正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

I visualized how Injective 🥷's MultiVM works, modelled and animated it. 1. Dev codes in a preferred VM stack. 2. Dev deploys dApp on Injective’s MultiVM L1 blockchain. 3. MultiVM makes your dApp function on all three VMs without re-writing much code. 4. And voila, interoperability at its peak!...

21,717 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This is my most important post of all time: For anybody who trades/invests in coins that I push, you will want to know this. I have one last goal to achieve in this space. 1. Be the best dev of all time (avg ATH / avg MC) 2. Run a coin to a billion market cap. ---------------------------------------------------------- What you need to know: 1. Any coins I push are all a part of @PIEindex $PIE. This is the backbone of this ecosystem to achieve said goals. 2. When I push other coins, it DOES NOT, mean I'n giving up on the others. If it is in the @PIEindex (dev wallet) is has my support, even if it doesn't look like it at the time. 3. Panic sellers that don't understand this and hop from one coin to the other will just be selling their bags to me and @PIEindex for cheap. (if it is still in our index). Example: A coin may go to 2m, down to 300k, and up to 10m, all while I'm posting about another coin. ---------------------------------------------------------- How I will be the GOAT dev and run up a 1B MC coin: My job is to take great narratives, and give them enough runway (initial support) to fly on their own. Example: $67 is at 25 million market cap. It is not reliant on the dev anymore, it became bigger than him. From my unique ability to not only push a coin here on X, but also Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube, I will be giving each coin enough eyeballs for it to have a life of its own. Some coins might be an instant hit, some coins may run, die, then rise from the dead from @PIEindex support. Some coins may just die entirely (you will know this is the @PIEindex dev wallet holds). ---------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: I am aiming to achieve things no dev has ever done before, and to do that requires putting up lots of calculated shots, and being very controversial and misunderstood, that is, until it works. I do not know what coins will go where, nor when. None of these coins should be taken as real investments nor anything I say as financial advice. I am trying to bring back memecoins and be the number one dev. Thank you for your support on this mission.

Nikolai

33,403 次观看 • 9 个月前

Did Epstein influence Bitcoin core development? Short answer: No. This is not how Bitcoin works. Here’s what happened: Epstein donated to MIT Media Lab…who in turn supported MIT Digital Currency Initiative…which in turn funded Bitcoin developers. These devs used to be funded by The Bitcoin Foundation (which I used to run as volunteer Executive Director) there are many devs and no dev or team had power or control over Bitcoin. Under MIT’s patronage the devs had the same deal they had with us at The Bitcoin Foundation: that they could work on the code and not have direction from the org. More importantly — how Bitcoin works is that *even if* a dev was compromised then the nodes and miners would still have to run that code to make it included in Bitcoin. So for example if I had somehow asked the devs paid by Bitcoin Foundation to “add 1000 coins for Bruce” 1) they wouldn’t have done this / it would have been counter to our agreement 2) no miners would run that code & no nodes would recognize it. It would be a laughing stock and completely rejected. Does this mean code dev is not an attack vector? No. It’s still a risk. Particularly with nation state style actors and very careful efforts to co-opt which are much more sophisticated than “give Bruce coins” or something. This is one reason I’m cautious of Bitcoin core funding - especially from actors who’ve had bad judgment in the past. I think we should be cautious of who does the dev and view it as an attack vector. Bitcoin code is transparent and has lots of eyes on it. So in this case especially there isn’t even a solid accusation, let alone evidence that MIT directed nefarious code changes. If that was an allegation the first question should be: well what code specifically did MIT direct and what proof is there and how was it harmful? I think claims around this would collapse. There’s obviously plenty to criticize about Epstein and MIT working with him — and when it comes to digital assets MIT’s work with Gensler and especially its work on CBDCs is much more suspect than the chance that malicious code was pushed through on Bitcoin. Be cautious but this is a nothing burger

Bruce Fenton

231,920 次观看 • 6 个月前

Here's what the Founder of Claude Code does before he starts ANY project: 1. Plans first, codes never, he goes back and forth with Claude on the plan until it's perfect. No code gets written yet 2. Creates a CLAUDE.md file (a simple doc that Claude reads every session so it knows your project, your rules, your style) 3. Gives Claude a way to verify its own work - For backend: write and run tests - For UI: take screenshots, check in browser Claude should never finish a task without proving it works 4. Sets up project-level permission rules in settings.json instead of skipping permissions entirely. Shared with the whole team 5. Five more preparation steps in VIDEO BELOW 6. Only then switches to auto-accept mode and lets Claude build The part most people miss: he doesn't treat Claude as a magic box that gets things right first try he treats it like a junior dev that needs clear instructions, feedback loops, and guardrails at scale he runs multiple sessions in parallel, uses Opus with thinking enabled because it makes fewer mistakes even though it's slower and relies on background agents that push code for later review his setup is surprisingly simple. no crazy custom tools. just slash commands, subagents, and a clean CLAUDE.md the difference isn't the tool. it's how you set it up before you start ❤️ P.S. for sure 99.5% of readers will scroll down this tweet, but I send it to 0.5% who loves to learn how to improve your workflow daily and control 99.5% in 2 years Hard skills literally mean nothing in our world The most important skills which you can have are: building architectures and orchestrations If you master it and use a creative approach, CONGRATS

Ronin

146,503 次观看 • 4 个月前