Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
I truly appreciated Dr. Redfield’s honesty at the hearing today.
561,787 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)
10 Comments

Redfield states he knew the harms of the RNA vaccine in 2/2021. Why didn’t he say anything then? I want to know how much he made in royalties selling the vaccines?

I just can’t figure out why democrats want to hold gun manufacturers responsible for gun violence but not hold pharmaceutical manufacturers responsible for vaccine injuries

Former CDC Director Robert Redfield's testimony justifies the criminal referrals sent by Edward L. Tarpley Jr. and the Vires Law Group implicating Redfield, Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Rochelle Walensky, Daszak, Rick Bright, Hahn and Lane for murder.

Unbelievably intelligent question and answer session in a Senate hearing no less. Well done Senator Johnson @SenRonJohnson. You've been a stalwart in the battle for truth about the deadly vaccines and your Country is better off because of it. Thank you.

There's this really big disconnection between the conversations people like @SenRonJohnson are having and an older generation who are suffering after getting all the shots. Some are even lining up for more boosters after the CDC recently announced that everyone from age 6 months old and up should get another booster. But if the spike protein is deadly, why are we still encouraging babies to take it? This seems so evil. Somehow we need to get these conversations people like you are having in front of the American people who need to hear it most. Huge disconnect right now, local news refuses to even acknowledge these conversations are happening. Someone please help solve this problem!

I can't wait until you go to prison.

#Redfield Lied Before:

HONESTY would require Dr. Redfield coming clean about Operation Crimson Contagion. When did he know the original patients in Wuhan were co infected with avian influenza? When did he know it was our virus from the University of Wisconsin? 🐓

Ivermectin was a recommended treatment by the NIH. It was removed because it worked. If there was an effective treatment they couldn't put it on the children's schedule where they receive immunity from harms.

Dr. Redfield retired because he knew what was going on and wanted to get out of the line of fire. Why didn't he say something then, when he might have saved millions of lives?
