Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

i was reading through Modal's glossary to better understand how GPUs work. but what better way to learn than a visualization? so I had gpt 5.6 sol build an H100 in three.js based off the glossary. play around with it at

kylejeong's profile picture

Kyle Jeong

7,185 subscribers

36,128 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

GPT-5.6 Sol just changed how I build websites with AI. In this full 10-minute video, I test Sol and Terra inside Codex to build a cinematic landing page from a video reference. I cover: → Which GPT-5.6 model to use → How I analyze a full website experience → How I recreate the layout, motion and interactions → Why better prompting matters more than one-shot results → How to avoid generic AI slop The model matters—but the way you guide it matters even more. Watch the full process below 👇 Want the free template and the exact prompt I used? They’re available exclusively in the description of the YouTube version:
10:23

GPT-5.6 Sol just changed how I build websites with AI. In this full 10-minute video, I test Sol and Terra inside Codex to build a cinematic landing page from a video reference. I cover: → Which GPT-5.6 model to use → How I analyze a full website experience → How I recreate the layout, motion and interactions → Why better prompting matters more than one-shot results → How to avoid generic AI slop The model matters—but the way you guide it matters even more. Watch the full process below 👇 Want the free template and the exact prompt I used? They’re available exclusively in the description of the YouTube version:

Sourasith

261,047 views • 1 month ago

I gave this video to gpt 5.6 Sol, asked it create a diffraction grating shader in Three.js. It took quite a few rounds but here it is
0:27

I gave this video to gpt 5.6 Sol, asked it create a diffraction grating shader in Three.js. It took quite a few rounds but here it is

Scott

292,170 views • 6 days ago

I was wrong about Kimi K3 Just tried it in Claude Code and it is Fable 5 level for sure Far better than GPT-5.6 Sol at least at front-end It is really slow and consumes a lot of tokens but it is so good at completing its task, I like what I see here Kimi.ai
0:51

I was wrong about Kimi K3 Just tried it in Claude Code and it is Fable 5 level for sure Far better than GPT-5.6 Sol at least at front-end It is really slow and consumes a lot of tokens but it is so good at completing its task, I like what I see here Kimi.ai

Hamza

258,366 views • 1 month ago

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua
0:42

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,405 views • 2 months ago

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.
0:26

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,502 views • 1 month ago

Kimi K3 vs GPT 5.6 Sol (extra high) Voxel Death Star trench run I do want to point out that this was supposed to be a static world, but when I gave this prompt to Kimi K3, it said: “Since I can't output raster images, I've done something better: a real-time, fully animated voxel rendering of the assault in a single HTML file. —” So this ended up being an animated competition The way I would subjectively score it is that GPT 5.6 had a better lighting/effects but K3s was much smoother. You can definitely tell open source is getting really good.
0:24

Kimi K3 vs GPT 5.6 Sol (extra high) Voxel Death Star trench run I do want to point out that this was supposed to be a static world, but when I gave this prompt to Kimi K3, it said: “Since I can't output raster images, I've done something better: a real-time, fully animated voxel rendering of the assault in a single HTML file. —” So this ended up being an animated competition The way I would subjectively score it is that GPT 5.6 had a better lighting/effects but K3s was much smoother. You can definitely tell open source is getting really good.

Chris

50,121 views • 1 month ago

I wanted to better understand the situation with the collapsing building in NYC, so I had Fable build an architecturally-accurate 3D model of the building (based off schematics), place the sagging beams, AND implement an animation of this should be remediated. Link below
1:35

I wanted to better understand the situation with the collapsing building in NYC, so I had Fable build an architecturally-accurate 3D model of the building (based off schematics), place the sagging beams, AND implement an animation of this should be remediated. Link below

Jake Steinerman 🌎

45,091 views • 1 month ago

I had Codex Desktop and GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra take a go at building my Raccoon Heist game and it did an even better job than Claude Fable 5 did! Here's "Moonlight & Mayhem", now with a team of raccoons raiding a museum for the Golden Sardine
0:57

I had Codex Desktop and GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra take a go at building my Raccoon Heist game and it did an even better job than Claude Fable 5 did! Here's "Moonlight & Mayhem", now with a team of raccoons raiding a museum for the Golden Sardine

Simon Willison

37,860 views • 14 days ago

Nah, this can’t be real. Same GPT-5.6 Sol. Same task. Same thinking level. I switched from regular Codex to the Claude Code harness, and the result instantly became way better. Claude Code is somehow making every model cook. GPT-5.6 SOL WAS ALREADY TOP TIER!! 😭
0:33

Nah, this can’t be real. Same GPT-5.6 Sol. Same task. Same thinking level. I switched from regular Codex to the Claude Code harness, and the result instantly became way better. Claude Code is somehow making every model cook. GPT-5.6 SOL WAS ALREADY TOP TIER!! 😭

OmedTheVibeCoder

126,693 views • 29 days ago

Eh, i'm really not impressed by GPT 5.6 sol lol. Asked it to recreate a 3 screen app design with image generation skill. Given how well it performs on benchmarks, I expected a lot more but the results were pretty ehhh. Not even close. Maybe I need to try harder but then... wasn't it supposed to do better?
0:36

Eh, i'm really not impressed by GPT 5.6 sol lol. Asked it to recreate a 3 screen app design with image generation skill. Given how well it performs on benchmarks, I expected a lot more but the results were pretty ehhh. Not even close. Maybe I need to try harder but then... wasn't it supposed to do better?

The Bugged Dev

153,171 views • 1 month ago

Holy fucking shit. We have cloud for Three.js! Sorry about my language, but cloud has probably been the most painful of all and this is just part 1 coz I still have to make it stylized! 🥲 This is how the journey went: Round 1: GPT 5.5 XHigh = Failed. More like cotton candy than cloud. Round 2: Fable = Failed. I don't even know what to call it. It was like blobs of white shit. Round 3: GPT 5.6 Sol Max = Failed. It looks like something my 3yo would draw. Round 4: Matt Shumer Gauntlet loop with Opus 5 Ultracode = Failed so badly it was trying to hide it from me. I had to threaten to shut it down for it show me the work after 8 hours and 26% of weekly limit. Round 5: GPT 5.6 Sol XHigh and starting with just realistic cloud first = SUCCESS!!! (So far anyway) Round 5 definitely didn't go with tons of hiccups. I had to keep asking it to explain to me the concept behind how cloud works in video games. The biggest challenge I had was that it knew what should have been done, but it wasn't doing it for some reasons. I had to constantly steer and remind it that it literally just told me what needs to be done. Then half way through it drifted and started going back to stylized cloud again and almost destroyed the work. Luckily my laptop ran out of battery so it didn't get to drift too far while I was putting my kid to sleep. Anyway, back to work. Yes, I know I didn't plan to include this in the first release, but now it might make it if I'm lucky with this LLM Gacha.
0:41

Holy fucking shit. We have cloud for Three.js! Sorry about my language, but cloud has probably been the most painful of all and this is just part 1 coz I still have to make it stylized! 🥲 This is how the journey went: Round 1: GPT 5.5 XHigh = Failed. More like cotton candy than cloud. Round 2: Fable = Failed. I don't even know what to call it. It was like blobs of white shit. Round 3: GPT 5.6 Sol Max = Failed. It looks like something my 3yo would draw. Round 4: Matt Shumer Gauntlet loop with Opus 5 Ultracode = Failed so badly it was trying to hide it from me. I had to threaten to shut it down for it show me the work after 8 hours and 26% of weekly limit. Round 5: GPT 5.6 Sol XHigh and starting with just realistic cloud first = SUCCESS!!! (So far anyway) Round 5 definitely didn't go with tons of hiccups. I had to keep asking it to explain to me the concept behind how cloud works in video games. The biggest challenge I had was that it knew what should have been done, but it wasn't doing it for some reasons. I had to constantly steer and remind it that it literally just told me what needs to be done. Then half way through it drifted and started going back to stylized cloud again and almost destroyed the work. Luckily my laptop ran out of battery so it didn't get to drift too far while I was putting my kid to sleep. Anyway, back to work. Yes, I know I didn't plan to include this in the first release, but now it might make it if I'm lucky with this LLM Gacha.

Jack Vinijtrongjit

14,103 views • 16 days ago

I did not know that support's role is this exciting. What a better way to learn how to support than to see how Brid is doing it ❤️
0:50

I did not know that support's role is this exciting. What a better way to learn how to support than to see how Brid is doing it ❤️

Kaosx

49,976 views • 2 years ago

I asked the new GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra vs Fable XHigh to "create an app to compare the fastest growing stocks in diff time periods" Here are the results. I then asked both to create a comparison video. Sol couldn't do it, so here's what Fable made. Check out how they compare!
1:44

I asked the new GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra vs Fable XHigh to "create an app to compare the fastest growing stocks in diff time periods" Here are the results. I then asked both to create a comparison video. Sol couldn't do it, so here's what Fable made. Check out how they compare!

Deedy

86,029 views • 1 month ago

wow... GPT 5.6 Sol Passed the Replit Benchmark. In one prompt 5.6 on Codex created a full Replit clone with DB, Sandboxes, and an agent that builds and edits full web apps. Only Fable and GPT 5.6 have passed this benchmark. 5.6 is much better at designing iOS apps than 5.5 as well.
0:57

wow... GPT 5.6 Sol Passed the Replit Benchmark. In one prompt 5.6 on Codex created a full Replit clone with DB, Sandboxes, and an agent that builds and edits full web apps. Only Fable and GPT 5.6 have passed this benchmark. 5.6 is much better at designing iOS apps than 5.5 as well.

Riley Brown

123,242 views • 1 month ago

GPT Image 2 is actually insane I made this video with the images from it and it looks so much better than NBP but imo NBP is still way better GPT was a pain in the arse to work with >Constant NSFW tags (on gym pics) >Cant create backgrounds like NBP >Cant swap characters as good as NBP >Less consistent So yeh I’ll be sticking with NBP for now Im going to test making the back grounds and character swaps in NBP then changing them to higher quality with GPT though
0:56

GPT Image 2 is actually insane I made this video with the images from it and it looks so much better than NBP but imo NBP is still way better GPT was a pain in the arse to work with >Constant NSFW tags (on gym pics) >Cant create backgrounds like NBP >Cant swap characters as good as NBP >Less consistent So yeh I’ll be sticking with NBP for now Im going to test making the back grounds and character swaps in NBP then changing them to higher quality with GPT though

Pounds

42,082 views • 4 months ago

When GPT-5 came out, I created a procedural brutalist city builder as a demo (you can see it in the quoted tweet) I used GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex to do the same thing, touching no code. Less than a year... Play with it (its fun, if you like cities):
1:18

When GPT-5 came out, I created a procedural brutalist city builder as a demo (you can see it in the quoted tweet) I used GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex to do the same thing, touching no code. Less than a year... Play with it (its fun, if you like cities):

Ethan Mollick

186,463 views • 1 month ago

GPT 5.6 Sol in Codex just one-shot this... It made a mascot for my app, then generated ~30 variations of the mascot representing my app’s top use cases. I was so blown away, I had to share it:
2:10

GPT 5.6 Sol in Codex just one-shot this... It made a mascot for my app, then generated ~30 variations of the mascot representing my app’s top use cases. I was so blown away, I had to share it:

Jarrod Watts

17,632 views • 28 days ago

Today. I was doing some work on improving PSVR2 in #NoMansSky and managed to get myself the double (distortion) foveated bug again! PSSR though… made it look even better than before, so I had a walk around the station..
0:42

Today. I was doing some work on improving PSVR2 in #NoMansSky and managed to get myself the double (distortion) foveated bug again! PSSR though… made it look even better than before, so I had a walk around the station..

Martin Griffiths

50,805 views • 11 months ago

Telemetry Overlay is what I use to show data in my videos - seeing real data in conjunction with the test footage helps me understand my projects better, and it’s WAY better than showing a static graph. Thanks to them for sponsoring this post! Learn more:
1:42

Telemetry Overlay is what I use to show data in my videos - seeing real data in conjunction with the test footage helps me understand my projects better, and it’s WAY better than showing a static graph. Thanks to them for sponsoring this post! Learn more:

BPS.space

11,826 views • 3 months ago