Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
I want PROFESSIONALS to look at Iran's second goal form these TWO angles, and tell me HOW this is offsides I even slowed down both clips so you can see it in slow motion from the viewer angle and from the TOP. I am asking to learn, because this... show more
3,158,709 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 34

I don’t usually like to use Grok but here’s the explanation. When the goalkeeper moves up he’s becomes the second last defender. So in the position here the last defender becomes the “goalie” in the offside position and the goalie is the second defender. So if he is passed the second defender which is the goalie he’s off sides.

This is how

I appreciate everyone taking the time to explain. Thank you.

The professionals 😂

Let me explain. This is an off side position because the Iranian players foot is in front of the the second-last opponent. I see some comments that Iranian player is behind that second-last opponent, but I draw the lines so you can easily see this was not a case.

Explanation why it was not offisde.

It is offside, but it's a shit rule and should be changed.

This is so emotional 😭

it was a true goal.. the problem here, when the player was offside, it shouldn't have counted as the player did not pass the ball to him, he shot directly at the goal and keep saved.

It wasn’t an offside, it was a clean goal onside. Actually FIFA decided to rig Iran of their goal just like what they did to them in their opening match…

Because the goal keeper was in front of two defenders, so the last defender takes the position of a goalkeeper, hence the second defender played him offside, although marginal.

It’s called the strait of Hormuz offsite

@kenan101138 Losing is part of football. Feeling robbed is something else entirely. #FIFA #Iran

Many people are relying on 2 outfield defenders’ rule in this situation and often arrogantly sit back and say “offside”. I am no expert at all, but this is very unfair to apply two outfield defenders' rule in this case… because: The ball was not played directly to number 4, we see in slow motion that the ball hit the keeper first... Jose Mourinho, Alan Shearer and many other football experts have called it out an outrageous and impossible VAR offside decision

Iran got robbed. New rule should of helped them, not hindered.

Not even close to being offside…..but it’s always been fixed. It’s bread & circuses to keep you from noticing the tyranny they are perpetuating all around.

They got robbed. I was watching. They weren’t going to let them win. That was pretty clear.

When the ball was played the goal scorer was in an offside position.

He was past the last defender by just a half foot.

This breaks my heart for the team that has been treated like non- humans. They deserve so much better 💔

You don’t know the rules apparently. Here…follow along.

I think its a goal, there's zero interference by the player but they change the rules all the time

İt’s not offside 😤

Against Belgium, it was Taremi’s backside. Today, it’s Khalilzadeh’s shoelace. At this point, it really feels like everything is going against Iran.

This is the only angle that matters.

Not a professional, but the Egyptian number 2 (in the box) and the the Egyptian number 9's left heel were both between the Iranian number 4's right foot's toe and the goal line. Iran was onside.

The fella who shoots was closer to goal then the second nearest defensive player when the ball was played forward It’s not so hard

It's not offside.. at no point were any of the 2 players after the header offside or in the way of the goalkeepers sight of the ball. Should have been a goal.

The foot is offside. You need 2 players between you and the goal (usually one of these is the goalkeeper, so it’s easy to make the mistake of thinking U.K. need just one).

I’m not a professional …. Far from it! The attached scene is how I think about the off sides rule in Soccer. I’m no help to you, but I hope you enjoy the scenes.

Nunca es fuera de lugar, además si esa injusticia la hubieran cometido contra Alemania, Inglaterra, Israel etc hubieran repetido hasta el cansancio los videos, daría la vuelta al mundo incansablemente etc etc etc

Two touches from Egyp players before Iran Score , it’s a clear goal

The offside rule is flawed. it should be changed to require only some part of the body to be behind the last defender, such as the foot. The NHL made this change and it works fantastic.

It’s clearly offsides. People need to stop whining and learn the rules. It’s a total shame for that goal to be taken away, but the rule is clear, and he was indeed offsides. FIFA needs to change the rule so that it’s not offsides if the foremost offensive player is behind the back-most non-goalie defender. But, the rule is such that the offensive player is offsides if he is not behind the two back-most defensive players, goalie or not. This creates a situation where the goalie could be outside of the box and you have two defensive players struggling to defend, and the offensive player is called offsides just as he was in the scenario last night, and it ends up costing a team a beautiful goal and at least half the fans a beautiful moment.
Похожие видео
Sensitive content
You can learn a lot from movies. This is very smooth. If you accidentally take your date to an X-rated film and it doesn’t go down well - this is how to handle it. I share because I’m sure just about everyone has made this mistake at one time or another.
FischerKing
49,466 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
