Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

“I think it’s a process and system issue that has to be addressed, and I don’t think it is about finger-pointing or looking for who to blame. If you think about the process today, there are a lot of stages with manual hands-on that anything can go wrong.” -... show more

Imran Muhammad

195,032 subscribers

189,885 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Former CDC Director dr. Robert Redfield: "I happen to be of the view that I don't think Secretary Kennedy is anti-vaccine. I do believe he's for transparency and honest discussion about what we know about vaccines in terms of their safety and efficacy. And I think some of that has been sort of skirted through over the last couple of years." "I still say what I said when he got confirmed that I think Kennedy has the potential to be the most consequential Secretary of Health that our nation's ever had. That said, I understand a lot of the controversies and a lot of the way people act." "I thought the hearing today was very unfortunate. I think you brought it up. I think there was no real communication in that hearing." "It was people with their own position. Kennedy never really had the opportunity to explain why he thought what he thought. You and I can agree or disagree with what he thinks, but I do think it's important that you can express that."

Former CDC Director dr. Robert Redfield: "I happen to be of the view that I don't think Secretary Kennedy is anti-vaccine. I do believe he's for transparency and honest discussion about what we know about vaccines in terms of their safety and efficacy. And I think some of that has been sort of skirted through over the last couple of years." "I still say what I said when he got confirmed that I think Kennedy has the potential to be the most consequential Secretary of Health that our nation's ever had. That said, I understand a lot of the controversies and a lot of the way people act." "I thought the hearing today was very unfortunate. I think you brought it up. I think there was no real communication in that hearing." "It was people with their own position. Kennedy never really had the opportunity to explain why he thought what he thought. You and I can agree or disagree with what he thinks, but I do think it's important that you can express that."

Camus

33,374 views • 11 months ago

Harry on running and why he chose "Sted Sarandos" as his name for the Berlin Marathon “I think the relationship between that almost spiritual aspect that music can have, when you're dancing and you get into this meditative place, I think there is a lot of synergy there between how you can feel when you're running sometimes. […] I think that the relationship between the meditation meditative aspect that music can have and the meditative aspect that running can sometimes have, it was like, weirdly made a lot of sense to me that those two things happened at the same time. But yeah, I think just feeling clear and present and doing one thing at a time and just being in it was the goal of both. And for the name, I don’t know. It’s silly, really.” - The Bru Show

Harry on running and why he chose "Sted Sarandos" as his name for the Berlin Marathon “I think the relationship between that almost spiritual aspect that music can have, when you're dancing and you get into this meditative place, I think there is a lot of synergy there between how you can feel when you're running sometimes. […] I think that the relationship between the meditation meditative aspect that music can have and the meditative aspect that running can sometimes have, it was like, weirdly made a lot of sense to me that those two things happened at the same time. But yeah, I think just feeling clear and present and doing one thing at a time and just being in it was the goal of both. And for the name, I don’t know. It’s silly, really.” - The Bru Show

HSNews

127,806 views • 6 months ago

McGeehan: The first thing to understand is that World Cups are a scam, right? They’re a complete scam because the U.S. pays for everything, and FIFA walks away with all the profits. Now, Donald Trump probably knows it’s a scam. And if we know anything about Donald Trump, it’s that he doesn’t like getting scammed. I mean, this is the man who talks about The Art of the Deal. So, one theory—or one part of it—could just be this: Trump is basically saying, “Okay, you can come in here, you can waltz off with all the money, and you can put us on the hook for all the costs, but I’m going to get my part of this.” So that’s one theory. There are other people who think that Trump was involved in Gianni Infantino’s machinations when he became president back in 2016. I can’t speak to that, but certainly there’s a lot of money involved and a lot of money changing hands, and FIFA is walking away with a lot of it.

McGeehan: The first thing to understand is that World Cups are a scam, right? They’re a complete scam because the U.S. pays for everything, and FIFA walks away with all the profits. Now, Donald Trump probably knows it’s a scam. And if we know anything about Donald Trump, it’s that he doesn’t like getting scammed. I mean, this is the man who talks about The Art of the Deal. So, one theory—or one part of it—could just be this: Trump is basically saying, “Okay, you can come in here, you can waltz off with all the money, and you can put us on the hook for all the costs, but I’m going to get my part of this.” So that’s one theory. There are other people who think that Trump was involved in Gianni Infantino’s machinations when he became president back in 2016. I can’t speak to that, but certainly there’s a lot of money involved and a lot of money changing hands, and FIFA is walking away with a lot of it.

Acyn

105,476 views • 26 days ago

The fact that the universe doesn’t care about you doesn’t mean that other humans don’t care about you, or that we don’t have to care about other humans. That is, there is a purpose, there is a meaning: that is, to make people as well off as possible, to increase flourishing, to increase knowledge and life and health and freedom and safety. These are really, really meaningful. At least, I think they are. I don’t see anything wrong with them. I don’t think that that should leave you empty. And the fact that we live in a cold universe—that is, the laws of physics, the laws of biology, the behavior of viruses and bacteria and parasites and fungi—they don’t care about you. I’m sorry, they don’t care about you. And the sooner you realize that, the more you’ll be able to attend to the things that really do matter. Human Progress

The fact that the universe doesn’t care about you doesn’t mean that other humans don’t care about you, or that we don’t have to care about other humans. That is, there is a purpose, there is a meaning: that is, to make people as well off as possible, to increase flourishing, to increase knowledge and life and health and freedom and safety. These are really, really meaningful. At least, I think they are. I don’t see anything wrong with them. I don’t think that that should leave you empty. And the fact that we live in a cold universe—that is, the laws of physics, the laws of biology, the behavior of viruses and bacteria and parasites and fungi—they don’t care about you. I’m sorry, they don’t care about you. And the sooner you realize that, the more you’ll be able to attend to the things that really do matter. Human Progress

Steven Pinker

70,927 views • 4 months ago

Senator John Cornyn admits that President Trump’s endorsement of Ken Paxton over him was to “send a message” — because Trump was frustrated that the Senate was unwilling to pass his agenda. CORNYN: “You know, I really don’t think it was about me.” “I think it’s very different from the Cassidy and Massie situation because I’ve been a Trump ally...” “I think he got frustrated with the Senate not able to get what he wanted when he wanted it.” “And as you know, the president can be a pretty impatient guy and I certainly understand that. He’s a chief-executive guy, he’s not a legislative guy.” “And so, I think he just got frustrated and he wanted to send a message.”

Senator John Cornyn admits that President Trump’s endorsement of Ken Paxton over him was to “send a message” — because Trump was frustrated that the Senate was unwilling to pass his agenda. CORNYN: “You know, I really don’t think it was about me.” “I think it’s very different from the Cassidy and Massie situation because I’ve been a Trump ally...” “I think he got frustrated with the Senate not able to get what he wanted when he wanted it.” “And as you know, the president can be a pretty impatient guy and I certainly understand that. He’s a chief-executive guy, he’s not a legislative guy.” “And so, I think he just got frustrated and he wanted to send a message.”

Overton

455,851 views • 2 months ago

Mariana: Hi Lewis, I believe you were expecting much more or not? ... You had the car... Whats going on? Tell me? 😭🫶 Lewis: Well, we didn't have the car, obviously. I honestly thought that we were faster than we were. I think we need to look at our practice sessions because obviously it was very promising on Friday. We made, I think, a step in the wrong direction on Saturday morning and we didn't move from there. And the car was just very weak in the middle and the last sector. So we couldn't get close to the cars ahead. Soso ultimately, I think process-wise we can improve and then set up the direction that we took was wrong. But I think also the guys around us were really quick. We just needed to qualify quick. Mariana: Yeah, that's why I said that I thought that you had the car for a better position because yesterday you said it was actually a process problem, you know, choosing the right or the wrong tyres. Lewis: Yeah, I think if we qualified in the top three, I think we would have probably stayed there, you know, because people weren't overtaking. So it's just down to qualifying. Mariana: Thank You. - F1 2025 Azerbaijan -

Mariana: Hi Lewis, I believe you were expecting much more or not? ... You had the car... Whats going on? Tell me? 😭🫶 Lewis: Well, we didn't have the car, obviously. I honestly thought that we were faster than we were. I think we need to look at our practice sessions because obviously it was very promising on Friday. We made, I think, a step in the wrong direction on Saturday morning and we didn't move from there. And the car was just very weak in the middle and the last sector. So we couldn't get close to the cars ahead. Soso ultimately, I think process-wise we can improve and then set up the direction that we took was wrong. But I think also the guys around us were really quick. We just needed to qualify quick. Mariana: Yeah, that's why I said that I thought that you had the car for a better position because yesterday you said it was actually a process problem, you know, choosing the right or the wrong tyres. Lewis: Yeah, I think if we qualified in the top three, I think we would have probably stayed there, you know, because people weren't overtaking. So it's just down to qualifying. Mariana: Thank You. - F1 2025 Azerbaijan -

sim

116,911 views • 10 months ago

“Zak and Andrea have said throughout the year that the emphasis is on treating you and Lando fairly and giving you equal opportunity, even so much as being willing to sacrifice the Drivers’ Championship to afford you that opportunity. Now that you’re living that scenario, how does that sit with you? And do you think that same approach next year is something you’d sign up to, having been through this experience?" Oscar: “I don’t think there’s really been too many scenarios where it’s been detrimental to us, really. Obviously, there was what happened in Monza, but that’s really the only one where maybe you can. Well, a lot of people did argue about it, but I think the last few races have been nothing to do with how we’ve approached things as a team going wrong. On my side, it’s been some things with the car and myself just not working. Clearly, Lando has been very quick the last few weeks. This weekend, I think we got it wrong just because that’s what we thought was the right thing to do – not because we were concerned about what was fair or what was not. So I don’t think we need to change that approach. I think it yields a lot of positives. Yes, there are some tough moments, but there are also a lot of tough moments if you go in a different direction to that. So, yeah, I don’t think we need to change anything.” #QatarGP

“Zak and Andrea have said throughout the year that the emphasis is on treating you and Lando fairly and giving you equal opportunity, even so much as being willing to sacrifice the Drivers’ Championship to afford you that opportunity. Now that you’re living that scenario, how does that sit with you? And do you think that same approach next year is something you’d sign up to, having been through this experience?" Oscar: “I don’t think there’s really been too many scenarios where it’s been detrimental to us, really. Obviously, there was what happened in Monza, but that’s really the only one where maybe you can. Well, a lot of people did argue about it, but I think the last few races have been nothing to do with how we’ve approached things as a team going wrong. On my side, it’s been some things with the car and myself just not working. Clearly, Lando has been very quick the last few weeks. This weekend, I think we got it wrong just because that’s what we thought was the right thing to do – not because we were concerned about what was fair or what was not. So I don’t think we need to change that approach. I think it yields a lot of positives. Yes, there are some tough moments, but there are also a lot of tough moments if you go in a different direction to that. So, yeah, I don’t think we need to change anything.” #QatarGP

naenia ¹ ⁶³

245,575 views • 8 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: EAM Dr S Jaishankar, "Look at our response to 26/11 in Mumbai and look at our response to Uri and Balakot. I think nothing can tell you more clearly, more sharply, because, you know, at the end of the day, the armed forces are the same, the bureaucracy is the same, the intelligence is the same. So if you look at what are the structural inputs and responses of the system, it would be the same...Uri and Balakot were meant to demonstrate that no, life will not go on and that there will be a price and don't think because you've done something and run away to that side, that you are safe there. You will not be safe there. It will not be safe across the line of control nor across international borders. So there was a clear, direct message out there and I think the people to whom that message was intended to be sent, hopefully got it."

#WATCH | Delhi: EAM Dr S Jaishankar, "Look at our response to 26/11 in Mumbai and look at our response to Uri and Balakot. I think nothing can tell you more clearly, more sharply, because, you know, at the end of the day, the armed forces are the same, the bureaucracy is the same, the intelligence is the same. So if you look at what are the structural inputs and responses of the system, it would be the same...Uri and Balakot were meant to demonstrate that no, life will not go on and that there will be a price and don't think because you've done something and run away to that side, that you are safe there. You will not be safe there. It will not be safe across the line of control nor across international borders. So there was a clear, direct message out there and I think the people to whom that message was intended to be sent, hopefully got it."

ANI

86,425 views • 2 years ago

Sen. Paul: "If you would spend an hour and go to the SCIF…and just tell both the ranking member and the other, it would be private and won't be revealed. I think it would get this over with and we wouldn't have a complaint about going ahead with the vote tomorrow." Mullin: "I have no issue with that. If you guys get cleared on it, because the way my understanding was that there's only 4 people read in it." Paul: "That would be on you. We're not gonna try to figure out who the four people are and whether we can be of approval to it." Mullin: "I don't have the authority to do that."

Sen. Paul: "If you would spend an hour and go to the SCIF…and just tell both the ranking member and the other, it would be private and won't be revealed. I think it would get this over with and we wouldn't have a complaint about going ahead with the vote tomorrow." Mullin: "I have no issue with that. If you guys get cleared on it, because the way my understanding was that there's only 4 people read in it." Paul: "That would be on you. We're not gonna try to figure out who the four people are and whether we can be of approval to it." Mullin: "I don't have the authority to do that."

The Bulwark

25,818 views • 5 months ago

Q: Did you talk to the president about the red card suspension? If you cannot answer, why were you so scared of answering that question? Was there some sort of agreement that you not talk about it? Mamdani: No. There is no agreement about that and I haven't spoken to him about the red card. I made it clear that the conversations I have with the president has to do with what benefits the city and the struggles of New Yorkers to afford the city

Q: Did you talk to the president about the red card suspension? If you cannot answer, why were you so scared of answering that question? Was there some sort of agreement that you not talk about it? Mamdani: No. There is no agreement about that and I haven't spoken to him about the red card. I made it clear that the conversations I have with the president has to do with what benefits the city and the struggles of New Yorkers to afford the city

Acyn

606,524 views • 1 month ago

Ala Stanford, PA-03 candidate, freezes when asked who would enforce immigration laws if ICE is abolished and asks NBC to pause the interview so she can think about it "It's a good question. And you can um– pause because I just want to think about it." "Well, we need to continue though." "Oh, okay. Who do I think should be in charge of enforcing immigration laws? Not the executive branch, because the executive branch is self-serving." "But who should be on the ground? I mean, there are immigration laws in this country, and a border. If you've abolished ICE, who handles it?" "Understood. So you can't– Once you abolish you have to rebuild." "So are you saying have no ICE?" "I'm saying the connotation of that word is so negative that you would need a new name."

Ala Stanford, PA-03 candidate, freezes when asked who would enforce immigration laws if ICE is abolished and asks NBC to pause the interview so she can think about it "It's a good question. And you can um– pause because I just want to think about it." "Well, we need to continue though." "Oh, okay. Who do I think should be in charge of enforcing immigration laws? Not the executive branch, because the executive branch is self-serving." "But who should be on the ground? I mean, there are immigration laws in this country, and a border. If you've abolished ICE, who handles it?" "Understood. So you can't– Once you abolish you have to rebuild." "So are you saying have no ICE?" "I'm saying the connotation of that word is so negative that you would need a new name."

Popstonox

250,127 views • 3 months ago

Reporter: The FIFA decision. Millions of American soccer fans are obviously very happy, but what do you say to the critics who say this sets a precedent that other powerful leaders— Trump: Well, I don’t know. I mean, I can only say this: I had nothing to do with the decision. What I did do is say, “I think that should be reviewed,” because I watched the play, and he didn’t do anything wrong. You’ve got to look at it. By the way, if he did, I’d probably feel differently. If he punched him in the face or did something wrong… I thought your young, wonderful basketball player, Caitlin—I thought she was treated rather rough, if you want to know the truth. That was a much different kind of an event. That was a pretty bad event. But in this case, he didn’t do anything wrong. Two people ran into each other. And by the way, if you look at that game, there were 10 instances that were much rougher than that. So I think it starts with the fact that it shouldn’t have been a foul. Then you have to look at the person who raised the card, and that’s up to you people. You look at it. But I didn’t think it was very good because it was not good.

Reporter: The FIFA decision. Millions of American soccer fans are obviously very happy, but what do you say to the critics who say this sets a precedent that other powerful leaders— Trump: Well, I don’t know. I mean, I can only say this: I had nothing to do with the decision. What I did do is say, “I think that should be reviewed,” because I watched the play, and he didn’t do anything wrong. You’ve got to look at it. By the way, if he did, I’d probably feel differently. If he punched him in the face or did something wrong… I thought your young, wonderful basketball player, Caitlin—I thought she was treated rather rough, if you want to know the truth. That was a much different kind of an event. That was a pretty bad event. But in this case, he didn’t do anything wrong. Two people ran into each other. And by the way, if you look at that game, there were 10 instances that were much rougher than that. So I think it starts with the fact that it shouldn’t have been a foul. Then you have to look at the person who raised the card, and that’s up to you people. You look at it. But I didn’t think it was very good because it was not good.

Acyn

109,598 views • 1 month ago

“When we were doing in the soop together, there were things I talked to you about when I was under a lot of stress. And people talked about that a lot. I mentioned how I wanted to be like you, but the truth is I don’t really remember much about it because it was two years ago.” “That means you’re like me now. Because you’re doing exactly what I told you to do. I told you to just forget everything, the past is the past”

“When we were doing in the soop together, there were things I talked to you about when I was under a lot of stress. And people talked about that a lot. I mentioned how I wanted to be like you, but the truth is I don’t really remember much about it because it was two years ago.” “That means you’re like me now. Because you’re doing exactly what I told you to do. I told you to just forget everything, the past is the past”

Daily Suchwita

29,495 views • 9 months ago

MSNOW host Luke Russert on the Politico article about Graham Platner: “I don’t see how he can be the nominee for senator in Maine for the Democratic Party.” “Well, I think something that jumped out to me in the article, which I just read, is that the person who made the accusations was very conflicted about coming forward, and primarily because she said she very much supported Platner’s politics and believed in his messaging and didn’t want to hurt him politically, but also felt it necessary to see the full scope of the person, and I think that’s something that is going to have to be wrestled with. If these allegations are true, to this extent, I don’t see how he can be the nominee for senator in Maine for the Democratic Party. I think there’s a lot of people who might look at this out of the gate and say, well, Ken Paxton in Texas is is terrible, and the Republicans are putting him up, and he is someone who has had all sorts of legal issues and infidelity issues, etc. I think what you have here, though, is a pickup opportunity is incredibly important in Maine for the party if they want to get control of the Senate, but also somebody who there is a belief that he may have gotten through the storm on this, but now is looking that it’s significantly worse than what was advertised, and especially for a party that was so intertwined with Me Too, and believing women, it looks very hypocritical if there is not, I think, a real examination of him moving forward.”

MSNOW host Luke Russert on the Politico article about Graham Platner: “I don’t see how he can be the nominee for senator in Maine for the Democratic Party.” “Well, I think something that jumped out to me in the article, which I just read, is that the person who made the accusations was very conflicted about coming forward, and primarily because she said she very much supported Platner’s politics and believed in his messaging and didn’t want to hurt him politically, but also felt it necessary to see the full scope of the person, and I think that’s something that is going to have to be wrestled with. If these allegations are true, to this extent, I don’t see how he can be the nominee for senator in Maine for the Democratic Party. I think there’s a lot of people who might look at this out of the gate and say, well, Ken Paxton in Texas is is terrible, and the Republicans are putting him up, and he is someone who has had all sorts of legal issues and infidelity issues, etc. I think what you have here, though, is a pickup opportunity is incredibly important in Maine for the party if they want to get control of the Senate, but also somebody who there is a belief that he may have gotten through the storm on this, but now is looking that it’s significantly worse than what was advertised, and especially for a party that was so intertwined with Me Too, and believing women, it looks very hypocritical if there is not, I think, a real examination of him moving forward.”

Curtis Houck

89,071 views • 1 month ago

🚨’People are waking up to the fact there is something FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG with the liberal system’ ‘I think it was very easy to think liberalism worked in the Clinton era. When Clinton’s playing a saxophone and Wall Street is booming, it’s very easy to say that it’s working now. A lot of people said it’s not going to work. A lot of people on the left and on the right, I’m thinking Pat Buchanan and the paleo-conservatives and stuff, a lot of people on the left and the right, even in the Clinton era, said this isn’t going to work. I think now the whole thing is coming apart. I think people are looking around, looking for explanations, and I think they are going to fall on this explanation: that there was something fundamentally wrong with this system.’ Philip Pilkington on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

🚨’People are waking up to the fact there is something FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG with the liberal system’ ‘I think it was very easy to think liberalism worked in the Clinton era. When Clinton’s playing a saxophone and Wall Street is booming, it’s very easy to say that it’s working now. A lot of people said it’s not going to work. A lot of people on the left and on the right, I’m thinking Pat Buchanan and the paleo-conservatives and stuff, a lot of people on the left and the right, even in the Clinton era, said this isn’t going to work. I think now the whole thing is coming apart. I think people are looking around, looking for explanations, and I think they are going to fall on this explanation: that there was something fundamentally wrong with this system.’ Philip Pilkington on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

79,822 views • 7 months ago

Bernie Sanders Just Explained Why Trump Won—and It Actually Makes Sense “When you talk about people losing faith in the American political system, it’s justified because you have a corrupt campaign finance system.” “He [Trump] was elected president, I think, because many, many millions of people are looking at the economic and political system in America and understand that it is not working for them.” He says that the system is rigged from both sides—that Democrats and Republicans controlled by billionaire donors and corporate interests. Continuing with the message, Sanders argued that the American people are right to feel frustrated because what we’re living under isn’t a real democracy. “People have a right to be angry.”

Bernie Sanders Just Explained Why Trump Won—and It Actually Makes Sense “When you talk about people losing faith in the American political system, it’s justified because you have a corrupt campaign finance system.” “He [Trump] was elected president, I think, because many, many millions of people are looking at the economic and political system in America and understand that it is not working for them.” He says that the system is rigged from both sides—that Democrats and Republicans controlled by billionaire donors and corporate interests. Continuing with the message, Sanders argued that the American people are right to feel frustrated because what we’re living under isn’t a real democracy. “People have a right to be angry.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

594,771 views • 1 year ago

🚨 JD VANCE NAILS IT ON BIDEN'S CANCER DIAGNOSIS: "We really do need to be honest about whether the former president was capable of doing the job [...] I don't think that he was in good enough health. In some ways, I blame him less than I blame the people around him." "You can separate the desire for him to have the right health outcome with the recognition that whether it was doctors or whether there were staffers around the former president, I don't think he was able to do a good job for the American people. And that's not politics. That's not because I disagreed with him on policy. That's because I don't think that he was in good enough health." "And why didn't the American people have a better sense of his health picture? Why didn't the American people have more accurate information about what he was actually dealing with? This is serious stuff." "This is the guy who carries around the nuclear football for the world's largest nuclear arsenal. This is not child's play." "And we can pray for good health, but also recognize that if you're not in good enough health to do the job, you shouldn't be doing the job." 💯 JD Vance

🚨 JD VANCE NAILS IT ON BIDEN'S CANCER DIAGNOSIS: "We really do need to be honest about whether the former president was capable of doing the job [...] I don't think that he was in good enough health. In some ways, I blame him less than I blame the people around him." "You can separate the desire for him to have the right health outcome with the recognition that whether it was doctors or whether there were staffers around the former president, I don't think he was able to do a good job for the American people. And that's not politics. That's not because I disagreed with him on policy. That's because I don't think that he was in good enough health." "And why didn't the American people have a better sense of his health picture? Why didn't the American people have more accurate information about what he was actually dealing with? This is serious stuff." "This is the guy who carries around the nuclear football for the world's largest nuclear arsenal. This is not child's play." "And we can pray for good health, but also recognize that if you're not in good enough health to do the job, you shouldn't be doing the job." 💯 JD Vance

Eric Daugherty

4,251,351 views • 1 year ago

🚨 JD Vance just said it PERFECTLY to the troops: "What I remember about [2003-2007] is that there were people who learned all the WRONG lessons from that moment in history. There were people who learned the lesson that we could NEVER use the military again, but that's not the right lesson, because the military isn't who screwed up in 2003 and 2007!" "It was the political leadership screwed up!" "There were also people who learned a different lesson, an equally wrong lesson, that the solution to the problems that we had in the early 2000s was to ask YOU to do more and more and more and more without giving you a clearly defined objective." "Ladies and gentlemen, I think that you deserve to have a clearly defined objective." "I think you deserve to have a president of the United States who believes in you and gives you the weapons to win." "And I believe that you have a presidential leadership today that will never ask you to go to war unless he's telling you why you're going to war." "And most importantly, when he sends you to war, he gives you the tools you need to kick the HELL out of the enemy and come home safely. That's what you deserve!" 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

🚨 JD Vance just said it PERFECTLY to the troops: "What I remember about [2003-2007] is that there were people who learned all the WRONG lessons from that moment in history. There were people who learned the lesson that we could NEVER use the military again, but that's not the right lesson, because the military isn't who screwed up in 2003 and 2007!" "It was the political leadership screwed up!" "There were also people who learned a different lesson, an equally wrong lesson, that the solution to the problems that we had in the early 2000s was to ask YOU to do more and more and more and more without giving you a clearly defined objective." "Ladies and gentlemen, I think that you deserve to have a clearly defined objective." "I think you deserve to have a president of the United States who believes in you and gives you the weapons to win." "And I believe that you have a presidential leadership today that will never ask you to go to war unless he's telling you why you're going to war." "And most importantly, when he sends you to war, he gives you the tools you need to kick the HELL out of the enemy and come home safely. That's what you deserve!" 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

22,884 views • 1 month ago

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna says Jeffrey Epstein was a 'DEMON' When Asked About the Spiritual Nature of his Crimes Against Children. "I think that he was absolutely a demon." "This type of stuff exists when people refuse to believe in God. I think that this type of harm to children specifically is done because there’s a spiritual element of how pure children can be... and I think that it’s demonic and I don’t think that there’s any way that you can chalk it up. But I pray every day and I prayed before going into look at the files in and are still praying." "I just think that we all didn’t need to remember that... You can’t get complicit in this. If you say well, that’s it like this is just you know, gonna throw our hands up and not do anything... that’s part of the spiritual battle and that’s an attack you have to get involved in. You have to make sure that you’re always backing and on the right side of justice... and that is standing for children."

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna says Jeffrey Epstein was a 'DEMON' When Asked About the Spiritual Nature of his Crimes Against Children. "I think that he was absolutely a demon." "This type of stuff exists when people refuse to believe in God. I think that this type of harm to children specifically is done because there’s a spiritual element of how pure children can be... and I think that it’s demonic and I don’t think that there’s any way that you can chalk it up. But I pray every day and I prayed before going into look at the files in and are still praying." "I just think that we all didn’t need to remember that... You can’t get complicit in this. If you say well, that’s it like this is just you know, gonna throw our hands up and not do anything... that’s part of the spiritual battle and that’s an attack you have to get involved in. You have to make sure that you’re always backing and on the right side of justice... and that is standing for children."

Benny Johnson

148,414 views • 6 months ago