I will never not retweet this message!!

The poor often cannot afford his legal services, while the wealthy benefit most from the protection of the law. This is a system that safeguards the interests of the rich while discouraging the poor from creating alternative forms of justice or representation.

Mxim, the guy that is protecting Phala Phala farmgate gangster. The big man in Union Building 🤔

For those that don't understand: 1st part: constitution nihilism - the constitution means nothing. 2nd part: since law is removed and means nothing. Chaos shall be the order of the day. 3rd part: poor majority will be badly effected buy these. 4th part: we can criticize law

The problem we have is that rule of law can be bought , that the biggest problem we have and that in the current form law is expensive and people are poor.

Who drafted the constitution? The man with money.

I always find the 'we are doing for the poor' line cringey. What does it even mean in this context?

Rule of law which is supposedly for the poor means to put the power in check so that they have fear and rely on sassa grants

@NatashaMarrian Talk is cheap when the system benefits u but for the poor to be told by same constitution that uyofela khonapho this so called the best constitution which isn't even adopted by a single country it's very suspicious Ngcukatoibi is defending the indefencible but ke is now a judge

When was this?

He banna. 😂😂😂😂😂😂 The current system has a poverty rate of 70%+, the largest genie coefficient in the world, the 6th highest murder rate, cartels walk free cos prosecutors don't pitch to court and u want to tell me that it's protectingg the poor? 😂😂😂😂😂 - eeeeeeh ok

It is true that lawlessness always benefit those who hold power, they seek to exploit systems and evade accountability. It is a pity that we allow criminal syndicates to run and sit in our parliament.

He is on point.

Yoh this guy talk something do something else ayi our professionals😢🤷

I heard him well and i concur.