正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

"I think that these black triangles that fly around, I think they're probably ours." ~KM Kirk McConnell - Former Senate Staffer : "We have reports from, you know, insiders, a large number of people who say, 'Yeah, progress has really not been very significant.' But, you know, you certainly...

TheUfoJoe's profile picture

Joe Murgia

115,703 subscribers

53,770 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I don't think people realize how massive President Trumps declassification of the UFO / UAP information is. If it's what's suspected, it will change the world and humanity as we know it forever. Listen to Rep. Anna Paulina Luna who leads the Congressional UAP task force on Joe Rogan's podcast from a few months ago. Not only is there strong evidence of "inter dimensional beings" but has significant religious and historical context. "Well, they call them interdimensional beings. I think that they can actually operate through the time spaces that we currently have" "I think that there's this historical aspect of, you know, this gets into the deeper theories and concepts of religion. And I think the history that we currently know, and that kind of spins off into another topic of, you know, you have the modern day Bible, you have this aspect of books of the Bible that have been removed that explain and kind of touch on these topics" Whether you believe in aliens or not. What is clear is that our Government knows something about our universe that we don't. Whether it's technology or aliens there is something there. They might not know what it is either. One thing is for certain, this information belongs to all of humanity not hidden from a government. Hidden know more thanks to President Trump.
3:58

I don't think people realize how massive President Trumps declassification of the UFO / UAP information is. If it's what's suspected, it will change the world and humanity as we know it forever. Listen to Rep. Anna Paulina Luna who leads the Congressional UAP task force on Joe Rogan's podcast from a few months ago. Not only is there strong evidence of "inter dimensional beings" but has significant religious and historical context. "Well, they call them interdimensional beings. I think that they can actually operate through the time spaces that we currently have" "I think that there's this historical aspect of, you know, this gets into the deeper theories and concepts of religion. And I think the history that we currently know, and that kind of spins off into another topic of, you know, you have the modern day Bible, you have this aspect of books of the Bible that have been removed that explain and kind of touch on these topics" Whether you believe in aliens or not. What is clear is that our Government knows something about our universe that we don't. Whether it's technology or aliens there is something there. They might not know what it is either. One thing is for certain, this information belongs to all of humanity not hidden from a government. Hidden know more thanks to President Trump.

J

35,745 次观看 • 6 个月前

Mellon knows people who believe 100% that the USG and/or its contractors have materials and craft from a non-human intelligence. But, he also knows this... "I can tell you that there are senior Pentagon people who do not believe that there's any crash material [and] do think that this is all bogus." ~Christopher K. Mellon in Barcelona (People like to ignore this from Mellon but I won't. I shared similar comments from him at this same conference back when he said it but the post did crappy because a lot of people just want info. that will confirm their beliefs. As Rizwan Virk said, it would be interesting to see what Mellon thinks today, as this was in the fall of 2022, before Grusch went public. Obviously, Mellon knew about Grusch when he made these comments.) Mellon: "I can tell you that there are senior Pentagon people who do not believe that there's any crash material [and] do think that this is all bogus, they think it's rubbish. And, uhhh, and, you know, much less disclosure. And I'm talking about very, very senior people who have access to a lot of information. And they're saying, in some cases, to the people on The Hill, 'What are you talking about?' And, you know, 'Show us the evidence.' And, you know, they're mystified, still. "So, the UFO community, of which I'm a part, I guess, but you know, we have a tendency to see and hear, you know, one side of the story in our own stuff. And there's a lot of conspiracy theories because the government has lied and concealed information, and all of those things. The conspiracy theories grow in darkness, right? "But, to the best of my knowledge, the federal government is not in charge of running, it doesn't have any big plan, and disclosure is not imminent. If it does happen, it'll be the result of the efforts of people in Congress right now, and people who are taking action. And a small number of people who may have this information, if they come forward."
1:22

Mellon knows people who believe 100% that the USG and/or its contractors have materials and craft from a non-human intelligence. But, he also knows this... "I can tell you that there are senior Pentagon people who do not believe that there's any crash material [and] do think that this is all bogus." ~Christopher K. Mellon in Barcelona (People like to ignore this from Mellon but I won't. I shared similar comments from him at this same conference back when he said it but the post did crappy because a lot of people just want info. that will confirm their beliefs. As Rizwan Virk said, it would be interesting to see what Mellon thinks today, as this was in the fall of 2022, before Grusch went public. Obviously, Mellon knew about Grusch when he made these comments.) Mellon: "I can tell you that there are senior Pentagon people who do not believe that there's any crash material [and] do think that this is all bogus, they think it's rubbish. And, uhhh, and, you know, much less disclosure. And I'm talking about very, very senior people who have access to a lot of information. And they're saying, in some cases, to the people on The Hill, 'What are you talking about?' And, you know, 'Show us the evidence.' And, you know, they're mystified, still. "So, the UFO community, of which I'm a part, I guess, but you know, we have a tendency to see and hear, you know, one side of the story in our own stuff. And there's a lot of conspiracy theories because the government has lied and concealed information, and all of those things. The conspiracy theories grow in darkness, right? "But, to the best of my knowledge, the federal government is not in charge of running, it doesn't have any big plan, and disclosure is not imminent. If it does happen, it'll be the result of the efforts of people in Congress right now, and people who are taking action. And a small number of people who may have this information, if they come forward."

Joe Murgia

23,587 次观看 • 2 个月前

🎥| “Well, for starters, it's not the first time I've heard a story like that, you know, of people kind of being inspired to work in the industry. Um, and I think that's really cool, you know. I've always been a big believer that the more fans that work in the music industry, the better for the music and the better for everyone, really. You know, they're definitely the most passionate people. Um, you know, especially the likes of like managements or record labels, these kind of opinions are vital. [Fan: We live it, like, quite literally.] Absolutely, absolutely, yeah. There's not really, you know, it's not about kind of guessing, it's, like you say, you guys kind of live that life. So, I think it's really, really important, it's really cool that it seems to be happening more and more, um, which I think is great. Um, in terms of the relationship with the fans, something I really, really cherish. it's a really funny thing, you know, when you've grown up together, but that ‘together’ to me is, you know, a decent chunk of people. It's a funny concept to me, really, in general. But I feel very, very lucky to have it, and I feel really—I think I've always felt quite protective over my fans as well, and I think... that is a nature of kind of growing up together, you know? I feel like we've got each other's back like that. [Fan: I feel like you have a unique relationship with your fans that is not common amongst artists today, so we really appreciate that, the effort you put in and the care.] I like to, yeah, I like to think so. I mean, I feel very, very blessed that wherever I am, you know, wherever I am, there's a certain kind of level of support and passion, you know? And that... there's a friend, exactly, that's lovely.” via Jesslyn Downey
2:21

🎥| “Well, for starters, it's not the first time I've heard a story like that, you know, of people kind of being inspired to work in the industry. Um, and I think that's really cool, you know. I've always been a big believer that the more fans that work in the music industry, the better for the music and the better for everyone, really. You know, they're definitely the most passionate people. Um, you know, especially the likes of like managements or record labels, these kind of opinions are vital. [Fan: We live it, like, quite literally.] Absolutely, absolutely, yeah. There's not really, you know, it's not about kind of guessing, it's, like you say, you guys kind of live that life. So, I think it's really, really important, it's really cool that it seems to be happening more and more, um, which I think is great. Um, in terms of the relationship with the fans, something I really, really cherish. it's a really funny thing, you know, when you've grown up together, but that ‘together’ to me is, you know, a decent chunk of people. It's a funny concept to me, really, in general. But I feel very, very lucky to have it, and I feel really—I think I've always felt quite protective over my fans as well, and I think... that is a nature of kind of growing up together, you know? I feel like we've got each other's back like that. [Fan: I feel like you have a unique relationship with your fans that is not common amongst artists today, so we really appreciate that, the effort you put in and the care.] I like to, yeah, I like to think so. I mean, I feel very, very blessed that wherever I am, you know, wherever I am, there's a certain kind of level of support and passion, you know? And that... there's a friend, exactly, that's lovely.” via Jesslyn Downey

World Tomlinson

18,346 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman take on the recent UAP disclosures. "My position on this is that, look I don't want to comment as to the the credibility of individuals. Some of it I look at and say this is really insightful and some of it I say is that that falls outside the bounds of what I think is perhaps credible on that. Just because somebody worked for the government or had a clearance does not necessarily mean that their interpretation of what they saw is accurate. I think some of it is certainly unexplained based on what we know. And I think some of it if you probably put enough people behind it, you'd say that was a weather balloon, that was a an Iranian one-way attack drone or something. I will tell you I have immense access and have been at a seat at the table since the get-go on this. I have no information, no knowledge, I can take a lie detector test, on any crashed spaceships or bodies or biological organisms on this, but for sure we're gathering a lot of data and there is some unexplained anomalous phenomenon and we are putting it out there as part of these disclosure efforts."
1:20

This is NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman take on the recent UAP disclosures. "My position on this is that, look I don't want to comment as to the the credibility of individuals. Some of it I look at and say this is really insightful and some of it I say is that that falls outside the bounds of what I think is perhaps credible on that. Just because somebody worked for the government or had a clearance does not necessarily mean that their interpretation of what they saw is accurate. I think some of it is certainly unexplained based on what we know. And I think some of it if you probably put enough people behind it, you'd say that was a weather balloon, that was a an Iranian one-way attack drone or something. I will tell you I have immense access and have been at a seat at the table since the get-go on this. I have no information, no knowledge, I can take a lie detector test, on any crashed spaceships or bodies or biological organisms on this, but for sure we're gathering a lot of data and there is some unexplained anomalous phenomenon and we are putting it out there as part of these disclosure efforts."

Peter H. Diamandis, MD

17,079 次观看 • 1 个月前

Senator Fetterman admitted he never really understood President Trump’s push for the White House ballroom — until after last night. FETTERMAN: “I never really had a strong opinion on the ballroom, to be honest.” “But but this clearly demonstrated, you know, how difficult it is to move around there.” “And you know that the the ballroom is, is effectively underground and it has very limited, very limited kinds of ingress and egress to get out.” “So I think from an evacuation and when you have to evacuate, whether the president or other parts of of the leadership, I mean, this is just not the right place for that.”
1:22

Senator Fetterman admitted he never really understood President Trump’s push for the White House ballroom — until after last night. FETTERMAN: “I never really had a strong opinion on the ballroom, to be honest.” “But but this clearly demonstrated, you know, how difficult it is to move around there.” “And you know that the the ballroom is, is effectively underground and it has very limited, very limited kinds of ingress and egress to get out.” “So I think from an evacuation and when you have to evacuate, whether the president or other parts of of the leadership, I mean, this is just not the right place for that.”

Overton

334,772 次观看 • 4 个月前

Zack Snyder on his dyslexia: "It was a challenge for me when I was, you know, young in school, and all I wanted to do was make movies because that was the thing that I got great pleasure from and reward from. I love books, and I'm an avid reader, but I just have a hard time because of the way that I perceive. "I've had a great sort of - one side of me anyways - was really satisfied by art and drawing and sculpture and sort of visual expression. And I think that that started to, you know, was the thing that kind of made me feel un-frustrated. And also the way the system was designed, sort of not to support me when I was in high school at that time. "It was very difficult, you know, there was a lot of, you know, just, difficulty. My English teacher in high school was worried about what my career would be, and I'm like. He would be happy to know that I'm in the Writers Guild of America now. "But, I think that that all those things are, they're all... you can transcend all those things with perseverance and with interest and with with help. And I think that that's an important part of it. "And I just think I've had to adapt, and sort of... I have my own style of the way I write, I write all, you know, but I'm pretty prolific. And I love- I listen to tons of audio books on tape, unabridged hours and hours and hours. That's all I do when I'm driving in the car or wherever I'm doing. And it's helped me a lot. "And yeah, I mean, I just hope that anyone who is- feels trapped or frustrated by the world in general. You know, they need to just, I think that we all have like a magic spark, and you need to just find the thing that makes you, you know, inspires you and, and gets you excited and pursue it as hard as you can find your passion in the world. That's a, that's a great motivator."
2:59

Zack Snyder on his dyslexia: "It was a challenge for me when I was, you know, young in school, and all I wanted to do was make movies because that was the thing that I got great pleasure from and reward from. I love books, and I'm an avid reader, but I just have a hard time because of the way that I perceive. "I've had a great sort of - one side of me anyways - was really satisfied by art and drawing and sculpture and sort of visual expression. And I think that that started to, you know, was the thing that kind of made me feel un-frustrated. And also the way the system was designed, sort of not to support me when I was in high school at that time. "It was very difficult, you know, there was a lot of, you know, just, difficulty. My English teacher in high school was worried about what my career would be, and I'm like. He would be happy to know that I'm in the Writers Guild of America now. "But, I think that that all those things are, they're all... you can transcend all those things with perseverance and with interest and with with help. And I think that that's an important part of it. "And I just think I've had to adapt, and sort of... I have my own style of the way I write, I write all, you know, but I'm pretty prolific. And I love- I listen to tons of audio books on tape, unabridged hours and hours and hours. That's all I do when I'm driving in the car or wherever I'm doing. And it's helped me a lot. "And yeah, I mean, I just hope that anyone who is- feels trapped or frustrated by the world in general. You know, they need to just, I think that we all have like a magic spark, and you need to just find the thing that makes you, you know, inspires you and, and gets you excited and pursue it as hard as you can find your passion in the world. That's a, that's a great motivator."

Zack Snyder Film

11,128 次观看 • 8 个月前

"I think humanity, to some level, is a resource for them." ~Matthew Brown "I think there is a very small group (of humans) that does have a good degree of fidelity on intention (of the non-humans)." ~Brown "If it's true that there has been genetic interventions on humanity at certain points in our evolution, well, I very much wanna know what is the intent behind those interventions. What is being, you know, added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced in humanity, and for what reasons?" ~Brown (Brown said this to George Knapp and Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell in May on "Weaponized." ⬇️) "I think I have a good degree of confidence that the reason they're here is us. I think life, especially sentient life, it's a precious thing. And I think, to some, it might be a resource. I think humanity, to some level, is a resource for them." ~Brown ~From Today's Event ⬇️⬇️⬇️~ Matthew Brown - Matthew: "In the short term, and in my immediate environment, I'm more concerned about humans. But yeah, to get to that next part, I think longer term, you know, I definitely am more concerned about the NHI intentions. You know that's a really broad bucket so, you know, more...you narrow it down to specific groups of them. "It seems at least some of them have been present on Earth for a very long time, but they do not maintain an open relationship with humanity, except for very-discreet encounters with leadership and humans through the sort of abduction or experiencer modalities." (I'm gonna assume that "encounters with leadership" is referring to the alleged Holloman landing.) Brown: "And those certainly, you know, while some people claim to have very positive interactions, there's a very large amount that that have the opposite, especially women, who seem to, unfortunately, you know, get the worst of it, and over a very long period of time. So, I'm very concerned about that. "If it's true that there has been genetic interventions on humanity at certain points in our evolution, well, I very much wanna know what is the intent behind those interventions. What is being, you know, added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced in humanity, and for what reasons?" (That's important: Added, removed, suppressed or enhanced. If any of that is true, this goes way beyond, "Well, they haven't blown us up so they must not have bad intentions.") Brown: "You know, I don't have answers, but that's where, you know, you know, this is a journey of discovery, right? And that's kind of where I am at, is again, what are the long term intentions of the NHI present on Earth toward towards humanity?" Leslie Kean: "Do you think there are government officials that know a lot on the classified level and beyond, that have an idea about the intention that they're just not sharing with with anyone? Or, do you think everyone is baffled by that?" Brown: "I think there is a very small group that does have a good degree of fidelity on intention, both in the U.S. government and in, you know, probably the major governments around the world. You know, I have some reason to believe that's true, as well as analysis, so it's a mix of, you know, what we would call evidence and thought. That's where I'm at." Kean: "And just to reiterate, you don't have any idea of what they may have discovered about the intention or any thoughts about what that might be? Is that correct?" Brown: "None that I would say publicly yet. You know, I want to have some degree of certainty before I share something you know serious as that." Kean: "Can you say if you think it might be sort of something that might be quote 'negative' for humanity as we go forward, or something that might be evolutionarily positive for us as a species? You have any sense of that? Of, you know, whether it's a positive or negative kind of intention? Or maybe a mixed one, depending on who we're dealing with. I don't know if you can just can say any more about that." Brown: "it's probably mixed because there seems to be at least more groups involved than just one. So, you know, it's like saying all of humanity's bad news just because you only encountered the worst aspects of humanity. You can't fall into that trap. Yeah, I'd need more data before I would feel comfortable, you know, saying it's definitely this or that." Kean: "Thank you. Yeah, I think that's the big question in everyone's mind, so many people's minds, is the intention. And so far, Jeff (Jeff Nuccetelli) says we're all here. We're still here, except for there are the individuals that have had the frightening encounters. But, you know, nothing on a mass scale has happened to harm us. So, here we are." (Harm can come in many forms. They may not have attacked us with bombs or missiles but, as Brown asked: Have they added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced anything, genetically, or otherwise, from humans? Peter Levenda has written and spoken about this on numerous occasions. Have they done anything to us that's related to consciousness? As far as if there's anybody who knows a lot more about the phenomenon (could be more than one intelligence) and its intentions than we do? I have shared my opinion on that question a few times. IMO, yes. But that's not based on any hard evidence. Does Brown have evidence on that front? Here's something that suggests someone, somewhere, knows more...) Hvbears88: "Interestingly, [Grusch] also mentioned how many people know the full scope of the phenomenon to be no more than 50 people. But it wasn't clear whether this meant 50 people currently alive or 50 people ever in history." (Have these folks read "The Document?") Retired Naval Commander Will Miller: "Through a former NSA contact of mine, I had the chance to meet with a high-level, retired, National Security Agency, senior civilian. And this gentleman, we talked about the subject of UFOs and, again, whether any government agency either had information on the subject or had interest in. And he revealed one tidbit of information I found very interesting. "He said within NSA, there was a document known only as “the document” and it was on the subject of UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence. And it was so highly classified that only the Director himself and perhaps one or two other people were actually able to view it. Its existence was widely known, but again, very, very close hold information." Source:
3:50

