正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🇺🇸 “I STARTED ELIMINATING THE ‘COOL-SOUNDING’ THEORIES ABOUT KIRK MURDER THAT JUST DIDN’T ADD UP” After digging deeper into the Charlie Kirk shooting, Stephen Gardner says he stopped chasing wild theories and started focusing on the facts. “I began looking at every angle of the crime. Could the shot... have come from somewhere else? Nope, pretty much just that one location.” Then he started breaking it down piece by piece: “What kind of gun could it be? Was it that guy tugging at his shirt, maybe a palm gun? No way. Too loud. Too much force coming from the front.” Stephen even analyzed the wound. “Is it an exit wound or an entrance wound? Could it have been fired from behind?” He began reaching out to firearms and forensics experts, crossing off the theories that didn’t fit.show more

Mario Nawfal

2,682,492 subscribers

69,961 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

It was NEVER an "ENTRANCE" or "EXIT WOUND" from a bullet. What if it was a PUNCTURE WOUND from the PENDANT VIOLENTLY impaling him in the neck this entire time? This would explain the bizarre movement of his t-shirt and what looks like something under it that lifts up right into the EXACT SPOT where the WOUND APPEARS. As soon as the shirt falls, you then see the WOUND. This would also explain the necklace you see flying off that everyone believed was Charlie's earpiece. This actually makes more sense at would support Charlie being shot from another position rather than the front, especially from the roof top in front. The amount of force you see that necklace break and fly backwards off of Charlie, especially his shirt movement makes more logical sense than anything else. cc: triggersmart

It was NEVER an "ENTRANCE" or "EXIT WOUND" from a bullet. What if it was a PUNCTURE WOUND from the PENDANT VIOLENTLY impaling him in the neck this entire time? This would explain the bizarre movement of his t-shirt and what looks like something under it that lifts up right into the EXACT SPOT where the WOUND APPEARS. As soon as the shirt falls, you then see the WOUND. This would also explain the necklace you see flying off that everyone believed was Charlie's earpiece. This actually makes more sense at would support Charlie being shot from another position rather than the front, especially from the roof top in front. The amount of force you see that necklace break and fly backwards off of Charlie, especially his shirt movement makes more logical sense than anything else. cc: triggersmart

The SCIF

142,462 次观看 • 9 个月前

It seems that everyone has come to the SAME conclusion that Charlie Kirk was NOT shot with a .30-06. Where do we go from here? - 99.9% NOT a front shot from a .30-06. This is why it is hard to progress into what actually happened and where the shooter actually was or with what weapon or projectile. - The biggest tell is NO EXIT WOUND and the minimal damage that was seen. The ballistics also do not make sense at all. - The angle of the shot and location would most likely NOT have had any disruptions or have STRUCK ANYTHING in its path besides soft tissue and muscle, etc. NOT even striking any bones, which would not in general cause it to change its path and angle another staggering 81 degrees to enter down into Charlie's body. The shot would have EASILY went straight through and would have easily shattered any bones along the way, especially in the human neck, if it even hit any. What makes this entire situation difficult to conclude and to progress in the state of affairs is the fact that there is NO EXIT WOUND, and the only hole we see looks LIKE AN EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. cc: Mario Nawfal, RT

It seems that everyone has come to the SAME conclusion that Charlie Kirk was NOT shot with a .30-06. Where do we go from here? - 99.9% NOT a front shot from a .30-06. This is why it is hard to progress into what actually happened and where the shooter actually was or with what weapon or projectile. - The biggest tell is NO EXIT WOUND and the minimal damage that was seen. The ballistics also do not make sense at all. - The angle of the shot and location would most likely NOT have had any disruptions or have STRUCK ANYTHING in its path besides soft tissue and muscle, etc. NOT even striking any bones, which would not in general cause it to change its path and angle another staggering 81 degrees to enter down into Charlie's body. The shot would have EASILY went straight through and would have easily shattered any bones along the way, especially in the human neck, if it even hit any. What makes this entire situation difficult to conclude and to progress in the state of affairs is the fact that there is NO EXIT WOUND, and the only hole we see looks LIKE AN EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. cc: Mario Nawfal, RT

The SCIF

60,377 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 EYEWITNESS DROPS NUCLEAR CONFIRMATION: Charlie Kirk SHOT POINT-BLANK in the CHEST – TWO SHOOTERS PROVEN! A front-row eyewitness—standing RIGHT IN FRONT of Charlie Kirk on his RIGHT SIDE— just shattered the official "single shooter from behind" BS. This guy's account? Straight fire. He watched in HORROR as Kirk took a DEADLY STRETCH SHOT STRAIGHT TO THE HEART and the Wound BLEEDS Through Shirt. His words: "Like, it was a stretch shot to the heart. And look right, right where his heart is. It started going red. He fell back and went to his side. Then I look down at the crowd. And look like the crowd all went to the knees really fast." Crowd DROPS like dominoes—no trampling, no chaos from a "lone gunman" scramble. Eyewitness hit the deck too: "I, kind of, did go to my knees as fast everybody, cause I wanted to see if anyone who was close to the shooter would be trampling all over that person. And I saw nothing like that at all... They were just not moving." Then? Panic pushes him backstage. Blood SOAKING his shirt from the CHEST— not just neck. This lines up PERFECTLY with the palm gun shooter we've been screaming about. TWO SHOOTERS: One from behind (neck?), one from FRONT (heart-piercing kill shot). Cover-up much? Official story crumbling FAST. Who silenced Kirk? Deep State? Foreign ops? Drop your takes BELOW— this is the thread that pulls it all together!

🚨 EYEWITNESS DROPS NUCLEAR CONFIRMATION: Charlie Kirk SHOT POINT-BLANK in the CHEST – TWO SHOOTERS PROVEN! A front-row eyewitness—standing RIGHT IN FRONT of Charlie Kirk on his RIGHT SIDE— just shattered the official "single shooter from behind" BS. This guy's account? Straight fire. He watched in HORROR as Kirk took a DEADLY STRETCH SHOT STRAIGHT TO THE HEART and the Wound BLEEDS Through Shirt. His words: "Like, it was a stretch shot to the heart. And look right, right where his heart is. It started going red. He fell back and went to his side. Then I look down at the crowd. And look like the crowd all went to the knees really fast." Crowd DROPS like dominoes—no trampling, no chaos from a "lone gunman" scramble. Eyewitness hit the deck too: "I, kind of, did go to my knees as fast everybody, cause I wanted to see if anyone who was close to the shooter would be trampling all over that person. And I saw nothing like that at all... They were just not moving." Then? Panic pushes him backstage. Blood SOAKING his shirt from the CHEST— not just neck. This lines up PERFECTLY with the palm gun shooter we've been screaming about. TWO SHOOTERS: One from behind (neck?), one from FRONT (heart-piercing kill shot). Cover-up much? Official story crumbling FAST. Who silenced Kirk? Deep State? Foreign ops? Drop your takes BELOW— this is the thread that pulls it all together!

Project Constitution

52,867 次观看 • 9 个月前

Joe Rogan lays out why the official story of how Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk doesn't add up for him. He keeps circling back to two things: the gun and the wound. ROGAN: "There's something going on with the guy being able to climb on top of that roof with a gun, dismantle it, put it back together again, and then dismantle it again and put it back together again. Like the whole thing makes no sense." "Anybody who knows anything about guns knows that you take a scope off a gun, you take the barrel off the gun, you take the stock off the gun, you got to put it all back together again. You might not be on anymore. You're going to have to sight that gun in." "And this kid's not like a marksman. It's not like he's got a ton of experience shooting people and shooting at a distance." ".30-06 is a big rifle round. And to shoot a guy in the neck with a .30-06, you'd expect an exit wound. And there's no exit wound. It just goes in." "That's a round that you would shoot an elk with." What's your take on this? Let's hear it.

Joe Rogan lays out why the official story of how Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk doesn't add up for him. He keeps circling back to two things: the gun and the wound. ROGAN: "There's something going on with the guy being able to climb on top of that roof with a gun, dismantle it, put it back together again, and then dismantle it again and put it back together again. Like the whole thing makes no sense." "Anybody who knows anything about guns knows that you take a scope off a gun, you take the barrel off the gun, you take the stock off the gun, you got to put it all back together again. You might not be on anymore. You're going to have to sight that gun in." "And this kid's not like a marksman. It's not like he's got a ton of experience shooting people and shooting at a distance." ".30-06 is a big rifle round. And to shoot a guy in the neck with a .30-06, you'd expect an exit wound. And there's no exit wound. It just goes in." "That's a round that you would shoot an elk with." What's your take on this? Let's hear it.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

941,025 次观看 • 27 天前

An eyewitness says the shot that took the life of Charlie Kirk was fired right after he was asked about trans violence, as if it were coordinated. He believes it wasn’t just one person acting alone, but several people working together. He also claims that someone in the crowd confessed to the shooting right after it happened, even though they didn’t have a weapon.

