Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

ICE agent waves gun around while blocking truck—points it directly at driver's head for several seconds. "I'll F-ing shoot you!" agent yells pointing his gun through windshield at the driver. Another agent drags away woman screaming, "What are you doing!?" LAPD officers seen on video afterwards just standing around...

141,884 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

8 Comments

@SsebrinaD's profile picture
@SsebrinaD1 year ago

See now, THAT lets me know that those were not sworn officers. Their initial response would not be "I'll fucking shoot you" while pointing a gun at your head. I just don't believe that's part of their training.

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻's profile picture
LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻1 year ago

Join the discussion. 👇 "Are these actual Federal ICE agents or Deputized Bounty Hunters?"

An Old Woman, M.S. Applied Statistics's profile picture
An Old Woman, M.S. Applied Statistics1 year ago

Trump wants violence in the streets, imo.

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻's profile picture
LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻1 year ago

Trump suggested that “one real rough, nasty” and “violent” day could effectively end crime. “We have to let police do their job, [even] if they have to be extraordinarily rough.”

Carolyn Gonzalez 🇺🇸🇺🇦🪷's profile picture
Carolyn Gonzalez 🇺🇸🇺🇦🪷1 year ago

Civilians are going to have to arm themselves in public—and defend themselves.

just rams's profile picture
just rams1 year ago

There is NO WAY these morbidly obese men are normal agents. NO WAY.

𝙇𝙪𝙧𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙄𝙣 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙝𝙖𝙙𝙤𝙬𝙨 🇨🇭's profile picture
𝙇𝙪𝙧𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙄𝙣 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙝𝙖𝙙𝙤𝙬𝙨 🇨🇭1 year ago

it is 1,500 USD per person. criminal or not, US citizen or not, young or old. it's just a money making scam brought to you by your own US government. cops usually don't want to get involved.

Seriously…WTF's profile picture
Seriously…WTF1 year ago

LAPD allowing it should be identified and charged.

Related Videos

CNN’s Josh Campbell admits the ICE officer’s cellphone video of his deadly confrontation with Renee Good that the thud heard at the end *might be* sound of the officer being “struck by that vehicle,” but it *might NOT* and instead “could be from you know, the phone on his clothing.” He adds the video showed “wasn’t, you know, coming head on at that agent, you know, trying to mow him over.” “Well, this is a critical new angle. This was the actual vantage point of the officer. And we know that not many immigration officers actually wear body worn cameras. But, in this instance, the immigration agent was holding his phone up, essentially filming this encounter, which we can now see in this video obtained by our colleague Holmes Lybrand. So, in the video, you see that the officers are making contact with Renee Good there. She’s parked somewhat perpendicular in a street. And there’s another woman that’s there, which is outside the vehicle. And you can tell, you know, as the exchange there with Renee Good that, you know, she’s being somewhat pleasant. The other woman is, you know, kind of mouthy. And, you know, this is obviously a bit a bit tense, you tells the agent at one point, you know, ‘why don’t you go get some lunch, big boy?’ You also see critically. And I’ll get to this in a second. Bystanders behind the vehicle. We’ve seen other angles. This one shows us again, the vantage point of that officer. Another agent orders Renee Good out of the vehicle. This agent then walks around. That is the moment that she then takes off. And, on that audio, what we hear, it appears that you can actually hear friction on the phone. You know, it appears from other angles that the agent was indeed struck by that vehicle. But you hear on the audio, it appears friction on the phone, that could be from the vehicle strike. That could be from you know, the phone on his clothing. But then it appears three shots were fired after that. And then you hear afterwards someone, it appears, maybe an immigration agent who was there, actually, you know, use profanity, you know, calling — calling her an f-ing B, which we heard on — on the audio there. Now, let’s talk about the tactics for a second so I can tell you this, as a former federal agent, that law enforcement officers can use deadly force only when necessary, when they believe that there is an imminent threat to their life. In this instance, you have a moving vehicle that’s coming at that agent. “Now, the driver, Renee Good, did turn the wheel to the right. So, it appears that she wasn’t, you know, coming head on at that agent, you know, trying to mow him over. But nevertheless, an agent in that split second decision would have to make that calculation. Am I in danger? Is my life threatened here? You know, agents are also taught What are other options? Could you move out of the way? And that’s why this has been such a contentious issue here — the judgment, the decision of that agent to actually open fire. We’ve heard, you know, obviously, people supporting that decision, others, being quite critical. One other thing I want to note is that when agents undergo training and not just the feds, but law enforcement across the country, it is a cardinal rule that you are responsible for every round that you fire. And one key component of that is to the extent that you have the time and you can, you must be aware of what is beyond your shot, what is in the background? Here, it appears from that video that this other woman who had been engaging in the agent with the agent, was quite clearly in the line of fire. But there were also other people that were standing behind that car on the sidewalk. And this is a residential area. And so, I’m sure that will face some scrutiny as well. The officer opening fire at that moment, you know, directly, it appears towards those other people beyond the shot. And then his partners. And you brought this up, Brianna, just the other day, his partners are there in close range as well. And so, this will be heavily scrutinized from a tactical perspective as well. About the officer opening fire, but again, just critical, critical new video here that we’re seeing an important angle what the officer would have been seeing in the moment.”

Curtis Houck

68,500 views • 5 months ago