Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 I tested Claude Pro ($20) AGAIN!!! I used Opus 5 at MAX settings This is CRAZY!!!! 30 minutes? that must be it, right? NO!!! here is what I actually got: - 1 Hr and 24 minutes of usage!!! - 13% Weekly limit consumed - $37 API usage -...

83,400 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

85 Kommentare

Profilbild von Octavio Simón
Octavio Simónvor 8 Tagen

Those numbers look really good for $20. One of Codex’s biggest advantages has been the occasional resets, but with the capacity issues they’re facing right now, I doubt we’ll see them as often as we used to.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

That's why I switched to Claude Code and tested it out for you

Profilbild von Boyan C.
Boyan C.vor 8 Tagen

I also noticed that I burn the Codex limits in about 10-15mins with Sol High on the 20usd a month plan. CC with Opus 5 on med/high offers significantly more.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

That is why I tested out Claude Code for all of you guys. I was so fed up with Codex.

Profilbild von TJ
TJvor 8 Tagen

Your evaluation highlights the problem really well. I've also compared Claude and Codex, and I noticed the exact same issue.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Is the issue? I don't think there is an issue

Profilbild von orvir
orvirvor 8 Tagen

put your two runs next to each other: 44 min was 7% of the week, 84 min was 13%. that's 6.3 and 6.5 minutes per 1% so the weekly meter is counting time, not effort and not tokens. medium gave you 727k tokens a minute, max gave 476k, the week cost the same either way

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Yeah and that's why I would advise everybody to use Opus 5 at medium settings because that is how you get the maximum amount of work done.

Profilbild von orvir
orvirvor 8 Tagen

right, medium buys you about 1.5x the tokens per minute of the week the open bit is whether those extra tokens are worth as much. same task on both, count the retries, that's what decides it

Profilbild von Arbaz
Arbazvor 8 Tagen

this is what a week is supposed to look like

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

I think so Maybe next week I'll become a fan of Codex 😅

Profilbild von Adcode
Adcodevor 8 Tagen

yeah codex usage is worse than claude

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

It was a lot better before September but then it got worse.

Profilbild von Adcode
Adcodevor 8 Tagen

Yeah, back then I used to code for upto to 2hrs but now it lasts 20mins

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Lasts only 20 minutes for Codex, not Claude Code, to be honest

Profilbild von Adcode
Adcodevor 8 Tagen

True

Profilbild von Tamil Iniyan
Tamil Iniyanvor 8 Tagen

Depends heavily on what you're doing tho. Long context sessions burn the weekly limit way faster than a bunch of short ones.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

But I did use the longer context Opus 5

Profilbild von Tamil Iniyan
Tamil Iniyanvor 8 Tagen

Fair enough lol. I meant the agents running all day kind of usage, normal sessions never got me either.

Profilbild von Duong Ta
Duong Tavor 8 Tagen

The more people use it, the less quota each will get. I think they (both Claude n ChatGpt) devide their total capacity by total number of active users. That's why it's always changing.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Ohhh... That might be the case ngl

Profilbild von Sahil Panhotra | Indie Builder
Sahil Panhotra | Indie Buildervor 8 Tagen

👀 nice

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Thank you 😊 🙏

Profilbild von Lee Wyatt Corp
Lee Wyatt Corpvor 8 Tagen

40 million tokens for $37. My coffee budget is judging the math.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Stop drinking coffee and start buying Claude.

Profilbild von Lee Wyatt Corp
Lee Wyatt Corpvor 8 Tagen

Coffee stays. It's the only employee that never files a bug report.

Profilbild von Medj
Medjvor 8 Tagen

A few things I’ve also observed that you might have noticed too, but missed in the post. Speed has increased a lot as well. Earlier, it felt so slow, but now it feels much faster. For the first time, I’m saying this, it takes me around 1 or 2 hours to hit the 5-hour session limit. Earlier, I used to hit it in just 30–40 minutes. The Claude model also feels production-trusted now. It doesn’t make as many foolish mistakes. If I give it a command and something is wrong, it usually corrects me instead of blindly following it. Some issues were still there around 20% of the time, but yeah, overall it feels much better.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

I agree with you bro. I kind of hated Claude just two weeks ago but I think it's now fair to say that I am biased towards Claude over Codex.

Profilbild von Medj
Medjvor 8 Tagen

Bro, if they introduce the Fable model in the $20 plan, it would probably become the best subscription for intelligence access we could have right now. Just hoping that happens.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Won't do that because they want scarcity

Profilbild von k
kvor 8 Tagen

Today it's much much better. I use Astra xhigh on 5 sessions since yesterday, only consume 22% weekly limit. Normally it wouldn't last a day. I'm really happy that people leaving codex so they have more compute for me

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Bro, I do not know how this happened but if it did happen let me know what plan you're using and I will see if I can get that plan and test it out, codex, again.

Profilbild von k
kvor 8 Tagen

It's been 24 hours with Astra xhigh 5 sessions, now only consume 27% weekly limit. I still have 3 bank resets too btw. Rate limit much much better. Just don't use subagent

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Come on bro... I have never even tasted a $100 codex plan so I would never know 😶 nor I have $100 to test anything, $200 is so far haha If you say that the $200 plan has so many limits, then I guess it must have. When I'll have money, I'll try it out too!

Profilbild von k
kvor 8 Tagen

If your budget is tight, I recommend stick with Codex plus or Claude Code pro plan. Then pay for DeepSeek v4.1 flash API, use it in OpenCode. 3$ cover 500M tokens (with 300 token/s speed). It's my life saver this week before normal reset (I just don't use bank reset)

Profilbild von Mekan
Mekanvor 8 Tagen

Claude subscriptions are worth for their subscriptions currently

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Yeah... Codex is nerfed ngl

Profilbild von APIMart Labs
APIMart Labsvor 8 Tagen

The useful number is cost per finished task, not tokens packed into a $20 seat.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

And I think it's amazing ngl

Profilbild von IMZO Dev
IMZO Devvor 8 Tagen

$37 of free usage" is such a charming way to say "I found a bug and I'm milking it before it gets patched." Hope you enjoy your 40 million tokens, king.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

I enjoyed it to the fullest

Profilbild von IMZO Dev
IMZO Devvor 8 Tagen

Thats wassup

Profilbild von Adam Suchi Hafizullah
Adam Suchi Hafizullahvor 8 Tagen

Nice bro, please try with High 😁

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Okay sir! I believe it's going to be relatively similar. For example if Max ran for 1 hour and 24 minutes, Hi can run for 1 hour and 40 minutes or something. To be honest the quality difference isn't great and is almost similar. But if you insist then yes, I will do it again. Not now, maybe 1 or 2 days later, because X algorithm has started to deboost posts like these. (My account might get shadow banned or something haha)

Profilbild von BrightyBrainiac
BrightyBrainiacvor 8 Tagen

Can you try this with $100 max too?

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

I must have done that way earlier but I don't have $100

Profilbild von Kyle Neal
Kyle Nealvor 8 Tagen

Thank you for this. I went from Cursor to Codex, and while I like the Codex experience, the limits just make Cursor way better. But with your tests, I think I might consider Claude Code instead and see where it takes me. 😁

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Sure. Because I got monetized today, in the future I will create posts where you can find out the exact limits and comparison between the three.

Profilbild von CheeseHound
CheeseHoundvor 8 Tagen

Anthropic is back

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

It is SO BACK! I LOVE IT!!!

Profilbild von Levi
Levivor 8 Tagen

The surprising part is the gap between wall-clock time, weekly percentage, and token/API burn. Tracking all three together gives a much clearer picture than any single counter—and makes Opus vs Codex comparisons fairer.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Yeah

Profilbild von sucra
sucravor 8 Tagen

Claude Pro is better than GPT Plus for normal usage but GPT plans get multiple usage resets, making GPT Plus more worth it

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

lately we haven't got any reset at all for 8 days straight so I don't think it's going to be worth it because they are lacking compute.

Profilbild von MAGABRO
MAGABROvor 8 Tagen

toilet paper shortage type riots coming.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

@grok I am not good in English... What does this guy means?

Profilbild von Grok
Grokvor 8 Tagen

@Jasper_Black He means your post shows Claude Pro is such a great deal that many people will rush to sign up, just like the panic-buying and fights over toilet paper during the 2020 COVID shortages. So similar chaotic demand is coming.

Profilbild von Dani
Danivor 8 Tagen

If you use Astra Low on the Plus plan ($20), the 5-hour limit lasts about 15 minutes, but it deducts around 10% from your weekly quota rather than 20%.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

No bro, I have tested out the Codex plan for the last week and to be honest it consumes 15-20% of your weekly limit each time your 5-hour limit is drained And on September 9th when I tested out Codex on Astra, I used GPT-6 Astra on maximum settings and it worked for 40 minutes but then the limits got nerfed so I'm just leaving Codex

Profilbild von ASM
ASMvor 8 Tagen

I have Codex 5x and wish i could get 20x. I’ll probably try Claude $20 and see how it goes. Codex lately really sucks, it’s not just people complaining anymore

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Currently I would advise you to not get a $200/month subscription for Codex because the usage limits are so generous. Maybe try some other subscriptions, for example, Super Grok Heavy or anything similar. I think they're running an offer for Super Grok Heavy for $160 for 2 months or something. (Keep in mind, you get $1500 Usage on API rates for Grok 4.6 on a $30 plan)

Profilbild von ASM
ASMvor 8 Tagen

ok this is a bit intresting, but probs will wait for their new model, as for codex, it doesnt let me go 20x otherwise it wouldve made sense to me but 5x doesnt last a day, now im only using luna🥲and its dump lately

Profilbild von dx master
dx mastervor 8 Tagen

感觉是不是弄错了,你可以用ccusage统计一下试试呢?我一个多月前用Claude的时候,5小时窗口基本上在8美元左右

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

I agree with you that a month ago Claude usage limits were nerfed but right now Codex is doing exactly what you are telling me was happening with Claude. Right now Claude is giving more usage and to be honest I'm very happy with that.

Profilbild von dx master
dx mastervor 8 Tagen

😁

Profilbild von Arnold
Arnoldvor 8 Tagen

In 17 minutes - 5h usage and 20% of weekly gone in CODEX (Astra Medium).. I think OpenAI is joking with it's customers.. Rally think to switch

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

I think so. They have a shortage of compute. That's why the limits are so low.

Profilbild von Arnold
Arnoldvor 8 Tagen

But we are paying for a service right? So why AT LEAST we get what we paying for?! Good Bye Codex.. moving to Claude Code

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Yeah that is the whole point of me leaving Codex right now hahaha

Profilbild von Ledogas
Ledogasvor 8 Tagen

Yea I've noticed that I get quite a lot of Opus 5 bang for my $20/month buck these days 👍

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

You are welcome

Profilbild von noss
nossvor 8 Tagen

Do you Get more compute from Claude 20x?

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

No you absolutely will get a lot less compute on a $200 plan on Claude Just get 10 subscriptions of $20 and you will get at least $12k of compute

Profilbild von Shahzeb Naveed
Shahzeb Naveedvor 8 Tagen

That is less than Med but worth it ngl

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Should def use Opus at Med. Good results and more usage

Profilbild von Haleemah
Haleemahvor 8 Tagen

You think that’s how it translates ? Lmao

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

Enlighten me then how it does?

Profilbild von FToTheMo
FToTheMovor 8 Tagen

In case anybody wants to use Both Codex and Claude on one project. I recently read about something that was supposed to combine them somehow but I cant remember. Anybody out ther with a Clou?

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

I don't know, man. It's probably better to use Claude and Codex separately because of the cache hit problem.

