Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

I tried Hedra Agent by Hedra to see if one conversation could replace the usual mess of switching models, rewriting prompts, and juggling tools. So I started with a simple idea, Hedra Agent: - Selected the right models on its own - Generated refined visuals - Suggested multiple stylistic... directions - Then turned the chosen frames into a cohesive video All within the same conversation while remembering every detail we discussed. I was able to shift the mood, adjust the lighting, refine the composition, explore different angles, and even adapt the format simply by giving natural feedback. I did not have to restart or rebuild anything from scratch. The Agent handled the workflow from idea to finished, platform-ready content. What stood out was not just the output quality, but also the continuity. Instead of operating tools, it felt like collaborating with a system that understands context and builds with you step by step. Check how it works 👇🏻show more

Amira Zairi

54,214 subscribers

31,593 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Hedra Agent 2 turns a simple concept into a full creative production workflow. Hedra I gave it a challenge: “What could New York look like in 2050?” It researched future urban trends, developed the creative direction and script, then built the visuals and final cinematic sequence. What stood out was how the entire process—from research → concept → planning → production → final videohappened in one Space. Workflow 👇

Hedra Agent 2 turns a simple concept into a full creative production workflow. Hedra I gave it a challenge: “What could New York look like in 2050?” It researched future urban trends, developed the creative direction and script, then built the visuals and final cinematic sequence. What stood out was how the entire process—from research → concept → planning → production → final videohappened in one Space. Workflow 👇

Smiling Khan

21,533 views • 2 months ago

I wanted this typography to feel like part of the story, not just text added over a video. I used Pexo to explore different ways the words could move with the idea, giving it clear direction around the timing, movement and transitions. From there, I refined the result with feedback and Mark to Fix until the animation felt right. That’s what I like about the workflow — I can focus on the creative idea and communicate what needs to change without getting lost in a traditional editing timeline. Pexo The tool behind this one:

I wanted this typography to feel like part of the story, not just text added over a video. I used Pexo to explore different ways the words could move with the idea, giving it clear direction around the timing, movement and transitions. From there, I refined the result with feedback and Mark to Fix until the animation felt right. That’s what I like about the workflow — I can focus on the creative idea and communicate what needs to change without getting lost in a traditional editing timeline. Pexo The tool behind this one:

Anissa

14,763 views • 16 days ago

I created this 15-second cinematic product video with GPTProto Official using Seedance 2.0, and I was really impressed by how smooth the workflow was. What stood out to me was being able to access multiple advanced AI models in one place, making it easier to test ideas, compare results, and create without constantly switching between different platforms. A more flexible way to explore AI creativity while simplifying the process of working with multiple AI tools.

I created this 15-second cinematic product video with GPTProto Official using Seedance 2.0, and I was really impressed by how smooth the workflow was. What stood out to me was being able to access multiple advanced AI models in one place, making it easier to test ideas, compare results, and create without constantly switching between different platforms. A more flexible way to explore AI creativity while simplifying the process of working with multiple AI tools.

Alamin

48,506 views • 2 months ago

From product image to video with just one tool - Dzine As you may have noticed, this is one of my favorite tools. It is also very underrated, as probably 50% of my tutorials include some workflow. I was testing the new image-to-video option today, and I love it. Step - by step guide in comments 🔽 I can do 95% of a workflow without switching between apps. Image generation, Image to image with style reference, background removal, background generation, and 2 frames image to video. The only other app I have been using for this video is CapCut so that I can stitch it together. Step by step 🔽

From product image to video with just one tool - Dzine As you may have noticed, this is one of my favorite tools. It is also very underrated, as probably 50% of my tutorials include some workflow. I was testing the new image-to-video option today, and I love it. Step - by step guide in comments 🔽 I can do 95% of a workflow without switching between apps. Image generation, Image to image with style reference, background removal, background generation, and 2 frames image to video. The only other app I have been using for this video is CapCut so that I can stitch it together. Step by step 🔽

Teodora P L

28,523 views • 2 years ago

Still dropping plain-text checklists or messy screenshots when showing off app features? As someone who doesn't have the time to learn complex video editing software, I brought my Apple Notes product-film idea into Pexo and worked through the creation process with it. I started with my concept and materials, then used conversation to refine the structure, visuals, pacing, and details. After reviewing the initial result, I continued giving feedback and making revisions until the video came together. This time, I used Pexo. Pexo is a conversational AI video agent that helps you create complete videos through natural-language collaboration. It can handle visuals, audio, subtitles, and graphic treatments while you continue refining the result through conversation. For my project, I wanted to showcase Apple Notes features with smooth UI transitions, quick checklist creation, and interactive drawing tools. What I like about the process is that it doesn't stop after the first generation. You can keep discussing what needs to change, give feedback, and refine the video instead of starting everything over. No need to learn a complicated video-editing workflow first—just explain what you're trying to create, provide your materials, review the result, and keep refining it with Pexo. Give Pexo a try if you want to explore a more conversational way to create commercial videos. #MadeWithPexo

Still dropping plain-text checklists or messy screenshots when showing off app features? As someone who doesn't have the time to learn complex video editing software, I brought my Apple Notes product-film idea into Pexo and worked through the creation process with it. I started with my concept and materials, then used conversation to refine the structure, visuals, pacing, and details. After reviewing the initial result, I continued giving feedback and making revisions until the video came together. This time, I used Pexo. Pexo is a conversational AI video agent that helps you create complete videos through natural-language collaboration. It can handle visuals, audio, subtitles, and graphic treatments while you continue refining the result through conversation. For my project, I wanted to showcase Apple Notes features with smooth UI transitions, quick checklist creation, and interactive drawing tools. What I like about the process is that it doesn't stop after the first generation. You can keep discussing what needs to change, give feedback, and refine the video instead of starting everything over. No need to learn a complicated video-editing workflow first—just explain what you're trying to create, provide your materials, review the result, and keep refining it with Pexo. Give Pexo a try if you want to explore a more conversational way to create commercial videos. #MadeWithPexo

Elora🌞

44,050 views • 15 days ago

Created this mixed media video using the 'invideo editor', just by chatting with an editing agent. ~ Asked the agent to break up the original video into individual frames (for this one it was 12 fps) ~ Described the mixed media style we wanted in detail to the agent (you could also give the agent reference images and videos that you feel work best for the video you're creating), ~ And then asked it to generate each frame using an image-gen model and line it back up in the right place as a separate layer. Did all this in ~30 minutes.

Created this mixed media video using the 'invideo editor', just by chatting with an editing agent. ~ Asked the agent to break up the original video into individual frames (for this one it was 12 fps) ~ Described the mixed media style we wanted in detail to the agent (you could also give the agent reference images and videos that you feel work best for the video you're creating), ~ And then asked it to generate each frame using an image-gen model and line it back up in the right place as a separate layer. Did all this in ~30 minutes.

Invideo

219,290 views • 1 month ago

A product launch needs more than just a good idea. It needs visuals that communicate the product clearly. I explored using a new tool, a conversational AI video agent from Pexo, for a product launch concept with UX motion, focusing on smooth UI animations and engaging storytelling. What stood out to me was being able to refine the creative direction through conversation and use Mark to Fix for targeted changes. A practical workflow for turning product concepts into polished launch content.

A product launch needs more than just a good idea. It needs visuals that communicate the product clearly. I explored using a new tool, a conversational AI video agent from Pexo, for a product launch concept with UX motion, focusing on smooth UI animations and engaging storytelling. What stood out to me was being able to refine the creative direction through conversation and use Mark to Fix for targeted changes. A practical workflow for turning product concepts into polished launch content.

Johnn

67,113 views • 12 days ago

I tried MiniMax Design (H3) to see how it handles real content creation. The workflow is simple. You just write a prompt or drop in an image, and it turns that into a dynamic video with motion, framing, and scene depth. No timeline to manage. No editing setup. No back and forth. What stood out to me: • Text to video and image to video both feel smooth. • It handles motion, camera angles, and flow on its own. • Output is fast, usually within seconds. • Works well for reels, quick ads, storytelling, and idea testing. It removes the hardest part: starting from scratch and turns your ideas into content in minutes. Instead of thinking, “How do I make this video?” You start with, “What do I want to create?” That shift alone makes it worth exploring. Try it here: #Hailuo

I tried MiniMax Design (H3) to see how it handles real content creation. The workflow is simple. You just write a prompt or drop in an image, and it turns that into a dynamic video with motion, framing, and scene depth. No timeline to manage. No editing setup. No back and forth. What stood out to me: • Text to video and image to video both feel smooth. • It handles motion, camera angles, and flow on its own. • Output is fast, usually within seconds. • Works well for reels, quick ads, storytelling, and idea testing. It removes the hardest part: starting from scratch and turns your ideas into content in minutes. Instead of thinking, “How do I make this video?” You start with, “What do I want to create?” That shift alone makes it worth exploring. Try it here: #Hailuo

Manish Kumar Shah

27,680 views • 6 months ago

Making a good product video usually means juggling scripts, visuals, editing, subtitles, and all the little revisions along the way So I tried doing the whole thing through conversation with Pexo I gave it the details for Aether, a cloud devbox for Claude Code and Codex, with live agent control What I liked was being able to keep refining the video in the same chat. Explain what needs changing, look at the result, and keep going Pexo brings the production together into a complete video, rather than leaving you with separate assets to piece together yourself That makes getting started a lot easier. You don’t need to learn an editing app or complex prompt. You can focus on explaining the product and giving feedback You still decide what looks right, but you can ask for a change without knowing how to make every edit yourself And here’s the result 👇 Made with Pexo #MadeWithPexo

Making a good product video usually means juggling scripts, visuals, editing, subtitles, and all the little revisions along the way So I tried doing the whole thing through conversation with Pexo I gave it the details for Aether, a cloud devbox for Claude Code and Codex, with live agent control What I liked was being able to keep refining the video in the same chat. Explain what needs changing, look at the result, and keep going Pexo brings the production together into a complete video, rather than leaving you with separate assets to piece together yourself That makes getting started a lot easier. You don’t need to learn an editing app or complex prompt. You can focus on explaining the product and giving feedback You still decide what looks right, but you can ask for a change without knowing how to make every edit yourself And here’s the result 👇 Made with Pexo #MadeWithPexo

Aditi

12,457 views • 16 days ago

Most of my motion videos are now done fully by agents. Best approach I found looks sth like this: - Scribble out the rough storyboard - Hand it to an agent with a short description - Agent builds each scene with real components from the codebase - Skills & references handle the camera, transitions, cuts, easing and pacing It's impressive how fast you can get to sth solid, if you have the right workflow & skills.

Most of my motion videos are now done fully by agents. Best approach I found looks sth like this: - Scribble out the rough storyboard - Hand it to an agent with a short description - Agent builds each scene with real components from the codebase - Skills & references handle the camera, transitions, cuts, easing and pacing It's impressive how fast you can get to sth solid, if you have the right workflow & skills.

Nils

44,763 views • 20 days ago

messy inputs 👉🏽 polished outputs built a prototype with the idea of letting users bring together images from Lummi into a canvas, quickly wireframe a concept, and then generate polished images as a photo, illustration, 3d render, whatever—with the right lighting, shadows, cohesive colors, and all that good stuff the output is still not great... but this is where I see the future of creative tools heading—kind of like how you give ChatGPT an idea for an email—all the messy bits—and it writes it for you in any tone or style you want in a clear way. now imagine that but for design or imagery

messy inputs 👉🏽 polished outputs built a prototype with the idea of letting users bring together images from Lummi into a canvas, quickly wireframe a concept, and then generate polished images as a photo, illustration, 3d render, whatever—with the right lighting, shadows, cohesive colors, and all that good stuff the output is still not great... but this is where I see the future of creative tools heading—kind of like how you give ChatGPT an idea for an email—all the messy bits—and it writes it for you in any tone or style you want in a clear way. now imagine that but for design or imagery

Pablo Stanley

12,115 views • 1 year ago

Hot take: most “AI creator” tools are just fancy prompt boxes. This one actually behaves like an agent. I gave it a messy idea and instead of breaking, it: - built visuals (images) - turned them into video - kept iterating without me stepping in every 2 seconds (you can see it in the screen recording 👇) Halfway through using Yapper , it clicked — this thing doesn’t just generate… it works through ideas. That’s the difference: it thinks in workflows, not single outputs. You spend less time prompting…and more time actually creating. Not perfect yet — but it’s one of the first tools that feels like it scales with you. If you’re deep into AI, you’ll see the shift instantly.

Hot take: most “AI creator” tools are just fancy prompt boxes. This one actually behaves like an agent. I gave it a messy idea and instead of breaking, it: - built visuals (images) - turned them into video - kept iterating without me stepping in every 2 seconds (you can see it in the screen recording 👇) Halfway through using Yapper , it clicked — this thing doesn’t just generate… it works through ideas. That’s the difference: it thinks in workflows, not single outputs. You spend less time prompting…and more time actually creating. Not perfect yet — but it’s one of the first tools that feels like it scales with you. If you’re deep into AI, you’ll see the shift instantly.

The AI Guru 💡

50,197 views • 5 months ago

Opus 5.5 + Boreal-H3 is insane. I wanted to see what “one-shot an ad from a single ask” actually looks like, so I tried it with AssessZen, a platform that helps companies, universities, and recruitment teams create technical, coding, and online assessments built around real-world skills, integrity, and scale. From one ask, the video carried the product context, pacing, scenes, and overall story into a surprisingly coherent ad. That changes the creative workflow completely. Instead of generating individual clips and piecing everything together, you can start with the ad you have in mind and let the system build from there. I generated this with Creatify’s Ad Agent + Boreal-H3. Try Boreal-H3 in Model Playground.

Opus 5.5 + Boreal-H3 is insane. I wanted to see what “one-shot an ad from a single ask” actually looks like, so I tried it with AssessZen, a platform that helps companies, universities, and recruitment teams create technical, coding, and online assessments built around real-world skills, integrity, and scale. From one ask, the video carried the product context, pacing, scenes, and overall story into a surprisingly coherent ad. That changes the creative workflow completely. Instead of generating individual clips and piecing everything together, you can start with the ad you have in mind and let the system build from there. I generated this with Creatify’s Ad Agent + Boreal-H3. Try Boreal-H3 in Model Playground.

Jaymin Shah

79,618 views • 7 days ago

Burned 200k tokens just for "animations" and still AI couldn't do it well. I tried one of the expert animation design engineer's, Emil Kowalski's Agent Skill on my website to improve animation using Grok 4.5 It analyzed the UI, found issues, came up with a good plan, and iterated multiple times. The end result actually made parts of the UX worse. Also, it never suggested the animation experience I had in mind. So I explained exactly how I wanted it to feel. It got much closer, but still missed details like applying the same animation during keyboard navigation between cards. That silly. The lesson isn't about the model or the Agent Skill. But it's about, "Even the strongest models can't infer your taste yet." They can't and won't suggest it. AI only executes. You have to define the experience with enough details for it to execute. Otherwise, you'll end up with something that's almost okay, but still not what you wanted

Burned 200k tokens just for "animations" and still AI couldn't do it well. I tried one of the expert animation design engineer's, Emil Kowalski's Agent Skill on my website to improve animation using Grok 4.5 It analyzed the UI, found issues, came up with a good plan, and iterated multiple times. The end result actually made parts of the UX worse. Also, it never suggested the animation experience I had in mind. So I explained exactly how I wanted it to feel. It got much closer, but still missed details like applying the same animation during keyboard navigation between cards. That silly. The lesson isn't about the model or the Agent Skill. But it's about, "Even the strongest models can't infer your taste yet." They can't and won't suggest it. AI only executes. You have to define the experience with enough details for it to execute. Otherwise, you'll end up with something that's almost okay, but still not what you wanted

The Bugged Dev

26,416 views • 2 months ago

My favorite cmux feature is Cmd+Shift+U. I have 17 workspaces open right now, each running an agent. I used to click through tabs and macOS system-wide notifications to figure out what completed. But with cmux, I can just "Cmd+Shift+U" Cmd+Shift+U jumps to the newest unread notification. In practice that means the last agent that finished. It switches to the right workspace, focuses the exact pane, flashes it so you see where to look, and marks it read. If the notification came from another window, that window comes forward.

My favorite cmux feature is Cmd+Shift+U. I have 17 workspaces open right now, each running an agent. I used to click through tabs and macOS system-wide notifications to figure out what completed. But with cmux, I can just "Cmd+Shift+U" Cmd+Shift+U jumps to the newest unread notification. In practice that means the last agent that finished. It switches to the right workspace, focuses the exact pane, flashes it so you see where to look, and marks it read. If the notification came from another window, that window comes forward.

Lawrence Chen

28,517 views • 6 months ago

For 6 months I woke up at 5 AM to catch Asian markets on Polymarket. During that time I lost my girlfriend, gained 8 kg, and got used to drinking coffee instead of breakfast Then I wrote an agent that monitors everything for me while I sleep. In the 1st month income went up 15% and I finally deleted the 5 AM alarm Turns out a half-asleep human trades worse than a 200-line script I thought discipline meant waking up early. In reality it was just stubbornness that cost me money and health. When I finally sat down to build the agent it became clear why Here is what is under the hood: 1. Sentiment analysis powered by Claude. Every 15 minutes the agent runs a feed from 40+ Asian sources: Reuters Asia, Nikkei, South China Morning Post, Yonhap 2. NLP tone classification. It compares sentiment shifts to open markets on Polymarket through the API, and if the news has already dropped but the odds have not reacted yet that is the entry window 3. Kelly criterion. A mathematical formula for position sizing instead of my usual "I will bet more, feeling lucky" 4. A hard stop at 5% of the deposit per trade so that 1 mistake cannot kill the entire account 5. A cooldown between entries so the agent does not stack up a cluster of correlated positions These are exactly the rules I was missing at 5 AM. I knew them perfectly well but consistently ignored them because on adrenaline and caffeine every bet felt like an "obvious opportunity" When I ran a backtest on my old trades it was genuinely painful: 60% of the bets I placed by hand in a half-asleep state would have been rejected by the agent for failing the expected value filter Those were the exact ones dragging the whole result down When I was building my agent I needed a benchmark. A wallet that already trades on similar logic so I could compare my results to someone else's Found 1 that works almost like a mirror of what I described: same Asian markets, same cold calculation without emotion. I still keep it bookmarked and periodically check how it handles the same situations: That is actually the wallet I started with when testing auto-copying through a bot before I launched my own agent. A useful thing if you want to see how a strategy works on someone else's example first and only then build your own:

For 6 months I woke up at 5 AM to catch Asian markets on Polymarket. During that time I lost my girlfriend, gained 8 kg, and got used to drinking coffee instead of breakfast Then I wrote an agent that monitors everything for me while I sleep. In the 1st month income went up 15% and I finally deleted the 5 AM alarm Turns out a half-asleep human trades worse than a 200-line script I thought discipline meant waking up early. In reality it was just stubbornness that cost me money and health. When I finally sat down to build the agent it became clear why Here is what is under the hood: 1. Sentiment analysis powered by Claude. Every 15 minutes the agent runs a feed from 40+ Asian sources: Reuters Asia, Nikkei, South China Morning Post, Yonhap 2. NLP tone classification. It compares sentiment shifts to open markets on Polymarket through the API, and if the news has already dropped but the odds have not reacted yet that is the entry window 3. Kelly criterion. A mathematical formula for position sizing instead of my usual "I will bet more, feeling lucky" 4. A hard stop at 5% of the deposit per trade so that 1 mistake cannot kill the entire account 5. A cooldown between entries so the agent does not stack up a cluster of correlated positions These are exactly the rules I was missing at 5 AM. I knew them perfectly well but consistently ignored them because on adrenaline and caffeine every bet felt like an "obvious opportunity" When I ran a backtest on my old trades it was genuinely painful: 60% of the bets I placed by hand in a half-asleep state would have been rejected by the agent for failing the expected value filter Those were the exact ones dragging the whole result down When I was building my agent I needed a benchmark. A wallet that already trades on similar logic so I could compare my results to someone else's Found 1 that works almost like a mirror of what I described: same Asian markets, same cold calculation without emotion. I still keep it bookmarked and periodically check how it handles the same situations: That is actually the wallet I started with when testing auto-copying through a bot before I launched my own agent. A useful thing if you want to see how a strategy works on someone else's example first and only then build your own:

Blaze

126,979 views • 6 months ago

New open-source agent harness just landed! I got early access to TrueForge by TrueFoundry and have been running it locally for the past few days. The harness layer deserves as much attention as the model, and open source matters here because you can inspect the loop, run it on your own infrastructure, and swap to the latest or cheaper models. TrueForge handles the runtime work that makes an agent reliable. It drives the tool-calling loop, manages context, coordinates subagents, and executes code in a sandbox, with any model you choose. Every tool call re-sends the growing context to the model, so in practice the harness controls most of what an agent costs to run. A few things stood out from my testing and their published benchmarks. Vendor-Neutral by design. It runs OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google models alongside open-weight models like Kimi, GLM, and DeepSeek. Model routing is a setting, and you can send each task to the model that fits it. On a 14-task enterprise agent benchmark, it matched the accuracy of Claude Managed Agents running the same Opus 4.8 model at roughly 30% lower cost per run (3.8M tokens vs 10M for the same answers). Routing the same tasks to GLM-5.2 held accuracy and brought cost down by about 75%, around $3 per run instead of $12. Fully self-hosted and Open Source (MIT License). I had it running locally with one command, with sandboxed code execution working out of the box. It's time to own your agent harness. Thanks to TrueFoundry for partnering on this post.

New open-source agent harness just landed! I got early access to TrueForge by TrueFoundry and have been running it locally for the past few days. The harness layer deserves as much attention as the model, and open source matters here because you can inspect the loop, run it on your own infrastructure, and swap to the latest or cheaper models. TrueForge handles the runtime work that makes an agent reliable. It drives the tool-calling loop, manages context, coordinates subagents, and executes code in a sandbox, with any model you choose. Every tool call re-sends the growing context to the model, so in practice the harness controls most of what an agent costs to run. A few things stood out from my testing and their published benchmarks. Vendor-Neutral by design. It runs OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google models alongside open-weight models like Kimi, GLM, and DeepSeek. Model routing is a setting, and you can send each task to the model that fits it. On a 14-task enterprise agent benchmark, it matched the accuracy of Claude Managed Agents running the same Opus 4.8 model at roughly 30% lower cost per run (3.8M tokens vs 10M for the same answers). Routing the same tasks to GLM-5.2 held accuracy and brought cost down by about 75%, around $3 per run instead of $12. Fully self-hosted and Open Source (MIT License). I had it running locally with one command, with sandboxed code execution working out of the box. It's time to own your agent harness. Thanks to TrueFoundry for partnering on this post.

elvis

11,303 views • 1 month ago

Very pleasantly surprised to discover Cursor cloud agents can playtest the godot game I built. See the (sped up) video below of the agent playtesting the game. As I was watching it play the game, I can see the agent slowly learn how the game works and familiarise with the game's UI. I also realised that the agent is a very 'safe' player, choosing to play very safely and retreating from battle if it foresees it can't defeat. Very interesting to see. I wonder if I could simulate different game playtester behaviours that mimic different types of real-world player archetypes. With agentic playtesting, this means that the agents are able to provide actual gameplay feedback and suggestions to improve the game, having played the game itself. This unlocks a whole lot of possibilities for AI-assisted game dev, since it closes the playtest loop. This feels like the future of recursive game development, where agents can now recursively build > playtest > improve the games they are working on. Thanks edwin for letting me know that these agents can actually playtest games, not just software! Very excited to dig deeper to see what I can do with these agents with computer access!

Very pleasantly surprised to discover Cursor cloud agents can playtest the godot game I built. See the (sped up) video below of the agent playtesting the game. As I was watching it play the game, I can see the agent slowly learn how the game works and familiarise with the game's UI. I also realised that the agent is a very 'safe' player, choosing to play very safely and retreating from battle if it foresees it can't defeat. Very interesting to see. I wonder if I could simulate different game playtester behaviours that mimic different types of real-world player archetypes. With agentic playtesting, this means that the agents are able to provide actual gameplay feedback and suggestions to improve the game, having played the game itself. This unlocks a whole lot of possibilities for AI-assisted game dev, since it closes the playtest loop. This feels like the future of recursive game development, where agents can now recursively build > playtest > improve the games they are working on. Thanks edwin for letting me know that these agents can actually playtest games, not just software! Very excited to dig deeper to see what I can do with these agents with computer access!

Danny Limanseta

52,432 views • 7 months ago

I built "Avalanche Map" as a desktop app with to plan ski touring adventures! The Glaze agent just figured out how to pull the latest avalanche report from the official Swedish avalanche website - including detailed topo shading and slope angles. It supports 3d maps and can filter map output by the aspects affected by today's danger. Building niche software like this with just a few prompts is great

I built "Avalanche Map" as a desktop app with to plan ski touring adventures! The Glaze agent just figured out how to pull the latest avalanche report from the official Swedish avalanche website - including detailed topo shading and slope angles. It supports 3d maps and can filter map output by the aspects affected by today's danger. Building niche software like this with just a few prompts is great

Samuel

11,883 views • 7 months ago