"I think humanity, to some level, is a resource for them." ~Matthew Brown "I think there is a very small group (of humans) that does have a good degree of fidelity on intention (of the non-humans)." ~Brown "If it's true that there has been genetic interventions on humanity at certain points in our evolution, well, I very much wanna know what is the intent behind those interventions. What is being, you know, added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced in humanity, and for what reasons?" ~Brown (Brown said this to George Knapp and Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell in May on "Weaponized." ⬇️) "I think I have a good degree of confidence that the reason they're here is us. I think life, especially sentient life, it's a precious thing. And I think, to some, it might be a resource. I think humanity, to some level, is a resource for them." ~Brown ~From Today's Event ⬇️⬇️⬇️~ Matthew Brown - Matthew: "In the short term, and in my immediate environment, I'm more concerned about humans. But yeah, to get to that next part, I think longer term, you know, I definitely am more concerned about the NHI intentions. You know that's a really broad bucket so, you know, more...you narrow it down to specific groups of them. "It seems at least some of them have been present on Earth for a very long time, but they do not maintain an open relationship with humanity, except for very-discreet encounters with leadership and humans through the sort of abduction or experiencer modalities." (I'm gonna assume that "encounters with leadership" is referring to the alleged Holloman landing.) Brown: "And those certainly, you know, while some people claim to have very positive interactions, there's a very large amount that that have the opposite, especially women, who seem to, unfortunately, you know, get the worst of it, and over a very long period of time. So, I'm very concerned about that. "If it's true that there has been genetic interventions on humanity at certain points in our evolution, well, I very much wanna know what is the intent behind those interventions. What is being, you know, added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced in humanity, and for what reasons?" (That's important: Added, removed, suppressed or enhanced. If any of that is true, this goes way beyond, "Well, they haven't blown us up so they must not have bad intentions.") Brown: "You know, I don't have answers, but that's where, you know, you know, this is a journey of discovery, right? And that's kind of where I am at, is again, what are the long term intentions of the NHI present on Earth toward towards humanity?" Leslie Kean: "Do you think there are government officials that know a lot on the classified level and beyond, that have an idea about the intention that they're just not sharing with with anyone? Or, do you think everyone is baffled by that?" Brown: "I think there is a very small group that does have a good degree of fidelity on intention, both in the U.S. government and in, you know, probably the major governments around the world. You know, I have some reason to believe that's true, as well as analysis, so it's a mix of, you know, what we would call evidence and thought. That's where I'm at." Kean: "And just to reiterate, you don't have any idea of what they may have discovered about the intention or any thoughts about what that might be? Is that correct?" Brown: "None that I would say publicly yet. You know, I want to have some degree of certainty before I share something you know serious as that." Kean: "Can you say if you think it might be sort of something that might be quote 'negative' for humanity as we go forward, or something that might be evolutionarily positive for us as a species? You have any sense of that? Of, you know, whether it's a positive or negative kind of intention? Or maybe a mixed one, depending on who we're dealing with. I don't know if you can just can say any more about that." Brown: "it's probably mixed because there seems to be at least more groups involved than just one. So, you know, it's like saying all of humanity's bad news just because you only encountered the worst aspects of humanity. You can't fall into that trap. Yeah, I'd need more data before I would feel comfortable, you know, saying it's definitely this or that." Kean: "Thank you. Yeah, I think that's the big question in everyone's mind, so many people's minds, is the intention. And so far, Jeff (Jeff Nuccetelli) says we're all here. We're still here, except for there are the individuals that have had the frightening encounters. But, you know, nothing on a mass scale has happened to harm us. So, here we are." (Harm can come in many forms. They may not have attacked us with bombs or missiles but, as Brown asked: Have they added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced anything, genetically, or otherwise, from humans? Peter Levenda has written and spoken about this on numerous occasions. Have they done anything to us that's related to consciousness? As far as if there's anybody who knows a lot more about the phenomenon (could be more than one intelligence) and its intentions than we do? I have shared my opinion on that question a few times. IMO, yes. But that's not based on any hard evidence. Does Brown have evidence on that front? Here's something that suggests someone, somewhere, knows more...) Hvbears88: "Interestingly, [Grusch] also mentioned how many people know the full scope of the phenomenon to be no more than 50 people. But it wasn't clear whether this meant 50 people currently alive or 50 people ever in history." (Have these folks read "The Document?") Retired Naval Commander Will Miller: "Through a former NSA contact of mine, I had the chance to meet with a high-level, retired, National Security Agency, senior civilian. And this gentleman, we talked about the subject of UFOs and, again, whether any government agency either had information on the subject or had interest in. And he revealed one tidbit of information I found very interesting. "He said within NSA, there was a document known only as “the document” and it was on the subject of UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence. And it was so highly classified that only the Director himself and perhaps one or two other people were actually able to view it. Its existence was widely known, but again, very, very close hold information." Source:

Joe Murgia

53,263 次观看 • 8 天前

WOW Matt Gaetz (Matt Gaetz) Confronts United States Air Force Official Who Confims Illegal Release Of GOP Lawmakers Records The 11 Individuals Who Had Their Records Illegally Released Were Republicans (Shocker) “If it wasn't a breach, it was an illegal release.” Air Force “You for that question. So we did have a PII breach, um, 11 individuals overall. Uh, their data was released, um, Matt Gaetz “Well, you say when I hear breach, what I hear is that, like, someone hacked or broken or got the information. You gave this information?” Air Force “We did.” Matt Gaetz “No. Right. If it wasn't a breach, it was an illegal release.” Air Force “It was a yes. It was. Right. You're right. We take full responsibility for that.” Air Force “11. 11.” Matt Gaetz “Yes. And all Republicans. Right?” Air Force “Um, I don't know the answer to that. I know some of them were, but I think “ Matt Gaetz “But if I represent to you that that that it's All or almost all Republicans?” Air Force “Almost all Republicans. That's correct. Yes.”
2:46

WOW Matt Gaetz (Matt Gaetz) Confronts United States Air Force Official Who Confims Illegal Release Of GOP Lawmakers Records The 11 Individuals Who Had Their Records Illegally Released Were Republicans (Shocker) “If it wasn't a breach, it was an illegal release.” Air Force “You for that question. So we did have a PII breach, um, 11 individuals overall. Uh, their data was released, um, Matt Gaetz “Well, you say when I hear breach, what I hear is that, like, someone hacked or broken or got the information. You gave this information?” Air Force “We did.” Matt Gaetz “No. Right. If it wasn't a breach, it was an illegal release.” Air Force “It was a yes. It was. Right. You're right. We take full responsibility for that.” Air Force “11. 11.” Matt Gaetz “Yes. And all Republicans. Right?” Air Force “Um, I don't know the answer to that. I know some of them were, but I think “ Matt Gaetz “But if I represent to you that that that it's All or almost all Republicans?” Air Force “Almost all Republicans. That's correct. Yes.”

Wall Street Apes

899,266 次观看 • 2 年前

👽 Minimal, Firsthand Legacy Witnesses? 👽 (Sorry for the Debbie Downer posts but I think most people wanna hear the truth and not have smoke blown up their ass. We're all aware of folks who do that. Maybe...in the Senate, "we have a problem that there's not been quite enough of what members in the Senate would say are firsthand sources with direct involvement in the Legacy program." ~Former Senate Staffer, Kirk McConnell (In August 2024, I was told the following by a contact: "I don’t think firsthand whistleblowers are on our horizon. Tons of credible sounding second hand, though. Some with decent credentials or rank, but none with particularly great (credentials or rank), however." I shared that on here but most people didn't wanna hear it. I'm lucky to have contacts who give it to me straight, with zero hype. Some hope? "I don't think that we have to be so discouraged by the defeat of the UAPDA for the third time." ~McConnell ~~~ Kirk McConnell: "First, let me say that I'm greatly encouraged by Mr. Rep. Eric Burlison comments. He's a he's a politician. He has a way better sense of, you know, having his finger on the pulse of the Congress and the nation than I do. "I will also say that I, respectfully, don't agree with my friend Karl Nell. I don't think that we have to be so discouraged by the defeat of the UAPDA for the third time. I think there's a lot of reasons for hope that this issue, is not gonna be in a significant down cycle. And that's what I certainly hope. As we've seen from Mr. Burlison, there is certainly a lot of energy in the house among members of the Oversight Committee, and that in itself is encouraging. "You know, I hope that what I'm about to say is not true, but I think it might be, and I definitely feel that this is maybe the case in the Senate: That maybe we have a problem that there's not been quite enough of what members in the Senate would say are firsthand sources with direct involvement in the Legacy program. Looking back on history, my sense is that Congress undertakes these really historically important investigations when it is broadly clear that there's a there there and they know kind of what the outcome [will] be, at least in its broad strokes. "You know, you think about Watergate, the Church/Pike committees, Iran Contra, all of these are examples where Congress was finally moved to not take no for an answer and to just go full-speed and full-depth into exhaustive investigations when they knew that it had to be done, and that there was a pony at the end, you know, there was something very significant at the end of the process. "So, I have been getting this feedback as well from folks I've worked with in the Senate, that there needs to be more firsthand witnesses. And how do you encourage that? I think we also hear that there's quite a number of other people out there that could come forward. Their concern, though, is, as we've seen, they feel that there's not, by any means, sufficient whistleblower protections, and that despite the existence of protections in the law on paper, that really doesn't get at the problem. And that they're fearful of losing their careers, their security clearances, which translates into their careers, and that they're gonna suffer immense, legal expenses and perhaps legal jeopardy. So I think whistleblower protection is extremely important. "That said, it's really hard to get whistleblower protections passed in Congress. And so you have a kind of Catch-22, and I think that's the kind of problem that needs to be overcome, incrementally. So, I also would say that it's obvious that Congress is heavily influenced by public opinion, of course, and it's really important to keep up the pressure. But that in turn, you know, the public is motivated by what they see in the news and what they hear about from from experts, and therefore, you know, that's another dependency here, "But on that score, you know one of our panelists here, Dr. Anna Brady-Estevez, I loved when she, with a bright smile on her face, has said repeatedly that, in a sense, disclosure has already happened, or is certainly happening. A significant fraction of the population believes that we are being visited by non-human intelligence and that this belief is only likely to grow. The scientific community is much more friendly to this issue than in the past. "I would also say that the NHI itself gets a vote here, and they drive a lot of this. How much interaction are they going to....how much are they going to expose what they're doing and what they're doing here? And yet, at the same time, we've got an awful lot of people out there now with the ability to, and the interest in, detecting and tracking and trying to document what is happening out there. You think about efforts like the Galileo Project, Garry P. Nolan at the The Sol Foundation and Stanford, Beatriz Villarroel and the astrophysics community, and many others are tracking fundamental aspects of this problem. And a number of scientists and engineers working on new physics concepts to explain UAP characteristics and behavior is unprecedented. You know, you think about Skywatcher as another example of a private initiative. "There's also the experiencer community, you know, the people who have had actual direct interactions, and certainly a large number of folks who report abduction experiences, who retain the ability to communicate with NHI. This can be used, and is very likely to be used or exploited to gain insight into physics and intentions and so forth. "So, I'm actually on the optimistic side. I think with work and perseverance of groups like this, we can continue to amp up the interest and the pressure on the part of the American people, and that will translate into action by the government."
6:54

👽 Minimal, Firsthand Legacy Witnesses? 👽 (Sorry for the Debbie Downer posts but I think most people wanna hear the truth and not have smoke blown up their ass. We're all aware of folks who do that. Maybe...in the Senate, "we have a problem that there's not been quite enough of what members in the Senate would say are firsthand sources with direct involvement in the Legacy program." ~Former Senate Staffer, Kirk McConnell (In August 2024, I was told the following by a contact: "I don’t think firsthand whistleblowers are on our horizon. Tons of credible sounding second hand, though. Some with decent credentials or rank, but none with particularly great (credentials or rank), however." I shared that on here but most people didn't wanna hear it. I'm lucky to have contacts who give it to me straight, with zero hype. Some hope? "I don't think that we have to be so discouraged by the defeat of the UAPDA for the third time." ~McConnell ~~~ Kirk McConnell: "First, let me say that I'm greatly encouraged by Mr. Rep. Eric Burlison comments. He's a he's a politician. He has a way better sense of, you know, having his finger on the pulse of the Congress and the nation than I do. "I will also say that I, respectfully, don't agree with my friend Karl Nell. I don't think that we have to be so discouraged by the defeat of the UAPDA for the third time. I think there's a lot of reasons for hope that this issue, is not gonna be in a significant down cycle. And that's what I certainly hope. As we've seen from Mr. Burlison, there is certainly a lot of energy in the house among members of the Oversight Committee, and that in itself is encouraging. "You know, I hope that what I'm about to say is not true, but I think it might be, and I definitely feel that this is maybe the case in the Senate: That maybe we have a problem that there's not been quite enough of what members in the Senate would say are firsthand sources with direct involvement in the Legacy program. Looking back on history, my sense is that Congress undertakes these really historically important investigations when it is broadly clear that there's a there there and they know kind of what the outcome [will] be, at least in its broad strokes. "You know, you think about Watergate, the Church/Pike committees, Iran Contra, all of these are examples where Congress was finally moved to not take no for an answer and to just go full-speed and full-depth into exhaustive investigations when they knew that it had to be done, and that there was a pony at the end, you know, there was something very significant at the end of the process. "So, I have been getting this feedback as well from folks I've worked with in the Senate, that there needs to be more firsthand witnesses. And how do you encourage that? I think we also hear that there's quite a number of other people out there that could come forward. Their concern, though, is, as we've seen, they feel that there's not, by any means, sufficient whistleblower protections, and that despite the existence of protections in the law on paper, that really doesn't get at the problem. And that they're fearful of losing their careers, their security clearances, which translates into their careers, and that they're gonna suffer immense, legal expenses and perhaps legal jeopardy. So I think whistleblower protection is extremely important. "That said, it's really hard to get whistleblower protections passed in Congress. And so you have a kind of Catch-22, and I think that's the kind of problem that needs to be overcome, incrementally. So, I also would say that it's obvious that Congress is heavily influenced by public opinion, of course, and it's really important to keep up the pressure. But that in turn, you know, the public is motivated by what they see in the news and what they hear about from from experts, and therefore, you know, that's another dependency here, "But on that score, you know one of our panelists here, Dr. Anna Brady-Estevez, I loved when she, with a bright smile on her face, has said repeatedly that, in a sense, disclosure has already happened, or is certainly happening. A significant fraction of the population believes that we are being visited by non-human intelligence and that this belief is only likely to grow. The scientific community is much more friendly to this issue than in the past. "I would also say that the NHI itself gets a vote here, and they drive a lot of this. How much interaction are they going to....how much are they going to expose what they're doing and what they're doing here? And yet, at the same time, we've got an awful lot of people out there now with the ability to, and the interest in, detecting and tracking and trying to document what is happening out there. You think about efforts like the Galileo Project, Garry P. Nolan at the The Sol Foundation and Stanford, Beatriz Villarroel and the astrophysics community, and many others are tracking fundamental aspects of this problem. And a number of scientists and engineers working on new physics concepts to explain UAP characteristics and behavior is unprecedented. You know, you think about Skywatcher as another example of a private initiative. "There's also the experiencer community, you know, the people who have had actual direct interactions, and certainly a large number of folks who report abduction experiences, who retain the ability to communicate with NHI. This can be used, and is very likely to be used or exploited to gain insight into physics and intentions and so forth. "So, I'm actually on the optimistic side. I think with work and perseverance of groups like this, we can continue to amp up the interest and the pressure on the part of the American people, and that will translate into action by the government."

