Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

I think we should stop talking about international law When Netanyahu, with arrest warrants against him, can visit anywhere while former Philippines leader Duterte is whisked off to the Hague, there's no pretence of justice Follow #MOATS 429 #ICC #Netanyahu #Duterte

314,392 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von DebateDrifter 🇺🇸
DebateDrifter 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

The world was deceived into believing that Western countries genuinely uphold democracy, the rule of law, and morality. However, their unwavering support for criminal Netanyahu has exposed the hypocrisy. For example, they claim to champion women’s rights, pointing fingers at Muslim countries for “oppressing” women who wear the hijab—while simultaneously funding a genocide.

Profilbild von Torsum Zulfiqar
Torsum Zulfiqarvor 1 Jahr

Resign @PMOIndia puppets @10DowningStreet .

Profilbild von Takeshi Murakawa
Takeshi Murakawavor 1 Jahr

International law died with the Clinton administration and EU criminal organization.

Profilbild von Rarely Tolerable.
Rarely Tolerable.vor 1 Jahr

Do you support Trump's executive order ending Birthright Citizenship?

Profilbild von Torsum Zulfiqar
Torsum Zulfiqarvor 1 Jahr

Resign gang take jolani Erdogan affiliate @NawazSharifMNS & @OfficialDGISPR

Profilbild von palestine_palestine
palestine_palestinevor 1 Jahr

This!

Profilbild von ᚾᛟᚱᛊᛖ ᚱᛖᚾᛖᚷᚨᛞᛖ
ᚾᛟᚱᛊᛖ ᚱᛖᚾᛖᚷᚨᛞᛖvor 1 Jahr

#InternationalLaw is only for colored people, it's #racist to the bone

Profilbild von Torsum Zulfiqar
Torsum Zulfiqarvor 1 Jahr

Cut him off mr @PutinDirect …….. @PMOIndia / zelensky v2 traps snake 🐍 again with @OfficialDGISPR & @PMOIndia ref for mr @realDonaldTrump - criminal charges on them. .

Profilbild von steeeve8
steeeve8vor 1 Jahr

Your outfit is a crime.

Profilbild von Torsum Zulfiqar
Torsum Zulfiqarvor 1 Jahr

Spot on what law Uk bar is done full of illusion & cocktail for game theory pawn respected Mr @georgegalloway ref

Profilbild von Charger Rachak
Charger Rachakvor 1 Jahr

There never was. At one point in early 00s, US Secretary of State Colin Powel was ultimatively demanding from Serbia to extradite it's citizens to Hague Tribunal, all the while demanding that Belgrade signs a pledge not to extradite US soldiers to ICC.

Ähnliche Videos

Senator Imee Marcos and her gang’s contradictions: Twisting the law to protect Duterte Senator Imee Marcos and her gang’s attempt to frame Rodrigo Duterte’s arrest as unlawful is riddled with contradictions and blatant bias. They claims Duterte’s rights were “glaringly violated,” yet conveniently ignores the thousands of Filipinos who were deprived of their right to life under his brutal drug war. Now, when the justice system finally moves against Duterte, Manang Imee suddenly discovers a passion for due process. Let look into their assertions: 1. No Obligation to Arrest Duterte? Wrong. Senator Imee and her pro-Duterte gang asserts that the Philippines had no legal obligation to arrest Duterte because the ICC’s diffusion notice wasn’t a “Red Notice.” Yet, their own investigation confirmed that the Interpol’s “Wanted Persons Red Diffusion” serves the same purpose as a Red Notice, authorising the arrest of fugitives. If this mechanism was valid for other cases, why should Rodrigo Duterte be exempt? Manang Imee and her gang’s argument isn’t based on law—it’s based on political favoritism. 2. “No Due Process” for Duterte? A False Narrative. Senator Imee and her gang criticises the government for allegedly not obtaining a warrant from a Philippine court, but this completely ignores the reality of international legal cooperation. Duterte is wanted for crimes against humanity—an international crime that supersedes national legal barriers when local justice systems fail to act. Manang Imee and her gang’s argument would hold water if the Philippines had genuinely investigated and prosecuted Duterte’s crimes, but the government has done the opposite—shielding him from accountability. The ICC stepped in because Philippine institutions refused or failed to act. 3. The Family Visitation Argument is Pure Hypocrisy. Senator Imee and her gang bemoans that Duterte’s daughter, Vice President Sara Duterte, was temporarily prevented from seeing him after his arrest. They cite Republic Act 7438, which ensures visitation rights for detained individuals. However, this law does not require immediate access during an ongoing law enforcement operation—especially one involving a high-risk individual like Duterte, whose arrest could trigger security threats. If ordinary detainees can have temporary restrictions for operational security, why should Duterte receive special treatment? More importantly, Manang Imee and her gang never once raised concerns about the thousands of drug war victims who never got the chance to say goodbye to their families before being executed without trial. If they truly cared about visitation rights, where was their outrage when Duterte’s police forces killed, dumped, and buried Filipinos without a second thought? Their selective outrage exposes the glaring bias. Conclusion: Senator Imee’s defense of Duterte is not about justice—it’s about power Senator Imee and her gang’s statements are not rooted in legal principle, but in a desperate attempt to shield Duterte from facing the very justice he denied to thousands of Filipinos. The Philippine authorities did not violate due process—they upheld it by cooperating with the ICC to ensure that no one, not even a former president, is above the law. Manang Imee and her gang’s blatant bias in favor of Duterte proves one thing: they are not defending justice—they are defending impunity.

The King

41,751 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr