Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

I strolled down amnesia lane today and remembered this: Remember when Colin Carrie, MP for Oshawa, rose in the House rose to ask about outside interference in Canadian democracy when he asked, on behalf of a constituent, which MPs were on board with the WEF's agenda? You know, the...

rationalposts's profile picture

Rational Posts™

18,812 subscribers

32,926 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Remember when CPC MP, Colin Carrie, asked about Klaus Schwab penetrating Justin Trudeau's Cabinet in relation to foreign interference during question period? He was shut down by the Speaker who claimed technical glitches and NDP MP, Charlie Angus, cried "misinformation"...
1:07

Remember when CPC MP, Colin Carrie, asked about Klaus Schwab penetrating Justin Trudeau's Cabinet in relation to foreign interference during question period? He was shut down by the Speaker who claimed technical glitches and NDP MP, Charlie Angus, cried "misinformation"...

Kris Eriksen

152,473 просмотров • 1 год назад

Remember this clip? The stuff on Anthony Weiner’s laptop was so bad that hardened New York investigators had to go throw up … It was that bad.
1:01

Remember this clip? The stuff on Anthony Weiner’s laptop was so bad that hardened New York investigators had to go throw up … It was that bad.

Sheri Unfiltered™

66,088 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

D’Souza says “we heard these rumblings about TPUSA losing donors but we were very much on the outside” And then he says that Shillman was messaging him the day before Charlie was killed essentially talking bad about Charlie. So clearly D’Souza wasn’t “on the outside.” And it’s clear from these videos that Shillman despised Charlie and thought he was a “Jew hater” too. These are the demons Charlie was forced to battle in the months before his death.
1:02

D’Souza says “we heard these rumblings about TPUSA losing donors but we were very much on the outside” And then he says that Shillman was messaging him the day before Charlie was killed essentially talking bad about Charlie. So clearly D’Souza wasn’t “on the outside.” And it’s clear from these videos that Shillman despised Charlie and thought he was a “Jew hater” too. These are the demons Charlie was forced to battle in the months before his death.

Mel

152,754 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Threadguy reveals the exact moment sneakers died forever "I so vividly remember this. The fake market got so bad that the only way to verify if a shoe was real is if it had a StockX tag. That's it. That was the only way. Then this thread drops, some bulk seller on Twitter reveals he has an 85% hit rate on fake Travis Scott Mocha 1s getting through StockX verification. $1,100 spread on each pair and they were moving thousands of these. After that it was over. That was the final nail in the coffin for sneakers."
1:44

Threadguy reveals the exact moment sneakers died forever "I so vividly remember this. The fake market got so bad that the only way to verify if a shoe was real is if it had a StockX tag. That's it. That was the only way. Then this thread drops, some bulk seller on Twitter reveals he has an 85% hit rate on fake Travis Scott Mocha 1s getting through StockX verification. $1,100 spread on each pair and they were moving thousands of these. After that it was over. That was the final nail in the coffin for sneakers."

Kai

457,856 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Now she’s threatening to name the donors. In this video she says she will name the donors. I’m not sure that’s legal. This woman is absolutely disgusting. Now she’s bringing in people to this that are not a part of “who killed Charlie”. It was never about who killed Charlie. This has always been about vengeance on TPUsa for not bringing her back. Has anyone ever asked the question about why she never looked at Tyler, Lance, their friends, the discords, the reason people were at their house the night before? I have and it’s because that didn’t fit her agenda. I have a story I was going to do today but I’ll do tomorrow that will make you think all this US bad, Israel bad, Russia good is so orchestrated by her and it started a day after Charlie was murdered.
1:04

Now she’s threatening to name the donors. In this video she says she will name the donors. I’m not sure that’s legal. This woman is absolutely disgusting. Now she’s bringing in people to this that are not a part of “who killed Charlie”. It was never about who killed Charlie. This has always been about vengeance on TPUsa for not bringing her back. Has anyone ever asked the question about why she never looked at Tyler, Lance, their friends, the discords, the reason people were at their house the night before? I have and it’s because that didn’t fit her agenda. I have a story I was going to do today but I’ll do tomorrow that will make you think all this US bad, Israel bad, Russia good is so orchestrated by her and it started a day after Charlie was murdered.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