Joe Murgia

38,924 次观看 • 10 个月前

.Jason Rantz on Seattle Red on a federal judge expressing concern for the alleged WHCD shooter... "I would like to think that perhaps this is a judge who knows this is going to be really high profile, and maybe he's leading in one direction out of an abundance of caution to ensure that there's nothing that ends up causing any problems with this case down the road. But I don't know quite how you can look at the facts as they've been established right now and come to that conclusion. I hope that's what this ends up becoming. But again, I think a lot of us on the right and then awfully suspicious of some comments that have been made postures that have been taken by judges just around country, frankly, anything having to do with Donald Trump. I think the default from a lot of us is that the judges might be just great with Donald Trump is going to go overboard in one direction."
0:49

.Jason Rantz on Seattle Red on a federal judge expressing concern for the alleged WHCD shooter... "I would like to think that perhaps this is a judge who knows this is going to be really high profile, and maybe he's leading in one direction out of an abundance of caution to ensure that there's nothing that ends up causing any problems with this case down the road. But I don't know quite how you can look at the facts as they've been established right now and come to that conclusion. I hope that's what this ends up becoming. But again, I think a lot of us on the right and then awfully suspicious of some comments that have been made postures that have been taken by judges just around country, frankly, anything having to do with Donald Trump. I think the default from a lot of us is that the judges might be just great with Donald Trump is going to go overboard in one direction."

Curtis Houck

20,638 次观看 • 3 个月前

“I still believe in this belief that there is really something different from you know others that you know we only the team called #BTS just only has still you know it's been 12 years i believe this speciality in the original of our team I can't explain what it is If you guys have that experience, you guys saw our going to stage we are not the Best best we are not technically the best , you know there is some kind of energy in this kind of feeling well can't see we can just feel it” - #RM about BTS
0:54

“I still believe in this belief that there is really something different from you know others that you know we only the team called #BTS just only has still you know it's been 12 years i believe this speciality in the original of our team I can't explain what it is If you guys have that experience, you guys saw our going to stage we are not the Best best we are not technically the best , you know there is some kind of energy in this kind of feeling well can't see we can just feel it” - #RM about BTS

BTS Charts Daily

64,852 次观看 • 11 个月前

Q: I understand the drivers are going to meet with the some of the stewards and some of the race directors Later "Not that I know of.." Q: You haven't saw a meeting or anything like that? "No, I try and avoid those things." Q: Haha "Yeah, I'm not gonna.. I don't think I'll be there. I don't know anything apart from drivers briefing." Q: But in terms of that, so you wouldn't be seeking any kind of I don't know just flexibility I guess under the driving standards that we have at the moment given that that seemed to be a racing incident? "Not particularly. It's not something that's not something I've come into this weekend thinking about, no. I'm sure they'll look at it and look at... I think that you know the FIA is trying to do the best job and be consistent. Obviously, it's not always the case that the consistency is achieved but yeah, I'm not really thinking about last weekend. It's done. I'm moving forwards." F1 2026 || Hungary
1:07

Q: I understand the drivers are going to meet with the some of the stewards and some of the race directors Later "Not that I know of.." Q: You haven't saw a meeting or anything like that? "No, I try and avoid those things." Q: Haha "Yeah, I'm not gonna.. I don't think I'll be there. I don't know anything apart from drivers briefing." Q: But in terms of that, so you wouldn't be seeking any kind of I don't know just flexibility I guess under the driving standards that we have at the moment given that that seemed to be a racing incident? "Not particularly. It's not something that's not something I've come into this weekend thinking about, no. I'm sure they'll look at it and look at... I think that you know the FIA is trying to do the best job and be consistent. Obviously, it's not always the case that the consistency is achieved but yeah, I'm not really thinking about last weekend. It's done. I'm moving forwards." F1 2026 || Hungary

