Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

If a Commission appears institutionally assertive in one context but conspicuously toothless in another, while proceedings against fellow Hindus are pursued with alacrity, the issue is no longer merely administrative. It goes to the credibility, consistency and constitutional neutrality of the institution itself. We cannot seriously invoke “Hindu unity”...

20,792 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

26 Yorum

Sumant Dubey profil fotoğrafı
Sumant Dubey2 gün önce

Dictatorship all general category people are targeted.

Sunny profil fotoğrafı
Sunny2 gün önce

We need GC commission or else we are doomed @BJP4India do you have any spine will show you during vote

Mansi profil fotoğrafı
Mansi2 gün önce

In tilchato ke pass kaam hi kya hai.... subah utho aur modi act laga do Don't worry didi we are with you Socially, mentally, financially. Jai bhawani 🚩

Ajay Kumar Jha profil fotoğrafı
Ajay Kumar Jha2 gün önce

ये आरक्षण हटाओ आंदोलन को कमजोर करने का षड्यंत्र है, ये मूर्ख लोग जंतर मंतर से उन लोगों को मार पीट कर भगा चुके हैं, माफी मांगने के बजाय ��े षडयंत्र कर रहे हैं। कोई बात नहीं हम गांव में गली मोहल्ले में चौंक चौराहे में स्वागत करेंगे, बिच्छू पाल लिया है तो डंक तो झेलना पड़ेगा।

JIX5A profil fotoğrafı
JIX5A2 gün önce

Show BJP their place at The voting boothsS

Piyush पीयूष profil fotoğrafı
Piyush पीयूष2 gün önce

@narendramodi have some shame, stop this dictatorship on your own supporters.

Mansi profil fotoğrafı
Mansi2 gün önce

Modi ka time pura ho Gaya hai.... shuruwat ho chuki hai didi

Awadhesh Jha profil fotoğrafı
Awadhesh Jha2 gün önce

सरकार के संरक्षित गुण्डा एक्ट के बारे में कोई सामान्य जन बात कैसे कर सकता है।ये हिसाब चुकता महामानव का बदलापुर है। यहां सब कुछ वही है, बांकी कुछ नहीं।

Narendra Pandey profil fotoğrafı
Narendra Pandey2 gün önce

मोदी के आब हारने की बेला आ गई है और दिया ���ुझने से पहले एक बार तेजी से जलता है वही हो रहा है

Vikrantha profil fotoğrafı
Vikrantha2 gün önce

is this a recent escalation

aki profil fotoğrafı
aki2 gün önce

Flower color has changed to blue

Riya Sharma भूतपूर्व भाजपाई profil fotoğrafı
Riya Sharma भूतपूर्व भाजपाई2 gün önce

मोदी एक्ट

Sumit profil fotoğrafı
Sumit2 gün önce

BJP=new Congress

Sujit Kumar Singh profil fotoğrafı
Sujit Kumar Singh2 gün önce

In reality, general castes are mintorities in India. Thus they should have had reservation rather than those majority so called oppressed vote banks.

Bihari Grub With me profil fotoğrafı
Bihari Grub With me2 gün önce

Stand with you

Er. Prahlad Kumar Ram ☸ profil fotoğrafı
Er. Prahlad Kumar Ram ☸2 gün önce

Caste census is only remedy

Krish Aupamanyava profil fotoğrafı
Krish Aupamanyava2 gün önce

This is the action of the BJP gobarmint.

Civil profil fotoğrafı
Civil2 gün önce

She is such a scumbag and anti national can do anything to prove that she belong to upper caste 🤡

Reena Sharma profil fotoğrafı
Reena Sharma2 gün önce

@BJP4UP

sandy max profil fotoğrafı
sandy max2 gün önce

Mogliji ki pant ab fatne lagi hai

Dogemon profil fotoğrafı
Dogemon2 gün önce

Very true.. And more importantly institutions should have unshakeable conduct irrespective of which government is in power, right @narendramodi ji? Else how would minimum government and maximum governance happen? How would people respect institutions? @jsaideepak @Sanjay_Dixit

Manoj Bhai sahab ji🇮🇳 profil fotoğrafı
Manoj Bhai sahab ji🇮🇳2 gün önce

Chalo eska bhi bandobast ho gya ..😎 Jail jayegi nafrati aunty 😎

Hopeful profil fotoğrafı
Hopeful2 gün önce

Neele Modi ke neele log apna kaam kar rahe hain.

Hopeful profil fotoğrafı
Hopeful2 gün önce

I think, GCs need to assemble. Otherwise, it will be the demise of our future generations.

GC_UR profil fotoğrafı
GC_UR2 gün önce

These all started after mahamanav came in power

Sudhir k tiwari profil fotoğrafı
Sudhir k tiwari2 gün önce

We are with you

Benzer Videolar

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Thomas Massie

229,372 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce