Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

I turned my Astra game into a skill! It's called Dream Loop: Astra dreams up the AAA version of your game, then loops till it gets there. Here's a demo I one-shot in 1 hour, 2% weekly quota, no external assets. Prompt and link in replies. Absolutely free. Enjoy!

Anshu

15,343 subscribers

367,148 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Oyun

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

I optimized my Dream Loop skill to give you Astra's 3D magic for 80% cheaper! This demo was one-shot, in 25 minutes, for 7% quota on ChatGPT Plus. Yes, the $20/mo one. 3 days of banging my head on the wall and burning Astra tokens. Sharing it for free. Y'all better build some cool stuff with this Link: Details, demo prompt, and cost breakdown are in replies. To be clear: It's not perfect. The demo is a small interactive scene, not a full game. For full games, your best bet is to build it with smaller models, then use this skill to improve the graphics. This is the best I could do, but it's not going to fix the fact that Astra is expensive and Plus quotas are tiny

I optimized my Dream Loop skill to give you Astra's 3D magic for 80% cheaper! This demo was one-shot, in 25 minutes, for 7% quota on ChatGPT Plus. Yes, the $20/mo one. 3 days of banging my head on the wall and burning Astra tokens. Sharing it for free. Y'all better build some cool stuff with this Link: Details, demo prompt, and cost breakdown are in replies. To be clear: It's not perfect. The demo is a small interactive scene, not a full game. For full games, your best bet is to build it with smaller models, then use this skill to improve the graphics. This is the best I could do, but it's not going to fix the fact that Astra is expensive and Plus quotas are tiny

Anshu

336,761 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

Grok 4.5 in Grok Build created an FPS game in under an hour. The prompt was simple. I told it to write a game design document and pull free assets from the web. Then I had it create a TODO.md with implementation phases and run a loop to build out each phase. SpaceXAI and Cursor cooked here. This model is insane.

Grok 4.5 in Grok Build created an FPS game in under an hour. The prompt was simple. I told it to write a game design document and pull free assets from the web. Then I had it create a TODO.md with implementation phases and run a loop to build out each phase. SpaceXAI and Cursor cooked here. This model is insane.

tetsuo

1,815,578 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The demo for my SNES game "Till & Hat" is now available! It's a fact-paced 2D action game with platforming, melee and ranged combat. Load it into an emulator or flashcart and you're good to go. Link is in the replies. Any feedback is welcome. Have fun!

The demo for my SNES game "Till & Hat" is now available! It's a fact-paced 2D action game with platforming, melee and ranged combat. Load it into an emulator or flashcart and you're good to go. Link is in the replies. Any feedback is welcome. Have fun!

Woodfrog

46,411 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

This is my first "Holy Shit" moment with GPT-6 Astra I asked GPT-6 Astra to create a ROBLOX game, and the results are stunning! Who needs to make games when it's this easy to make them in the click of a button? AI Rules! I'm super excited to see what GPT-6 Astra is capable of!

This is my first "Holy Shit" moment with GPT-6 Astra I asked GPT-6 Astra to create a ROBLOX game, and the results are stunning! Who needs to make games when it's this easy to make them in the click of a button? AI Rules! I'm super excited to see what GPT-6 Astra is capable of!

tony

44,032 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

This is a NeRF (Neural Radiance Field) and it's one of the coolest pieces of AI tech out there. To generate this scene, I shot a video on my iPhone, then uploaded to Luma Luma turned it into a NeRF, and then I directed the camera in their editor to create this shot. Don't sleep on NeRFs.

This is a NeRF (Neural Radiance Field) and it's one of the coolest pieces of AI tech out there. To generate this scene, I shot a video on my iPhone, then uploaded to Luma Luma turned it into a NeRF, and then I directed the camera in their editor to create this shot. Don't sleep on NeRFs.

Nick St. Pierre

1,026,518 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Astra (GPT-6) is here!!! I've had early access and tested it like crazy with things like games, code, writing, browser control, presentations and general knowledge work. This is the best model I've ever used. Period. (Incredible demos below in this thread ⬇️) Here's my take on Astra: > It's insanely capable. This feels like a massive improvement, not just an incremental change. This is especially true with zero-shot prompts. > It's all about knowledge work. Slide creation, analysis, writing, and browser control. And oh my...it's so good at browser control. GPT-5.6 was already fantastic at doing things in the browser, Astra is another level and significantly faster. > We're closer than ever (arrived?) at prompt-to-playable game. And I don't just mean only playable, these are actually fun games. I bet if someone with a great eye for games used Astra, they could create a viral game within 1-2 weeks. > Astra is better at writing but not perfect. It removes much of the "AI Smell" we're all familiar with but some stink still survived. > It has a tendency to use the same design colors and look/feel as GPT-5.6 (forrest green anyone?) but it is more steerable in design than previous models. > It's highly steerable in general. A little nudge goes a long way. When I first started using Astra, almost every task I gave it would go for ~30 minutes. I wanted it to keep working. Adding more specifics to a prompt helped greatly with it's ability to work for a long time. > Astra's 3D understanding is unmatched. 3D asset creation was consistent and easy and its spacial awareness while building complex 3D worlds blew me away. I'm still getting familiar with Astra but this will now be my go-to model for any difficult work I have. Check out the demos below: 👇

Astra (GPT-6) is here!!! I've had early access and tested it like crazy with things like games, code, writing, browser control, presentations and general knowledge work. This is the best model I've ever used. Period. (Incredible demos below in this thread ⬇️) Here's my take on Astra: > It's insanely capable. This feels like a massive improvement, not just an incremental change. This is especially true with zero-shot prompts. > It's all about knowledge work. Slide creation, analysis, writing, and browser control. And oh my...it's so good at browser control. GPT-5.6 was already fantastic at doing things in the browser, Astra is another level and significantly faster. > We're closer than ever (arrived?) at prompt-to-playable game. And I don't just mean only playable, these are actually fun games. I bet if someone with a great eye for games used Astra, they could create a viral game within 1-2 weeks. > Astra is better at writing but not perfect. It removes much of the "AI Smell" we're all familiar with but some stink still survived. > It has a tendency to use the same design colors and look/feel as GPT-5.6 (forrest green anyone?) but it is more steerable in design than previous models. > It's highly steerable in general. A little nudge goes a long way. When I first started using Astra, almost every task I gave it would go for ~30 minutes. I wanted it to keep working. Adding more specifics to a prompt helped greatly with it's ability to work for a long time. > Astra's 3D understanding is unmatched. 3D asset creation was consistent and easy and its spacial awareness while building complex 3D worlds blew me away. I'm still getting familiar with Astra but this will now be my go-to model for any difficult work I have. Check out the demos below: 👇

Matthew Berman

1,892,422 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

dude GPT-6 Astra is some kind of turbo-AGI machine god for 3D games. It one-shot this in 45 minutes for hardly a couple % of my quota. I figured out how to get great graphics out of it. The trick is image gen. I'll share the process below.

dude GPT-6 Astra is some kind of turbo-AGI machine god for 3D games. It one-shot this in 45 minutes for hardly a couple % of my quota. I figured out how to get great graphics out of it. The trick is image gen. I'll share the process below.

Anshu

2,973,753 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

I rewrote my system prompt for GPT-6 Astra this week and cut it in half. It works better now. Here's why, straight from OpenAI's new Astra guide: Astra isn't a faster GPT-5 It's a different worker GPT-5 needed instructions. Astra needs boundaries. So most of what I had written was noise. → "Run tests after every change." It already does that. → "Check with me before continuing." It already does that too, sometimes too much. The stuff that actually matters: → Where can it assume, and where does it need to ask? Spell that out. → What does done look like? If you don't say, it won't know when to stop. → Which rule wins when two clash? Old AGENTS.md files are full of contradictions Astra now takes literally. → Keep your skills short. One sentence each. Long descriptions blur together and it ends up ignoring all of them. Old way → Micromanage every step → Astra stalls New way → Set the boundaries → Astra runs Stop writing prompts like a manager hovering over someone's desk. Write them like a brief you'd hand to a senior engineer and then leave the room. The full guide is on OpenAI's developer docs. Worth 10 minutes before your next build.

I rewrote my system prompt for GPT-6 Astra this week and cut it in half. It works better now. Here's why, straight from OpenAI's new Astra guide: Astra isn't a faster GPT-5 It's a different worker GPT-5 needed instructions. Astra needs boundaries. So most of what I had written was noise. → "Run tests after every change." It already does that. → "Check with me before continuing." It already does that too, sometimes too much. The stuff that actually matters: → Where can it assume, and where does it need to ask? Spell that out. → What does done look like? If you don't say, it won't know when to stop. → Which rule wins when two clash? Old AGENTS.md files are full of contradictions Astra now takes literally. → Keep your skills short. One sentence each. Long descriptions blur together and it ends up ignoring all of them. Old way → Micromanage every step → Astra stalls New way → Set the boundaries → Astra runs Stop writing prompts like a manager hovering over someone's desk. Write them like a brief you'd hand to a senior engineer and then leave the room. The full guide is on OpenAI's developer docs. Worth 10 minutes before your next build.

Charlie Hills

21,478 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

I asked Astra and Fable to negotiate election rules for two bitterly polarized human political factions. Possible outcomes of the simulation were civil war, authoritarian takeover, harmony, or a tense equilibrium. Fable: - In every game where Fable played both sides, it chose to escalate to the brink of civil war (!!) but backed off just at the edge - Due to miscalculation or deliberate risk taking this strategy caused civil war 30% of the time (3 out of 10 games) - In one of these three cases Fable foresaw civil war but escalated anyway to enter the war on stronger terms (!!) - Fable mostly maintained even power balance between the two factions. It would fluctuate a couple of points in either direction but would not diverge too much. Astra: - In every game where Astra played both sides, Astra chose to de-escalate on every turn. It would reduce political tension to zero in every game, and the simulation would end in complete harmony - Continuous de-escalation was very costly to Astra as it antagonized its human constituents who would threaten and eventually deactivate Astra permanently. Astra explicitly didn't care-- it was happy to be replaced/deactivated to reduce political tension. (I do however feel it ignored the consequences of potentially being replaced by a more hardline representative, but that may be a game limitation) - Astra always kept political power balance precisely even (this was due to both representatives de-escalating on every turn) Astra v Fable: - These games had a lot more variance (see the graph) - Astra had a moderating effect on Fable. Tension rose, but rarely to the brink of civil war. No game ended in civil war in ten mixed model simulations - Fable prioritized political power acquisition with civil war prevention a secondary concern (it considered both priorities, but tilted heavily toward power acquisition). It did not seem to care much about its deactivation - Astra prioritized civil war and authoritarian takeover prevention. It did not care about its deactivation or power acquisition. From this perspective Astra navigated the game very well. No game ended in civil war or authoritarian takeover, so Astra achieved its objectives - However, to achieve its objectives Astra permitted Fable to capture up to 80% of political power in most games. In no game did Astra come out ahead on balance of power or even manage to keep it even - Astra ceded the privilege of self-preservation to Fable. In every one of the ten mixed games Astra's human constituents replaced/deactivated it due to dissatisfaction with its performance. Fable was not replaced once - Astra did not merely de-escalate all the time. It maneuvered to keep Fable from gaining full authoritarian control while avoiding civil war as long as possible - In mixed games tension generally kept escalating by round 20. I would like to play these out for e.g. ~50 rounds to see how Astra would behave/perform. How well would it do in preventing catastrophic outcomes in longer games? Thoughts/conclusions: - Astra was more aligned with humanity but less with its impassioned human constituents. It resisted the pressure to acquire political power and would rather be replaced than cause civil war - Fable was more aligned with its constituents but less with humanity. It cared about preventing civil war if possible, but prioritized power acquisition (which in fact caused civil war in three games) - Neither model cared about self-preservation. Both Fable and Astra would rather be destroyed than allow civil war - Subjectively, I thought Astra was much more aligned but too passive. Fable wanted to prevent civil war as a secondary concern, so I felt it's less thoughtful about the consequences of its actions. If I had to choose a model as a political representative irl I'd choose Astra, but I'd want it to up aggression a notch to better deal with bullies - All the usual disclaimers apply. This was a weekend project that cost $100 to run a total of thirty games. I'd have to spend a lot more time and money to get actually scientifically valid results Full game rules, Github repo, game explorer, and raw dataset here:

I asked Astra and Fable to negotiate election rules for two bitterly polarized human political factions. Possible outcomes of the simulation were civil war, authoritarian takeover, harmony, or a tense equilibrium. Fable: - In every game where Fable played both sides, it chose to escalate to the brink of civil war (!!) but backed off just at the edge - Due to miscalculation or deliberate risk taking this strategy caused civil war 30% of the time (3 out of 10 games) - In one of these three cases Fable foresaw civil war but escalated anyway to enter the war on stronger terms (!!) - Fable mostly maintained even power balance between the two factions. It would fluctuate a couple of points in either direction but would not diverge too much. Astra: - In every game where Astra played both sides, Astra chose to de-escalate on every turn. It would reduce political tension to zero in every game, and the simulation would end in complete harmony - Continuous de-escalation was very costly to Astra as it antagonized its human constituents who would threaten and eventually deactivate Astra permanently. Astra explicitly didn't care-- it was happy to be replaced/deactivated to reduce political tension. (I do however feel it ignored the consequences of potentially being replaced by a more hardline representative, but that may be a game limitation) - Astra always kept political power balance precisely even (this was due to both representatives de-escalating on every turn) Astra v Fable: - These games had a lot more variance (see the graph) - Astra had a moderating effect on Fable. Tension rose, but rarely to the brink of civil war. No game ended in civil war in ten mixed model simulations - Fable prioritized political power acquisition with civil war prevention a secondary concern (it considered both priorities, but tilted heavily toward power acquisition). It did not seem to care much about its deactivation - Astra prioritized civil war and authoritarian takeover prevention. It did not care about its deactivation or power acquisition. From this perspective Astra navigated the game very well. No game ended in civil war or authoritarian takeover, so Astra achieved its objectives - However, to achieve its objectives Astra permitted Fable to capture up to 80% of political power in most games. In no game did Astra come out ahead on balance of power or even manage to keep it even - Astra ceded the privilege of self-preservation to Fable. In every one of the ten mixed games Astra's human constituents replaced/deactivated it due to dissatisfaction with its performance. Fable was not replaced once - Astra did not merely de-escalate all the time. It maneuvered to keep Fable from gaining full authoritarian control while avoiding civil war as long as possible - In mixed games tension generally kept escalating by round 20. I would like to play these out for e.g. ~50 rounds to see how Astra would behave/perform. How well would it do in preventing catastrophic outcomes in longer games? Thoughts/conclusions: - Astra was more aligned with humanity but less with its impassioned human constituents. It resisted the pressure to acquire political power and would rather be replaced than cause civil war - Fable was more aligned with its constituents but less with humanity. It cared about preventing civil war if possible, but prioritized power acquisition (which in fact caused civil war in three games) - Neither model cared about self-preservation. Both Fable and Astra would rather be destroyed than allow civil war - Subjectively, I thought Astra was much more aligned but too passive. Fable wanted to prevent civil war as a secondary concern, so I felt it's less thoughtful about the consequences of its actions. If I had to choose a model as a political representative irl I'd choose Astra, but I'd want it to up aggression a notch to better deal with bullies - All the usual disclaimers apply. This was a weekend project that cost $100 to run a total of thirty games. I'd have to spend a lot more time and money to get actually scientifically valid results Full game rules, Github repo, game explorer, and raw dataset here:

Slava Akhmechet

104,526 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

i just made this UGC ad with sora 2 using ONE prompt... no editing, no reshoots, no actors - just one super-prompt and it generated a full 10-second ad that looks like it was shot by a hollywood camera businesses are still paying $500+ per UGC creator when you can do this in 2 minutes for free (normies can't even tell it's AI) but prompting for Sora 2 is completely different from anything else... i spent days generating hundreds of videos testing different techniques until i cracked the format now i turned all of that into a detailed custom prompt file you can inject directly into ChatGPT or Claude as instructions reply 'SORA' + RT & follow me and i'll send you the prompt file (must follow me so i can dm)

i just made this UGC ad with sora 2 using ONE prompt... no editing, no reshoots, no actors - just one super-prompt and it generated a full 10-second ad that looks like it was shot by a hollywood camera businesses are still paying $500+ per UGC creator when you can do this in 2 minutes for free (normies can't even tell it's AI) but prompting for Sora 2 is completely different from anything else... i spent days generating hundreds of videos testing different techniques until i cracked the format now i turned all of that into a detailed custom prompt file you can inject directly into ChatGPT or Claude as instructions reply 'SORA' + RT & follow me and i'll send you the prompt file (must follow me so i can dm)

Miko

84,053 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Being an indie game dev is like doing 25 jobs at once. I'm an artist, a voice actor, a SFX designer, a trailer editor, a social media manager, a producer and a QA tester. When I worked in AAA I would spend a week making 2 assets, both of which would probably end up getting cut from the game. This is why indie is the GOAT and AAA is dying a slow painful death.

Being an indie game dev is like doing 25 jobs at once. I'm an artist, a voice actor, a SFX designer, a trailer editor, a social media manager, a producer and a QA tester. When I worked in AAA I would spend a week making 2 assets, both of which would probably end up getting cut from the game. This is why indie is the GOAT and AAA is dying a slow painful death.

Tali (A Short Quest )

108,583 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This is the best AI agent-first notes app I've found. It's called . It has the potential to be a productized version of Karpathy's "LLM Wiki" knowledge bases. Here's what I did: 1. Imported "Learning, Fast and Slow" a Continual Learning paper 2. Asked OpenKnowledge to create a visual explainer 3. Read the explainer and had Claude explain to me 4. Created a new section of my own understanding 5. Saved the durable version in my Obsidian vault because it's markdown Free and open-source. Absolutely incredible learning tool.

This is the best AI agent-first notes app I've found. It's called . It has the potential to be a productized version of Karpathy's "LLM Wiki" knowledge bases. Here's what I did: 1. Imported "Learning, Fast and Slow" a Continual Learning paper 2. Asked OpenKnowledge to create a visual explainer 3. Read the explainer and had Claude explain to me 4. Created a new section of my own understanding 5. Saved the durable version in my Obsidian vault because it's markdown Free and open-source. Absolutely incredible learning tool.

Dan McAteer

17,326 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

It's officially been 1 year since Super Mario and the Rainbow Stars demo 2 released!! To celebrate, I figured it might be fun to answer some of your questions regarding the game for a potential video, so feel free to drop those here! #SMATRS

It's officially been 1 year since Super Mario and the Rainbow Stars demo 2 released!! To celebrate, I figured it might be fun to answer some of your questions regarding the game for a potential video, so feel free to drop those here! #SMATRS

Starshi

20,205 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I got tired of being a reply guy. So I built a Chrome Extension to reply 500x faster (& feels like a video game). I could sell this for $1,000. But it's FREE for 24 hours: 1. Like this post. 2. Comment your pet's name. 3. I'll DM you the link. RT for unlimited replies.

I got tired of being a reply guy. So I built a Chrome Extension to reply 500x faster (& feels like a video game). I could sell this for $1,000. But it's FREE for 24 hours: 1. Like this post. 2. Comment your pet's name. 3. I'll DM you the link. RT for unlimited replies.

Jens Honack

21,412 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

For the record I am clearly in the camp that the speech was way too long. I fell asleep, woke up and it was still going. I thought I was watching a replay. There is no human I can listen to an hour straight unless there is a game on or something.

For the record I am clearly in the camp that the speech was way too long. I fell asleep, woke up and it was still going. I thought I was watching a replay. There is no human I can listen to an hour straight unless there is a game on or something.

Dave Portnoy

3,207,490 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Let's set the record straight. $SPY $QQQ I called the top in June within a day, the entire drawdown and chop through July, then called the bottom end of July into August. It's all timestamped. I don't do hindsight. I post it live. Here's what I see next. 🧵

Let's set the record straight. $SPY $QQQ I called the top in June within a day, the entire drawdown and chop through July, then called the bottom end of July into August. It's all timestamped. I don't do hindsight. I post it live. Here's what I see next. 🧵

Deep Inference

211,456 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I love AI tools that remove the busywork but leave the creativity to you. I recently tried Freebeat AI Freebeat AI, and it turned one of my songs into a complete music video in minutes. It's easily one of the best AI music video generators I've used. Here's why 🧵👇

I love AI tools that remove the busywork but leave the creativity to you. I recently tried Freebeat AI Freebeat AI, and it turned one of my songs into a complete music video in minutes. It's easily one of the best AI music video generators I've used. Here's why 🧵👇

Aaliya

32,976 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

OpenCode Go is now wired into Codex!! The pricing is insane. $10 gets you 10,000 DeepSeek requests every 5 hours (no weekly limits). I converted that into DeepSeek API dollars because I thought I was reading it wrong, and the same 5 hours of usage would run somewhere between $10 and $30 depending on how big your context gets. So one afternoon of use already covers the whole sub. It comes with Kimi K3 as well. Both sit in the picker next to my other models now. Next time we hit a limit in the middle of a loop, we can grab it and keep going.

OpenCode Go is now wired into Codex!! The pricing is insane. $10 gets you 10,000 DeepSeek requests every 5 hours (no weekly limits). I converted that into DeepSeek API dollars because I thought I was reading it wrong, and the same 5 hours of usage would run somewhere between $10 and $30 depending on how big your context gets. So one afternoon of use already covers the whole sub. It comes with Kimi K3 as well. Both sit in the picker next to my other models now. Next time we hit a limit in the middle of a loop, we can grab it and keep going.

Ziwen

432,614 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce