is the fraction of traders in the market who already know the correct answer spread 0.05 → α = 5% safe to enter spread 0.15 → α = 15% be careful spread 0.25 → α = 20% one in five knows more than you before this i entered markets with wide spreads i thought illiquid, inefficient, that's where the money is turns out a wide spread means smart money is already there and i was paying their bill every single time once i started filtering markets by this formula stopped entering anything where α > 12% $83,000 in the next two months same polymarket same markets i just stopped being someone else's α i track these markets in real time through a bot it calculates α for every market automatically and only alerts when the entry is clean did you know the spread tells you exactly who else is in the game?$

i made $83,000 by looking at one number not the price not the volume the spread α = Δ / (V_h − μ) α is the fraction of traders in the market who already know the correct answer spread 0.05 → α = 5% safe to enter spread 0.15 → α = 15% be careful spread 0.25 → α = 20% one in five knows more than you before this i entered markets with wide spreads i thought illiquid, inefficient, that's where the money is turns out a wide spread means smart money is already there and i was paying their bill every single time once i started filtering markets by this formula stopped entering anything where α > 12% $83,000 in the next two months same polymarket same markets i just stopped being someone else's α i track these markets in real time through a bot it calculates α for every market automatically and only alerts when the entry is clean did you know the spread tells you exactly who else is in the game?

self.dll

42,399 views • 5 months ago

I deleted all my Polymarket positions at 2am on a Tuesday because I realized I was winning 54% of my bets and still down $11,400. It took me three weeks to understand that sentence. Fifty four percent wins. Why is the balance shrinking? The math was brutal once I finally saw it. I was buying outcomes at 55 to 65 cents feeling smart because my picks kept winning. But the payout at those prices was so thin that one loss wiped out five wins. My edge was maybe 3% and the spread was eating 4%. I dug into the data hoping to find a way to trade better and instead found a number that made me want to close the app. 70% of all Polymarket addresses are in the red. And the profits? Captured by 0.04% of wallets. Four thousand addresses out of 1.7 million own almost everything. I was playing a game where 96% of participants exist to fund the other 4%. But the trades of those wallets are public. Every entry, every exit, sitting on the blockchain. I started tracking them manually. One wallet broke me. It started January 6 with $50. By the time I found it the balance was close to $500,000. Pulling $20 to $30K a day on 15 minute BTC, ETH and SOL markets, exploiting the fact that Binance updates faster than Polymarket odds. A few seconds of lag, hundreds of times a day. I scrolled its history for an hour trying to find a losing streak. Could not. That is when I stopped doing this by hand. Set up PMX. Alerts the second a tracked wallet moves, one tap copy. → Link to bot: Three weeks of shadowing instead of trading. Made back $4,200 of my $11,400 hole. Not because I got smarter. Because I stopped pretending I was the edge. The game on Polymarket is not about being right. It is about standing behind someone who already is. I am still not in profit. But for the first time in four months my balance moves the right direction and I sleep through the night. That is worth more than any win.

I deleted all my Polymarket positions at 2am on a Tuesday because I realized I was winning 54% of my bets and still down $11,400. It took me three weeks to understand that sentence. Fifty four percent wins. Why is the balance shrinking? The math was brutal once I finally saw it. I was buying outcomes at 55 to 65 cents feeling smart because my picks kept winning. But the payout at those prices was so thin that one loss wiped out five wins. My edge was maybe 3% and the spread was eating 4%. I dug into the data hoping to find a way to trade better and instead found a number that made me want to close the app. 70% of all Polymarket addresses are in the red. And the profits? Captured by 0.04% of wallets. Four thousand addresses out of 1.7 million own almost everything. I was playing a game where 96% of participants exist to fund the other 4%. But the trades of those wallets are public. Every entry, every exit, sitting on the blockchain. I started tracking them manually. One wallet broke me. It started January 6 with $50. By the time I found it the balance was close to $500,000. Pulling $20 to $30K a day on 15 minute BTC, ETH and SOL markets, exploiting the fact that Binance updates faster than Polymarket odds. A few seconds of lag, hundreds of times a day. I scrolled its history for an hour trying to find a losing streak. Could not. That is when I stopped doing this by hand. Set up PMX. Alerts the second a tracked wallet moves, one tap copy. → Link to bot: Three weeks of shadowing instead of trading. Made back $4,200 of my $11,400 hole. Not because I got smarter. Because I stopped pretending I was the edge. The game on Polymarket is not about being right. It is about standing behind someone who already is. I am still not in profit. But for the first time in four months my balance moves the right direction and I sleep through the night. That is worth more than any win.