An eyewitness says the shot that took the life of Charlie Kirk was fired right after he was asked about trans violence, as if it were coordinated. He believes it wasn’t just one person acting alone, but several people working together. He also claims that someone in the crowd confessed to the shooting right after it happened, even though they didn’t have a weapon.

Shadow of Ezra

8,161,967 次观看 • 10 个月前

BREAKING DOWN the FACTS and ODD occurrences about the Charlie Kirk assassination. - Why does NOBODY seem to help or attend to Charlie's wound and WHY does NOBODY have any BLOOD on their hands? Why aren't they packing the wound? - There is NO WAY it was a .30-06 or a SOFT-TIP .30-06 round. NONE of that would even matter with the amount of power and FPS behind a .30-06 round. A soft-tip round would actually create an even bigger EXIT WOUND than a standard FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) round. BUT... We DIDN'T even get an EXIT WOUND at all, unless the hole we see is the exit wound. Even at a 9 degree angle, shooting from the roof position, a .30-06 would of 100% went RIGHT THROUGH Charlie's neck. Maybe even worse. There is NO WAY the bullet would deflect and go STRAIGHT DOWN after hitting his spine or neck bones. It would of CONTINUED DIRECTLY THROUGH. - Where is the RIFLE in the pictures of him on the steps? There is no visible RIFLE in his pant legs, and it WOULD not fit in that backpack especial with the barrel being 2 ft long itself even broken down, and especially the stock/butt of the gun and the scope fit into a pair of skinny jeans. HOW did Tyler get the RIFLE ON THE ROOF? - Why don't we have more footage, ESPECIALLY of when he took the shot or just with the RIFLE in his hands at ANY POINT? Why does the video start with him running? Nothing makes sense and now with all the new footage of Tyler at the gas station and all these other places and an alleged WOMAN that was seen with the shooter, it makes even less sense, with even more questions. cc: Alex Jones, Owen Benjamin

BREAKING DOWN the FACTS and ODD occurrences about the Charlie Kirk assassination. - Why does NOBODY seem to help or attend to Charlie's wound and WHY does NOBODY have any BLOOD on their hands? Why aren't they packing the wound? - There is NO WAY it was a .30-06 or a SOFT-TIP .30-06 round. NONE of that would even matter with the amount of power and FPS behind a .30-06 round. A soft-tip round would actually create an even bigger EXIT WOUND than a standard FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) round. BUT... We DIDN'T even get an EXIT WOUND at all, unless the hole we see is the exit wound. Even at a 9 degree angle, shooting from the roof position, a .30-06 would of 100% went RIGHT THROUGH Charlie's neck. Maybe even worse. There is NO WAY the bullet would deflect and go STRAIGHT DOWN after hitting his spine or neck bones. It would of CONTINUED DIRECTLY THROUGH. - Where is the RIFLE in the pictures of him on the steps? There is no visible RIFLE in his pant legs, and it WOULD not fit in that backpack especial with the barrel being 2 ft long itself even broken down, and especially the stock/butt of the gun and the scope fit into a pair of skinny jeans. HOW did Tyler get the RIFLE ON THE ROOF? - Why don't we have more footage, ESPECIALLY of when he took the shot or just with the RIFLE in his hands at ANY POINT? Why does the video start with him running? Nothing makes sense and now with all the new footage of Tyler at the gas station and all these other places and an alleged WOMAN that was seen with the shooter, it makes even less sense, with even more questions. cc: Alex Jones, Owen Benjamin