22,319 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

On Friday, Bill Maher asked me if what happened with Biden at the disastrous debate with Trump was the same story as the Emperor's New Clothes. Me: The story of the Emperor's New Clothes is a story about common knowledge, because when the kid blurted it out, he actually wasn't telling anyone anything they didn't already know. They could see the Emperor was naked. But he still changed their knowledge, because by blurting it out with an earshot of the others, now everyone knew that everyone else knew that everyone else knew that everyone else knew. And what that allowed them to do is change their relationship with the Emperor, from obsequious deference to ridicule and scorn. And the thing about common knowledge in the social realm is that it's what props up our social relationships. And so when something is blurted out, then it can change everything. It changes the nature of your relationship with someone. Maher: And we do have sort of a modern version of the Emperor parable, which is Joe Biden. I mean, he was the Emperor who everyone wouldn't say had lost his marbles. I mean, is that not really the same story? Me: It is the same story, because opinion polls showed that after that disastrous debate with Trump, the number of people who thought that he was cognitively impaired didn't go up by that much. It went up by a few percentage points. But before, a majority of people thought that he was cognitively impaired. The difference is, when it's on TV, where you're watching it, you know that the rest of the country is watching it, you know the rest of the country knows the rest of the country, it's no longer private. It's common. And that's when he was challenged. That was the end. Bill Maher Real Time with Bill Maher
1:29

On Friday, Bill Maher asked me if what happened with Biden at the disastrous debate with Trump was the same story as the Emperor's New Clothes. Me: The story of the Emperor's New Clothes is a story about common knowledge, because when the kid blurted it out, he actually wasn't telling anyone anything they didn't already know. They could see the Emperor was naked. But he still changed their knowledge, because by blurting it out with an earshot of the others, now everyone knew that everyone else knew that everyone else knew that everyone else knew. And what that allowed them to do is change their relationship with the Emperor, from obsequious deference to ridicule and scorn. And the thing about common knowledge in the social realm is that it's what props up our social relationships. And so when something is blurted out, then it can change everything. It changes the nature of your relationship with someone. Maher: And we do have sort of a modern version of the Emperor parable, which is Joe Biden. I mean, he was the Emperor who everyone wouldn't say had lost his marbles. I mean, is that not really the same story? Me: It is the same story, because opinion polls showed that after that disastrous debate with Trump, the number of people who thought that he was cognitively impaired didn't go up by that much. It went up by a few percentage points. But before, a majority of people thought that he was cognitively impaired. The difference is, when it's on TV, where you're watching it, you know that the rest of the country is watching it, you know the rest of the country knows the rest of the country, it's no longer private. It's common. And that's when he was challenged. That was the end. Bill Maher Real Time with Bill Maher

Steven Pinker

272,948 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Remember that time Chris D'Entremont squashed any discussion about WEF interference with Canadian MPs? He was speaker of the house when a question came into the House of Commons about WEF infiltration and he cut it off! Now he's crossed the floor to the Liberal Party. His party doesn't matter. He's a globalist. LOST FREEDOM FILES # 2516
1:34

Remember that time Chris D'Entremont squashed any discussion about WEF interference with Canadian MPs? He was speaker of the house when a question came into the House of Commons about WEF infiltration and he cut it off! Now he's crossed the floor to the Liberal Party. His party doesn't matter. He's a globalist. LOST FREEDOM FILES # 2516

Matt Alexander

254,022 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

👀 "There was a levitation of a human being. And, you know, that was by a reliable person. I'm talking about an actual person in the air." ~Lacatski 👀 (That type of, reported, phenomena is also part of poltergeist cases. I wanna know more!) Lacatski: "There was a case...that happened during Kona Blue there. . Now, you already know about the levitating objects (I don't. ~Joe), you know, there at the ranch. I'm talking about an actual person in the air. "So, we didn't try to explain, as you've commented before, and certain events that were clearly off the property itself, because the Mesa wasn't on the property. And I remember Bob Bigelow taking me up there to check the mesa off [the list of things for me to see]. And he went up the most (audio cut out), to me, and me to him, to go up this route and I had no idea why we were going straight up. Well, he wanted to get me the full impact. And that was after I saw what I saw inside the ranch house, which is, as I now understand it, a repetitive...in the area I was sitting. I wasn't the only one to see something in that location." (I'll share what he saw in the replies.)
1:27

👀 "There was a levitation of a human being. And, you know, that was by a reliable person. I'm talking about an actual person in the air." ~Lacatski 👀 (That type of, reported, phenomena is also part of poltergeist cases. I wanna know more!) Lacatski: "There was a case...that happened during Kona Blue there. . Now, you already know about the levitating objects (I don't. ~Joe), you know, there at the ranch. I'm talking about an actual person in the air. "So, we didn't try to explain, as you've commented before, and certain events that were clearly off the property itself, because the Mesa wasn't on the property. And I remember Bob Bigelow taking me up there to check the mesa off [the list of things for me to see]. And he went up the most (audio cut out), to me, and me to him, to go up this route and I had no idea why we were going straight up. Well, he wanted to get me the full impact. And that was after I saw what I saw inside the ranch house, which is, as I now understand it, a repetitive...in the area I was sitting. I wasn't the only one to see something in that location." (I'll share what he saw in the replies.)

Joe Murgia

59,908 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

November 3, 2020: Sedition against the United States government caught on audio recording: “So when they said that, BOOM under the table. Ruby Freeman… the ballots came out from under the table—cut the zip ties & scan those ballots… so the number would go up… so that was how the number was created… so after we scanned them—the number went up—we put them back under the table—we got our number.” In other words: a mother and a daughter, caught on surveillance video and admitting on audio recording to committing sedition, got awards for it. 📝Let me tell you something: the Department of Justice is as corrupt now as it was January 19, 2025.
1:18

November 3, 2020: Sedition against the United States government caught on audio recording: “So when they said that, BOOM under the table. Ruby Freeman… the ballots came out from under the table—cut the zip ties & scan those ballots… so the number would go up… so that was how the number was created… so after we scanned them—the number went up—we put them back under the table—we got our number.” In other words: a mother and a daughter, caught on surveillance video and admitting on audio recording to committing sedition, got awards for it. 📝Let me tell you something: the Department of Justice is as corrupt now as it was January 19, 2025.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

168,909 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Kyle Shanahan recalls how he felt when Brock Purdy entered the game for an injured Jimmy Garoppolo against the Dolphins on December 4th 2022: “I just remember how good he was. The game that he came into, the duress that he was under, the style of defense they were playing at the time. The amount of blitzes that we had seen was probably the most we had seen in the six years I’d been here. At the time, he was our third quarterback to come in that year, so it wasn’t looking very good. But he didn’t hesitate, and right away, he was making plays. It was an awesome game; we were so pumped about it, but everyone was down a little bit after the game because we knew we had a good team and it was so unfortunate to lose Jimmy, which we knew would be for the year at the time. I’ll always remember going to bed that night and I was so upset about losing Jimmy. And I finally relaxed and started thinking, 'Holy cow, this guy played unbelievable, we might be all right'.” via: 49ers on NBCS
1:34

Kyle Shanahan recalls how he felt when Brock Purdy entered the game for an injured Jimmy Garoppolo against the Dolphins on December 4th 2022: “I just remember how good he was. The game that he came into, the duress that he was under, the style of defense they were playing at the time. The amount of blitzes that we had seen was probably the most we had seen in the six years I’d been here. At the time, he was our third quarterback to come in that year, so it wasn’t looking very good. But he didn’t hesitate, and right away, he was making plays. It was an awesome game; we were so pumped about it, but everyone was down a little bit after the game because we knew we had a good team and it was so unfortunate to lose Jimmy, which we knew would be for the year at the time. I’ll always remember going to bed that night and I was so upset about losing Jimmy. And I finally relaxed and started thinking, 'Holy cow, this guy played unbelievable, we might be all right'.” via: 49ers on NBCS

Coach Yac 🗣

141,332 просмотров • 1 год назад

👤: we were on a show together onceand he said hello to me but apparently, i didnt say hi back. Do you remember that? Jin: i dont remember at all. But how could you? 👱 that was bad 👧 how could you? Even i fell hurt 👤 i feel so hurt my legs gave out and i sank to the ground. I did that to you? That was bad. But the impostant thing is i wanted to clear the air so i came immediately.
0:20

👤: we were on a show together onceand he said hello to me but apparently, i didnt say hi back. Do you remember that? Jin: i dont remember at all. But how could you? 👱 that was bad 👧 how could you? Even i fell hurt 👤 i feel so hurt my legs gave out and i sank to the ground. I did that to you? That was bad. But the impostant thing is i wanted to clear the air so i came immediately.

hope⁷

1,084,266 просмотров • 1 год назад

Batya Ungar-Sargon on U.S. strikes on a drug boat: “Well, first of all, the story has been massively misreported. So, you have actual headlines saying that Hegseth gave the order for the second hit. That wasn't in the initial Washington Post article, which claimed that following, by hearsay, somebody claimed to have heard Hegseth say, we have to kiII everybody, therefore the admiral gave the second hit. So, I just want to clear that up. I think that's why Hegseth wrote the tweet, is to just correct the record.” “But what I don't understand is it is the secretary of state's right to determine who is a terrorist and who isn't. The secretary of state answers to the executive branch. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has determined that these boats are carrying terrorists, which makes the attacks on them legal. And the only question is whether that boat was disabled or whether it was destroyed. If it was destroyed, how were there still live people clinging to it? And if it was only disabled, let me just finish the point, then it was still a threat, meaning it was still a legitimate target. So, I'm very confused.” “And, by the way, I've spoken to a lot of veterans today who are also very confused by all of this bipartisan outrage. I don't get it.”
1:22

Batya Ungar-Sargon on U.S. strikes on a drug boat: “Well, first of all, the story has been massively misreported. So, you have actual headlines saying that Hegseth gave the order for the second hit. That wasn't in the initial Washington Post article, which claimed that following, by hearsay, somebody claimed to have heard Hegseth say, we have to kiII everybody, therefore the admiral gave the second hit. So, I just want to clear that up. I think that's why Hegseth wrote the tweet, is to just correct the record.” “But what I don't understand is it is the secretary of state's right to determine who is a terrorist and who isn't. The secretary of state answers to the executive branch. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has determined that these boats are carrying terrorists, which makes the attacks on them legal. And the only question is whether that boat was disabled or whether it was destroyed. If it was destroyed, how were there still live people clinging to it? And if it was only disabled, let me just finish the point, then it was still a threat, meaning it was still a legitimate target. So, I'm very confused.” “And, by the way, I've spoken to a lot of veterans today who are also very confused by all of this bipartisan outrage. I don't get it.”

RedWave Press

43,180 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Jarring listen. One thing that sticks out to me: In Biden's press conference after the Hur report was released, he attacked Hur and dismissed the report he couldn't remember what year Beau Biden died by claiming it was an intrusive question ("When I was asked the question, I thought to myself it was none of their damn business.") But the audio proves that *Biden himself* brought up Beau's death by asking "What month did Beau die?"
0:14

Jarring listen. One thing that sticks out to me: In Biden's press conference after the Hur report was released, he attacked Hur and dismissed the report he couldn't remember what year Beau Biden died by claiming it was an intrusive question ("When I was asked the question, I thought to myself it was none of their damn business.") But the audio proves that *Biden himself* brought up Beau's death by asking "What month did Beau die?"

Steve Morris

219,313 просмотров • 1 год назад

Big up Bad Sekki. This is so real when you use the Gleaner and "friend of a coworker" network to look for rentals. I remember being shown a kennel back in the day...it was renovated and the dog was still in the yard 🤣🤣🤣
1:50

Big up Bad Sekki. This is so real when you use the Gleaner and "friend of a coworker" network to look for rentals. I remember being shown a kennel back in the day...it was renovated and the dog was still in the yard 🤣🤣🤣

Boogie

18,698 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Trump: The story of Hillary. She was in bad shape when she called me up that night and by the way, she called up an conceded and then spent 7 years on saying how she was a good sport
0:24

Trump: The story of Hillary. She was in bad shape when she called me up that night and by the way, she called up an conceded and then spent 7 years on saying how she was a good sport

Acyn

182,984 просмотров • 1 год назад

Remember when the media tried to downplay the turnout for the celebration of the 250th birthday of the Army and tried to say that attendance was low — they lied. P. S. This video was recorded by Army Brat on TikTok and has dispelled the question of whether this is AI - it’s not 🙄
0:22

Remember when the media tried to downplay the turnout for the celebration of the 250th birthday of the Army and tried to say that attendance was low — they lied. P. S. This video was recorded by Army Brat on TikTok and has dispelled the question of whether this is AI - it’s not 🙄