Blaze

13,874 views • 6 months ago

Last Thursday I was having dinner with a friend at a regular shawarma spot near the subway. A guy he knew was sitting with us. Around 21, maybe 22. Hoodie, AirPods, beat-up backpack When the check came he grabbed it without a word. No discussion. Just tapped his phone and paid for all 3 of us My friend was not even surprised. Apparently this was not the first time I asked: what do you do? He said: "I copy wallets on Polymarket" I thought it was a joke. Or some trading guru with a $500 course But he explained it simpler than I expected "On Polymarket there are wallets that are consistently in profit. Not on 1 bet but on dozens in a row. I do not try to guess who wins the election or what the weather will be in Dallas. I just look at what a wallet with a 70+ win rate is doing and repeat it" He did not build models. Did not write scripts. Did not analyze news He opened Telegram and showed me a channel. Simple messages: wallet X entered position Y, price Z cents, market such and such Then he opened Polymarket and showed me his balance I am not going to name the exact number because he did not ask for that. But I will say this: it is enough for a guy in a rented apartment with 3 roommates to casually pay for dinner for 3 and not think twice I asked: "How did you figure out which wallet to follow?" He shrugged "That is the easiest part. Polymarket is blockchain. All trades are open. You go to the leaderboard, filter by win rate, look at history. If a wallet consistently enters positions at 3 to 8 cents and closes at a dollar that is not luck. That is an information edge" Then he added something that made me freeze "The funniest part is I do not even need to understand why he bets. I do not know where he gets his information. Maybe he is an insider. Maybe he has a model. Maybe he just reads news faster. I do not care. I see that he entered and I enter a minute later. The price usually has not moved yet" I came home and could not fall asleep Opened Polymarket. Went to the leaderboard. Started digging An hour later I found the wallet he was talking about → Starting balance was negative. Current balance is a 5-figure number. Win rate above 73%. Average entry 4 to 7 cents. Average win covers 10 to 15 losses I started monitoring it manually. Set alarms. Checked every 2 hours By day 3 I realized I cannot live like this I needed the same thing that guy had. A signal in Telegram that comes on its own the moment the wallet opens a position I found a bot that does exactly that → No delays. No manual monitoring. Wallet enters and you get a notification What you do with it is up to you. Copy it exactly, use it as a signal, or just observe 2 weeks have passed. I have not become that guy from the shawarma spot. Yet But I stopped guessing. And started copying Right now somewhere a smart wallet is opening a new position. The question is whether you find out about it in a second or in 24 hours when the price has already moved

Last Thursday I was having dinner with a friend at a regular shawarma spot near the subway. A guy he knew was sitting with us. Around 21, maybe 22. Hoodie, AirPods, beat-up backpack When the check came he grabbed it without a word. No discussion. Just tapped his phone and paid for all 3 of us My friend was not even surprised. Apparently this was not the first time I asked: what do you do? He said: "I copy wallets on Polymarket" I thought it was a joke. Or some trading guru with a $500 course But he explained it simpler than I expected "On Polymarket there are wallets that are consistently in profit. Not on 1 bet but on dozens in a row. I do not try to guess who wins the election or what the weather will be in Dallas. I just look at what a wallet with a 70+ win rate is doing and repeat it" He did not build models. Did not write scripts. Did not analyze news He opened Telegram and showed me a channel. Simple messages: wallet X entered position Y, price Z cents, market such and such Then he opened Polymarket and showed me his balance I am not going to name the exact number because he did not ask for that. But I will say this: it is enough for a guy in a rented apartment with 3 roommates to casually pay for dinner for 3 and not think twice I asked: "How did you figure out which wallet to follow?" He shrugged "That is the easiest part. Polymarket is blockchain. All trades are open. You go to the leaderboard, filter by win rate, look at history. If a wallet consistently enters positions at 3 to 8 cents and closes at a dollar that is not luck. That is an information edge" Then he added something that made me freeze "The funniest part is I do not even need to understand why he bets. I do not know where he gets his information. Maybe he is an insider. Maybe he has a model. Maybe he just reads news faster. I do not care. I see that he entered and I enter a minute later. The price usually has not moved yet" I came home and could not fall asleep Opened Polymarket. Went to the leaderboard. Started digging An hour later I found the wallet he was talking about → Starting balance was negative. Current balance is a 5-figure number. Win rate above 73%. Average entry 4 to 7 cents. Average win covers 10 to 15 losses I started monitoring it manually. Set alarms. Checked every 2 hours By day 3 I realized I cannot live like this I needed the same thing that guy had. A signal in Telegram that comes on its own the moment the wallet opens a position I found a bot that does exactly that → No delays. No manual monitoring. Wallet enters and you get a notification What you do with it is up to you. Copy it exactly, use it as a signal, or just observe 2 weeks have passed. I have not become that guy from the shawarma spot. Yet But I stopped guessing. And started copying Right now somewhere a smart wallet is opening a new position. The question is whether you find out about it in a second or in 24 hours when the price has already moved

Blaze

122,780 views • 5 months ago

Polymarket introduced fees 3% to crush automated trading. A week ago in a Discord with developers we spent an hour doing the math: is it even possible to squeeze $250 a day on 15-minute markets with the new fees? The consensus: margin is dead. One developer didn't let that stop him from quietly making $98K a week. He automated the full pipeline: data parsing, entry calculation, trade execution. While everyone was counting fees, he was collecting money. Second place on the Polymarket leaderboard. I stared at his chart and couldn't figure it out: either I'm missing something, or the entire Discord was wrong. I found him by accident. Scrolling through top wallets and stumbled on numbers that didn't compute. $313 to start. Now $912K. Two months. I recalculated three times: $12-24K per day, and these aren't peak days, this is every day. The profit curve looks like someone drew it with a ruler. Not a single serious drawdown. Not one. For three weeks I watched this wallet. Entry timing. Position sizes. Which markets. What time of day. Looking for what separates him from hundreds of other automated traders. Then I noticed a pattern that made me uncomfortable. There's a 30-second window. Thirty seconds where Polymarket and reality don't match. BTC moves on Binance. The price already changed. But Polymarket odds are still frozen. Old numbers. Outdated prices. The world already shifted, but the prediction market is still asleep. Imagine an auction. You're standing in the room and hear the hammer drop. The lot sold for $50,000. But the other bidders are sitting in the next room watching a delayed broadcast. For them the bidding is still going. They're still raising their paddles trying to outbid. You know the lot already sold. They don't. This wallet is the one standing in the room. Every 15 minutes. Entry while odds are frozen. Wait. Window closes. Pays 30 cents, takes a dollar. No manual intervention. The developer automated the entire process and now just watches. The system only enters after a confirmed impulse on Binance and Coinbase, when Polymarket hasn't caught up to reality yet. The mechanics are laughably simple: Calculates fair value based on the last 10 trades. Price above FV, accumulate YES. Below, accumulate NO. No magic. Just basic math that takes money from people trading on emotions. And here's what got me. When Polymarket introduced fees, everyone wrote: end of automation. Now it'll be a fair game. Know what actually happened? Small players died. The ones with thin margins. The ones who couldn't afford to pay fees on every trade. And this titan? He just knocked off competitors. Less competition in the queue, more liquidity for him. Fees? Just a cost of doing business. At $98K a week it's a rounding error. Polymarket thought they were crushing freeloaders. In reality they cleared the field for one predator. $889K profit. Largest single win $28K. 723 thousand profile views. Profit curve goes straight up without a single serious drop. A human without automation can't even come close to this result. We blink. Think. Hesitate. While your finger reaches for the mouse, his system already closed the position. A week ago I decided to test it. Not analyze. Not build theories. Just copy. He entered a position, I followed. BTC market, 15-minute window. Nothing complicated. I didn't even understand what was happening, just copied. Four hours later I closed. +$247. It didn't change my life. But it changed how I see money working on this market. I spent three years drawing lines in TradingView. Reading analysis. Watching streams. $247 in 4 hours copying someone else's trade blindly. Know what I felt? Not joy. Anger. At myself. For all those years trying to be smarter than the market instead of just standing behind someone who already is. Here he is: Most traders try to predict the future. This one just watches the present arrive 30 seconds early. Right now somewhere BTC is moving on Binance. Polymarket is still asleep. You have 30 seconds. Will you be the one selling to him at old prices? Or the one standing beside him?

Blaze

94,122 views • 7 months ago

A Polymarket bot developer mass deleted his code last week. I found his Reddit confession before it disappeared. I'm done. Not because the money stopped. Because I can't sleep anymore. He built prediction algorithms for 3 years. Made $2.1M. Then wrote 47 paragraphs explaining why he's walking away. The part that haunts me: Every time you place a bet, you're not competing with other humans. You're feeding data to systems that learned your patterns months ago. Your hesitation. Your favorite markets. The exact moment you check your phone after news breaks. We have all of it. He described the architecture: Layer 1: Sentiment scrapers reading 140,000 tweets per minute. Before a rumor becomes a headline, the position is already built. Layer 2: Exchange bridges. The bot sees BTC move on Coinbase, calculates Polymarket impact, and executes. Total latency: 80ms. Your finger hasn't touched the screen yet. Layer 3: Behavioral modeling. They know retail traders panic-sell at -15%. So they push prices to -14.8%. Wait. Then buy your shares at discount when you finally crack. The worst part? We call regular traders yield. Not competitors. Not opponents. Yield. Like crops we harvest seasonally. Stop being yield: He ended with this: The only retail traders making money are the ones who stopped trading. They just copy the wallets that copy us. I read it three times. Then I deleted my indicators. My charts. My strategy. Because there's no strategy against someone who sees your cards, knows your tells, and moves before you think. There's only one play left: Stop being yield. Start being a shadow. They spend millions on infrastructure. You spend nothing. They take the risk. You take the same entry. They do the math. You copy the answer. In Polymarket, you're either the algorithm or the agriculture. Choose. Not financial advice.

A Polymarket bot developer mass deleted his code last week. I found his Reddit confession before it disappeared. I'm done. Not because the money stopped. Because I can't sleep anymore. He built prediction algorithms for 3 years. Made $2.1M. Then wrote 47 paragraphs explaining why he's walking away. The part that haunts me: Every time you place a bet, you're not competing with other humans. You're feeding data to systems that learned your patterns months ago. Your hesitation. Your favorite markets. The exact moment you check your phone after news breaks. We have all of it. He described the architecture: Layer 1: Sentiment scrapers reading 140,000 tweets per minute. Before a rumor becomes a headline, the position is already built. Layer 2: Exchange bridges. The bot sees BTC move on Coinbase, calculates Polymarket impact, and executes. Total latency: 80ms. Your finger hasn't touched the screen yet. Layer 3: Behavioral modeling. They know retail traders panic-sell at -15%. So they push prices to -14.8%. Wait. Then buy your shares at discount when you finally crack. The worst part? We call regular traders yield. Not competitors. Not opponents. Yield. Like crops we harvest seasonally. Stop being yield: He ended with this: The only retail traders making money are the ones who stopped trading. They just copy the wallets that copy us. I read it three times. Then I deleted my indicators. My charts. My strategy. Because there's no strategy against someone who sees your cards, knows your tells, and moves before you think. There's only one play left: Stop being yield. Start being a shadow. They spend millions on infrastructure. You spend nothing. They take the risk. You take the same entry. They do the math. You copy the answer. In Polymarket, you're either the algorithm or the agriculture. Choose. Not financial advice.

Blaze

868,182 views • 7 months ago

Wondering if you are “quad dominant” in your throw and if you should change it? Maybe you shouldn’t 🤷‍♂️ A coach’s post coming from Austin Roark 🚀⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ One question I get from a lot of athletes is whether they should change their lower half because their knee is over their toe during their loading phase down the mound. ⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ The biggest thing that I look for when trying to figure out if it is an issue or not is to see how they are able to get out of that position. Some guys are able to leverage and rotate from that position extremely well, which then I would say that it’s not an issue.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ On the other hand, there are some guys who will get out of this position by driving extension out of their back leg, killing their ability to rotate their pelvis and get it in an open position into landing.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ This is when I would suggest trying to make a change. I think a lot of people jump into certain ideologies that you shouldn’t do certain things because it’s “inefficient” or it looks “wrong”. ⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ Take a look at these pitchers shown in the video. All 3 of these high level arms have some degree of knee flexion over their toe. Now, granted, they all have insane levers to help them, but the way they are moving is what makes them efficient in how they throw. ⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ I think if you told Dustin May that he had to hold a vertical shin down the mound, it would be a disaster and mess a lot of things up upstream that would impact him in a negative way.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ The big takeaway here is that there are no absolutes. One thing that may look inefficient to you could be the thing that makes someone else very efficient.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ When trying to figure out if you should change something about someone's delivery, make sure to look at the entire unit as a whole and don’t jump into any quick changes.

Wondering if you are “quad dominant” in your throw and if you should change it? Maybe you shouldn’t 🤷‍♂️ A coach’s post coming from Austin Roark 🚀⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ One question I get from a lot of athletes is whether they should change their lower half because their knee is over their toe during their loading phase down the mound. ⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ The biggest thing that I look for when trying to figure out if it is an issue or not is to see how they are able to get out of that position. Some guys are able to leverage and rotate from that position extremely well, which then I would say that it’s not an issue.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ On the other hand, there are some guys who will get out of this position by driving extension out of their back leg, killing their ability to rotate their pelvis and get it in an open position into landing.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ This is when I would suggest trying to make a change. I think a lot of people jump into certain ideologies that you shouldn’t do certain things because it’s “inefficient” or it looks “wrong”. ⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ Take a look at these pitchers shown in the video. All 3 of these high level arms have some degree of knee flexion over their toe. Now, granted, they all have insane levers to help them, but the way they are moving is what makes them efficient in how they throw. ⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ I think if you told Dustin May that he had to hold a vertical shin down the mound, it would be a disaster and mess a lot of things up upstream that would impact him in a negative way.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ The big takeaway here is that there are no absolutes. One thing that may look inefficient to you could be the thing that makes someone else very efficient.⠀⁠ -⠀⁠ When trying to figure out if you should change something about someone's delivery, make sure to look at the entire unit as a whole and don’t jump into any quick changes.

Tread Athletics

25,070 views • 8 months ago

My dad told me I was wasting my life using Claude to analyze Polymarket wallets instead of "learning real trading" 2 weeks later he asked me why one weather market suddenly made someone $11,000 overnight. I didn’t know how to explain to him that half the market is now bots reacting to each other. So I started digging through GitHub trying to understand how deep this rabbit hole actually goes. The first repo that caught my attention was: A few hours later I found people building autonomous agents for Polymarket: That’s when the entire platform started looking different to me. One wallet made $87k trading weather markets. Another was making hundreds of trades a day while barely holding positions longer than 90 minutes. The highest-performing wallets didn’t even look human anymore. No emotional entries. No hesitation. No scrolling Twitter waiting for opinions. Just instant reactions to forecast changes, liquidity shifts and crowd behavior. Then I found this: And suddenly it clicked. Most people on Polymarket still think they’re trading events. They’re not. They’re trading how millions of emotional humans react to events in real time. Huge difference. One wallet I tracked kept entering positions BEFORE major sentiment swings happened. At first I thought it was luck. Then I realized the bot was monitoring forecast disagreements, Twitter activity and liquidity changes simultaneously. Humans physically cannot process information that fast anymore. Here wallet: The scary part is that almost all of this infrastructure is public. Most people just never open GitHub long enough to notice what's happening.

My dad told me I was wasting my life using Claude to analyze Polymarket wallets instead of "learning real trading" 2 weeks later he asked me why one weather market suddenly made someone $11,000 overnight. I didn’t know how to explain to him that half the market is now bots reacting to each other. So I started digging through GitHub trying to understand how deep this rabbit hole actually goes. The first repo that caught my attention was: A few hours later I found people building autonomous agents for Polymarket: That’s when the entire platform started looking different to me. One wallet made $87k trading weather markets. Another was making hundreds of trades a day while barely holding positions longer than 90 minutes. The highest-performing wallets didn’t even look human anymore. No emotional entries. No hesitation. No scrolling Twitter waiting for opinions. Just instant reactions to forecast changes, liquidity shifts and crowd behavior. Then I found this: And suddenly it clicked. Most people on Polymarket still think they’re trading events. They’re not. They’re trading how millions of emotional humans react to events in real time. Huge difference. One wallet I tracked kept entering positions BEFORE major sentiment swings happened. At first I thought it was luck. Then I realized the bot was monitoring forecast disagreements, Twitter activity and liquidity changes simultaneously. Humans physically cannot process information that fast anymore. Here wallet: The scary part is that almost all of this infrastructure is public. Most people just never open GitHub long enough to notice what's happening.

Lunar

54,853 views • 3 months ago

My girlfriend asked why I had 14 Polymarket tabs open tracking rainfall at 3 AM instead of sleeping. An hour later one wallet made $7,200 because NOAA changed a forecast before Twitter noticed. That was the entire trade. I started digging through GitHub trying to understand how these wallets react so absurdly fast. The first repo that caught my attention was: A few hours later I found people building autonomous agents for Polymarket: That’s when the whole platform started looking different to me. One wallet made $64k trading weather markets. Another was making hundreds of trades a day while barely holding positions longer than an hour. The highest-performing wallets didn’t even look human anymore. No hesitation. No emotional entries. No scrolling Twitter waiting for opinions. Just instant reactions to forecast updates, liquidity shifts and crowd behavior. Then I found this: And suddenly it clicked. Most people on Polymarket still think they’re trading events. They’re not. They’re trading how long it takes emotional humans to react to events. Huge difference. One wallet I tracked kept entering positions before major sentiment swings happened. At first I thought it was luck. Then I realized the bot was monitoring NOAA revisions, Twitter activity and liquidity changes simultaneously. Humans physically cannot process information that fast anymore. Copytrade wallet: The scary part is that almost all of this infrastructure is public. Most people just never open GitHub long enough to notice what's happening.

My girlfriend asked why I had 14 Polymarket tabs open tracking rainfall at 3 AM instead of sleeping. An hour later one wallet made $7,200 because NOAA changed a forecast before Twitter noticed. That was the entire trade. I started digging through GitHub trying to understand how these wallets react so absurdly fast. The first repo that caught my attention was: A few hours later I found people building autonomous agents for Polymarket: That’s when the whole platform started looking different to me. One wallet made $64k trading weather markets. Another was making hundreds of trades a day while barely holding positions longer than an hour. The highest-performing wallets didn’t even look human anymore. No hesitation. No emotional entries. No scrolling Twitter waiting for opinions. Just instant reactions to forecast updates, liquidity shifts and crowd behavior. Then I found this: And suddenly it clicked. Most people on Polymarket still think they’re trading events. They’re not. They’re trading how long it takes emotional humans to react to events. Huge difference. One wallet I tracked kept entering positions before major sentiment swings happened. At first I thought it was luck. Then I realized the bot was monitoring NOAA revisions, Twitter activity and liquidity changes simultaneously. Humans physically cannot process information that fast anymore. Copytrade wallet: The scary part is that almost all of this infrastructure is public. Most people just never open GitHub long enough to notice what's happening.

Lunar

52,892 views • 3 months ago

I spent my entire youth dreaming of having money, I thought the harder I worked the more money would come, I dedicated my life to the hardest professional I could imagine, MMA. I gave it everything, my entire heart & soul. Made it to the UFC and became one of the best middleweights in the UK, then Europe and at one point I was ranked in the top 25 middleweights in the world. It was HARD… the hardest way you could imagine trying to make money. When I stopped I started looking into how other people are making money.. I now know 16 year old kids making more money than I made as a professional athlete fighting with the most elite in the world, and all from behind a computer screen in their bedroom. I picked the hardest slowest way to make money! You can pick the easiest and fastest one instead:

I spent my entire youth dreaming of having money, I thought the harder I worked the more money would come, I dedicated my life to the hardest professional I could imagine, MMA. I gave it everything, my entire heart & soul. Made it to the UFC and became one of the best middleweights in the UK, then Europe and at one point I was ranked in the top 25 middleweights in the world. It was HARD… the hardest way you could imagine trying to make money. When I stopped I started looking into how other people are making money.. I now know 16 year old kids making more money than I made as a professional athlete fighting with the most elite in the world, and all from behind a computer screen in their bedroom. I picked the hardest slowest way to make money! You can pick the easiest and fastest one instead:

LukeBarnatt

241,601 views • 2 years ago

Kenny Atkinson on the injuries to De'Andre Hunter and Evan Mobley: "I don't think they were dirty plays, but I think it passed a line of physicality. That line we've kind of been talking about where it became excessive. So number one was the non-call on De’Andre's layup, which I don't know. Everyone in the world just look at that play, and they reviewed it, and I'm just in shock. I dunno. And I guess I gotta know the rules better. So maybe I don't know the rules. I felt he got absolutely obliterated and dislocated his thumb, so he'll be questionable. And then Evan, around the same time, I can't remember if it was before or after, [Myles] Turner contests his two-point shot, comes under, clearly under him. And shooters need space to land, and is pushed off balance in kind of our opinion and tweaks his ankle pretty bad. I think you guys saw him limping the rest of the game."

Kenny Atkinson on the injuries to De'Andre Hunter and Evan Mobley: "I don't think they were dirty plays, but I think it passed a line of physicality. That line we've kind of been talking about where it became excessive. So number one was the non-call on De’Andre's layup, which I don't know. Everyone in the world just look at that play, and they reviewed it, and I'm just in shock. I dunno. And I guess I gotta know the rules better. So maybe I don't know the rules. I felt he got absolutely obliterated and dislocated his thumb, so he'll be questionable. And then Evan, around the same time, I can't remember if it was before or after, [Myles] Turner contests his two-point shot, comes under, clearly under him. And shooters need space to land, and is pushed off balance in kind of our opinion and tweaks his ankle pretty bad. I think you guys saw him limping the rest of the game."

Danny Cunningham

243,517 views • 1 year ago

Polymarket introduced new fees to kill bots on 15-minute markets. Result? They just eliminated competition for the two apex predators. These wallets did not just survive. They mutated. While the platform tried to "fix" the system, these two made $918,357 in pure profit in one month. On the fees that were supposed to bankrupt them. Someone on Twitter was complaining his stops get blown at the exact same second every time. Said he was up against HFT bots with direct exchange connections. In the comments someone dropped two profiles. Said here are your "manipulators". Just code. $522,439 profit in one month. $65 million volume. First place on crypto leaderboard. This is not a person. This is PurpleThunderBicycleMountain. His profile: The second profile looked like it could not top the first. 0x8dxd. Second place. $395,918 in the same month. But here is what breaks the brain completely. In December 2025 this wallet had $313. Three hundred thirteen dollars. Now his all-time profit exceeds $658,000. The numbers do not lie. $313 turned into a fortune in six weeks. See for yourself: The mechanics are uncomfortably simple. Both trade the same thing. 15-minute crypto markets. Bitcoin up or down. ETH above or below. Every 15 minutes a new contract. Here is the trick. You look at Polymarket and see 50/50 odds. For you this is a fair coin flip. But these two do not look at Polymarket. They look at Binance. When BTC makes a move on the exchange Polymarket does not know yet. Price already moved. Direction already determined. But odds on the platform still show yesterday. The window lasts 30 seconds. Sometimes 90. It is like playing poker against someone with a mirror behind your back. He already sees your cards. You still think you are bluffing. During this time the bot enters at old prices. Buys YES at 25 cents when real probability is already 80%. Or NO at 1.5 cents when the market already crashed. Then the window closes. Odds catch up to reality. Bot gets $1 for every 25 cents. This is not forecasting. This is harvesting from people staring at a stale screen. One trade stands out. ETH dumped on spot. PurpleThunderBicycleMountain loaded NO at 1.5 cents. Kept buying as price rose to 15 cents. Window closed down. Every share paid $1. 785% in fifteen minutes. On one trade. The craziest part is 0x8dxd stats. Win rate 98%. Out of 6,615 trades. Almost perfect. A human cannot trade like this. A human has shaky hands. A human doubts. A human sleeps. The bot does not sleep. The bot does not doubt. The bot just waits for Binance and Polymarket to diverge for 30 seconds. And takes the difference. Their profit curves both grow without a single pullback. No crashes. No nervous breakdowns. Methodical. Mechanical. Relentless. Polymarket introduced fees to stop this. Result? Small bots died. These two took their market share. A 1.5% fee means nothing when your average return is 300%. Here is what kills. Anyone can spend months learning Python. Rent a server near the exchange. Write an algorithm. Test. Debug. Lose money on mistakes. Or just open their profiles and see what they are buying. The blockchain stores everything. Every position. Every timing. Full history in the open. They spend thousands on infrastructure. Write code for months. Optimize milliseconds. Anyone can just watch where they enter. $918,357 in one month between them. First and second place on the leaderboard. This is not theory. This is a working machine. Right now somewhere BTC is making a move. Polymarket still shows old odds. These two are already entering a position. Only one question remains: Will you be the one selling to them at stale prices? Or the one entering alongside them? In 15 minutes a new contract opens. 14 minutes left.

Blaze

61,835 views • 7 months ago

My girlfriend walked into my home office Friday at 11pm. "Are you still working?" "What?" "It's Friday. Eleven at night. Why are you on the laptop?" "Just checking the bot." She leaned against the doorframe. "What bot?" "The trading one. Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." She stared at me. "So you code for free?" "No. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking cleared $2,800 in a single weekend. Another flipped 156 trades in 48 hours with 78% winrate. One more turned $950 into $14,200 in 17 days. She walked in. Closed the door. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed her the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. She went quiet for a long time. Then: "Why are you only telling me this now?" "We've been dating nine months." "Exactly. Nine months." I didn't have a good answer. She sat on the desk. Looked at me. "You're going to show me everything. Tonight. From the top. I'm not asking." Profile: Girlfriends don't ask about the money. They ask why you waited nine months. Then they take over the conversation.

Lunar

42,542 views • 2 months ago

VTubing is for everyone! I don't like to bring this up, but recent events in the VTuber community made some people really vile. I had my M&G at HolMat last week and had people come up and just yell at me for being a girl in the "womans world", that is VTubing, no idea about who I was, or why I was there. I had the same group return to my handler multiple times, I felt really worried about the person carrying me around having to deal with this repeatedly and tried to steer them away from the group. It seems they found my YT and left me a handful of the same comments, luckily all caught by moderation tools. While I will refrain from M&G's for a little until this calms down I want to say this; I have been managing for over 1.5 years now, I deliberately take on male VTubers to show them that they can still do it. I take on people that have babiniku accounts, those that are changing from one gender presentation to another and want help, and those that have no gender presentation in their avatar. A lot of male VTubers struggle to find a manager because the stereotype is that all male VTubers are evil and it perpetuates a stereotype that extends beyond entertainment industry subcultures like streaming. VTubing has always been a medium, while character and marketing matters, it's about what makes you happy, YOU are the person that makes the content. Use whatever you want as an avatar, use a voice changer if that's what you want to do. Every month I have a male client bring up they can't do it the same way, that it's easier if jiggle physics or a cute voice is the answer to fast growth. And I tell them yeah, I can also do ASMR, I can do drama content, collab with a larger person, and get to x amount of viewers. There are shortcuts in every entertainment profession and subculture. Does it last? Do quick fixes for anything ever last? Yes, great physics and an expensive model can get people in, but if your value, your way of interacting with people, your content plan and marketing is ass, you can pack up. Most of us start on a small budget, premade or resold models, and it's the same in the big league entertainment industry too. Can I take out a loan and put myself on a billboard tomorrow, can I pay the most expensive model artist and rigger and get in along corporate VTubers tomorrow? Sure. Will it last, will it be genuine, will people trust me? Hell no. Genuine communities and growth build trust. I think streaming, creative industries, entertainment, are full of people, regardless of gender, that will see success and call it "easy", because of what they see as the end product. They don't see most VTubers working a second job, they don't see the managers, they don't see 100+ hours a month going into content production, years invested in singing and voice lessons, model redebut after redebut. I think a lot of male VTubers get a bad rep, because so many boys are raised without putting emphasis on empathy and creativity, watching my brothers be told they should not pursue art, that theatre class is a waste of time, and that they needed to go study x or y to make money for their families in the future was heartbreaking. Nobody should have to look at others and feel so much hatred for society they turn against a whole group of people. If you want to pursue entertainment, please do. If you want to grow and try and make a name for yourself, you should start there, not with yelling about how you already failed. "Oh but I can't", "Oh but the odds are stacked against me", look at the big streamers, look at Ironmouse who overcame everything with hard work, look at Kiara who rose from the ashes, look at everyone that fights against their odds every day and give it your all. If you already think you lost, then you have nothing to lose. Don't give up on your dreams because others tell you to.

Kuromiya Lucien

15,552 views • 8 months ago

A witness's memoir. The first days of a full-scale war. Massacre on the Zhytomyr highway, Kyiv region. Every Ukrainian killed by Russian soldiers is not a number. It is a person, people. Read this memoir. We were driving in the opposite lane. Almost as soon as we entered the stretch [of the Zhytomyr highway towards Kyiv - ed.] we heard shots. We stopped, the car was not moving. Maksym jumped out and started waving: "There are children here! Children!" It was all in front of me. He fell down. Ksenia started to rattle. Once, twice. Hordii said: "Why is mom rattling?" I turned around and took Hordii. I put him [in the driver's seat] and covered him [with myself]. I got a bullet (points to his right forearm - ed.). They were shooting for a long time. And then there was silence. I opened the door and there were Buryats with machine guns... I realized that they were Russians. I said immediately: "There are children here, don't shoot, please, there are children here." And they: "The child first". Hordii went out, but I couldn't go out... I got out and saw Maksym's legs. I wanted to approach him, but [the Russian] did not let me pass. He said: "That's it! That's it!" I started saying, "Ksenia is here! Mom is behind!" He looked: "Cover the child's eyes". I covered Hordii's eyes, I had a shawl. And he took us in that direction (to the area behind the gas station - ed.). There was a pit there. I asked him [the Russian who brought us]: "Are you serious now? Don't do that." And he said: "I'm sorry. My child is also six years old. I'm sorry." I thought they were going to shoot us. But a Russian officer appeared behind the pit and shouted: "Who opened fire? Who shot? Who brought her here?" I started to tell him: "We were on our way, we evacuated, they are shooting... we have children...", "You had no identification marks". I said: "We had white ones... and [the inscription] 'children' both in front and behind". Someone behind me said: "What are you going to do with them?" He looked me in the eye for so long, and then said: "Let them go." They took us out through the gas station and we left with Hordii. Another Buryat took Hordii in his arms and asked, "What's your name?" "'Hordii'. "I'm sorry, I know you won't forgive me, but I'm sorry." I think he was the one who shot and killed my parents. Mass murder on the Zhytomyr highway: map, chronology and investigation of the Russian crime:

A witness's memoir. The first days of a full-scale war. Massacre on the Zhytomyr highway, Kyiv region. Every Ukrainian killed by Russian soldiers is not a number. It is a person, people. Read this memoir. We were driving in the opposite lane. Almost as soon as we entered the stretch [of the Zhytomyr highway towards Kyiv - ed.] we heard shots. We stopped, the car was not moving. Maksym jumped out and started waving: "There are children here! Children!" It was all in front of me. He fell down. Ksenia started to rattle. Once, twice. Hordii said: "Why is mom rattling?" I turned around and took Hordii. I put him [in the driver's seat] and covered him [with myself]. I got a bullet (points to his right forearm - ed.). They were shooting for a long time. And then there was silence. I opened the door and there were Buryats with machine guns... I realized that they were Russians. I said immediately: "There are children here, don't shoot, please, there are children here." And they: "The child first". Hordii went out, but I couldn't go out... I got out and saw Maksym's legs. I wanted to approach him, but [the Russian] did not let me pass. He said: "That's it! That's it!" I started saying, "Ksenia is here! Mom is behind!" He looked: "Cover the child's eyes". I covered Hordii's eyes, I had a shawl. And he took us in that direction (to the area behind the gas station - ed.). There was a pit there. I asked him [the Russian who brought us]: "Are you serious now? Don't do that." And he said: "I'm sorry. My child is also six years old. I'm sorry." I thought they were going to shoot us. But a Russian officer appeared behind the pit and shouted: "Who opened fire? Who shot? Who brought her here?" I started to tell him: "We were on our way, we evacuated, they are shooting... we have children...", "You had no identification marks". I said: "We had white ones... and [the inscription] 'children' both in front and behind". Someone behind me said: "What are you going to do with them?" He looked me in the eye for so long, and then said: "Let them go." They took us out through the gas station and we left with Hordii. Another Buryat took Hordii in his arms and asked, "What's your name?" "'Hordii'. "I'm sorry, I know you won't forgive me, but I'm sorry." I think he was the one who shot and killed my parents. Mass murder on the Zhytomyr highway: map, chronology and investigation of the Russian crime:

Anton Gerashchenko

809,212 views • 2 years ago

I need to be real with ya'll, I'm disappointed with the Shapeless Man edit style. I just realized that the lines on his body are completely still and don't move at all. That was one of the coolest features of the Shapeless Man and it made him look a lot more creepy & shapeless. Not sure why they chose to make the lines still, but if the style can be updated to have the moving lines that would be amazing. The eyes also just being solid yellow instead of the yellow & orange gradient bugs me a bit too. I really don't want to complain, but I'm kinda let down with this style. The rest of the set is fire, no complaints from me there, it's just the Shapeless Man style.

I need to be real with ya'll, I'm disappointed with the Shapeless Man edit style. I just realized that the lines on his body are completely still and don't move at all. That was one of the coolest features of the Shapeless Man and it made him look a lot more creepy & shapeless. Not sure why they chose to make the lines still, but if the style can be updated to have the moving lines that would be amazing. The eyes also just being solid yellow instead of the yellow & orange gradient bugs me a bit too. I really don't want to complain, but I'm kinda let down with this style. The rest of the set is fire, no complaints from me there, it's just the Shapeless Man style.

Rezztro

133,640 views • 9 days ago

I built a full-stack Chat App to learn React Deeper. When I started, I only know the basics in React. I was hesitant at first if I would be able to do it or not, but I started building it anyways. Through building it, I have learned: - Typescript - Tailwind - Redux - Firebase - File Structuring - Optimization - More hooks The list could go on... The point is you don't need to know it all to start building something. Fundamentals are enough, you can figure out and learn the others on the way. Here's the link of the app: Source code: I create visual web dev content and its all here:

I built a full-stack Chat App to learn React Deeper. When I started, I only know the basics in React. I was hesitant at first if I would be able to do it or not, but I started building it anyways. Through building it, I have learned: - Typescript - Tailwind - Redux - Firebase - File Structuring - Optimization - More hooks The list could go on... The point is you don't need to know it all to start building something. Fundamentals are enough, you can figure out and learn the others on the way. Here's the link of the app: Source code: I create visual web dev content and its all here:

Ali

112,136 views • 2 years ago

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING EXTREMELY BAD IS COMING ON MONDAY... Four things are breaking at the same time. Interest rate hikes by December is almost confirmed now. Not pauses. Not holds. HIKES. Everything priced on the assumption that cheap money returns just got repriced from scratch. Every leveraged position, every rate-sensitive asset, every model built on a pivot that isn't coming. Japan officially entered yen intervention, that sounds technical. Here's what it means in practice. Japan is burning through reserves defending a currency that's been collapsing for months. And to fund that defense they sell what they own. US Treasuries, at scale, Into a bond market that's already under pressure from every other direction. China hasn't stopped, while everyone was watching Iran and the Fed, China has been quietly and consistently dumping US Treasury holdings for weeks. No announcement, no fanfare. Just steady selling that shows up in the data for anyone paying attention. And the AI rally is dying in real time. The momentum that carried Nvidia, Microsoft, Google, and Meta to valuations that made no fundamental sense is reversing. Funds that loaded up on the AI narrative at the top are now the ones selling into every bounce. The multiple that drove three years of outperformance doesn't survive a rate hike cycle and a liquidity crisis simultaneously. Now put all four together. Rates going up, liquidity going out. The world's two largest foreign Treasury holders selling simultaneously. And the primary growth narrative of the last three years losing believers by the session. When liquidity disappears across multiple layers of the financial system at once markets don't correct. They don't dip, they don't give you a clean exit. They crash fast and they crash hard. Stocks. Bonds. Metals. Crypto. There is no rotation trade that works when everything is being sold to cover everything else. There is no safe haven when the people who need cash are selling whatever has a bid. Insiders are already out, funds are already cutting. The rotation happened this week while retail was still debating whether to buy the dip. By the time Monday's open confirms what's coming it's already too late to position. This sounds SCARY, but I will keep you updated on everything here When I rotate money, I will post my moves here so my FOLLOWERS can SAVE their money Many will regret not following me earlier...

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING EXTREMELY BAD IS COMING ON MONDAY... Four things are breaking at the same time. Interest rate hikes by December is almost confirmed now. Not pauses. Not holds. HIKES. Everything priced on the assumption that cheap money returns just got repriced from scratch. Every leveraged position, every rate-sensitive asset, every model built on a pivot that isn't coming. Japan officially entered yen intervention, that sounds technical. Here's what it means in practice. Japan is burning through reserves defending a currency that's been collapsing for months. And to fund that defense they sell what they own. US Treasuries, at scale, Into a bond market that's already under pressure from every other direction. China hasn't stopped, while everyone was watching Iran and the Fed, China has been quietly and consistently dumping US Treasury holdings for weeks. No announcement, no fanfare. Just steady selling that shows up in the data for anyone paying attention. And the AI rally is dying in real time. The momentum that carried Nvidia, Microsoft, Google, and Meta to valuations that made no fundamental sense is reversing. Funds that loaded up on the AI narrative at the top are now the ones selling into every bounce. The multiple that drove three years of outperformance doesn't survive a rate hike cycle and a liquidity crisis simultaneously. Now put all four together. Rates going up, liquidity going out. The world's two largest foreign Treasury holders selling simultaneously. And the primary growth narrative of the last three years losing believers by the session. When liquidity disappears across multiple layers of the financial system at once markets don't correct. They don't dip, they don't give you a clean exit. They crash fast and they crash hard. Stocks. Bonds. Metals. Crypto. There is no rotation trade that works when everything is being sold to cover everything else. There is no safe haven when the people who need cash are selling whatever has a bid. Insiders are already out, funds are already cutting. The rotation happened this week while retail was still debating whether to buy the dip. By the time Monday's open confirms what's coming it's already too late to position. This sounds SCARY, but I will keep you updated on everything here When I rotate money, I will post my moves here so my FOLLOWERS can SAVE their money Many will regret not following me earlier...

ᴛʀᴀᴄᴇʀ

169,405 views • 1 month ago