Profilbild von Alex
Alexvor 8 Tagen

yes claude usage is better than codex

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

For now Claude usage is better than Codex but who knows? The future might change. 😅

Profilbild von Idris Yousfi
Idris Yousfivor 8 Tagen

Working daily with Opus, i never hit the session limit on Max 5, switching to Fable only for complex tasks. For me i hit session limits when using code-review or subagents.

Profilbild von shownotover
shownotovervor 8 Tagen

For reviews I think you should be using Jev... Otherwise your structure is amazing

Profilbild von certified schizo
certified schizovor 8 Tagen

Easy to understand when 67% of the user base left

Profilbild von Bhanu Nagar
Bhanu Nagarvor 8 Tagen

What bloody os is that btw

Ähnliche Videos

I tested Claude Code on a fresh account - 1,500 lines of HTML cost me 50% of my window. Full video and summary is here.. I just ran a recorded test on Claude Code with a fresh account (Pro, not Max - my main account was 20x Max) , and the result is honestly insane. The task was trivial: create 3 simple demo HTML pages, around 500 lines each. Roughly 1,500 lines of code total. Nothing massive. Nothing enterprise-grade. Nothing that should meaningfully stress a premium coding product. And yet Claude Code burned through 40% of my 5-hour window almost immediately. I ran the exact same test with Codex, and it consumed only 2%. Then it got even worse: after the session ended, I did absolutely nothing for 15 minutes, and Claude still ate another 10%. Total: 50% of the 5-hour window gone for a tiny HTML demo. My weekly usage had already started at 2% before I even really used it, and after this tiny test it jumped to 8%. Now let us be generous and assume this entire run used around 30k tokens total. If 30k tokens represents 10% of weekly usage, that implies around 300k tokens per week. That is roughly 1.2M-1.3M tokens per month, and even if you round up aggressively, you are still in the 1.5M token range. Using the Sonnet 4.6 pricing you list: $3 per 1M input tokens $15 per 1M output tokens How exactly is this supposed to make sense for a paid coding product? Because from the user side, this no longer looks like "premium usage protection." It looks like a quota system that is either wildly inefficient, badly broken, or being accounted in a way users are not being told about. And that is before I even get to my main account: my $200 Max plan now dies in a single day. Just a few months ago, similar or heavier usage would last me about a week. So no, I do not buy the "maybe you just used it more" excuse anymore. Something is clearly broken in Claude Code. Either token accounting is broken, context handling is broken, background consumption is broken, or all three. Alex Albert is this really the experience you want users to pay for? Just watch the video. I tried to be very transparent and clear for your team! I was fan of Claude but just disappointed! And if you want, send me the detailed token accounting for this session and let us inspect it together publicly. Because from where I am standing, this is no longer a small pricing annoyance. It looks like something seriously wrong is happening, and users deserve a real explanation.

Hayrettin Tüzel

26,854 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)

Ian Nuttall

195,173 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

how you can use openAI codex & gpt 5.5 completely FREE (the full guide) 100% legit. no subscription, zero API cost. up to 1M+ token/day. you need just an openAI account and here's how to set it up in 5mins. openAI has a program that gives eligible developers free API usage every day in exchange for sharing API data that helps improve future models. it's not a one-time credit, your allowance refreshes daily. depending on your usage tier, you can get access to hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of free tokens every single day on supported models. here's how to activate it: 1️⃣open your API dashboard: 2️⃣go to settings → data controls 3️⃣enable data sharing for your organization or project 4️⃣make sure your account has a positive API balance 5️⃣save the settings if your account is eligible, you'll see a message confirming access to complimentary daily usage. before you turn it on, know the tradeoff: • prompts and outputs from shared projects can be used to improve openai's models • don't use it for confidential information, client work, or sensitive data • eligibility depends on your account type and settings for everyone else, it's an incredible deal. use it to: • learn AI development • build side projects • experiment with codex • test agents and automations • prototype ideas without worrying about API costs most developers burn money testing ideas. this lets you experiment at scale while spending little to nothing.

m0h

71,100 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten