Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

"I think we need to have a complete shift in how we think about suffering." Dr Suzanne O'Sullivan's book, The Age of Diagnosis, lays out her argument that over-diagnosis of medical conditions can be detrimental. #R4Today

38,090 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

11 Yorum

Jenny 👩‍🦽 profil fotoğrafı
Jenny 👩‍🦽1 yıl önce

This woman needs to read the huge amount of papers on the effects of covid that continue after the initial symptoms. Oh, and by the way, covid is still killing around 1000 people a month in its early stages in the UK. Look At The Evidence.

World Transformation Movement profil fotoğrafı
World Transformation Movement2 yıl önce

The holy grail of insight needed to rehabilitate the human race! Leading psychiatrist says “this is the most important interview of all time, it solves the human condition, ends suffering & turmoil at its source & finally makes sense of our lives!”

Katy B profil fotoğrafı
Katy B1 yıl önce

In 2015 the Countess of Mar was amongst many who wrote to Suzanne O'Sullivan about the truly appallingly misinformed way she wrote about #ME in her previous book. Why is O'Sullivan being given a platform to promote her views again now?

Globe Twig profil fotoğrafı
Globe Twig1 yıl önce

Dr Suzanne O'Sullivan has a long history of claiming a range of conditions are psychosomatic when it isn't actually the case. She may have a background in stem subjects but she's pushing doctrine rather than science.

Kerry Newnham profil fotoğrafı
Kerry Newnham1 yıl önce

I’m not sure there is plenty of evidence. A few Neurologists/ psychiatrists have said this type of thing for years. In the 90s there was “worry” re. diagnosing the illness that I have, M.E, & failure to diagnose &provide careful early-stage Mngmt led many to become very disabled

ElaineGolding profil fotoğrafı
ElaineGolding1 yıl önce

She has a book out. Is that why she is on?

Janice Bardwell🌻🇺🇦 profil fotoğrafı
Janice Bardwell🌻🇺🇦1 yıl önce

Employers have never properly accepted ‘fit noted’, generally took the line ‘if you’re not fit you’re not fit and stay away’. Don’t want to upset insurance companies with added risk. Employers also not prepared to take on those who are disabled/special needs. Fix this first

Anna #CovidIsAirborne #KickoutRacism #FPHD profil fotoğrafı
Anna #CovidIsAirborne #KickoutRacism #FPHD1 yıl önce

Yeah. She's akin to an anti vaxxer. Really @BBCr4today what have you become? Are you not embarrassed by this? I mean it's Daily Fail rubbish

Kerry Newnham profil fotoğrafı
Kerry Newnham1 yıl önce

BBC Laura k “ Suzanne o Sullivan says this, do you agree Wes Streeting ? Yes I do” BBC today re SoS “ WES Streeting says this & suzanne agrees” Hmm, 2 personal opinions, with little supporting evidence. Poor timing of bbc amidst benefits controversy & around LC awareness day

Paula Knight profil fotoğrafı
Paula Knight1 yıl önce

We do need a complete shift - people's suffering needs to be acknowledged, and the diseases funded and treated to alleviate that suffering. Erasing diseases doesn't erase suffering.

Nicola Owens profil fotoğrafı
Nicola Owens1 yıl önce

The issue re neurodivergence is that it is medicalised and seen as abnormal . It is the attitudes to the diagnosis not the diagnosis that is the issue . It is not a disorder, it is different and can be wonderful !

Benzer Videolar

Right to Recovery Treatment evidence sessions in Scottish Parliament with Third Sector With You and The Salvation Army. What wording should replace “addiction” in the Bill to ensure people can access treatment without requiring a formal diagnosis? @GraemeCall78170 instead of answering his reply focuses on systemic access issues and the limitations of the Bill’s scope. Dr Sandesh Gulhane reminds him that the bill has narrow scope due to it not being a government bill and has to ask again about the use of the word addiction. Director of Addictions of The Salvation Armysays, "I think to give it a word or a title, it’s a really difficult thing". (Yes, its like a scene from the Ministry of Funny Walks) only none of this is funny, but deadly serious. Dr Sandesh Gulhane "Just on the point of addiction being used as a diagnosis, we heard from the Royal College of Psychiatrists, it was clear that perhaps the word addiction is not the right word to be used, and I'm sure that Douglas Ross, who is he member in charge of the bill, would be looking into that. So if we were to amend this because we need to say that you have something, not necessarily a diagnosis, but what is it that we should be saying in, in your opinion, as a way to have the right to have a treatment. Is it simply you would like to receive treatment or what exactly would you suggest?" @GraemeCall78170 "I think it for us, it's always been about access, right, so treatment is there. We recognise as an organisation we have a full clinical offer in England, not in Scotland, so we understand the importance of clinical process processes and in certain circumstances diagnosis is absolutely critical because there are other things that are going on, underlying mental health, underlying physical problems, so we completely recognise that. But the reality of the system is that people can't get access to the system, it's not about treatment. So services like ours here, all we do is we try and find ways to navigate the system to try and get people to where they need to be. But a lot of people that we engage with don't need a medical intervention, they dont. They just some mutual aid, some support, they need some practical stuff around their housing. So I think it's the disappointing thing as I read the bill as it was presented, it did feel narrow to me. I can't deny that. And I think it didn't reflect the experiences that we have as organisation." Dr Sandesh Gulhane "Being a member's bill it does need to be very narrow. It's not a government bill. If it was a government bill, that that's fair enough that this really does need to have enough scope. But my question was, what wording would you use in instead of a diagnosis of addiction? What wording would you like to see for people who do want to access treatment?" Lee Ball [Director of Addictions, Salvation Army] "For me, I think it's the person's right to want treatment. I think to give it a word or a title, it’s a really difficult thing. I don't envy your job trying to come up with a word for this because there are so many words that have so many different meanings."

FAVORUK 💜

22,503 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Shuler: If you think about every industrial revolution we’ve been through, working people have helped us make that transition. It’s really because we’ve helped tame the technology and figured out how to use it in the most effective way. So I think your question about augmentation versus replacement is the big question we have. If we can all agree that this is about making our jobs better, safer, easier, and more productive, then we’re all in. But if you’re looking to de-skill, dehumanize, and replace workers, to put people out on the street with no path forward, then absolutely you’re going to have a revolution. So I think that’s something we all need to be very real about and think seriously about. If we’re going to have productivity gains, working people—the ones who make these industries happen—need to share in that. There hasn’t been a lot of discussion about that here. Of course, in terms of how we create policies, how we create tax infrastructure, whether or not we are redistributing—yes, that word is a dirty word around here—we need to talk about it and confront how we’re going to make sure working people share in the gains of these technologies. And if you look at the numbers of jobs, let’s talk about job quality. Yes, maybe there are a lot of jobs created, but what kind of jobs are we talking about? Are they jobs that can sustain a family? Is it a job where people can actually work one job? One job should be enough.

Acyn

41,942 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce