正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

I tested whether an AI team could turn one evolving project into a finished campaign, without me re-explaining the brief in five different chats. Research, strategy, messaging, and a real update, all in one shared workspace now. Teamily AI

171,042 次观看 • 15 天前 •via X (Twitter)

18 条评论

Kiage Clinton, KC 的头像
Kiage Clinton, KC15 天前

@Teamily_AI Moving upmarket should affect more than a few words, which makes that revision a meaningful test.

ZACK™️💎 的头像
ZACK™️💎15 天前

@Teamily_AI Good to test an evolving brief rather than only showing a campaign built from one fixed instruction.

Comrade Wa kabarack 🙆 的头像
Comrade Wa kabarack 🙆15 天前

@Teamily_AI Changing the audience midway is a useful test of whether the shared context actually holds.

𝐈𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐇𝐌𝐀𝐍𖤐 的头像
𝐈𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐇𝐌𝐀𝐍𖤐15 天前

@Teamily_AI A shared workspace makes sense when the project keeps changing and the pieces need to stay aligned.

𝖭𝗂𝖼𝖼𝗈™ 的头像
𝖭𝗂𝖼𝖼𝗈™15 天前

@Teamily_AI The enterprise update gives the workflow a concrete challenge beyond producing an initial draft.

KATE 的头像
KATE15 天前

The problem wasn’t a lack of AI tools. It was the handoff: one chat had the research, another had the strategy, and a third needed the context pasted in again. Every project change meant manually checking whether the pieces still matched.

KATE 的头像
KATE15 天前

Teamily AI takes a different approach: bring humans and specialized agents into one conversation. With 2.0 Loop, connect an agent to teammates in a visual workflow, publish it, then trigger it in group chat. The Webpage Developer returns an interactive webpage artifact for review.

KATE 的头像
KATE15 天前

I gave the team one job: turn customer feedback into a campaign. A Research Agent organized the signal, a Strategy Agent shaped the positioning, and a Content Agent translated it into launch messaging, without starting from a blank chat each time.

KATE 的头像
KATE15 天前

Then I changed the brief: we were moving upmarket and targeting enterprise teams. Instead of rebuilding everything, I gave the team the update once. The positioning shifted, the messaging followed, and the campaign deliverable reflected the new direction.

KATE 的头像
KATE15 天前

My takeaway: this feels less like prompting isolated chatbots and more like managing a team that shares context. Try Teamily through my invite link: and follow @Teamily_AI to see what you build next. #teamily #aitools #aiworkflow

Future 的头像
Future15 天前

@Teamily_AI Keeping the research connected to the messaging is the part that makes this test worth discussing.

E 的头像
E15 天前

@Teamily_AI The example focuses on a real coordination problem rather than simply adding more agents to a task.

JA KISII™ 🇰🇪 的头像
JA KISII™ 🇰🇪15 天前

@Teamily_AI A campaign that changes direction is a better demonstration than several isolated outputs that look tidy.

Weigo 的头像
Weigo15 天前

@Teamily_AI Customer feedback gives the campaign a starting point that is more grounded than a blank brainstorm.

Kenyaan_coco 的头像
Kenyaan_coco15 天前

@Teamily_AI One update is a much clearer test than asking each agent to repeat the original assignment.

iano 的头像
iano15 天前

@Teamily_AI The handoffs deserve attention because a strong draft can still be built on an outdated assumption.

Ja telo 的头像
Ja telo15 天前

@Teamily_AI The handoff problem is familiar: every separate chat becomes another place to check for stale details.

🆁🅰🅽🅹🅾🆂 的头像
🆁🅰🅽🅹🅾🆂15 天前

@Teamily_AI Good to show the changed brief reaching the deliverable, not stopping at an updated strategy note.

相关视频

The client cuts the budget in half. Your AI team invents a cheaper quote to make it fit. Would you catch it? 👀 I tested Teamily AI Teamily AI with a real-world project scenario: 📌 One landing page, 3 social posts, and a project plan. 💰 Budget: $2,000 ⏳ Deadline: 10 days Four specialist AI agents collaborated in one chat through a saved Loop. 🔍 Research flagged a critical issue: the enquiry form had no submission destination. 📋 Planning used that finding to scope the work. ⚠️ Review caught a scheduling conflict between Day 8 publishing and Day 9 approval. 💻 Webpage Developer turned the plan into a live project dashboard using Teamily Website Builder. Then I changed one requirement: “The budget is now $1,000. Day 10 stays.” I reran the saved Loop. The updated brief flowed through the team without repeatedly prompting every agent. But there was a problem. The team proposed a $750 “trimmed” page. Our fixed estimate was $900. That lower price had never been approved. I challenged it. The Review agent rejected the unsupported quote and sent the correction back to the developer. The final dashboard exposed the real situation: $1,600 in core work $1,000 available $600 budget gap Instead of pretending everything could fit, the workflow made the trade-offs visible. And I took it further. Inside Open Studio, I used a comment to ask the developer to make the budget gap and available options clearer at the top of the page. The developer refined the dashboard, and I could review the before-and-after result in the same workflow. That’s the difference between generating AI outputs and coordinating AI agents around a shared project. ✅ Multiple agents collaborating in one chat ✅ Saved workflows that adapt when requirements change ✅ Review that challenges unsupported assumptions ✅ Website editing through Open Studio ✅ Clearer decisions without rebuilding everything from scratch The real value of AI isn't making every answer look perfect. It's making problems, costs, and decisions impossible to ignore. The finished dashboard was built with Teamily Website Builder. 🔗 Explore the dashboard and compare the budget options: 🚀 Put your next project through the same test: #Ad #AI #AIAgents #AITools #WebsiteBuilder #Automation

Ryan Carter

121,889 次观看 • 10 天前