sim

166,517 次观看 • 1 个月前

Phenomena, AAWSAP, Stratton and Consciousness "I keenly believe that consciousness is a key aspect of all of this, and perception." ~Jay Stratton ~ "I entered the [AATIP] program in 2008. I was asked by its director [Lacatski] to come on board and establish this program [AATIP]. And then, in 2010 is when I was asked to take over the effort." ~Lue Elizondo during WaPo Interview "Fast forward to 2015...I created a program called AATIP, which was a derivative of AAWSAP." ~Jay Stratton (As I've discussed before, AATIP (V2) didn't exist until much later (2015) than what we've been told by Lue. So what program did Lue come on board to in 2008 and which program did he "take over the effort" for in 2010 if AATIP (V2) was created by Stratton in 2015? Is that not a fair question to ask?) ~~~ Jay Stratton: "Starting back in the early 2000s, we saw the need - my colleague (Jim Lacatski. ~Joe) and I at the Defense Intelligence Agency - to start paying very close attention to this topic. Advanced technologies, emerging technologies, and really kind of the areas that the stigma has led for us to ignore for many years. "So, you know, we created a program that Hal (Puthoff) referred to as AAWSAP, you know, to address those issues. And that really started around 2005. So the DIA program, which you jumped in earlier and said the DOE or, you know, the DOD's program, and really, it's the Intelligence Community's program. DIA is part of the IC, the D in there being Defense, predominantly means the DIA looks at foreign-defense capabilities. "And we were looking at this from - and I hate to say it now - but a threat perspective. And the reason I say, 'I hate to say,' is because threat is capability plus intent, and some of these things, we just don't have an idea on the intent." (Does that mean that on some of these things we DO have an idea on the intent?) Stratton: "So, determining threat, you know, maybe it's an emerging-technologies threat or a concern anytime it can potentially exceed our own capabilities. But that DIA program focused on that, and the contract from 2008 to 2010, and then we transitioned and tried to move the program to a couple of other places. "Fast forward to 2015, I created a program called AATIP, which was a derivative of AAWSAP, and actually AATIP was a nickname for AAWSAP. And I know there's a lot of crazy names, but Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. But those 2015 events were the ones that you see now on the news: the Gimbal, the Go Fast. Ryan Graves, who usually participates in this, his wife is having a baby, currently, so he's not here (laughs). But all of those events started to happen...and those events helped fuel, you know, further highlight that need on the U.S. government side that, we gotta do something about this. "Which led to the creation of the UAP Task Force in 2018 into 2019 as when I started building it. I spent over two years building it out before the public even knew about it in 2020 when DoD established it. And at that point, it was truly a whole-of-government, interagency effort. Kind of the dream of, you know, my fifteen-years plus, at that point of looking at this topic and knowing everything that we needed with all the different authorities." (Much more on that can be found here: ) Stratton: "And that led into where we're at today with AARO, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office under DOD. And I think, you know, a few hiccups here and there, but I think now Dr Jon Koslowski, who has AARO, is approaching this problem set and dealing with the topic appropriately." (He seems like a good guy but James Fox recently said that he met with Kosloski who told him (Fox) that he (Kosloski) can't even part his hair without the DoD's permission. If that's true, and I have no reason to doubt Fox on that, I have little hope AARO will help bring Disclosure.) Stratton: "And I hope that, you know, obviously, my legacy, or the legacy of all of those involved, carries on, and that the government continues to take it seriously. And that we never have to look a pilot in the eyes again and say, 'Sorry, can't help you,' you know? Or the ridicule factor and all these other issues that happen from that." (If you want a true, lasting legacy... Push to be the UAP Czar, start another AAWSAP-like program, and do it for a few years until the world learns the truth about us not being alone on this planet and that we have craft and bodies of NHI. Allegedly, right? And help us figure out what the hell the phenomenon represents.) Stratton: "So, I mean, that's kind of the the cliff notes and the history. But the UAP Task Force recently got an award from the DNI. It's the first UFO program to get an award at that level, to my knowledge. And I'm really proud of where we're at today and and that we can have events like these to discuss this topic seriously, and everybody that's involved in putting their brands on this problem." (More on that award... ) Stratton: "I don't think we should overlook...and you had, you know, Paul (Smith) and others talk about remote viewing and that consciousness connection. I keenly believe that consciousness is a key aspect of all of this, and perception, you know, all the things that come from that. And that's an area that can get confusing, right? If you look at all of these recent drones, day-to-day, right? It's honestly driving me crazy because people are throwing in, you know, video of a Cessna Citation on final approach and calling it a UAP, you know? It's definitely a Cessna Citation. "And then folks start throwing around (laughs) the terms mimicry and other things that we've definitely looked at. And it gets like the Skinwalker Ranch, as you know I'm involved out there. You know, the things that you see, and are you really...you know, how is your brain forming that thing you're seeing and can that be manipulated? And I think that that technology is an area that, you know, I certainly focused on with my friends, Hal and others, to try to understand it." (Manipulation and perception deception. Is it a byproduct of the technology on our brains, or is it an intentional effort to deceive us? If it's the latter, that certainly doesn't seem to be a good thing for humanity, but I'm still open to all theories.) Stratton: "And that consciousness connection could be a key to understanding how some of these UAP are flying, you know, how they're acting, how they're controlled, I guess is the best way to put it, right?" (Are the craft controlled by some sort of 6th sense that the operators have and need in order to fly a craft?) Stratton: "So, you got to have that kind of open mindedness to approach this topic and I hope that my government, you know, folks are open to those kinds of things. And I know that there are still some key players that are open and thinking about...thinking out of the box about all those kinds of things. So, I mean, I think consciousness is the area that I would want to put more resources and time into if I were still there. (Yes, yes and yes. Bring back Stratton as the UAP and Consciousness Czar!) Anna Brady-Estevez: "And it's interesting because there's quite a bit of access to consciousness, you know, on a personal level-type experimentation. So it is interesting in that, you know, to get into UAPs, I mean, maybe you've seen one or more, maybe you haven't. But, if you haven't, you're kind of digging through other people's data. Whereas some of these consciousness or the remote viewing, it really just takes a couple people and a sheet of paper. So you can kind of step away pretty quickly from the, 'Do I believe the reports?' you know? Or somebody else's versus you can get to that primary experimentation at the cost of a sheet of paper, a pencil, and fifteen minutes or more of somebody's time here, at the most basic level. I mean, obviously there's extensive training to build the high-end capabilities. But some of that initial testing is pretty immediate. So thank you for bringing up that consciousness work." (When I took a basic Controlled Remove Viewing class with Lyn Buchanan (one of the OG remote viewers) in 1997, I saw the results for myself when I tried it. And right there and then, I KNEW that it worked. So people can debate with me all day long about the validity of psi and remote viewing but they won't change my mind. Seeing (and trying it for yourself) is believing.) Stratton: "I was gonna say, it took me years to move away from that nuts and bolts mentality of, you know, as an aerospace engineer, this is how it flies, thrust, you know, power, etc, you know, to...there's a lot more to this, right? Hence the name, you know, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, or Aerial Phenomena, however you want to look at it. That phenomena word is key in the definition and understanding of all of this." (Big H/T to neandrewthal and anybody else who let me know about this event Stratton was a part of.)
6:56

Phenomena, AAWSAP, Stratton and Consciousness "I keenly believe that consciousness is a key aspect of all of this, and perception." ~Jay Stratton ~ "I entered the [AATIP] program in 2008. I was asked by its director [Lacatski] to come on board and establish this program [AATIP]. And then, in 2010 is when I was asked to take over the effort." ~Lue Elizondo during WaPo Interview "Fast forward to 2015...I created a program called AATIP, which was a derivative of AAWSAP." ~Jay Stratton (As I've discussed before, AATIP (V2) didn't exist until much later (2015) than what we've been told by Lue. So what program did Lue come on board to in 2008 and which program did he "take over the effort" for in 2010 if AATIP (V2) was created by Stratton in 2015? Is that not a fair question to ask?) ~~~ Jay Stratton: "Starting back in the early 2000s, we saw the need - my colleague (Jim Lacatski. ~Joe) and I at the Defense Intelligence Agency - to start paying very close attention to this topic. Advanced technologies, emerging technologies, and really kind of the areas that the stigma has led for us to ignore for many years. "So, you know, we created a program that Hal (Puthoff) referred to as AAWSAP, you know, to address those issues. And that really started around 2005. So the DIA program, which you jumped in earlier and said the DOE or, you know, the DOD's program, and really, it's the Intelligence Community's program. DIA is part of the IC, the D in there being Defense, predominantly means the DIA looks at foreign-defense capabilities. "And we were looking at this from - and I hate to say it now - but a threat perspective. And the reason I say, 'I hate to say,' is because threat is capability plus intent, and some of these things, we just don't have an idea on the intent." (Does that mean that on some of these things we DO have an idea on the intent?) Stratton: "So, determining threat, you know, maybe it's an emerging-technologies threat or a concern anytime it can potentially exceed our own capabilities. But that DIA program focused on that, and the contract from 2008 to 2010, and then we transitioned and tried to move the program to a couple of other places. "Fast forward to 2015, I created a program called AATIP, which was a derivative of AAWSAP, and actually AATIP was a nickname for AAWSAP. And I know there's a lot of crazy names, but Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. But those 2015 events were the ones that you see now on the news: the Gimbal, the Go Fast. Ryan Graves, who usually participates in this, his wife is having a baby, currently, so he's not here (laughs). But all of those events started to happen...and those events helped fuel, you know, further highlight that need on the U.S. government side that, we gotta do something about this. "Which led to the creation of the UAP Task Force in 2018 into 2019 as when I started building it. I spent over two years building it out before the public even knew about it in 2020 when DoD established it. And at that point, it was truly a whole-of-government, interagency effort. Kind of the dream of, you know, my fifteen-years plus, at that point of looking at this topic and knowing everything that we needed with all the different authorities." (Much more on that can be found here: ) Stratton: "And that led into where we're at today with AARO, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office under DOD. And I think, you know, a few hiccups here and there, but I think now Dr Jon Koslowski, who has AARO, is approaching this problem set and dealing with the topic appropriately." (He seems like a good guy but James Fox recently said that he met with Kosloski who told him (Fox) that he (Kosloski) can't even part his hair without the DoD's permission. If that's true, and I have no reason to doubt Fox on that, I have little hope AARO will help bring Disclosure.) Stratton: "And I hope that, you know, obviously, my legacy, or the legacy of all of those involved, carries on, and that the government continues to take it seriously. And that we never have to look a pilot in the eyes again and say, 'Sorry, can't help you,' you know? Or the ridicule factor and all these other issues that happen from that." (If you want a true, lasting legacy... Push to be the UAP Czar, start another AAWSAP-like program, and do it for a few years until the world learns the truth about us not being alone on this planet and that we have craft and bodies of NHI. Allegedly, right? And help us figure out what the hell the phenomenon represents.) Stratton: "So, I mean, that's kind of the the cliff notes and the history. But the UAP Task Force recently got an award from the DNI. It's the first UFO program to get an award at that level, to my knowledge. And I'm really proud of where we're at today and and that we can have events like these to discuss this topic seriously, and everybody that's involved in putting their brands on this problem." (More on that award... ) Stratton: "I don't think we should overlook...and you had, you know, Paul (Smith) and others talk about remote viewing and that consciousness connection. I keenly believe that consciousness is a key aspect of all of this, and perception, you know, all the things that come from that. And that's an area that can get confusing, right? If you look at all of these recent drones, day-to-day, right? It's honestly driving me crazy because people are throwing in, you know, video of a Cessna Citation on final approach and calling it a UAP, you know? It's definitely a Cessna Citation. "And then folks start throwing around (laughs) the terms mimicry and other things that we've definitely looked at. And it gets like the Skinwalker Ranch, as you know I'm involved out there. You know, the things that you see, and are you really...you know, how is your brain forming that thing you're seeing and can that be manipulated? And I think that that technology is an area that, you know, I certainly focused on with my friends, Hal and others, to try to understand it." (Manipulation and perception deception. Is it a byproduct of the technology on our brains, or is it an intentional effort to deceive us? If it's the latter, that certainly doesn't seem to be a good thing for humanity, but I'm still open to all theories.) Stratton: "And that consciousness connection could be a key to understanding how some of these UAP are flying, you know, how they're acting, how they're controlled, I guess is the best way to put it, right?" (Are the craft controlled by some sort of 6th sense that the operators have and need in order to fly a craft?) Stratton: "So, you got to have that kind of open mindedness to approach this topic and I hope that my government, you know, folks are open to those kinds of things. And I know that there are still some key players that are open and thinking about...thinking out of the box about all those kinds of things. So, I mean, I think consciousness is the area that I would want to put more resources and time into if I were still there. (Yes, yes and yes. Bring back Stratton as the UAP and Consciousness Czar!) Anna Brady-Estevez: "And it's interesting because there's quite a bit of access to consciousness, you know, on a personal level-type experimentation. So it is interesting in that, you know, to get into UAPs, I mean, maybe you've seen one or more, maybe you haven't. But, if you haven't, you're kind of digging through other people's data. Whereas some of these consciousness or the remote viewing, it really just takes a couple people and a sheet of paper. So you can kind of step away pretty quickly from the, 'Do I believe the reports?' you know? Or somebody else's versus you can get to that primary experimentation at the cost of a sheet of paper, a pencil, and fifteen minutes or more of somebody's time here, at the most basic level. I mean, obviously there's extensive training to build the high-end capabilities. But some of that initial testing is pretty immediate. So thank you for bringing up that consciousness work." (When I took a basic Controlled Remove Viewing class with Lyn Buchanan (one of the OG remote viewers) in 1997, I saw the results for myself when I tried it. And right there and then, I KNEW that it worked. So people can debate with me all day long about the validity of psi and remote viewing but they won't change my mind. Seeing (and trying it for yourself) is believing.) Stratton: "I was gonna say, it took me years to move away from that nuts and bolts mentality of, you know, as an aerospace engineer, this is how it flies, thrust, you know, power, etc, you know, to...there's a lot more to this, right? Hence the name, you know, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, or Aerial Phenomena, however you want to look at it. That phenomena word is key in the definition and understanding of all of this." (Big H/T to neandrewthal and anybody else who let me know about this event Stratton was a part of.)

Joe Murgia

69,993 次观看 • 1 年前