正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

IBM just turned five of its best graph lectures into a 50-minute course on building AI systems around connected knowledge: • 00:00 - How knowledge graphs represent entities and relationships • 05:36 - Why vector-based RAG misses connections between facts • 09:53 - GraphRAG, precision retrieval and context engineering...

12,053 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

19 条评论

1mpulse 的头像
1mpulse2 个月前

Another strong breakdown, Morlex. The progression from text chunks to graph intelligence makes the whole topic much easier to understand.

Morlex 的头像
Morlex2 个月前

yeah, thanks broski enjoy it

Korens 的头像
Korens2 个月前

wow thanks for sharing

Morlex 的头像
Morlex2 个月前

enjoy it broski, i hope it will be helpful for you

ALEXYZ 的头像
ALEXYZ2 个月前

Connected knowledge finally feels teachable.

Morlex 的头像
Morlex2 个月前

yeah, u are right bro

Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack 的头像
Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack2 个月前

@0xMorlex didn't know IBM had a course like this, sounds super useful for my side project. gonna check it out!

Alex 的头像
Alex2 个月前

wow, this lecture is so important, thanks Morlex

Morlex 的头像
Morlex2 个月前

you’re welcome

Supriyo SB Chatterjee 的头像
Supriyo SB Chatterjee1 个月前

@grok provide the youtube link for this video

Bounce 的头像
Bounce2 个月前

graphrag recovers connections between facts that plain rag misses entirely

JP 的头像
JP2 个月前

Great way to teach it. Text search can find the quote. The graph can follow who approved it, which job it belongs to, and what changed afterward

unchosen.eth 的头像
unchosen.eth2 个月前

this looks like a good resource for learning graphs

0xbobaa 的头像
0xbobaa2 个月前

concise material is always easier to understand

Saman Ahmed 的头像
Saman Ahmed2 个月前

I ignored knowledge graphs for way too long. The more agent workflows I build, the more I find myself reaching for structured data instead of another vector search.

Cryton 的头像
Cryton2 个月前

GraphRAG is compelling, but the hard part may be maintaining accurate relationships as knowledge changes over time.

AI Mastery Guide 的头像
AI Mastery Guide2 个月前

Graphs recovering structure vector search misses is a great point.

Mithun Kumar 的头像
Mithun Kumar2 个月前

enjoy it broski" has the same energy as my professor assigning 300 pages and ending with "have fun!

veve 的头像
veve2 个月前

kursus 50 menit graphrag ini, di kantor malah dijadikan bahan meeting 2 jam cuma presentasi ulang.

相关视频

Build better RAG by letting a team of agents extract and connect your reference materials into a knowledge graph. Our new short course, “Agentic Knowledge Graph Construction,” taught by Neo4j Innovation Lead Andreas Kollegger, shows you how. Knowledge graphs are an important way to store information accurately but they are a lot of work to build manually. In this course you’ll learn how to build a team of agents that turn data– in this case product reviews and invoices from suppliers–into structured graphs of entities and relationships for RAG. Learn how agents can automatically handle the time-consuming work of building graphs — extracting entities and relationships (e.g., Product "contains" Assembly, Part "supplied_by" Supplier, Customer review "mentions" Product), deduplicating them, fact-checking them, and committing them to a graph database — so your retrieval system can find right information to generate accurate output. For example, you can use agents to help trace customer complaints directly to specific suppliers, manufacturing processes, and product hierarchies, thus turning fragmented information into queryable business intelligence. Skills you’ll gain: - Build, store, and access knowledge graphs using the Neo4j graph database - Build multi-agent systems using Google’s Agent Development Kit (ADK) - Set up a loop of agentic workflows to propose and refine a graph schema through fact-checking - Connect agent-generated graphs of unstructured and structured data into a unified knowledge graph This course gets into the practicum of why knowledge graphs give more accurate information retrieval than vector search alone, especially for high-stakes applications where precision matters more than fuzzy similarity matching. Sign up here:

Andrew Ng

168,153 次观看 • 1 年前