Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

I'd question this try, though. 5 behind 8 in the initial maul, breaks away, bound to team mates, ahead of the ball carrier. To my mind a clear shear and then obvious obstruction... But it was not even on the official's minds

Front Row Grunt

31,896 subscribers

17,046 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"It's not clear that Zelenskyy truly wants to stop the fighting. He came in, even though he was warned not to, determined to litigate all of that," says @MikeWaltz47. "This was the wrong approach, wrong time in history, and definitely the wrong president to try to do this."

"It's not clear that Zelenskyy truly wants to stop the fighting. He came in, even though he was warned not to, determined to litigate all of that," says @MikeWaltz47. "This was the wrong approach, wrong time in history, and definitely the wrong president to try to do this."

Rapid Response 47

674,801 views • 1 year ago

It was a good try… It was even verified, but then someone cried and in the end, the idea was left to die.

It was a good try… It was even verified, but then someone cried and in the end, the idea was left to die.

Ty Gower

24,207 views • 1 year ago

"It's going to be happening in a lot of games, players are maneuvering to try and get it brought forward" Good honesty from Brian Ó Beaglaoich on the show on the handing the ball back rule - he's not a fan even though he benefited from it.

"It's going to be happening in a lot of games, players are maneuvering to try and get it brought forward" Good honesty from Brian Ó Beaglaoich on the show on the handing the ball back rule - he's not a fan even though he benefited from it.

Smaller Fish

43,186 views • 6 months ago

I am in this clip rushing the court as a student (though the quality of the video makes me hard to find) but it was a highlight of my time at NU. I remember after the high bounce on the rim thinking "crap we lost" then seeing the ball bounce again and in and becoming just elated.

I am in this clip rushing the court as a student (though the quality of the video makes me hard to find) but it was a highlight of my time at NU. I remember after the high bounce on the rim thinking "crap we lost" then seeing the ball bounce again and in and becoming just elated.

Ryan Lindley

10,456 views • 7 months ago

Warren: "It seems to me that when the AG says 'I have the files on my desk' and then does a 180 turn and says, 'Nope, nothing here to see. I'm not going to release anything,' that that raises a question in the minds of people all across this country."

Warren: "It seems to me that when the AG says 'I have the files on my desk' and then does a 180 turn and says, 'Nope, nothing here to see. I'm not going to release anything,' that that raises a question in the minds of people all across this country."

Aaron Rupar

56,003 views • 1 year ago

Too shy? Rutte could not give a direct answer to the question of which country is behind the UAV incident in Poland "On the one hand, I think the question of who is behind this is significant, but on the other hand, it is not that significant because it does not matter whether it was done intentionally. It was reckless in any case, these were Russian drones," he believes. - SMI

Too shy? Rutte could not give a direct answer to the question of which country is behind the UAV incident in Poland "On the one hand, I think the question of who is behind this is significant, but on the other hand, it is not that significant because it does not matter whether it was done intentionally. It was reckless in any case, these were Russian drones," he believes. - SMI

Zlatti71

90,969 views • 11 months ago

Nothing to see here. The 12th man tried their best. 5 minute delay on what they thought was a clear and obvious error. Trying to rip Gyökeres' mask off. Clapping when receiving card for kicking the ball away. Handball in the box. All fine 🤷‍♂️

Nothing to see here. The 12th man tried their best. 5 minute delay on what they thought was a clear and obvious error. Trying to rip Gyökeres' mask off. Clapping when receiving card for kicking the ball away. Handball in the box. All fine 🤷‍♂️

🇳🇴 kimmoFC

369,446 views • 10 months ago

Call on the field is obstruction because her left foot was in the baseline. In my opinion, the obstruction rule is getting way out of hand and too nitpicky. The SS has to get the ball to make a play. Let them play! And let the runners be the D1 athletes that they are and figure it out.

Call on the field is obstruction because her left foot was in the baseline. In my opinion, the obstruction rule is getting way out of hand and too nitpicky. The SS has to get the ball to make a play. Let them play! And let the runners be the D1 athletes that they are and figure it out.

Megan Rembielak

904,651 views • 1 year ago

I decided to take a train from Washington DC to Eugene, Oregon to watch my team JMU in the college football playoffs. It was an epic journey through multiple cities…. But all of a sudden, in the middle of Montana, things started to go wrong… Now the question is even though the game is not for several days will I even make it? Here’s a thread of what’s been going on… stay tuned for the second or third post to see what has happened…

I decided to take a train from Washington DC to Eugene, Oregon to watch my team JMU in the college football playoffs. It was an epic journey through multiple cities…. But all of a sudden, in the middle of Montana, things started to go wrong… Now the question is even though the game is not for several days will I even make it? Here’s a thread of what’s been going on… stay tuned for the second or third post to see what has happened…

DMV Adventures

2,020,664 views • 7 months ago

This is as clear as it gets 🤷‍♂️ I understand Bryson being angry but he clearly tramples down the grass behind the ball and improves the lie whether it was intentional or not that’s a clear penalty

This is as clear as it gets 🤷‍♂️ I understand Bryson being angry but he clearly tramples down the grass behind the ball and improves the lie whether it was intentional or not that’s a clear penalty

Bay Area Sports Emo

438,558 views • 26 days ago

Mullin: Keep in mind, the same time this was going on, Obama was saying that we need to have a peaceful transfer of power. This is the same group of people that was trying to lecture President Trump on a peaceful transfer of power while they were actually trying to go behind the American people and say even though you voted this way you got it wrong

Mullin: Keep in mind, the same time this was going on, Obama was saying that we need to have a peaceful transfer of power. This is the same group of people that was trying to lecture President Trump on a peaceful transfer of power while they were actually trying to go behind the American people and say even though you voted this way you got it wrong

Acyn

146,911 views • 1 year ago

🗣️“[Michael Coleman] was very much in our minds during the game.” 🗣️”He was one of our own.” Galway GAA Official's Conor Whelan pays a beautiful tribute to the departed Michael Coleman on behalf of the county’s hurling team this evening. 🎙️ Jonathan Higgins

🗣️“[Michael Coleman] was very much in our minds during the game.” 🗣️”He was one of our own.” Galway GAA Official's Conor Whelan pays a beautiful tribute to the departed Michael Coleman on behalf of the county’s hurling team this evening. 🎙️ Jonathan Higgins

Off The Ball

26,017 views • 1 year ago

I can think of about 100 plays off the top of my head that are better than throwing the ball 5 yards behind the line of scrimmage on 3rd and 5 to set up a screen behind a 170-pound WR. This is just asinine. What's even worse, is following it up with a punt on 4th and 5 when the analytics say to go for it.

I can think of about 100 plays off the top of my head that are better than throwing the ball 5 yards behind the line of scrimmage on 3rd and 5 to set up a screen behind a 170-pound WR. This is just asinine. What's even worse, is following it up with a punt on 4th and 5 when the analytics say to go for it.

Shane Haff

119,021 views • 1 year ago

My sun stick launches on Monday! The highlight of the development process for this was going to Seoul for the development meeting and getting to meet the team behind the formulation of the product. I had a very clear idea of what I wanted and who it was for and they made magic 🤩

My sun stick launches on Monday! The highlight of the development process for this was going to Seoul for the development meeting and getting to meet the team behind the formulation of the product. I had a very clear idea of what I wanted and who it was for and they made magic 🤩

Ramón

175,838 views • 3 years ago

Watch this to the end, and look at Elon’s kid’s reaction. It’s so absurd, even a child knows. It takes up to a year to get on the “do not pay” list. And even then, the government still pays. It was a big criminal racket, and everyone was in on it. Even the Republicans.

Watch this to the end, and look at Elon’s kid’s reaction. It’s so absurd, even a child knows. It takes up to a year to get on the “do not pay” list. And even then, the government still pays. It was a big criminal racket, and everyone was in on it. Even the Republicans.

Viva Frei

63,820 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing

Check VAR World Cup

74,430 views • 1 month ago

Spurs went long. Tosin had the chance to win the aerial duel, but he left it and signalled as though he had everything under control. It was poor communication with the rest of his teammates. He was then caught ball watching when no Spurs player was even making a run, before running away from his main responsibility.

Spurs went long. Tosin had the chance to win the aerial duel, but he left it and signalled as though he had everything under control. It was poor communication with the rest of his teammates. He was then caught ball watching when no Spurs player was even making a run, before running away from his main responsibility.

SHAYEE 𒀭

129,739 views • 11 days ago

5 Runs were needed to win. Virender Sehwag was on 99. Sangakkara deliberately let the ball go through & Randiv then bowled a No ball to keep Viru stranded on 99. It was an act of disgrace, against the spirit of the game by the Lankan team.

5 Runs were needed to win. Virender Sehwag was on 99. Sangakkara deliberately let the ball go through & Randiv then bowled a No ball to keep Viru stranded on 99. It was an act of disgrace, against the spirit of the game by the Lankan team.

Akshat

972,338 views • 7 months ago

This fan in CF tried to catch a HR ball but unfortunately for him, he missed the catch and it landed on his marbles. The worst part, the play was challenged and the whole team, fans and stadium saw him get nailed in the nuts until it was clear that he never interfered with the baseball.

This fan in CF tried to catch a HR ball but unfortunately for him, he missed the catch and it landed on his marbles. The worst part, the play was challenged and the whole team, fans and stadium saw him get nailed in the nuts until it was clear that he never interfered with the baseball.

BaseballHistoryNut

175,868 views • 1 month ago

You cannot be in your right mind and send Mandelson to Washington. It was bound to blow up. The PM's biggest stroke of luck is that there's no obvious successor.

You cannot be in your right mind and send Mandelson to Washington. It was bound to blow up. The PM's biggest stroke of luck is that there's no obvious successor.

Diane Abbott

47,881 views • 3 months ago