Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

If a Commission appears institutionally assertive in one context but conspicuously toothless in another, while proceedings against fellow Hindus are pursued with alacrity, the issue is no longer merely administrative. It goes to the credibility, consistency and constitutional neutrality of the institution itself. We cannot seriously invoke “Hindu unity”...

20,792 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

26 Kommentare

Profilbild von Sumant Dubey
Sumant Dubeyvor 2 Tagen

Dictatorship all general category people are targeted.

Profilbild von Sunny
Sunnyvor 2 Tagen

We need GC commission or else we are doomed @BJP4India do you have any spine will show you during vote

Profilbild von Mansi
Mansivor 2 Tagen

In tilchato ke pass kaam hi kya hai.... subah utho aur modi act laga do Don't worry didi we are with you Socially, mentally, financially. Jai bhawani 🚩

Profilbild von Ajay Kumar Jha
Ajay Kumar Jhavor 2 Tagen

ये आरक्षण हटाओ आंदोलन को कमजोर करने का षड्यंत्र है, ये मूर्ख लोग जंतर मंतर से उन लोगों को मार पीट कर भगा चुके हैं, माफी मांगने के बजाय ��े षडयंत्र कर रहे हैं। कोई बात नहीं हम गांव में गली मोहल्ले में चौंक चौराहे में स्वागत करेंगे, बिच्छू पाल लिया है तो डंक तो झेलना पड़ेगा।

Profilbild von JIX5A
JIX5Avor 2 Tagen

Show BJP their place at The voting boothsS

Profilbild von Piyush पीयूष
Piyush पीयूषvor 2 Tagen

@narendramodi have some shame, stop this dictatorship on your own supporters.

Profilbild von Mansi
Mansivor 2 Tagen

Modi ka time pura ho Gaya hai.... shuruwat ho chuki hai didi

Profilbild von Awadhesh Jha
Awadhesh Jhavor 2 Tagen

सरकार के संरक्षित गुण्डा एक्ट के बारे में कोई सामान्य जन बात कैसे कर सकता है।ये हिसाब चुकता महामानव का बदलापुर है। यहां सब कुछ वही है, बांकी कुछ नहीं।

Profilbild von Narendra Pandey
Narendra Pandeyvor 2 Tagen

मोदी के आब हारने की बेला आ गई है और दिया ���ुझने से पहले एक बार तेजी से जलता है वही हो रहा है

Profilbild von Vikrantha
Vikranthavor 2 Tagen

is this a recent escalation

Profilbild von aki
akivor 2 Tagen

Flower color has changed to blue

Profilbild von Riya Sharma भूतपूर्व भाजपाई
Riya Sharma भूतपूर्व भाजपाईvor 2 Tagen

मोदी एक्ट

Profilbild von Sumit
Sumitvor 2 Tagen

BJP=new Congress

Profilbild von Sujit Kumar Singh
Sujit Kumar Singhvor 2 Tagen

In reality, general castes are mintorities in India. Thus they should have had reservation rather than those majority so called oppressed vote banks.

Profilbild von Bihari Grub With me
Bihari Grub With mevor 2 Tagen

Stand with you

Profilbild von Er. Prahlad Kumar Ram ☸
Er. Prahlad Kumar Ram ☸vor 2 Tagen

Caste census is only remedy

Profilbild von Krish Aupamanyava
Krish Aupamanyavavor 2 Tagen

This is the action of the BJP gobarmint.

Profilbild von Civil
Civilvor 2 Tagen

She is such a scumbag and anti national can do anything to prove that she belong to upper caste 🤡

Profilbild von Reena Sharma
Reena Sharmavor 2 Tagen

@BJP4UP

Profilbild von sandy max
sandy maxvor 2 Tagen

Mogliji ki pant ab fatne lagi hai

Profilbild von Dogemon
Dogemonvor 2 Tagen

Very true.. And more importantly institutions should have unshakeable conduct irrespective of which government is in power, right @narendramodi ji? Else how would minimum government and maximum governance happen? How would people respect institutions? @jsaideepak @Sanjay_Dixit

Profilbild von Manoj Bhai sahab ji🇮🇳
Manoj Bhai sahab ji🇮🇳vor 2 Tagen

Chalo eska bhi bandobast ho gya ..😎 Jail jayegi nafrati aunty 😎

Profilbild von Hopeful
Hopefulvor 2 Tagen

Neele Modi ke neele log apna kaam kar rahe hain.

Profilbild von Hopeful
Hopefulvor 2 Tagen

I think, GCs need to assemble. Otherwise, it will be the demise of our future generations.

Profilbild von GC_UR
GC_URvor 2 Tagen

These all started after mahamanav came in power

Profilbild von Sudhir k tiwari
Sudhir k tiwarivor 2 Tagen

We are with you

Ähnliche Videos

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Thomas Massie

229,372 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr