Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

'I think it should be really, really obvious.' 'What else can he do? Donald Trump is a petulant child who would impose tariffs out of personal spite.' James O'Brien and caller Ben debate if Keir Starmer has made the right decision to not rule out a relationship with the US.

71,919 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

The Grift Report 🎗🇮🇱🇬🇧's profile picture
The Grift Report 🎗🇮🇱🇬🇧1 year ago

James o bellend proving again he has Trump Derangement Syndrome Trump won and Starmer backed the wrong horse and insulted him massively and now we have to suffer being back of the line with the USA because of LABOURS fuckups

Captain Meh's profile picture
Captain Meh1 year ago

His idea is for us to simply sulk and not talk to America anymore because he doesn’t like their leader, yet is accusing someone else of being a petulant child. What an absolute joke.

David Crabb UK's profile picture
David Crabb UK1 year ago

The eternal wail of James O'Brien, the bard of banalities, crooning his usual dirge against Trump. Let me carve this debate into clarity: of course, Keir Starmer shouldn’t rule out a relationship with the United States. To even suggest otherwise is the hallmark of juvenile, short-sighted political posturing that mistakes moralistic grandstanding for strategy. The United States, regardless of its president, is an indispensable ally. Economically, militarily, and culturally, our nations are intertwined. The idea of "not ruling out a relationship" is a statement of sheer common sense, yet it’s dressed up here as some profound ethical dilemma. What are we to do instead? Flounce away in indignation while the world moves on without us? As for Trump—a "petulant child"? No doubt, he often behaves like one. But let’s not reduce geopolitics to playground grudges. Trump’s tariffs are as much about his America-first agenda as they are about his personal spite—ill-conceived, yes, but rooted in a legitimate challenge to global trade imbalances. Britain's leaders must navigate this dynamic with spine and strategy, not hand-wringing. The real question is why we’re even entertaining the notion of ruling out the U.S. in the first place. Would we prefer to cosy up to Beijing instead? Shall we adopt a policy of isolationism in a globalised world? Starmer’s hedging isn’t bold; it’s basic. The fact that it’s even debated demonstrates the intellectual anaemia of modern British discourse. My take? Britain doesn’t get to choose when to play ball with the world’s superpowers. We either engage or watch ourselves dwindle into irrelevance. O'Brien and his ilk would do well to grasp that pragmatism trumps puerile moralism every single time. #ReasonBitesBack

Jill Silluzio's profile picture
Jill Silluzio1 year ago

Just shows LBC peddling lies again..

Daniel ShenSmith (BlackBeltBarrister)'s profile picture
Daniel ShenSmith (BlackBeltBarrister)1 year ago

“He is a petulant child”, James cried in a petulant rant.

Billy Carruthers's profile picture
Billy Carruthers1 year ago

I found the petulant children ☝️

Charlie Genos's profile picture
Charlie Genos1 year ago

He imposes tariffs because that gets best for US citizens, you pair of retards.

Bleachers. 🇬🇧 🍺🥳's profile picture
Bleachers. 🇬🇧 🍺🥳1 year ago

Lefties losing it. 🤣

Alistair_𝕏's profile picture
Alistair_𝕏1 year ago

Is James 0'Brain worried about the US right cancelling the lefty UK? No one likes to be cancelled.

mickiam50's profile picture
mickiam501 year ago

What he said and what he does is too different things why not wait and see before you condemn him

Related Videos