The SCIF

17,884 次观看 • 9 个月前

What if we could RECREATE the REFLECTION of the FLASH seen in the GLASS during the Charlie Kirk assassination? Literally recreate it on site. The timing of the flash seen in the reflection of the glass is what makes it so interesting. What else would cause a flash that bright in the middle of the day? This could at least determine a lot of good information and confirm or deny theories that are out there. Just to get an idea of where the FLASH came from, which could identify a possible shooter or 2nd shooter location. The reason I say this is because it lines up perfectly with the sound of the gun, meaning you see the flash first, then you hear the shot, which would make sense because light travels faster than sound. This way we could get an idea of where it came from in the first place and determine if it's a good lead or not and then check the crowd or building locations. It could be recreated with a camera flash or something with bright enough lumens. This could clear up at least one theory or confirm it and lead us in the right direction of where the shooter could have been. Please comment with your thoughts and ideas. We need to get someone out there to the location with the Proper equipment. At least we could confirm or deny some theories. Video in bottom left shows the flash.

What if we could RECREATE the REFLECTION of the FLASH seen in the GLASS during the Charlie Kirk assassination? Literally recreate it on site. The timing of the flash seen in the reflection of the glass is what makes it so interesting. What else would cause a flash that bright in the middle of the day? This could at least determine a lot of good information and confirm or deny theories that are out there. Just to get an idea of where the FLASH came from, which could identify a possible shooter or 2nd shooter location. The reason I say this is because it lines up perfectly with the sound of the gun, meaning you see the flash first, then you hear the shot, which would make sense because light travels faster than sound. This way we could get an idea of where it came from in the first place and determine if it's a good lead or not and then check the crowd or building locations. It could be recreated with a camera flash or something with bright enough lumens. This could clear up at least one theory or confirm it and lead us in the right direction of where the shooter could have been. Please comment with your thoughts and ideas. We need to get someone out there to the location with the Proper equipment. At least we could confirm or deny some theories. Video in bottom left shows the flash.

The SCIF

108,760 次观看 • 10 个月前

The "VAN THEORY" Did the fatal shot/projectile come from inside or around the van behind Charlie Kirk? - The most fascinating part of this video is the alleged projectile that was caught on film directly before Charlie was hit, which would coincide with the front wound being an EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. - The overall angle makes more sense than the alleged rooftop shooter theory, which we now know was NOT a .30-06 round and was 99.9% most likely not taken from on top of the Losee building. - The back hatch of the van does open right before Charlie gets shot and then it closes immediately after. I believe we are getting a lot closer to the truth, while we uncover the massive amount of distractions and actors they had in place to cause misdirection, along with finding motives from potential foreign and or domestic actors. What are your overall theories and comments and is this object caught on camera the projectile that we've been looking for? cc: HustleBitch

The "VAN THEORY" Did the fatal shot/projectile come from inside or around the van behind Charlie Kirk? - The most fascinating part of this video is the alleged projectile that was caught on film directly before Charlie was hit, which would coincide with the front wound being an EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. - The overall angle makes more sense than the alleged rooftop shooter theory, which we now know was NOT a .30-06 round and was 99.9% most likely not taken from on top of the Losee building. - The back hatch of the van does open right before Charlie gets shot and then it closes immediately after. I believe we are getting a lot closer to the truth, while we uncover the massive amount of distractions and actors they had in place to cause misdirection, along with finding motives from potential foreign and or domestic actors. What are your overall theories and comments and is this object caught on camera the projectile that we've been looking for? cc: HustleBitch

The SCIF

85,858 次观看 • 9 个月前

🇺🇸 FIRST SHOT: It’s tough to see, but I think I found the muzzle flash from the first shot. This makes or breaks the situation. It’s important to know where the first shot came from. It looks like the shot came from the direction of the suspect, upwards. Theories: 1) An agent fumbles his gun and it falls there, hence they all scream “GUN!” They mean a second gun. The shot is unaided, just random. 2) An agent shot upwards? Seems unlikely. Why would others scream “gun” and run after seeing an agent with a gun? 3) The guy took away the gun? But he was on his elbows literally a second before the shot was fired.

🇺🇸 FIRST SHOT: It’s tough to see, but I think I found the muzzle flash from the first shot. This makes or breaks the situation. It’s important to know where the first shot came from. It looks like the shot came from the direction of the suspect, upwards. Theories: 1) An agent fumbles his gun and it falls there, hence they all scream “GUN!” They mean a second gun. The shot is unaided, just random. 2) An agent shot upwards? Seems unlikely. Why would others scream “gun” and run after seeing an agent with a gun? 3) The guy took away the gun? But he was on his elbows literally a second before the shot was fired.

Lord Bebo

36,134 次观看 • 6 个月前

Carlos Alcaraz says he initially wasn’t sure if he was cramping or if it was an issue with his adductor during his match against Zverev, ‘I just told what happened to the physio & he decided to take a medical’ “I didn’t think it was cramps at all at the beginning. I didn’t know exactly what it was. I ran to a forehand and started to feel it in the right adductor. That’s why I called the physio. Because it was just that moment, the rest of the legs.. the left leg was good. Not good but decent. After that with all the stress I didn’t know what was going on. I didn’t know if it was going to be worse or not. In that moment I just talked to the physio and said ‘Ok I just went to run to the forehand side and I started to feel the right adductor.’ He decided to take the medical time out and he did it. I just told what happened to the physio and he decided to take a medical.” (via Australian Open Press)

Carlos Alcaraz says he initially wasn’t sure if he was cramping or if it was an issue with his adductor during his match against Zverev, ‘I just told what happened to the physio & he decided to take a medical’ “I didn’t think it was cramps at all at the beginning. I didn’t know exactly what it was. I ran to a forehand and started to feel it in the right adductor. That’s why I called the physio. Because it was just that moment, the rest of the legs.. the left leg was good. Not good but decent. After that with all the stress I didn’t know what was going on. I didn’t know if it was going to be worse or not. In that moment I just talked to the physio and said ‘Ok I just went to run to the forehand side and I started to feel the right adductor.’ He decided to take the medical time out and he did it. I just told what happened to the physio and he decided to take a medical.” (via Australian Open Press)

The Tennis Letter

516,912 次观看 • 5 个月前

NEW: Charlie Kirk’s head of security, Brian Harpole, addresses conspiracy theories on Charlie's death, calls out people suggesting Erika Kirk was involved. Harpole explained what the doctor told him about why there was no exit wound from the bullet. "The doctor told us ... the bullet came in and hit the vertebra. So it came in and then tore up everything in the wound cavity..." "Hit the vertebra, crushed it, shattered it, turned, crushed the second one ... kept going down all the way, I think they said C6." ... "I know what pain looks and sounds like ... The words that came out of [Erika's] mouth and how they came out when she walked in that room and saw him, you don't want to hear that." Video: Shawn Ryan

NEW: Charlie Kirk’s head of security, Brian Harpole, addresses conspiracy theories on Charlie's death, calls out people suggesting Erika Kirk was involved. Harpole explained what the doctor told him about why there was no exit wound from the bullet. "The doctor told us ... the bullet came in and hit the vertebra. So it came in and then tore up everything in the wound cavity..." "Hit the vertebra, crushed it, shattered it, turned, crushed the second one ... kept going down all the way, I think they said C6." ... "I know what pain looks and sounds like ... The words that came out of [Erika's] mouth and how they came out when she walked in that room and saw him, you don't want to hear that." Video: Shawn Ryan

Collin Rugg

714,334 次观看 • 8 个月前

CRUCIAL ANALYSIS of Charlie Kirk assassination. There is NO WAY a .30-06 round hit Charlie directly in the neck period. The damage would be tremendous, especially out the back. We need to continue to ask questions and work together. Not get mad at one another for bouncing theories and ideas off of one another. The SIDE SHO*TER FLASH does flash before the crack of the rifle sound which is consistent with the speed of sound, seeing the flash of a barrel before hearing it. Take notice to the direction the T-SHIRT pulls, this is interesting if Charlie was wearing a vest and a bullet fragment hit him in the neck, therefor causing no exit wound. Bullet entry wounds are usually small in the front and large out the back, especially with hollow point rounds because they flatten on impact. The neck is very fragile especially considering if a main artery is ruptured or torn from a gun shot. There is no way he was shot with a .30-06 round because there is no extreme damage on the neck and especially behind it with NO BULLET EXIT WOUND. It would of been catastrophic damage. The only thing that makes sense is if it was a fragment of the bullet round itself off the bullet proof vest. But what if he wasn't wearing one? We need to verify if Charlie was wearing a vest and what kind. This question should have been answered immediately, but it was never even asked. No way a .30-06 round hit Charlie's neck straight on PERIOD. Unless it was an exit wound from a completely other gun, sho*ter, or object, angle, etc. There are many more layers and theories but this needs to be said. Keep asking questions and keep digging. Would love to hear your thoughts and feed back. cc: ProjectConstitution

CRUCIAL ANALYSIS of Charlie Kirk assassination. There is NO WAY a .30-06 round hit Charlie directly in the neck period. The damage would be tremendous, especially out the back. We need to continue to ask questions and work together. Not get mad at one another for bouncing theories and ideas off of one another. The SIDE SHOTER FLASH does flash before the crack of the rifle sound which is consistent with the speed of sound, seeing the flash of a barrel before hearing it. Take notice to the direction the T-SHIRT pulls, this is interesting if Charlie was wearing a vest and a bullet fragment hit him in the neck, therefor causing no exit wound. Bullet entry wounds are usually small in the front and large out the back, especially with hollow point rounds because they flatten on impact. The neck is very fragile especially considering if a main artery is ruptured or torn from a gun shot. There is no way he was shot with a .30-06 round because there is no extreme damage on the neck and especially behind it with NO BULLET EXIT WOUND. It would of been catastrophic damage. The only thing that makes sense is if it was a fragment of the bullet round itself off the bullet proof vest. But what if he wasn't wearing one? We need to verify if Charlie was wearing a vest and what kind. This question should have been answered immediately, but it was never even asked. No way a .30-06 round hit Charlie's neck straight on PERIOD. Unless it was an exit wound from a completely other gun, shoter, or object, angle, etc. There are many more layers and theories but this needs to be said. Keep asking questions and keep digging. Would love to hear your thoughts and feed back. cc: ProjectConstitution

The SCIF

437,524 次观看 • 10 个月前

Donald Trump Jr. says the Charlie Kirk assassination case is over, Tyler Robinson is guilty, and there is no room for questions or conspiracy theories. He says Tyler Robinson spoke to people from Turning Point before killing Charlie Kirk. "He comes back wearing long pants with a limp that somehow magically developed." "He jumps off the building carrying a long object that looks like the shape of a gun." "There was a screwdriver left, which leads me to believe he walked up there with a limp, disassembled the gun, put it down his pants, and then reassembled the gun." "Within seconds, he is seen again, and the limp has disappeared."

Donald Trump Jr. says the Charlie Kirk assassination case is over, Tyler Robinson is guilty, and there is no room for questions or conspiracy theories. He says Tyler Robinson spoke to people from Turning Point before killing Charlie Kirk. "He comes back wearing long pants with a limp that somehow magically developed." "He jumps off the building carrying a long object that looks like the shape of a gun." "There was a screwdriver left, which leads me to believe he walked up there with a limp, disassembled the gun, put it down his pants, and then reassembled the gun." "Within seconds, he is seen again, and the limp has disappeared."

Shadow of Ezra

380,290 次观看 • 16 天前

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

590,339 次观看 • 9 个月前

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Blood Spatter, Earpiece, or Necklace? This video is going viral from someone named RangeDayBro on YouTube, saying this is 100% evidence Charlie was shot in the head, BUT… it’s kinda wrong. I was the original person to point out that something looked like it hit Charlies right side of his head when it happened… when I first started looking, I thought the exact same thing he did about the “Blood Splatter”. But I kept slowing down the video, and discovered what appears to be an earpiece or necklace. He also gets the “FLASH” wrong, 100% wrong. Stating that’s where the shooter was.. then said he was hiding in the bush. After combing through video footage, I found what I believe to be 100% the muzzle flash. The shot did not and could not have come from that location because it’s merely the top window panel of the interior hall of flags (I think that’s what it’s called.) The muzzle flash was 100% a reflection off that glass panel from a far off distance, notably in the same general direction they said the shooter was. (See post below) Conclusion: Now, I’m not saying he couldn’t have been shot from anywhere else.. nor in any direction. In fact, I don’t buy the story at all that his neck bones stopped that bullet. As we saw that day, there were several distractions, which I feel played a significant role to allow the real people to get away. I’m only saying his suggestion about the “blood spatter” is just his earpiece or most likely a necklace... It’s important to be accurate and process eliminate these things. Maybe Turning Point USA can confirm if in fact his necklace did pop off, it could settle some of these “theories”. All we want is the truth.

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Blood Spatter, Earpiece, or Necklace? This video is going viral from someone named RangeDayBro on YouTube, saying this is 100% evidence Charlie was shot in the head, BUT… it’s kinda wrong. I was the original person to point out that something looked like it hit Charlies right side of his head when it happened… when I first started looking, I thought the exact same thing he did about the “Blood Splatter”. But I kept slowing down the video, and discovered what appears to be an earpiece or necklace. He also gets the “FLASH” wrong, 100% wrong. Stating that’s where the shooter was.. then said he was hiding in the bush. After combing through video footage, I found what I believe to be 100% the muzzle flash. The shot did not and could not have come from that location because it’s merely the top window panel of the interior hall of flags (I think that’s what it’s called.) The muzzle flash was 100% a reflection off that glass panel from a far off distance, notably in the same general direction they said the shooter was. (See post below) Conclusion: Now, I’m not saying he couldn’t have been shot from anywhere else.. nor in any direction. In fact, I don’t buy the story at all that his neck bones stopped that bullet. As we saw that day, there were several distractions, which I feel played a significant role to allow the real people to get away. I’m only saying his suggestion about the “blood spatter” is just his earpiece or most likely a necklace... It’s important to be accurate and process eliminate these things. Maybe Turning Point USA can confirm if in fact his necklace did pop off, it could settle some of these “theories”. All we want is the truth.

MJTruthUltra

237,534 次观看 • 10 个月前

“I’m not saying that the suspect didn’t do it. His fingerprints are on the gun, that case is going to be made. What I do know is that NCTC was investigating any foreign linkage that could have taken place, not necessarily just to the suspect, but any foreign connections. We were stopped really early on from thoroughly investigating that, and from my vantage point, I didn’t see that investigation being done very thoroughly. The only thing I know for sure is that our due diligence was not done on looking at the foreign links. Considering how prominent Charlie Kirk was, it’s important that every angle is looked into and that a complete investigation actually takes place.” Joe Kent

“I’m not saying that the suspect didn’t do it. His fingerprints are on the gun, that case is going to be made. What I do know is that NCTC was investigating any foreign linkage that could have taken place, not necessarily just to the suspect, but any foreign connections. We were stopped really early on from thoroughly investigating that, and from my vantage point, I didn’t see that investigation being done very thoroughly. The only thing I know for sure is that our due diligence was not done on looking at the foreign links. Considering how prominent Charlie Kirk was, it’s important that every angle is looked into and that a complete investigation actually takes place.” Joe Kent

Shawn Ryan

916,648 次观看 • 3 个月前

Candace stands her ground that this was an INTELLIGENCE/MILITARY type operation with multiple ACTORS for distractions. -Was Lance "Twiggs" one of the other people than we seen at UVU on the day of the shooting? - George Zinn had to receive medical attention the day of the shooting and stated to multiple people at the hospital that he said he acted like he k*lled Charlie because he said he was going to be paid for doing it. - We know of 4 potential "ACTORS" George Zinn, Maroon shirt guy, The guy on the stairs, and the guy on the Losee building. These could all and MOST LIKELY all be distractions to take attention away from the real killer. - Candace states that she believes Tyler's role in all of it had something to do with the changing of outfits to confuse investigators because he was seen putting a change of clothes in the graveyard and then is seen at the DQ in the infamous picture. - The reason coming to this conclusion is because we never see the "person" on the Losee building ever take a shot, we just see him running, and the guy in the maroon shirt, looks, and has a different build from the guy on the stairs in the black shirt and hat. - We know now with all the evidence we have gathered and concluded from this point that there is no way Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round or from the roof of the Losee building because of the alleged autopsy report that claims his C2 vertebrae broke first and by the location and angle of the alleged "entrance wound" that looks more like an "exit wound." - The bullet would of had to enter Charlie through his mouth or jaw in order to physically break the C2 bone first, pull a 90 degree angle and continue to break the C7. None of it makes any sense if the alleged autopsy report is 100% official as it claims. Plus they said they found the bullet right beneath the skin. - He had to be shot from a different location with a smaller round or some kind of other projectile weapon/round. This was a highly orchestrated hit and it has intelligence written all over it. I have came to all the same conclusions in my previous posts and stand with Candace. The writing is on the wall. cc: Candace Owens