Erica 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

51,408 просмотров • 1 год назад

P'Jak and P'Lek posted the back view and side view of Est being swarmed in Shangai airport. The situation was so bad that in first video you can see people were running behind Est, hence Est had to run as well. In second video, the pushing was so much P'Ko had to hold Est's hands to make sure he doesn't fall. This situation is not it. Consider Est's safety and privacy above everything else because situation is so bad, Est's team is posting on how bad the situation has gotten and that should be a wakeup call enough.
0:11

P'Jak and P'Lek posted the back view and side view of Est being swarmed in Shangai airport. The situation was so bad that in first video you can see people were running behind Est, hence Est had to run as well. In second video, the pushing was so much P'Ko had to hold Est's hands to make sure he doesn't fall. This situation is not it. Consider Est's safety and privacy above everything else because situation is so bad, Est's team is posting on how bad the situation has gotten and that should be a wakeup call enough.

mi𓇼

50,406 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

#tadcspoilers . . . . . So it really wasn't a simple "the blue AI was making Caine do bad things" They were two separate beings and Caine's first bad choice was to essentially trap the blue one in him That was all on Caine and ofc it had consequences, their codes clashed (1/4)
0:49

#tadcspoilers . . . . . So it really wasn't a simple "the blue AI was making Caine do bad things" They were two separate beings and Caine's first bad choice was to essentially trap the blue one in him That was all on Caine and ofc it had consequences, their codes clashed (1/4)

terra || kolapon 🍇 🌿 local wovengold enjoyer 🌿

186,683 просмотров • 19 дней назад

This is why the Colin / Allie pickup story has never sat right with me. In Trial 1, Colin Albert and Allie McCabe both seem very comfortable with the clean parts of the story12:10. Allie was there. Colin came out. It was starting to snow. But then the details that would actually make the story feel real suddenly get blurry. Colin says Allie texted him that she was there. He says he responded “come in.” He says he came out 30 seconds to a minute later. But when asked where Allie’s car was in the driveway, he does not remember. When asked what part of the car he got into, he does not remember. Front passenger seat? “Could have been.” Was anyone else in the car? He does not remember. Was anyone else in the car when she dropped him off? He does not remember. Then Allie says she believes she was in the driveway, on the left side, but she is not entirely sure. She does not remember whether she came from Chapman or Cedarcrest. She does not know which front door Colin came out of. She says “I believe” like she is saying what she is supposed to say, not what she actually remembers. So they both remember the time. They both remember it was starting to snow. But they cannot clearly remember the driveway, the route, the door, the seat, or who was in the car. Now add the new Life360 details, which raise even more questions about Allie’s movements and whether the documentary record actually supports the simple version we were told. At some point, this stops looking like a normal memory gap and starts looking like a story that was built around a timestamp. I am not saying what definitely happened. I am saying the testimony and the data do not line up cleanly enough to just wave it away. If the pickup happened exactly the way they said it did, why are the most basic details so hard to answer?
1:43

This is why the Colin / Allie pickup story has never sat right with me. In Trial 1, Colin Albert and Allie McCabe both seem very comfortable with the clean parts of the story12:10. Allie was there. Colin came out. It was starting to snow. But then the details that would actually make the story feel real suddenly get blurry. Colin says Allie texted him that she was there. He says he responded “come in.” He says he came out 30 seconds to a minute later. But when asked where Allie’s car was in the driveway, he does not remember. When asked what part of the car he got into, he does not remember. Front passenger seat? “Could have been.” Was anyone else in the car? He does not remember. Was anyone else in the car when she dropped him off? He does not remember. Then Allie says she believes she was in the driveway, on the left side, but she is not entirely sure. She does not remember whether she came from Chapman or Cedarcrest. She does not know which front door Colin came out of. She says “I believe” like she is saying what she is supposed to say, not what she actually remembers. So they both remember the time. They both remember it was starting to snow. But they cannot clearly remember the driveway, the route, the door, the seat, or who was in the car. Now add the new Life360 details, which raise even more questions about Allie’s movements and whether the documentary record actually supports the simple version we were told. At some point, this stops looking like a normal memory gap and starts looking like a story that was built around a timestamp. I am not saying what definitely happened. I am saying the testimony and the data do not line up cleanly enough to just wave it away. If the pickup happened exactly the way they said it did, why are the most basic details so hard to answer?

Dixie Normus

33,388 просмотров • 25 дней назад