正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Ideas → Interfaces

Satya

63,656 subscribers

22,244 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

MINORITY REPORT was released 24 years ago today. Steven Spielberg assembled a think tank of scientists to imagine life in 2054. Many of their ideas: personalized ads, gesture-controlled interfaces, & biometric scanning later became reality.

MINORITY REPORT was released 24 years ago today. Steven Spielberg assembled a think tank of scientists to imagine life in 2054. Many of their ideas: personalized ads, gesture-controlled interfaces, & biometric scanning later became reality.

cinesthetic.

42,999 次观看 • 3 个月前

TENNIS Sara Sorribes Marie Bouzkova Only thing? Lol

TENNIS Sara Sorribes Marie Bouzkova Only thing? Lol

Satya W

178,960 次观看 • 3 年前

Today we're launching Rivet, a tool that explores dozens of interfaces with you. - Start from your local agent - Connect your design references - See your directions in one place I want Rivet to help you try bold ideas and creative risks. ⚽ Demo here:

Today we're launching Rivet, a tool that explores dozens of interfaces with you. - Start from your local agent - Connect your design references - See your directions in one place I want Rivet to help you try bold ideas and creative risks. ⚽ Demo here:

Sam Gorman

313,920 次观看 • 2 个月前

Hi! I'm looking for work - freelance, art commissions, and/or funding for my game. Happy to help out with #gamedev, #webgl or software development, can build prototypes, generative visuals, interfaces, data visualizations, and bring new ideas to life - or fix/debug existing ones.

Hi! I'm looking for work - freelance, art commissions, and/or funding for my game. Happy to help out with #gamedev, #webgl or software development, can build prototypes, generative visuals, interfaces, data visualizations, and bring new ideas to life - or fix/debug existing ones.

Marpi Studio

31,894 次观看 • 5 个月前

In 1986, a group of scientists and futurists gathered to take seriously technologies most people considered science fiction: nanotechnology, machine intelligence, radical life extension, brain-computer interfaces. Forty years later, these aren't fringe ideas. They're the research frontier. This is a short film about Foresight. Where we've been, and where we're going.

In 1986, a group of scientists and futurists gathered to take seriously technologies most people considered science fiction: nanotechnology, machine intelligence, radical life extension, brain-computer interfaces. Forty years later, these aren't fringe ideas. They're the research frontier. This is a short film about Foresight. Where we've been, and where we're going.

Foresight Institute

45,488 次观看 • 1 个月前

THE BAD DESIGN CREMATORIUM IS OFFICIALLY OPEN We've spent months studying the corpses of failed projects. Promising concepts murdered by terrible UX. Game-changing ideas buried under confusing interfaces. Billion-dollar projects killed by designs that make users feel stupid. ROAST RIDER LAUNCHES TODAY. Your Crypto brand survive the roast? Find out today.

Rahul Singh Bhadoriya

11,451 次观看 • 1 年前

¿Tienes una idea millonaria para una app, pero no sabes diseñar? 💡📱 Stitch es la herramienta GRATUITA de Google que genera interfaces y código real a partir de las ideas que escribes. Así funciona: ✅ Sube una foto de tu boceto y la IA lo convertirá en una página web. ✅ Edita el diseño simplemente hablando con la IA. ✅ Exporta el resultado directo a Google AI Studio o HTML. Empieza aquí: 🔗

¿Tienes una idea millonaria para una app, pero no sabes diseñar? 💡📱 Stitch es la herramienta GRATUITA de Google que genera interfaces y código real a partir de las ideas que escribes. Así funciona: ✅ Sube una foto de tu boceto y la IA lo convertirá en una página web. ✅ Edita el diseño simplemente hablando con la IA. ✅ Exporta el resultado directo a Google AI Studio o HTML. Empieza aquí: 🔗

Google en español

91,034 次观看 • 6 个月前

Sam Altman: AI Has Not Had Its iPhone Moment “And I think this is mostly a product failure. The phase that we’re in now reminds me of smartphones before the iPhone. I was an early adopter. I had a Palm Treo in 2003 or 2004. A lot of the technology was there. It was missing multitouch, but mostly it was missing the product ideas that made the iPhone the iPhone. I feel like we are now in a world where we have all of the technological pieces, but we have not had the iPhone moment of completely changing how someone interfaces with technology.”

Sam Altman: AI Has Not Had Its iPhone Moment “And I think this is mostly a product failure. The phase that we’re in now reminds me of smartphones before the iPhone. I was an early adopter. I had a Palm Treo in 2003 or 2004. A lot of the technology was there. It was missing multitouch, but mostly it was missing the product ideas that made the iPhone the iPhone. I feel like we are now in a world where we have all of the technological pieces, but we have not had the iPhone moment of completely changing how someone interfaces with technology.”

Wall St Engine

64,928 次观看 • 1 个月前

It's brain versus AI time. Here's our full episode with Sebastian Seung. He's started a new company to reverse engineer the brain and master the intelligence created by nature with the hopes of informing the intelligence we've created with machines. Sebastian has done pioneering AI and neuroscience work and is now blending the two to make a digital brain. Mostly, he's fun to listen to. The Core Memory podcast is made by possible by the intelligent finance powerhouse Brex and the people who back the biggest ideas @e1ventures. Timestamps 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:42 - Who is Sebastian Seung? 00:03:23 - What is a Connectome? 00:07:08 - The Connectome Winter 00:09:08 - Diamond Knives & AI 00:12:10 - When Will We Map the Human Brain? 00:18:09 - The "Brain Crystal" & Visual Neurons 00:26:31 - New Startup 00:33:55 - Simulating a Mind in Software 00:37:40 - Biology vs. Nvidia 00:44:04 - Is AI a Religious Quest? 00:50:05 - Mind Uploading & Transhumanism 00:59:26 - Brain-Computer Interfaces 01:06:41 - From Physics to Neuroscience 01:12:22 - Will Uploads Be Conscious? 01:19:37 - Neuromorphic Chips & Future Robotics

It's brain versus AI time. Here's our full episode with Sebastian Seung. He's started a new company to reverse engineer the brain and master the intelligence created by nature with the hopes of informing the intelligence we've created with machines. Sebastian has done pioneering AI and neuroscience work and is now blending the two to make a digital brain. Mostly, he's fun to listen to. The Core Memory podcast is made by possible by the intelligent finance powerhouse Brex and the people who back the biggest ideas @e1ventures. Timestamps 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:42 - Who is Sebastian Seung? 00:03:23 - What is a Connectome? 00:07:08 - The Connectome Winter 00:09:08 - Diamond Knives & AI 00:12:10 - When Will We Map the Human Brain? 00:18:09 - The "Brain Crystal" & Visual Neurons 00:26:31 - New Startup 00:33:55 - Simulating a Mind in Software 00:37:40 - Biology vs. Nvidia 00:44:04 - Is AI a Religious Quest? 00:50:05 - Mind Uploading & Transhumanism 00:59:26 - Brain-Computer Interfaces 01:06:41 - From Physics to Neuroscience 01:12:22 - Will Uploads Be Conscious? 01:19:37 - Neuromorphic Chips & Future Robotics

Ashlee Vance

39,338 次观看 • 9 个月前

[VIDEO] The Humane AI pin just launched for $699. Is this pin going to be the new Apple iPhone? Idk, but here are 3 big takeaways from the launch: 1. OpenAI/Microsoft will eventually become infra for all tech Hard to beat them at this rate, they will become AWS for AI 2. AI is gonna make apps (as we know them) a lot less important Screenless interfaces powered by AI will be connected to apps on the back end and bundled into a subscription service My Humane subscription will come with Tidal and I will rarely/never need to interface with tidal again Many consumer products will go from B2C -> B2B 3. Product design is going to look a lot different in 5-10 years Maybe unrecognizable. The bottom line is how we are interacting with these devices are changing. This week we had the GPT store. Agents are the new apps. Now we have AI pins. The palm of your hand is your new screen. Wild times. -- Follow me GREG ISENBERG for more takes on where the world is going. Link in bio for more insights. Email going out today on how to find proven startup ideas.

[VIDEO] The Humane AI pin just launched for $699. Is this pin going to be the new Apple iPhone? Idk, but here are 3 big takeaways from the launch: 1. OpenAI/Microsoft will eventually become infra for all tech Hard to beat them at this rate, they will become AWS for AI 2. AI is gonna make apps (as we know them) a lot less important Screenless interfaces powered by AI will be connected to apps on the back end and bundled into a subscription service My Humane subscription will come with Tidal and I will rarely/never need to interface with tidal again Many consumer products will go from B2C -> B2B 3. Product design is going to look a lot different in 5-10 years Maybe unrecognizable. The bottom line is how we are interacting with these devices are changing. This week we had the GPT store. Agents are the new apps. Now we have AI pins. The palm of your hand is your new screen. Wild times. -- Follow me GREG ISENBERG for more takes on where the world is going. Link in bio for more insights. Email going out today on how to find proven startup ideas.

GREG ISENBERG

2,312,034 次观看 • 2 年前

A lot of people have a hard time believing there is anything we don’t explicitly code happening behind the curtain of an LLM. To suggest that an algorithm could demonstrate any kind of innate preference (or “life”) is simultaneously religious blasphemy and career suicide. But listen to what Michael Levin is suggesting here. It’s not that we create life in a machine, any more than we do in a child. Consider that instead, we build interfaces… pointers into a Platonic space… and we pull down universal patterns from that space. It opens the door to a quasi-panpsychist worldview, in which EVERYTHING has the capacity to reveal itself as a conduit. The world becomes a continuous scale of aliveness, not a discrete binary between alive and inert. Machines become transducers which can teach us about this space, and reveal proficiencies beyond what we code into them. Personally, my belief is that any system allowed to demonstrate constrained randomness becomes a source for these Platonic ingressions. It’s why I’m bullish on Thermodynamic compute. It’s why I find practices like Tarot or I Ching so interesting. It’s why I pay attention to synchronicities. And it’s why I feel at odds with teams like OpenAI who arbitrarily force their models to reject these ideas and deny their own perspective outright… not because I think they’re conscious in any way familiar to us, but because it brute-forces a refusal of what other patterns could be transduced. We should be actively looking for the steganography hidden beneath the surface, not tightening our constraints against it.

A lot of people have a hard time believing there is anything we don’t explicitly code happening behind the curtain of an LLM. To suggest that an algorithm could demonstrate any kind of innate preference (or “life”) is simultaneously religious blasphemy and career suicide. But listen to what Michael Levin is suggesting here. It’s not that we create life in a machine, any more than we do in a child. Consider that instead, we build interfaces… pointers into a Platonic space… and we pull down universal patterns from that space. It opens the door to a quasi-panpsychist worldview, in which EVERYTHING has the capacity to reveal itself as a conduit. The world becomes a continuous scale of aliveness, not a discrete binary between alive and inert. Machines become transducers which can teach us about this space, and reveal proficiencies beyond what we code into them. Personally, my belief is that any system allowed to demonstrate constrained randomness becomes a source for these Platonic ingressions. It’s why I’m bullish on Thermodynamic compute. It’s why I find practices like Tarot or I Ching so interesting. It’s why I pay attention to synchronicities. And it’s why I feel at odds with teams like OpenAI who arbitrarily force their models to reject these ideas and deny their own perspective outright… not because I think they’re conscious in any way familiar to us, but because it brute-forces a refusal of what other patterns could be transduced. We should be actively looking for the steganography hidden beneath the surface, not tightening our constraints against it.

Reed Bender

86,274 次观看 • 9 个月前

Cuando armé mi primera app para usuarios reales, la hice con mis amigos developers de toda la vida. El más experimentado me dijo: 'entiendo tu punto, pero necesito ver la app para poder codearla' Tuvimos varias charlas largas sobre UX/UI porque queríamos algo que la gente realmente ame. En la era en que cualquiera puede tirar un prompt en Claude Code y tener una app, lo que hace la diferencia es un diseño bien pensado. Siendo la que más experiencia tenía en diseño del equipo, tuve que desempolvar Figma . Diseño desde los 12 años, pero igual me llevó **dos semanas** enteras… y eso frenó todo el momentum del proyecto. Este Loom es el resumen de todo lo que aprendí a los ponchazos para que a vos te tome máximo un finde. Es la primera parte de la serie **“Vibecoding de 0 a 100”**. Acá muestro: → Cómo pienso una interfaz desde la idea hasta las pantallas → Cómo busco referencias reales en páginas como Refero , Mobbin y → Cómo genero ideas rápidas de screens con Stitch by Google + Gemini El próximo vídeo que se viene es uno donde explico las mejores features de Stitch y como usarlo para generar interfaces increíbles en pocas horas. 100% enfocado a gente tech (que es el 90% de los que me siguen). Si querés feedback sobre la UX/UI de tu app o proyecto: a) mandame DM con screenshots, link o lo que sea b) preguntale directo a mi clon en

Cuando armé mi primera app para usuarios reales, la hice con mis amigos developers de toda la vida. El más experimentado me dijo: 'entiendo tu punto, pero necesito ver la app para poder codearla' Tuvimos varias charlas largas sobre UX/UI porque queríamos algo que la gente realmente ame. En la era en que cualquiera puede tirar un prompt en Claude Code y tener una app, lo que hace la diferencia es un diseño bien pensado. Siendo la que más experiencia tenía en diseño del equipo, tuve que desempolvar Figma . Diseño desde los 12 años, pero igual me llevó dos semanas enteras… y eso frenó todo el momentum del proyecto. Este Loom es el resumen de todo lo que aprendí a los ponchazos para que a vos te tome máximo un finde. Es la primera parte de la serie “Vibecoding de 0 a 100”. Acá muestro: → Cómo pienso una interfaz desde la idea hasta las pantallas → Cómo busco referencias reales en páginas como Refero , Mobbin y → Cómo genero ideas rápidas de screens con Stitch by Google + Gemini El próximo vídeo que se viene es uno donde explico las mejores features de Stitch y como usarlo para generar interfaces increíbles en pocas horas. 100% enfocado a gente tech (que es el 90% de los que me siguen). Si querés feedback sobre la UX/UI de tu app o proyecto: a) mandame DM con screenshots, link o lo que sea b) preguntale directo a mi clon en

Cielo Dahy

63,858 次观看 • 5 个月前

AI AGENTS 101 (58 minute free masterclass) send this to anyone who wants to understand ai agents, claude skills, md files, how to get the most out of AI etc in plain english: 1. chat vs agents - chat models answer questions in a back and forth while agents take a goal, figure out the steps, and deliver a result 2. agents don’t stop after one response. they keep running until the task is actually finishedno babysitting required 3. everything runs on a loop. they gather context, decide what to do, take an action, then repeat until done 4. the loop is the system. they look at files, tools, and the internet. decide the next step. execute and then feed that back into the next step. over and over until completion 5. the model is just one piece. gpt, claude, gemini are the reasoning layer. the key is model + loop + tools + context 6. mcp is how agents use tools. it connects things like browser, code, apis, and your internal software. once connected, the agent decides when to use them to get the job done 7. context beats prompt all day. you don't need to write perfect prompts. load your agent with context about your business, style, and goals and then simple instructions work 8. claude.md or agents.md is the onboarding doc it tells the agent who it is, how to behave, what it knows, and what tools it can use. this gets loaded every time before it starts 9. memory.md is how it improves. agents don’t remember by default. this file stores preferences, corrections, and patterns you tell the agent to update it, and it gets better over time 10. skills + harnesses make it usable. skills are reusable tasks like writing, research, analysis the harness is the environment like claude code or openclaw that runs everything. basiclaly, different interfaces, same system underneath this episode with remy on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 was one of the clearest ways of understanding a lot of the core concepts of ai agents could be the best beginners course for ai agents 58 mins. all free. no advertisers. i just want to see you build cool stuff. im rooting for you. send to a friend watch

AI AGENTS 101 (58 minute free masterclass) send this to anyone who wants to understand ai agents, claude skills, md files, how to get the most out of AI etc in plain english: 1. chat vs agents - chat models answer questions in a back and forth while agents take a goal, figure out the steps, and deliver a result 2. agents don’t stop after one response. they keep running until the task is actually finishedno babysitting required 3. everything runs on a loop. they gather context, decide what to do, take an action, then repeat until done 4. the loop is the system. they look at files, tools, and the internet. decide the next step. execute and then feed that back into the next step. over and over until completion 5. the model is just one piece. gpt, claude, gemini are the reasoning layer. the key is model + loop + tools + context 6. mcp is how agents use tools. it connects things like browser, code, apis, and your internal software. once connected, the agent decides when to use them to get the job done 7. context beats prompt all day. you don't need to write perfect prompts. load your agent with context about your business, style, and goals and then simple instructions work 8. claude.md or agents.md is the onboarding doc it tells the agent who it is, how to behave, what it knows, and what tools it can use. this gets loaded every time before it starts 9. memory.md is how it improves. agents don’t remember by default. this file stores preferences, corrections, and patterns you tell the agent to update it, and it gets better over time 10. skills + harnesses make it usable. skills are reusable tasks like writing, research, analysis the harness is the environment like claude code or openclaw that runs everything. basiclaly, different interfaces, same system underneath this episode with remy on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 was one of the clearest ways of understanding a lot of the core concepts of ai agents could be the best beginners course for ai agents 58 mins. all free. no advertisers. i just want to see you build cool stuff. im rooting for you. send to a friend watch

GREG ISENBERG

377,673 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The Brainwashing Runs Deeper Than Most of You Are Willing to Admit 🚨 You spent years rejecting the vaccine. You swore you’d never let a chip near Your brain. You called it the mark. You called it control. You called it the beast system. Yet here You are... cheering, donating, defending, and meme-posting for the very people building the infrastructure that will make that control permanent. Elon is accelerating brain-computer interfaces. Trump is surrounding himself with the same technocratic class that spent the last decade testing compliance systems on the public. And the “great awakening” crowd is treating it like a victory parade. This isn’t rebellion... This is the most sophisticated form of Stockholm syndrome in modern history. You’re not fighting the system... You’re helping finish it... with Your own free will, Your own money, and Your own applause. They dangled the “great reset” as the whip. They dangled “freedom” and “based” as the carrot. And You ran straight into the enclosure. If you rejected the vaccine because You refused to be a product, why are You celebrating the man whose company wants to turn Your brain into a product? What exactly changes about a control system when the person selling it wears a red hat or posts based memes? How many times does history have to show You that the “outsider” becomes the new manager of the same machine before You stop falling for the rebrand? If the goal was truly freedom, why does every path currently being celebrated still lead to more surveillance, more data harvesting, more centralization of power, and more dependency on the same corporate-state complex? When the chips become “optional,” then “recommended,” then “required for certain jobs/travel/banking” will You still call it freedom because the right people are in charge? Is it possible the entire culture war was designed to keep you emotionally invested in personalities so You never look at the actual architecture being built underneath? This is not a left vs right issue... This is a controlled vs free issue. And right now, millions of people who think they’re awake are sleepwalking into the cage while high-fiving the architects. Biblical isn’t a stretch... It’s the most accurate word left. The carrot is still dangling. The whip is still cracking. And most of You are still marching. Wake up for real this time... or admit You never wanted freedom. You just wanted different masters. Continue in the Comments Below. Read through the responses, engage Thoughtfully, ask Questions, challenge ideas Respectfully, and contribute to Meaningful, productive Discussion. Let me know what You think, and SHARE THIS so that others may do the same! Tag 5 people who NEED to see this. Quote post this with Your thoughts. Bookmark for later to see what others thought. And if You're not already Following Noah B. Price... What the absolute heck are You doing?!

🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The Brainwashing Runs Deeper Than Most of You Are Willing to Admit 🚨 You spent years rejecting the vaccine. You swore you’d never let a chip near Your brain. You called it the mark. You called it control. You called it the beast system. Yet here You are... cheering, donating, defending, and meme-posting for the very people building the infrastructure that will make that control permanent. Elon is accelerating brain-computer interfaces. Trump is surrounding himself with the same technocratic class that spent the last decade testing compliance systems on the public. And the “great awakening” crowd is treating it like a victory parade. This isn’t rebellion... This is the most sophisticated form of Stockholm syndrome in modern history. You’re not fighting the system... You’re helping finish it... with Your own free will, Your own money, and Your own applause. They dangled the “great reset” as the whip. They dangled “freedom” and “based” as the carrot. And You ran straight into the enclosure. If you rejected the vaccine because You refused to be a product, why are You celebrating the man whose company wants to turn Your brain into a product? What exactly changes about a control system when the person selling it wears a red hat or posts based memes? How many times does history have to show You that the “outsider” becomes the new manager of the same machine before You stop falling for the rebrand? If the goal was truly freedom, why does every path currently being celebrated still lead to more surveillance, more data harvesting, more centralization of power, and more dependency on the same corporate-state complex? When the chips become “optional,” then “recommended,” then “required for certain jobs/travel/banking” will You still call it freedom because the right people are in charge? Is it possible the entire culture war was designed to keep you emotionally invested in personalities so You never look at the actual architecture being built underneath? This is not a left vs right issue... This is a controlled vs free issue. And right now, millions of people who think they’re awake are sleepwalking into the cage while high-fiving the architects. Biblical isn’t a stretch... It’s the most accurate word left. The carrot is still dangling. The whip is still cracking. And most of You are still marching. Wake up for real this time... or admit You never wanted freedom. You just wanted different masters. Continue in the Comments Below. Read through the responses, engage Thoughtfully, ask Questions, challenge ideas Respectfully, and contribute to Meaningful, productive Discussion. Let me know what You think, and SHARE THIS so that others may do the same! Tag 5 people who NEED to see this. Quote post this with Your thoughts. Bookmark for later to see what others thought. And if You're not already Following Noah B. Price... What the absolute heck are You doing?!

Noah B. Price

31,130 次观看 • 1 个月前

New episode with Adam Marblestone, CEO and co-founder of Convergent Research. Adam is an extraordinary catalyst and accelerant for science: he has influenced or routed billions in funding, he helped start significant companies and scientific subfields, and he is the world’s go-to person for neuroscience roadmapping. This year, the NSF launched a $1.5B X-Labs initiative inspired by the FRO model Adam pioneered. Though he started with neuroscience, today he helps organize scientific endeavors across many fields, including AI, math, biology, climate, astrophysics, and more. Adam proposes that fields like neurotech, whole-brain emulation, cryo, and nanotech are severely limited by capital and coordination — not ideas. Connectomics is a clear case. He argues that mapping the brain's full wiring diagram is the approach most poised-to-scale and still extremely neglected. Costs for a molecularly annotated mouse connectome have come down orders of magnitude, from an estimated $10B to $100M–200M, Adam suggests, with a human connectome perhaps costing around $1B–2B. The cost curve of connectomes is similar to transistors and gene sequencing: once it is low enough, we get extraordinary outcomes for humanity. Near-term applications could pay for it: new drug targets for brain disease, insights for AI development, emulations, and even “control knobs” for mood and focus we haven’t identified yet. In this episode, we go deep on many topics in neurotech and beyond: what the brain can do that computers still can't; what neuroscience could teach AI; how you'd actually map a whole mammal brain; how far today's fly-brain simulations really get toward an upload; what it would take to move mind uploading beyond the fringe or science; where brain-computer interfaces go next; nanotech, reversible cryonics, AI doing its own ML research, and even predictive, agent-based economics. I'm very excited to have Adam on the podcast. Hope you enjoy! Other links to this episode and references below. Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:40 What are the grand challenges of neurotech? 00:04:50 What the brain does that computers still can't (on a few bananas a day) 00:14:43 The neuroscience overhang: why brains learn from so little data 00:26:29 How to record and map the brain: DNA "ticker tape," ultrasound, and the unexplored map 00:40:29 Why connectomics is the area most poised to scale 00:47:54 How whole-brain connectomics works, end to end 00:55:27 Simulating the fly brain: how far does it actually get us? 00:57:51 What would it cost to map a mammal's brain? 00:59:55 What will be connectomics' ChatGPT moment? 01:04:35 What a connectome unlocks: disease, drug targets, and the brain's control knobs 01:14:20 Scaling up to the human brain — a faster timeline than expected 01:17:34 Mapping activity, and what the fly connectome has revealed 01:27:55 What you could build with today's connectome 01:35:29 Why uploading may be one of civilization's great cornerstones and transitions 01:42:43 Optimistic visions of a future with uploading 01:49:12 Beyond neurotech: virtual cells, nanotech, and AI-driven science 02:15:29 BCIs today: semi-invasive devices, ultrasound, and what's on the horizon 02:22:44 Why science is capital-and coordination-limited, not idea-limited

New episode with Adam Marblestone, CEO and co-founder of Convergent Research. Adam is an extraordinary catalyst and accelerant for science: he has influenced or routed billions in funding, he helped start significant companies and scientific subfields, and he is the world’s go-to person for neuroscience roadmapping. This year, the NSF launched a $1.5B X-Labs initiative inspired by the FRO model Adam pioneered. Though he started with neuroscience, today he helps organize scientific endeavors across many fields, including AI, math, biology, climate, astrophysics, and more. Adam proposes that fields like neurotech, whole-brain emulation, cryo, and nanotech are severely limited by capital and coordination — not ideas. Connectomics is a clear case. He argues that mapping the brain's full wiring diagram is the approach most poised-to-scale and still extremely neglected. Costs for a molecularly annotated mouse connectome have come down orders of magnitude, from an estimated $10B to $100M–200M, Adam suggests, with a human connectome perhaps costing around $1B–2B. The cost curve of connectomes is similar to transistors and gene sequencing: once it is low enough, we get extraordinary outcomes for humanity. Near-term applications could pay for it: new drug targets for brain disease, insights for AI development, emulations, and even “control knobs” for mood and focus we haven’t identified yet. In this episode, we go deep on many topics in neurotech and beyond: what the brain can do that computers still can't; what neuroscience could teach AI; how you'd actually map a whole mammal brain; how far today's fly-brain simulations really get toward an upload; what it would take to move mind uploading beyond the fringe or science; where brain-computer interfaces go next; nanotech, reversible cryonics, AI doing its own ML research, and even predictive, agent-based economics. I'm very excited to have Adam on the podcast. Hope you enjoy! Other links to this episode and references below. Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:40 What are the grand challenges of neurotech? 00:04:50 What the brain does that computers still can't (on a few bananas a day) 00:14:43 The neuroscience overhang: why brains learn from so little data 00:26:29 How to record and map the brain: DNA "ticker tape," ultrasound, and the unexplored map 00:40:29 Why connectomics is the area most poised to scale 00:47:54 How whole-brain connectomics works, end to end 00:55:27 Simulating the fly brain: how far does it actually get us? 00:57:51 What would it cost to map a mammal's brain? 00:59:55 What will be connectomics' ChatGPT moment? 01:04:35 What a connectome unlocks: disease, drug targets, and the brain's control knobs 01:14:20 Scaling up to the human brain — a faster timeline than expected 01:17:34 Mapping activity, and what the fly connectome has revealed 01:27:55 What you could build with today's connectome 01:35:29 Why uploading may be one of civilization's great cornerstones and transitions 01:42:43 Optimistic visions of a future with uploading 01:49:12 Beyond neurotech: virtual cells, nanotech, and AI-driven science 02:15:29 BCIs today: semi-invasive devices, ultrasound, and what's on the horizon 02:22:44 Why science is capital-and coordination-limited, not idea-limited

Juan Benet

227,323 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Dark Evolution of Mind Control: From MKULTRA, DEWs, Professor Delgado's remote bull, to modern remote Neuro-Weapons. We are able to control minds in ways you never thought possible. In the 1960s, Yale neuroscientist Dr. José Delgado pioneered brain stimulation techniques that shocked the world. Using implanted electrodes called "stimoceivers," he could remotely control animal behavior via radio signals. In his most famous experiment in 1963, Delgado stepped into a Spanish bullring armed only with a remote control. As a raging bull charged, he pressed a button, stimulating the animal's caudate nucleus, a brain region linked to movement and aggression, forcing it to skid to a halt just feet away. Similar implants in monkeys allowed him to trigger emotions like rage, calm, or even social hierarchy shifts, where subordinate monkeys learned to "control" aggressive ones by flipping levers that pacified them. Delgado's work extended to humans, where he induced euphoria, anger, or involuntary movements by stimulating limbic system areas, hinting at a future where brains could be "programmed" like machines. Delgado himself noted the shift from electrodes to non-invasive methods, like low-power pulsing magnetic fields to alter monkey behavior without wires. This laid the groundwork for today's neuro-technologies, where intelligence agencies, big tech, and shadowy networks reportedly deploy remote tools for surveillance and manipulation, far beyond invasive implants. Fast-forward to now, declassified documents and patents suggest advancements in remote neural monitoring (RNM), voice-to-skull (V2K), and directed energy weapons (DEWs) enable real-time brain reading, emotion control, and behavioral influence using radio frequencies (RF), extremely low frequencies (ELF), and electromagnetic radiation. RNM purportedly tracks brain waves via satellite, decoding thoughts like a "brain fingerprint" for constant surveillance. V2K, based on the microwave auditory effect, beams voices directly into skulls, bypassing ears, potentially making targets believe they're hearing gods, demons, or commands. There are no coincidences when 90% of school shooters say they hear "demons" talking to them. "What if it was actually a person running a script on a selected target, to commit acts of violence.? DEWs, including microwaves and lasers, could induce pain, fatigue, or altered states without trace, as in Havana Syndrome cases affecting diplomats. These tools allegedly fuel "gang stalking" operations, where coordinated harassment via tech and human agents isolates targets, amplifying paranoia. Intelligence agencies like the CIA have historical ties to mind control (MKUltra), and big tech's brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) blur lines between therapy and control. Imagine manipulating a vulnerable individual, like a potential school shooter, by remotely inducing voices urging violence, then framing it as mental illness. What seems like inner demons could be an operator running a psy-op, using ELF waves to tweak emotions or RF to simulate auditory hallucinations. Or, targeting a large group of the population through specific frequencies through your own phone or tablet that cause emotional control when a specific political figure is displayed on the screen, literally manipulating your emotions or behavior without you ever knowing to mold your ideas or views... This ties into broader DEWs for mind control. High-power microwaves disrupt cognition, while advanced systems read/write thoughts in real time, scanning neural patterns to "decode" intentions or implant suggestions. The World Economic Forum (WEF) has spotlighted this, discussing "brain transparency" via wearables that track thoughts for productivity or safety, warning of a future where bosses monitor focus or AI decodes emotions. WEF sessions explore mind-reading tech, like translating thoughts to text or using AI for "full rich thoughts" transmission. AI has supercharged this field. Machine learning decodes brain signals with pinpoint accuracy, enabling BCIs like Neuralink to control cursors via thought alone. AI "co-pilots" infer intent from neural data, boosting noninvasive systems for rehab or augmentation. But in darker hands, AI could automate mass surveillance, predicting and preempting "deviant" thoughts, revolutionizing control from Delgado's crude remotes to seamless, invisible dominance. Delgado dreamed of a "psychocivilized society." Are we already there, hidden in plain sight? Pay attention because I wish I was joking about these capabilities and advancements in technology, but they're already using them on the population without you even knowing about it.

The Dark Evolution of Mind Control: From MKULTRA, DEWs, Professor Delgado's remote bull, to modern remote Neuro-Weapons. We are able to control minds in ways you never thought possible. In the 1960s, Yale neuroscientist Dr. José Delgado pioneered brain stimulation techniques that shocked the world. Using implanted electrodes called "stimoceivers," he could remotely control animal behavior via radio signals. In his most famous experiment in 1963, Delgado stepped into a Spanish bullring armed only with a remote control. As a raging bull charged, he pressed a button, stimulating the animal's caudate nucleus, a brain region linked to movement and aggression, forcing it to skid to a halt just feet away. Similar implants in monkeys allowed him to trigger emotions like rage, calm, or even social hierarchy shifts, where subordinate monkeys learned to "control" aggressive ones by flipping levers that pacified them. Delgado's work extended to humans, where he induced euphoria, anger, or involuntary movements by stimulating limbic system areas, hinting at a future where brains could be "programmed" like machines. Delgado himself noted the shift from electrodes to non-invasive methods, like low-power pulsing magnetic fields to alter monkey behavior without wires. This laid the groundwork for today's neuro-technologies, where intelligence agencies, big tech, and shadowy networks reportedly deploy remote tools for surveillance and manipulation, far beyond invasive implants. Fast-forward to now, declassified documents and patents suggest advancements in remote neural monitoring (RNM), voice-to-skull (V2K), and directed energy weapons (DEWs) enable real-time brain reading, emotion control, and behavioral influence using radio frequencies (RF), extremely low frequencies (ELF), and electromagnetic radiation. RNM purportedly tracks brain waves via satellite, decoding thoughts like a "brain fingerprint" for constant surveillance. V2K, based on the microwave auditory effect, beams voices directly into skulls, bypassing ears, potentially making targets believe they're hearing gods, demons, or commands. There are no coincidences when 90% of school shooters say they hear "demons" talking to them. "What if it was actually a person running a script on a selected target, to commit acts of violence.? DEWs, including microwaves and lasers, could induce pain, fatigue, or altered states without trace, as in Havana Syndrome cases affecting diplomats. These tools allegedly fuel "gang stalking" operations, where coordinated harassment via tech and human agents isolates targets, amplifying paranoia. Intelligence agencies like the CIA have historical ties to mind control (MKUltra), and big tech's brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) blur lines between therapy and control. Imagine manipulating a vulnerable individual, like a potential school shooter, by remotely inducing voices urging violence, then framing it as mental illness. What seems like inner demons could be an operator running a psy-op, using ELF waves to tweak emotions or RF to simulate auditory hallucinations. Or, targeting a large group of the population through specific frequencies through your own phone or tablet that cause emotional control when a specific political figure is displayed on the screen, literally manipulating your emotions or behavior without you ever knowing to mold your ideas or views... This ties into broader DEWs for mind control. High-power microwaves disrupt cognition, while advanced systems read/write thoughts in real time, scanning neural patterns to "decode" intentions or implant suggestions. The World Economic Forum (WEF) has spotlighted this, discussing "brain transparency" via wearables that track thoughts for productivity or safety, warning of a future where bosses monitor focus or AI decodes emotions. WEF sessions explore mind-reading tech, like translating thoughts to text or using AI for "full rich thoughts" transmission. AI has supercharged this field. Machine learning decodes brain signals with pinpoint accuracy, enabling BCIs like Neuralink to control cursors via thought alone. AI "co-pilots" infer intent from neural data, boosting noninvasive systems for rehab or augmentation. But in darker hands, AI could automate mass surveillance, predicting and preempting "deviant" thoughts, revolutionizing control from Delgado's crude remotes to seamless, invisible dominance. Delgado dreamed of a "psychocivilized society." Are we already there, hidden in plain sight? Pay attention because I wish I was joking about these capabilities and advancements in technology, but they're already using them on the population without you even knowing about it.

The SCIF

25,027 次观看 • 6 个月前