Candace stands her ground that this was an INTELLIGENCE/MILITARY type operation with multiple ACTORS for distractions. -Was Lance "Twiggs" one of the other people than we seen at UVU on the day of the shooting? - George Zinn had to receive medical attention the day of the shooting and stated to multiple people at the hospital that he said he acted like he k*lled Charlie because he said he was going to be paid for doing it. - We know of 4 potential "ACTORS" George Zinn, Maroon shirt guy, The guy on the stairs, and the guy on the Losee building. These could all and MOST LIKELY all be distractions to take attention away from the real killer. - Candace states that she believes Tyler's role in all of it had something to do with the changing of outfits to confuse investigators because he was seen putting a change of clothes in the graveyard and then is seen at the DQ in the infamous picture. - The reason coming to this conclusion is because we never see the "person" on the Losee building ever take a shot, we just see him running, and the guy in the maroon shirt, looks, and has a different build from the guy on the stairs in the black shirt and hat. - We know now with all the evidence we have gathered and concluded from this point that there is no way Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round or from the roof of the Losee building because of the alleged autopsy report that claims his C2 vertebrae broke first and by the location and angle of the alleged "entrance wound" that looks more like an "exit wound." - The bullet would of had to enter Charlie through his mouth or jaw in order to physically break the C2 bone first, pull a 90 degree angle and continue to break the C7. None of it makes any sense if the alleged autopsy report is 100% official as it claims. Plus they said they found the bullet right beneath the skin. - He had to be shot from a different location with a smaller round or some kind of other projectile weapon/round. This was a highly orchestrated hit and it has intelligence written all over it. I have came to all the same conclusions in my previous posts and stand with Candace. The writing is on the wall. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

146,753 次观看 • 9 个月前

A TRAP DOOR located directly under the draped table in front of Charlie? You have to see this. What if they took down that camera directly behind Charlie right away because it showed too much? Maybe it showed something or someone coming from a trap door under the table that was directly in front of Charlie. Maybe that's why his shirt made the odd movement besides from the bullet shockwave. Not saying that this is solid proof of anything but we need the autopsy and ballistics report to start crossing out all the theories floating around. If we can even trust them if they even come out. Just something to think about and a reason as to why they removed that camera and its SD card immediately.

A TRAP DOOR located directly under the draped table in front of Charlie? You have to see this. What if they took down that camera directly behind Charlie right away because it showed too much? Maybe it showed something or someone coming from a trap door under the table that was directly in front of Charlie. Maybe that's why his shirt made the odd movement besides from the bullet shockwave. Not saying that this is solid proof of anything but we need the autopsy and ballistics report to start crossing out all the theories floating around. If we can even trust them if they even come out. Just something to think about and a reason as to why they removed that camera and its SD card immediately.

The SCIF

2,478,392 次观看 • 10 个月前

South Bronx, on a train one stop away from the 161st Street–Yankee Stadium station. • Apparently he had been following the ranting lady. • It seems he had just been assaulting a different woman, who the ranting lady is seen speaking to for a few moments. • It could be that he had just gotten out of jail, which helps explain much of what is seen here. • It could be that the ranting lady was carrying a gun.

South Bronx, on a train one stop away from the 161st Street–Yankee Stadium station. • Apparently he had been following the ranting lady. • It seems he had just been assaulting a different woman, who the ranting lady is seen speaking to for a few moments. • It could be that he had just gotten out of jail, which helps explain much of what is seen here. • It could be that the ranting lady was carrying a gun.

Crime In NYC

669,090 次观看 • 9 个月前

Candace Owens: The bullet wasn’t magically stopped by his neck Also Candace Owens: “…The part that he is telling truth about is that Charlie's neck indeed did stop the bullet, without question, okay? And this is going to dispel a lot of theories that are out there, and I'm telling you this 100%, Charlie Kirk was shot from the front, and the bullet did not exit, uh, and at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck……I have fact-checked this information from multiple sources now....

Candace Owens: The bullet wasn’t magically stopped by his neck Also Candace Owens: “…The part that he is telling truth about is that Charlie's neck indeed did stop the bullet, without question, okay? And this is going to dispel a lot of theories that are out there, and I'm telling you this 100%, Charlie Kirk was shot from the front, and the bullet did not exit, uh, and at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck……I have fact-checked this information from multiple sources now....

NΛTLY DΞNISΞ

27,538 次观看 • 6 个月前