Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

'I think it should be really, really obvious.' 'What else can he do? Donald Trump is a petulant child who would impose tariffs out of personal spite.' James O'Brien and caller Ben debate if Keir Starmer has made the right decision to not rule out a relationship with the US.

71,919 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

The Grift Report 🎗🇮🇱🇬🇧 profil fotoğrafı
The Grift Report 🎗🇮🇱🇬🇧1 yıl önce

James o bellend proving again he has Trump Derangement Syndrome Trump won and Starmer backed the wrong horse and insulted him massively and now we have to suffer being back of the line with the USA because of LABOURS fuckups

Captain Meh profil fotoğrafı
Captain Meh1 yıl önce

His idea is for us to simply sulk and not talk to America anymore because he doesn’t like their leader, yet is accusing someone else of being a petulant child. What an absolute joke.

David Crabb UK profil fotoğrafı
David Crabb UK1 yıl önce

The eternal wail of James O'Brien, the bard of banalities, crooning his usual dirge against Trump. Let me carve this debate into clarity: of course, Keir Starmer shouldn’t rule out a relationship with the United States. To even suggest otherwise is the hallmark of juvenile, short-sighted political posturing that mistakes moralistic grandstanding for strategy. The United States, regardless of its president, is an indispensable ally. Economically, militarily, and culturally, our nations are intertwined. The idea of "not ruling out a relationship" is a statement of sheer common sense, yet it’s dressed up here as some profound ethical dilemma. What are we to do instead? Flounce away in indignation while the world moves on without us? As for Trump—a "petulant child"? No doubt, he often behaves like one. But let’s not reduce geopolitics to playground grudges. Trump’s tariffs are as much about his America-first agenda as they are about his personal spite—ill-conceived, yes, but rooted in a legitimate challenge to global trade imbalances. Britain's leaders must navigate this dynamic with spine and strategy, not hand-wringing. The real question is why we’re even entertaining the notion of ruling out the U.S. in the first place. Would we prefer to cosy up to Beijing instead? Shall we adopt a policy of isolationism in a globalised world? Starmer’s hedging isn’t bold; it’s basic. The fact that it’s even debated demonstrates the intellectual anaemia of modern British discourse. My take? Britain doesn’t get to choose when to play ball with the world’s superpowers. We either engage or watch ourselves dwindle into irrelevance. O'Brien and his ilk would do well to grasp that pragmatism trumps puerile moralism every single time. #ReasonBitesBack

Jill Silluzio profil fotoğrafı
Jill Silluzio1 yıl önce

Just shows LBC peddling lies again..

Daniel ShenSmith (BlackBeltBarrister) profil fotoğrafı
Daniel ShenSmith (BlackBeltBarrister)1 yıl önce

“He is a petulant child”, James cried in a petulant rant.

Billy Carruthers profil fotoğrafı
Billy Carruthers1 yıl önce

I found the petulant children ☝️

Charlie Genos profil fotoğrafı
Charlie Genos1 yıl önce

He imposes tariffs because that gets best for US citizens, you pair of retards.

Bleachers. 🇬🇧 🍺🥳 profil fotoğrafı
Bleachers. 🇬🇧 🍺🥳1 yıl önce

Lefties losing it. 🤣

Alistair_𝕏 profil fotoğrafı
Alistair_𝕏1 yıl önce

Is James 0'Brain worried about the US right cancelling the lefty UK? No one likes to be cancelled.

mickiam50 profil fotoğrafı
mickiam501 yıl önce

What he said and what he does is too different things why not wait and see before you condemn him

Benzer Videolar