Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

I verified this and it’s true “This is a class Group 1 carcinogen. The new study warns there's NO SAFE amount of ham, bacon, or even pepperoni for human consumption” Processed meats including ham, bacon, pepperoni are now definitively linked to cancer (Group 1), and newer 2025–2026 studies reinforce...

WallStreetApes's profile picture

Wall Street Apes

1,377,377 subscribers

617,058 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessNews & PoliticsScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Bacon sausages hotdogs and ham officially classified in the same cancer risk group as a cigarette.
2:10

Bacon sausages hotdogs and ham officially classified in the same cancer risk group as a cigarette.

JOKAMRREDPILLZ

14,710 views • 17 days ago

American are saying that Dunkin' Donuts bacon looks so fake it’s essentially turned into those bacon strips you give to your dogs The way it looks is almost identical to the bacon strips made for dog treats The reason for this is at Dunkin' Donuts the bacon is extremely processed. According to their website, it’s real bacon but the look of it comes from the processing It’s also a carcinogen which is very concerning. The bacon contains Sodium Nitrite, when heated it forms nitrosamines, which are classified as probable carcinogens colorectal cancer risk. It also contains - Sodium Erythorbate, a synthetic antioxidant used alongside nitrite to speed up curing and help reduce nitrosamine formation. - Sodium Phosphate, high phosphate intake from processed foods is associated with potential kidney strain, bone health issues, and cardiovascular concerns. - And lots of added Sugars
1:24

American are saying that Dunkin' Donuts bacon looks so fake it’s essentially turned into those bacon strips you give to your dogs The way it looks is almost identical to the bacon strips made for dog treats The reason for this is at Dunkin' Donuts the bacon is extremely processed. According to their website, it’s real bacon but the look of it comes from the processing It’s also a carcinogen which is very concerning. The bacon contains Sodium Nitrite, when heated it forms nitrosamines, which are classified as probable carcinogens colorectal cancer risk. It also contains - Sodium Erythorbate, a synthetic antioxidant used alongside nitrite to speed up curing and help reduce nitrosamine formation. - Sodium Phosphate, high phosphate intake from processed foods is associated with potential kidney strain, bone health issues, and cardiovascular concerns. - And lots of added Sugars

Wall Street Apes

223,115 views • 6 days ago

This is crazy. American Doctor David Morris exposing lunch meats sold in the US are classified as a Class 1 Carcinogens We have been poisoned for decades “There is convincing evidence that ingredients in these meats cause cancer” “Lunch meats are classified as a Class I carcinogen. I'm going to read this to you just so you know what the World Health Organization says about lunch meats, deli meats here: "Considered a Class I carcinogen by the World Health Organization because it is a type of processed meat which is a Group 1 carcinogen in humans. Eating processed meats, including deli meats, increases the risk of colorectal cancer, with the risk growing with the amount consumed. There is convincing evidence that ingredients in these meats cause cancer." So, they can train- contain nitrates and nitrites that turn into a substance called NOCs in your gut, which significantly increase your risk of colorectal cancer, and then even other cancers. So, it would be my advice to people to s- significantly reduce or eliminate their consumption of deli meats and lunch meats. They're convenient, they might even be tasty and they might make a good sandwich, but the curing and the processing and the salting and the smoking and all these things that are done to these meats increases the toxic chemicals in them and the cancer-growing potential in them.” “You can continue to do what you want, if you live in a free country here in the United States, if you want to live long and you don't want to be subject to cancers, lots of things can cause cancers”
1:56

This is crazy. American Doctor David Morris exposing lunch meats sold in the US are classified as a Class 1 Carcinogens We have been poisoned for decades “There is convincing evidence that ingredients in these meats cause cancer” “Lunch meats are classified as a Class I carcinogen. I'm going to read this to you just so you know what the World Health Organization says about lunch meats, deli meats here: "Considered a Class I carcinogen by the World Health Organization because it is a type of processed meat which is a Group 1 carcinogen in humans. Eating processed meats, including deli meats, increases the risk of colorectal cancer, with the risk growing with the amount consumed. There is convincing evidence that ingredients in these meats cause cancer." So, they can train- contain nitrates and nitrites that turn into a substance called NOCs in your gut, which significantly increase your risk of colorectal cancer, and then even other cancers. So, it would be my advice to people to s- significantly reduce or eliminate their consumption of deli meats and lunch meats. They're convenient, they might even be tasty and they might make a good sandwich, but the curing and the processing and the salting and the smoking and all these things that are done to these meats increases the toxic chemicals in them and the cancer-growing potential in them.” “You can continue to do what you want, if you live in a free country here in the United States, if you want to live long and you don't want to be subject to cancers, lots of things can cause cancers”

Wall Street Apes

165,435 views • 9 months ago

2. Processed deli meat (bacon, salami, etc.) They're classified as a Group 1 carcinogen — the same category as tobacco & asbestos. • Nitrates • High-heat cooking They create cancer-linked compounds that silently damage your cells.
1:01

2. Processed deli meat (bacon, salami, etc.) They're classified as a Group 1 carcinogen — the same category as tobacco & asbestos. • Nitrates • High-heat cooking They create cancer-linked compounds that silently damage your cells.

Achilleas

282,494 views • 10 months ago

Subway launched hot dogs called the SubDog and people are noticing it looks very unappetizing and the color seems very dark I looked up the ingredients. They are: “Beef, water, corn syrup solids, modified corn starch, salt, potassium lactate, sodium phosphate, sodium diacetate, dextrose, sodium erythorbate, garlic powder, spice extractives, sodium nitrite, smoke” These are dangerous ones Sodium nitrite (curing/preservative): Prevents bacterial growth (e.g., botulism) and gives the pink color. When heated or in the body, it can form nitrosamines, which the World Health Organization and IARC classify processed meats as carcinogenic (Group 1). Linked to increased colorectal cancer risk with frequent consumption Yes you read that right, LINKED TO CANCER Sodium phosphate / Potassium lactate / Sodium diacetate: Used for texture, moisture retention, and preservation. High phosphate intake is sometimes associated with kidney strain or bone health issues in excess, but levels here are typical for processed foods. Sodium erythorbate: Antioxidant that speeds curing and prevents spoilage. GRAS loophole It’s launched mainly in Canada right now but man does this thing look questionable
1:55

Subway launched hot dogs called the SubDog and people are noticing it looks very unappetizing and the color seems very dark I looked up the ingredients. They are: “Beef, water, corn syrup solids, modified corn starch, salt, potassium lactate, sodium phosphate, sodium diacetate, dextrose, sodium erythorbate, garlic powder, spice extractives, sodium nitrite, smoke” These are dangerous ones Sodium nitrite (curing/preservative): Prevents bacterial growth (e.g., botulism) and gives the pink color. When heated or in the body, it can form nitrosamines, which the World Health Organization and IARC classify processed meats as carcinogenic (Group 1). Linked to increased colorectal cancer risk with frequent consumption Yes you read that right, LINKED TO CANCER Sodium phosphate / Potassium lactate / Sodium diacetate: Used for texture, moisture retention, and preservation. High phosphate intake is sometimes associated with kidney strain or bone health issues in excess, but levels here are typical for processed foods. Sodium erythorbate: Antioxidant that speeds curing and prevents spoilage. GRAS loophole It’s launched mainly in Canada right now but man does this thing look questionable

Wall Street Apes

129,595 views • 12 days ago

I am sorry but Dr Pal Manickam, the Gastroenterologist from California, is becoming not just a health misinformation menace, but also a subtle "hate-monger" with his divisive attitude towards dietary choices in India, also known as Bharat, a Union of States and marriage of [dietary] cultures and traditions. Claims: 1. Eating red meat (beef and pork) causes colon cancer 2. Nitrosamines (from nitrites/nitrates) in red meat causes colon cancer 3. Cancer screening in USA above age of 50, but not in India 4. Kerala has maximum number of colon cancers in India 5. Kerala has maximum number of colon cancers because Malayalees eat a lot of beef. A lot. Response: 1. Eating red meat does not cause colon cancer Higher red meat consumption was shown to have a correlation with increased risk for colon cancer, but the evidence for independent association was weak and remains weak Eating red meat does not increase risk of colon cancer. Excessive consumption of red meat/ processed meat (excessive not yet fully defined across populations) was confusingly correlated with increased risk of colon cancer 2. Studies have only looked at nitrites and nitrates [and hence nitrosamine formation] causing stomach cancer and not colon cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) also focussed on nitrosamines and stomach cancer, but the potential role for dietary nitrate/nitrite in colon cancer is not conclusively proven. Meat-based diets (specifically processed meat, not fresh meat) have a well described higher risk for cancer, but it is not readily attributable to nitrite consistently in all studies. Most studies are on ground and well water and not meat. And the strongest study to show cancer link and nitrite consumption is in mice, not humans The biggest source of nitrate exposure is dietary consumption of certain types of vegetables that are naturally high in nitrate. This is a clear case of investigator bias, looking at any possible way to force the data into a specific conclusion (like Dr. Pal is doing in the video). The IARC maintains the tone of its conclusion, but only to reiterate its validity in a theoretical state, while acknowledging that the epidemiology does to support these conclusions. Nitrites are just one reason processed meats may contribute to bowel cancer, and their relative importance is uncertain. Other factors that may contribute include iron; PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) which are formed in smoked meats; and HCAs (heterocyclic amines), which are created when meat is cooked over an open flame – and which also are tumour-promoting. So its not just red meat, but the cooking method signficantly affecting health outcomes. 3. India does not have a national level screening protocol because the proportion of colon cancer among all cancers in India is only 3% which would lead to wastage of medical resources on a low-incidence cancer detection protocol. But in the USA, colon cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death. Overall, the lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer is about 1 in 23 for men and 1 in 26 for women - which is much much higher compared to India and that is why they have screening protocols in place - not because they eat more red meat than Indians. 4. Kerala has the highest crude incidence rate of all cancers followed by Mizoram. Not colon cancer. All cancers. Highest colon cancer rates and burden of colon cancer are observed in Goa and Orissa, not Kerala. & While the discussion on beef and colon cancer is ongoing in the video, a segment of the clip shows a news item "concerning increasing cases of colon cancer in Kerala" - this is that news piece - - and read what it says: it talks about only younger age group and colon cancer. "Experts opine that underlying factors leading to the rise in cases, especially at this age, could be lifestyle, environment and genetic factors" - they do not mention beef at all. The report also says: "Though we have no authentic records to show the statistics of rising cases, we have been observing a trend here. Our changing lifestyle is most likely to blame for the rise in colorectal cancer cases amongst younger people, though hereditary reasons are also a major cause." - again, no mention of beef eating. 5. Lakshwadeep is India's biggest meat eater followed by north-east states such as Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Nagaland and Manipur followed by Kerala. MEAT EATING. Not beef eating. Specifically looking at the largest beef consuming state - it is Meghalaya, where more than 80% of the population consumes this meat, not Kerala. Kerala is the largest beef consuming state in the context of male population only. [ 6. Oh by the way, about pork and colon cancer --> the risk was not increased consuming high amounts of pork: and there is only one study showing colon cancer risk in women in Japan, not India and that too who consumed pork >/= 3 times/week compared to </=1 time: Add-on: The risk for colon cancer is not red meat alone (with weak evidence), but more importantly (with stronger evidence), alcohol use, smoking, family history of cancer, presence of inflammatory bowel disease, obesity and polyps or adenoma of colon. These have been very conviniently ignored by the Gastroenterologist from California. Summary - red meat causing colon cancer is not convincingly proven. Increased intake of processed red meat more than higher intake of unprocessed red meat is weakly linked from evidence point of view to colon cancer risk. Nitrosamine in red meat as cancer causing in humans is not proven. Kerala does not have the largest burden of colon cancer in India, nor it is the largest consumer of beef. There is no realistic evidence that eating pork increases risk of colon cancer. These are actual facts. And I am not even a Gastroenterologist from California. I am a Hepatologist. From India.
0:28

I am sorry but Dr Pal Manickam, the Gastroenterologist from California, is becoming not just a health misinformation menace, but also a subtle "hate-monger" with his divisive attitude towards dietary choices in India, also known as Bharat, a Union of States and marriage of [dietary] cultures and traditions. Claims: 1. Eating red meat (beef and pork) causes colon cancer 2. Nitrosamines (from nitrites/nitrates) in red meat causes colon cancer 3. Cancer screening in USA above age of 50, but not in India 4. Kerala has maximum number of colon cancers in India 5. Kerala has maximum number of colon cancers because Malayalees eat a lot of beef. A lot. Response: 1. Eating red meat does not cause colon cancer Higher red meat consumption was shown to have a correlation with increased risk for colon cancer, but the evidence for independent association was weak and remains weak Eating red meat does not increase risk of colon cancer. Excessive consumption of red meat/ processed meat (excessive not yet fully defined across populations) was confusingly correlated with increased risk of colon cancer 2. Studies have only looked at nitrites and nitrates [and hence nitrosamine formation] causing stomach cancer and not colon cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) also focussed on nitrosamines and stomach cancer, but the potential role for dietary nitrate/nitrite in colon cancer is not conclusively proven. Meat-based diets (specifically processed meat, not fresh meat) have a well described higher risk for cancer, but it is not readily attributable to nitrite consistently in all studies. Most studies are on ground and well water and not meat. And the strongest study to show cancer link and nitrite consumption is in mice, not humans The biggest source of nitrate exposure is dietary consumption of certain types of vegetables that are naturally high in nitrate. This is a clear case of investigator bias, looking at any possible way to force the data into a specific conclusion (like Dr. Pal is doing in the video). The IARC maintains the tone of its conclusion, but only to reiterate its validity in a theoretical state, while acknowledging that the epidemiology does to support these conclusions. Nitrites are just one reason processed meats may contribute to bowel cancer, and their relative importance is uncertain. Other factors that may contribute include iron; PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) which are formed in smoked meats; and HCAs (heterocyclic amines), which are created when meat is cooked over an open flame – and which also are tumour-promoting. So its not just red meat, but the cooking method signficantly affecting health outcomes. 3. India does not have a national level screening protocol because the proportion of colon cancer among all cancers in India is only 3% which would lead to wastage of medical resources on a low-incidence cancer detection protocol. But in the USA, colon cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death. Overall, the lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer is about 1 in 23 for men and 1 in 26 for women - which is much much higher compared to India and that is why they have screening protocols in place - not because they eat more red meat than Indians. 4. Kerala has the highest crude incidence rate of all cancers followed by Mizoram. Not colon cancer. All cancers. Highest colon cancer rates and burden of colon cancer are observed in Goa and Orissa, not Kerala. & While the discussion on beef and colon cancer is ongoing in the video, a segment of the clip shows a news item "concerning increasing cases of colon cancer in Kerala" - this is that news piece - - and read what it says: it talks about only younger age group and colon cancer. "Experts opine that underlying factors leading to the rise in cases, especially at this age, could be lifestyle, environment and genetic factors" - they do not mention beef at all. The report also says: "Though we have no authentic records to show the statistics of rising cases, we have been observing a trend here. Our changing lifestyle is most likely to blame for the rise in colorectal cancer cases amongst younger people, though hereditary reasons are also a major cause." - again, no mention of beef eating. 5. Lakshwadeep is India's biggest meat eater followed by north-east states such as Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Nagaland and Manipur followed by Kerala. MEAT EATING. Not beef eating. Specifically looking at the largest beef consuming state - it is Meghalaya, where more than 80% of the population consumes this meat, not Kerala. Kerala is the largest beef consuming state in the context of male population only. [ 6. Oh by the way, about pork and colon cancer --> the risk was not increased consuming high amounts of pork: and there is only one study showing colon cancer risk in women in Japan, not India and that too who consumed pork >/= 3 times/week compared to </=1 time: Add-on: The risk for colon cancer is not red meat alone (with weak evidence), but more importantly (with stronger evidence), alcohol use, smoking, family history of cancer, presence of inflammatory bowel disease, obesity and polyps or adenoma of colon. These have been very conviniently ignored by the Gastroenterologist from California. Summary - red meat causing colon cancer is not convincingly proven. Increased intake of processed red meat more than higher intake of unprocessed red meat is weakly linked from evidence point of view to colon cancer risk. Nitrosamine in red meat as cancer causing in humans is not proven. Kerala does not have the largest burden of colon cancer in India, nor it is the largest consumer of beef. There is no realistic evidence that eating pork increases risk of colon cancer. These are actual facts. And I am not even a Gastroenterologist from California. I am a Hepatologist. From India.

TheLiverDoc™

1,922,321 views • 2 years ago

The World Health Organization classifies deli meats like ham, turkey, salami and hot dogs as a Group 1 carcinogens Here’s the insane part, eating just 2 slices of deli meat a day increase your risk of cancer by 18% Read that again The International Agency for Research on Cancer analysis of multiple studies found that 50 grams of processed meat per day (roughly 2 slices of ham or similar deli meat) is associated with an 18% increased relative risk of colorectal cancer There’s something else you should know about and its nitrates added “People do not want to have nitrates in their food. So you'll see all of these turkeys say no nitrates or nitrites added. But if you flip it over and you read the label, you'll see celery powder. Celery powder is nitrates, and it actually has a higher concentration of nitrates” Again, this is true This is a common labeling loophole. USDA rules allow products cured with celery powder or juice which is naturally high in nitrates to be labeled “no nitrates or nitrites added” Our food is literally poison
0:36

The World Health Organization classifies deli meats like ham, turkey, salami and hot dogs as a Group 1 carcinogens Here’s the insane part, eating just 2 slices of deli meat a day increase your risk of cancer by 18% Read that again The International Agency for Research on Cancer analysis of multiple studies found that 50 grams of processed meat per day (roughly 2 slices of ham or similar deli meat) is associated with an 18% increased relative risk of colorectal cancer There’s something else you should know about and its nitrates added “People do not want to have nitrates in their food. So you'll see all of these turkeys say no nitrates or nitrites added. But if you flip it over and you read the label, you'll see celery powder. Celery powder is nitrates, and it actually has a higher concentration of nitrates” Again, this is true This is a common labeling loophole. USDA rules allow products cured with celery powder or juice which is naturally high in nitrates to be labeled “no nitrates or nitrites added” Our food is literally poison

Wall Street Apes

206,519 views • 1 month ago

Researchers find that consuming preservatives used in foods in America increases risk of cancer “A new study warning of a potential link between common food preservatives used to extend the shelf life of deli meats and some cereals and cancer. Researchers found consuming the preservatives used in foods like deli meats, bacon, breakfast cereal is associated with a higher risk of developing cancer. They say the study shows an association with developing cancer, but not proof that preservatives directly cause cancer.”
0:22

Researchers find that consuming preservatives used in foods in America increases risk of cancer “A new study warning of a potential link between common food preservatives used to extend the shelf life of deli meats and some cereals and cancer. Researchers found consuming the preservatives used in foods like deli meats, bacon, breakfast cereal is associated with a higher risk of developing cancer. They say the study shows an association with developing cancer, but not proof that preservatives directly cause cancer.”

Wall Street Apes

52,750 views • 6 months ago

The bacon at Dunkin Donuts looks very fake Dunkin uses pre-cooked and extremely processed bacon. They even offer a Kosher bacon option that almost looks 3d printed According to their site, their pork bacon is real but there are many questionable ingredients. It contains Sodium Nitrite, when heated it forms nitrosamines, which are classified as probable carcinogens colorectal cancer risk Stop eating processed food full of chemicals. Make America Healthy Again
1:01

The bacon at Dunkin Donuts looks very fake Dunkin uses pre-cooked and extremely processed bacon. They even offer a Kosher bacon option that almost looks 3d printed According to their site, their pork bacon is real but there are many questionable ingredients. It contains Sodium Nitrite, when heated it forms nitrosamines, which are classified as probable carcinogens colorectal cancer risk Stop eating processed food full of chemicals. Make America Healthy Again

Wall Street Apes

39,047 views • 1 month ago

Processed meat is a carcinogen Full stop Colorectal cancer rates have surged since the 1930s, and it’s no coincidence Over the same decades, our diets have shifted dramatically toward ultra-processed, nutrient-poor, calorie-dense foods packed with sugar, sodium, and additives If you're serious about lowering cancer risk, cutting processed meat should be non-negotiable
1:04

Processed meat is a carcinogen Full stop Colorectal cancer rates have surged since the 1930s, and it’s no coincidence Over the same decades, our diets have shifted dramatically toward ultra-processed, nutrient-poor, calorie-dense foods packed with sugar, sodium, and additives If you're serious about lowering cancer risk, cutting processed meat should be non-negotiable

FoundMyFitness Clips

402,164 views • 1 year ago

Make sure everyone you know sees this Aspartame was just officially classified as a “possibly carcinogenic to humans" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer US Manufacturers have just rebranded it, now labeling it as ‘Amino Sweet’ “A cancer causing agent” is what it’s been identified as, it’s also been linked to cancer during past studies on animals The FDA still officially says it’s safe and has not changed its stance even after the new research results came out. (UNBELIEVABLE)
0:20

Make sure everyone you know sees this Aspartame was just officially classified as a “possibly carcinogenic to humans" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer US Manufacturers have just rebranded it, now labeling it as ‘Amino Sweet’ “A cancer causing agent” is what it’s been identified as, it’s also been linked to cancer during past studies on animals The FDA still officially says it’s safe and has not changed its stance even after the new research results came out. (UNBELIEVABLE)

Wall Street Apes

283,575 views • 1 year ago

The Dangerous Cult of 'Fasting' Influencers. Fasting has its anecdotal benefits, yes. But it is overrated. And water fasting is highly overrated. But this video featuring a Cardiologist is amusingly nonsense. There is no study from Boston (from a "University?" - how vague!) that says 7-days water fasting reduces risk of cancer (what cancer?) by 70%. And there is no proof that fasting kills cancer cells in humans. Here is what fasting does to cancers in humans. Nothing. Fasting is now become a sort of religion-like cult for wellness influencers to rake in views and engagement. From a scientific standpoint, there are no realistically good human studies to prove anything from fasting that benefits cancers. I know, I know, "autophagy" and all that. Autophagy: Autophagy is the natural, conserved degradation of the cell that removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components. Yes, its a legit term and all. But in the context of cancer reduction and fasting in humans, it sounds like "immunity boosting," another wellness fraud term. The effects of fasting on cancer cells are all based on MOUSE studies, and none explicitly translated to humans. See this paper: everything is based on cells and tissues and small animal experiments: "While research on the subject is tantalizing, there’s little clinical evidence involving humans to substantiate the claims. Studies on the potential impacts on cancer treatment from various forms of fasting or calorie restriction, including the possibility that they reduce side effects, have been limited." "Fasting may not be appropriate for malnourished individuals or those with cancer cachexia, which results in a continuing loss of skeletal muscle mass, or for people with chronic diseases. Those with diabetes need to be very careful, because of the risk of hypoglycemia." "Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity." - see here: Even intermittent fasting (IF) is overrated in cancer. "IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, butwhether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered. See here: Also this: "Fasting for short periods does not have any beneficial effect on the quality of life of cancer patients during treatment. Evidence on fasting regimes reducing side effects and toxicities of chemotherapy is missing." See here: The whole aspect of "fasting reducing cancer incidence" in the real world is just due to weight loss. Obesity is associated with at least 13 types of cancers and reversing obesity reduces risk of cancer - nothing to do with fasting killing off cancers cells in the body. And one can lose weight even without fasting. See here: Everything from prevention of adverse events of cancer, to reduction in side effects from chemotherapy, to slowing cancer growth by reducing glucose levels, to promoting cell regeneration by affecting autophagy is all LAB BASED MOLECULAR LEVEL HYPOTHESIS that has not been proven conclusively in humans. See here: Cancer patients must not starve. They must remain hydrated and they must eat a well balanced diet because cancer condition is highly demanding. And dont water fast for 7 days. Easy for people to make reels on it, but in real life, it may prove disastrous. Water fast does make you lose weight (because of starvation) but it is not at all a healthy way to lose weight. Stop with this fasting and cancer madness already.
0:21

The Dangerous Cult of 'Fasting' Influencers. Fasting has its anecdotal benefits, yes. But it is overrated. And water fasting is highly overrated. But this video featuring a Cardiologist is amusingly nonsense. There is no study from Boston (from a "University?" - how vague!) that says 7-days water fasting reduces risk of cancer (what cancer?) by 70%. And there is no proof that fasting kills cancer cells in humans. Here is what fasting does to cancers in humans. Nothing. Fasting is now become a sort of religion-like cult for wellness influencers to rake in views and engagement. From a scientific standpoint, there are no realistically good human studies to prove anything from fasting that benefits cancers. I know, I know, "autophagy" and all that. Autophagy: Autophagy is the natural, conserved degradation of the cell that removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components. Yes, its a legit term and all. But in the context of cancer reduction and fasting in humans, it sounds like "immunity boosting," another wellness fraud term. The effects of fasting on cancer cells are all based on MOUSE studies, and none explicitly translated to humans. See this paper: everything is based on cells and tissues and small animal experiments: "While research on the subject is tantalizing, there’s little clinical evidence involving humans to substantiate the claims. Studies on the potential impacts on cancer treatment from various forms of fasting or calorie restriction, including the possibility that they reduce side effects, have been limited." "Fasting may not be appropriate for malnourished individuals or those with cancer cachexia, which results in a continuing loss of skeletal muscle mass, or for people with chronic diseases. Those with diabetes need to be very careful, because of the risk of hypoglycemia." "Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity." - see here: Even intermittent fasting (IF) is overrated in cancer. "IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, butwhether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered. See here: Also this: "Fasting for short periods does not have any beneficial effect on the quality of life of cancer patients during treatment. Evidence on fasting regimes reducing side effects and toxicities of chemotherapy is missing." See here: The whole aspect of "fasting reducing cancer incidence" in the real world is just due to weight loss. Obesity is associated with at least 13 types of cancers and reversing obesity reduces risk of cancer - nothing to do with fasting killing off cancers cells in the body. And one can lose weight even without fasting. See here: Everything from prevention of adverse events of cancer, to reduction in side effects from chemotherapy, to slowing cancer growth by reducing glucose levels, to promoting cell regeneration by affecting autophagy is all LAB BASED MOLECULAR LEVEL HYPOTHESIS that has not been proven conclusively in humans. See here: Cancer patients must not starve. They must remain hydrated and they must eat a well balanced diet because cancer condition is highly demanding. And dont water fast for 7 days. Easy for people to make reels on it, but in real life, it may prove disastrous. Water fast does make you lose weight (because of starvation) but it is not at all a healthy way to lose weight. Stop with this fasting and cancer madness already.

TheLiverDoc™

269,452 views • 2 years ago

The truth about alcohol and cancer. "Since 1988, we've known that alcohol is a group one carcinogen." "What that means is it's in the same bracket as asbestos, tobacco, radiation." "It's a cancer-causing substance."
2:46

The truth about alcohol and cancer. "Since 1988, we've known that alcohol is a group one carcinogen." "What that means is it's in the same bracket as asbestos, tobacco, radiation." "It's a cancer-causing substance."

Red Pill Dispenser

29,995 views • 8 months ago

11 of America’s top food companies are being sued over their ultra processed foods The companies being sued are Coca-Cola General Mills Kraft Heinz Mars Nestle PepsiCo Post Mondelez International Kellanova (formerly part of Kellogg’s cereal business) “Saying they sell ultra-processed food knowing that they are harmful to health — A growing body of scientific research says diets high in ultra-processed food lead to chronic diseases like obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart disease and depression.” (and cancer) “By some estimates, more than 60% of the food consumed in the United States is ultra-processed.” Higher consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is associated with an increased risk of several cancers: - Colorectal cancer - Breast cancer - Ovarian cancer - Pancreatic cancer - Prostate cancer - Brain cancer - Head and neck cancers - Esophageal cancer - Liver cancer
7:09

11 of America’s top food companies are being sued over their ultra processed foods The companies being sued are Coca-Cola General Mills Kraft Heinz Mars Nestle PepsiCo Post Mondelez International Kellanova (formerly part of Kellogg’s cereal business) “Saying they sell ultra-processed food knowing that they are harmful to health — A growing body of scientific research says diets high in ultra-processed food lead to chronic diseases like obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart disease and depression.” (and cancer) “By some estimates, more than 60% of the food consumed in the United States is ultra-processed.” Higher consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is associated with an increased risk of several cancers: - Colorectal cancer - Breast cancer - Ovarian cancer - Pancreatic cancer - Prostate cancer - Brain cancer - Head and neck cancers - Esophageal cancer - Liver cancer

Wall Street Apes

162,817 views • 6 months ago

11 of America’s top food companies are being sued over their ultra-processed foods. The companies being sued are: - Coca-Cola - General Mills - Kraft Heinz - Mars - Nestle - PepsiCo - Post - Mondelez International - Kellanova “Saying they sell ultra-processed food knowing that they are harmful to health — A growing body of scientific research says diets high in ultra-processed food lead to chronic diseases like obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart disease and depression.” “By some estimates, more than 60% of the food consumed in the United States is ultra-processed.” Higher consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is associated with an increased risk of several cancers: - Colorectal cancer - Breast cancer - Ovarian cancer - Pancreatic cancer - Prostate cancer - Brain cancer - Head and neck cancers - Esophageal cancer - Liver cancer
7:09

11 of America’s top food companies are being sued over their ultra-processed foods. The companies being sued are: - Coca-Cola - General Mills - Kraft Heinz - Mars - Nestle - PepsiCo - Post - Mondelez International - Kellanova “Saying they sell ultra-processed food knowing that they are harmful to health — A growing body of scientific research says diets high in ultra-processed food lead to chronic diseases like obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart disease and depression.” “By some estimates, more than 60% of the food consumed in the United States is ultra-processed.” Higher consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is associated with an increased risk of several cancers: - Colorectal cancer - Breast cancer - Ovarian cancer - Pancreatic cancer - Prostate cancer - Brain cancer - Head and neck cancers - Esophageal cancer - Liver cancer

healthbot

102,534 views • 4 months ago

Did you know? The World Health Organization has classified processed meats as a Group 1 carcinogen—the same category as tobacco. There’s no debate about the risks, yet these products remain on our shelves. ☠️Toxins don’t always act immediately; they accumulate over time. With 96% of cancers linked to environmental factors, we must recognize how chemicals, heavy metals, and poor nutrition contribute to disease. 👉🏽It’s time to educate ourselves and each other. The reality? Profits are prioritized over public health. 🙏While the best option is to eliminate processed meats, choosing minimally processed, organic alternatives is a step in the right direction—until you can make an even healthier choice.
1:01

Did you know? The World Health Organization has classified processed meats as a Group 1 carcinogen—the same category as tobacco. There’s no debate about the risks, yet these products remain on our shelves. ☠️Toxins don’t always act immediately; they accumulate over time. With 96% of cancers linked to environmental factors, we must recognize how chemicals, heavy metals, and poor nutrition contribute to disease. 👉🏽It’s time to educate ourselves and each other. The reality? Profits are prioritized over public health. 🙏While the best option is to eliminate processed meats, choosing minimally processed, organic alternatives is a step in the right direction—until you can make an even healthier choice.

Dr.Sebi

30,336 views • 1 year ago

A new study shows that 11 types of cancer are becoming more prevalent in the 20 to 49 age group. They include breast cancer, bowel cancer and liver cancer. A full explanation for the rise is still unclear, but scientists say that an increase in obesity is playing a role.
0:28

A new study shows that 11 types of cancer are becoming more prevalent in the 20 to 49 age group. They include breast cancer, bowel cancer and liver cancer. A full explanation for the rise is still unclear, but scientists say that an increase in obesity is playing a role.

Channel 4 News

25,983 views • 2 months ago

🚨 Dr. Paul Marik sounds the alarm on rising cancer rates. “The risk of getting cancer is increasing exponentially.” “Currently 1 in 2 people… will develop cancer during a lifetime.” “That’s like half the population.” “That is a staggering statistic, and is far going to exceed the risk of cardiac disease.” “What we know is that to some degree, it’s preventable.” “You can’t change your genes, but you can change your lifestyle.” “And there are enormous lifestyle factors and environmental factors that increase the risk.” “Most Americans are addicted to processed foods, are sugar addicts, and have insulin resistance.” “Apart from insulin resistance underlying many diseases, one of which is cancer, there’s no question that people who are insulin resistant have an increased risk of cancer.” “But it’s also important in other diseases such as heart disease.” “There’s this myth that it’s cholesterol.” “It’s not cholesterol, it’s insulin resistance.” “And then there’s diabetes, pre-diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and Alzheimer’s disease.” “We know one of the first steps in reducing one’s risk of getting cancer is to deal with insulin resistance.” “And it’s not difficult.” “What you need to do is change from eating processed food to real food.” drpaulmarik CHDTV Live MERYL NASS, MD
2:41

🚨 Dr. Paul Marik sounds the alarm on rising cancer rates. “The risk of getting cancer is increasing exponentially.” “Currently 1 in 2 people… will develop cancer during a lifetime.” “That’s like half the population.” “That is a staggering statistic, and is far going to exceed the risk of cardiac disease.” “What we know is that to some degree, it’s preventable.” “You can’t change your genes, but you can change your lifestyle.” “And there are enormous lifestyle factors and environmental factors that increase the risk.” “Most Americans are addicted to processed foods, are sugar addicts, and have insulin resistance.” “Apart from insulin resistance underlying many diseases, one of which is cancer, there’s no question that people who are insulin resistant have an increased risk of cancer.” “But it’s also important in other diseases such as heart disease.” “There’s this myth that it’s cholesterol.” “It’s not cholesterol, it’s insulin resistance.” “And then there’s diabetes, pre-diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and Alzheimer’s disease.” “We know one of the first steps in reducing one’s risk of getting cancer is to deal with insulin resistance.” “And it’s not difficult.” “What you need to do is change from eating processed food to real food.” drpaulmarik CHDTV Live MERYL NASS, MD

Children’s Health Defense

14,906 views • 1 month ago

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer...[and is] running, quietly, several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer...So this is not fringe... There's... real science behind it, patents behind it." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "For the past year and a half, I've been working with antiparasitics that are being repurposed for cancer. This is ivermectin, mebendazole and fenbendazole. And the reason is because there's a big body of research. There are over 400 published papers on ivermectin in cancer. There are over 240 published papers on mebendazole in cancer. "In fact, Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer, specifically the most aggressive cancer, which is glioblastoma, brain cancer, extremely aggressive cancer. Johns Hopkins has the patent. They are also running quietly several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer. There's colon cancer, gastric cancer and brain cancer, including children, children with brain cancers as well. So this is not fringe, this is not, something that is far out. There's actually real science behind it, patents behind it. "And when you search a lot of the AIs, for example Perplexity AI and you ask what are the most promising repurposed drugs for terminally ill cancer patients today, it will give you in its search, in the top three, you will get ivermectin as number one, mebendazole and fenbendazole, there's other antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine will be in the top 10, you will have curcumin in the top 10, you will have EGCG, which is from green tea extract in the top 10, resveratrol in the top 10, metformin, which is a diabetes drug but also has anti-cancer activity in the top 10 as well. "And what I have found working with these antiparasitics, is that there is a benefit to patients in at least 75% of the cases."
1:59

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer...[and is] running, quietly, several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer...So this is not fringe... There's... real science behind it, patents behind it." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "For the past year and a half, I've been working with antiparasitics that are being repurposed for cancer. This is ivermectin, mebendazole and fenbendazole. And the reason is because there's a big body of research. There are over 400 published papers on ivermectin in cancer. There are over 240 published papers on mebendazole in cancer. "In fact, Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer, specifically the most aggressive cancer, which is glioblastoma, brain cancer, extremely aggressive cancer. Johns Hopkins has the patent. They are also running quietly several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer. There's colon cancer, gastric cancer and brain cancer, including children, children with brain cancers as well. So this is not fringe, this is not, something that is far out. There's actually real science behind it, patents behind it. "And when you search a lot of the AIs, for example Perplexity AI and you ask what are the most promising repurposed drugs for terminally ill cancer patients today, it will give you in its search, in the top three, you will get ivermectin as number one, mebendazole and fenbendazole, there's other antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine will be in the top 10, you will have curcumin in the top 10, you will have EGCG, which is from green tea extract in the top 10, resveratrol in the top 10, metformin, which is a diabetes drug but also has anti-cancer activity in the top 10 as well. "And what I have found working with these antiparasitics, is that there is a benefit to patients in at least 75% of the cases."

Sense Receptor

227,993 views • 7 months ago

Bacon Cheeseburger Rolls 1 and 1 Half Pounds of Ground Beef 1 Tablespoon of Adobo 1 Packer of Sazon 1 Tablespoon of Worcestershire Sauce Everything is kinda self explanatory. Pillsbury pizza crust. Add the cheese. My only tip is make sure that the beef isn’t that hot. Let it cool a bit Cook in the oven on 400 for about 15 or until brown.. take them out add cheese and bacon to the top.. cook for an additional 3/4 minutes.
0:28

Bacon Cheeseburger Rolls 1 and 1 Half Pounds of Ground Beef 1 Tablespoon of Adobo 1 Packer of Sazon 1 Tablespoon of Worcestershire Sauce Everything is kinda self explanatory. Pillsbury pizza crust. Add the cheese. My only tip is make sure that the beef isn’t that hot. Let it cool a bit Cook in the oven on 400 for about 15 or until brown.. take them out add cheese and bacon to the top.. cook for an additional 3/4 minutes.

Uncle Bev

142,498 views • 2 years ago