Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🇺🇸🇮🇷 If a government were actually discussing using a nuclear weapon, would you expect silence, or leaks? That's the test Larry Johnson applies to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's claim that nuclear weapons are being discussed in White House strategy meetings on Iran. And his answer cuts against the panic....

323,795 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Marc Andreessen: Elon inspires incredible loyalty from his employees because they know he'll just sit all night with them to fix a problem. “Elon actually delegates almost everything. He's involved in the thing that is the biggest problem right now until that thing is fixed. And then, he doesn't have to be involved in it anymore, he can go focus on the next thing that's the biggest problem for that company right now. The job number one is to remove that bottleneck and get everything flowing again. I think Elon basically has universalized that concept and he basically looks at every company like it's some sort of conceptual assembly line. When he identifies the bottleneck, he goes and he talks to the line engineers who understand the technical nature of the bottleneck. If it's people on a manufacturing line, he's talking to people directly on the line. Or if that's people in a software development group, he's talking to the people actually writing the code. He's not asking the VP of Engineering to ask the Director of Engineering to ask the manager to ask the individual contributor to write a report that's to be reviewed in three weeks. He doesn't do that. He would throw them all out of the window. There's just no way he would do that. He goes and personally finds the engineer who actually has the knowledge about the thing, and then he sits in the room with that engineer and fixes the problem with them. This is why he inspires such incredible loyalty, especially from the technical people who he works with. They're like, wow, if I'm up against a problem I don't know how to solve, freaking Elon Musk is going to show up in his Gulfstream jet, and he's going to sit with me overnight in front of the keyboard or in front of the manufacturing line, and he's going to help me figure this out.” Interview of Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 by Chris Williamson on Youtube, December 14, 2024

ELON CLIPS

193,027 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Marc Andreessen: Elon inspires incredible loyalty from his employees because they know he'll sit all night with them to solve a problem. “Elon actually delegates almost everything. He's not involved in most of the things that his companies are doing. He's involved in the thing that is the biggest problem right now until that thing is fixed. And then, he doesn't have to be involved in it anymore, he can go focus on the next thing that's the biggest problem for that company right now. In manufacturing, there's this concept of the bottleneck. In any manufacturing chain, there's always some bottleneck, something that is keeping the manufacturing line from running the way that it's supposed to. Whatever the bottleneck, it's holding everything up. The job number one is to remove that bottleneck and get everything flowing again. I think Elon basically has universalized that concept and he basically looks at every company like it's some sort of conceptual assembly line. I don't need to manage everything else because everything else, by definition, is running better than that. I can go focus on that. A lot of CEOs, especially non-technical CEOs, would really struggle to implement his method. When he identifies the bottleneck, he goes and he talks to the line engineers who understand the technical nature of the bottleneck. If it's people on a manufacturing line, he's talking to people directly on the line. Or if that's people in a software development group, he's talking to the people actually writing the code. He's not asking the VP of Engineering to ask the Director of Engineering to ask the manager to ask the individual contributor to write a report that's to be reviewed in three weeks. He doesn't do that. He would throw them all out of the window. There's just no way he would do that. He goes and personally finds the engineer who actually has the knowledge about the thing, and then he sits in the room with that engineer and fixes the problem with them. This is why he inspires such incredible loyalty, especially from the technical people who he works with. They're like, wow, if I'm up against a problem I don't know how to solve, freaking Elon Musk is going to show up in his Gulfstream jet, and he's going to sit with me overnight in front of the keyboard or in front of the manufacturing line, and he's going to help me figure this out.” Interview of Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 by Chris Williamson on Youtube, December 14, 2024

ELON CLIPS

7,403,182 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Melania Trump on what it actually takes to be married to Donald Trump: In a 2005 sit-down with Larry King, Melania is asked whether Donald is a control freak at home. Her answer reframes the entire dynamic of their marriage. "I don't think he's a control freak. He's perfectionist," she says. She acknowledges that the demands of his business require a certain personality — but draws a sharp line between how he operates at work and how the relationship functions at home. She explains: "Maybe he makes demands in his business because he needs to, you know, he's kind of a general. He needs to have people in line, but not at home. We are very equal in the relationship and that's very important." Then comes the line that defines her view of the marriage: "To marry a man like Donald, you need to know who you are and you need to be very strong and smart. He needs to know that he could rely on me sometimes, and we share a lot of stuff together." When Larry presses on whether Donald's relentless work schedule bothers her (Saturdays, Sundays, golf, always working) Melania refuses the premise that a wife should want to pull her husband away from what he loves. "It's his passion. He loves it. It doesn't bother me. I don't want to change him. I don't want to say, come home and be with me. I don't want to change him. I want to give him a space. And I think that's very important in the relationship." Larry then asks the obvious follow-up: Doesn't she worry about other women being attracted to him? Her answer lands with the same self-possession: "No, I don't worry about that at all. I know who I am. And if a man doesn't want to be with me or I don't want to be with a man, goodbye and good luck." Donald, asked the reverse question about whether he worries about her with other men, responds simply: "No. I know her. That's the rock."

History Nerd

581,499 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

I know some people are never going to be okay with it, but Lucas simply liked this scene (sans the performance of the original Jabba actor), and he wanted to establish Han and Jabba's relationship as part of a subplot that would develop across the next two films (sorry, he didn't care about a Big Jabba Reveal). These are his openly stated reasons for restoring the scene. In order for the scene to be restored, Han simply *has* to step on Jabba's tail (all proposed alternatives are either even sillier or unworkable editorially). The question is: can you sell it? Because it is a little outrageous. I think the animators do a good job in the final version, because they actually integrate it into the core dynamic of the scene. Han (obviously) pisses off Jabba by stepping on his tail; if you notice, Han has, in fact, been deliberately provoking Jabba this entire time, because he's actually calling his bluff and daring Jabba to kill him right then and there, gambling that he won't actually do it, which will then force Jabba to negotiate. Jabba, as you would expect, gets very mad, clenches his fist, and looks like he probably *is* about to kill Han. But then Han immediately starts sweet-talking him and even offers to pay Jabba back, "plus a little extra." Jabba then relaxes with an "Oh Han, you impudent scamp" look on his face and decides to play ball, because Han is "[his] boy" and "[he's] the best." If Jabba can't bring himself to kill Han now, Jabba has to acknowledge to himself that he doesn't actually want to kill him, and so he'll stop waffling on the issue by sending bounty hunters with deliberately ambiguous instructions, and he'll negotiate. So Han's ploy worked. Of course, in order to accept all this, you have to grant that it's a good character scene (despite its partial redundancy) that's worth restoring in the first place. For various reasons, that is something that many people are radically against accepting. But if you start with the premise that it's a good scene, Han stepping on Jabba's tail is not that hard to justify. It is, in fact, part of establishing what Han and Jabba's relationship actually is at this point in time. It is not necessarily the same as it is in Return of the Jedi. Actually, it is obviously quite different. I don't think that is obviously a bad thing. I'm not sure what the point of including the scene would be if their relationship were portrayed as exactly the same.

The Mighty Dud Bolt

170,715 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Lt. Col. Anthony Aguilar: Trump just told the world "it always works out" about a war he started. That's not a strategy. He's counting 3 quotes from Trump in 24 hours: "we're low keying it," "we're semi-negotiating," "it always works out." Aguilar's blunt take: those sound less like a commander in chief and more like an 8-year-old explaining a bad report card. Meanwhile there are sailors on the Abraham Lincoln eating whatever's left in the galley and hoping the interceptors work. Here's the part that actually worries him: Iran just signaled through Ghalibaf's office that they're done negotiating with Trump entirely. They're going to wait him out until 2029. Iran's been under sanctions for over a decade; they can absorb pain most of the region can't. So they're betting they can simply outlast this administration. That's the dangerous move, Aguilar says, because it takes away Trump's off-ramp. If Iran won't give him anything to claim as a win, he's left with three options to save face before the next election: control of the strait (window's closing), the nuclear file, or regime change. None of those get solved with airstrikes. That's already been tried. He's got a physics metaphor: potential energy. All the pieces for a ground option are already staged: Green Berets, Kurdish partners, two carrier groups, a brigade of the 82nd sitting in the region. Nothing's stopping it except the decision to actually drop it. He thinks that decision gets made before Trump leaves office, not because the war is winnable, but because the alternative is running for reelection with nothing to show for it. The stat that stuck with him: World Bank growth forecasts for Gulf economies just got cut from 4.5% to 1.3% in a year. Everyone's feeling this. Iran's just better built to sit through it.

Mario Nawfal

285,857 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨Trump Betrayed His Voters on Behalf of a Foreign Country. 🚨"Trump could end the war in Ukraine with a single phone call" – Tucker Carlson. 🚨The same people who pushed Trump into war with Iran are pushing him to continue the war against Russia, against Putin. 📑And there was already a neocon war in progress, the war between the United States and Russia, which we mistakenly, misleadingly sometimes refer to as the Ukraine war. It's never been a Ukraine war. It's a war between NATO, which is our coalition, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, that we run and fund, and Russia. In other words, it's a war between the US and Russia. And that war, which began in the winter of 2022, was inspired by the Biden administration, which wanted it. So the United States, in the most passive-aggressive possible way, our leadership pushed Russia into this war so that the United States could defeat or weaken Russia. No one's ever defined what exactly that means. The whole project is insane. But that's what happened. And Trump knew exactly what was going on at the time and said so, and said repeatedly in interviews and in private, the main thing that we should worry about is Russia joining forces, being pushed into an alliance with China, because that would leave us where? It would leave us facing off against a coalition of the world's largest country, that would be Russia, with the world's largest population, that would be China, the world's largest economy, also China, the world's deepest military industrial capacity and resource bed, that would be Russia, against us. And we can't win. If Russia and China get together, we're done. Trump said that many times. And it's true, and it's proven to be true. And no, we can't win. So Trump knew that. And that's why he promised repeatedly on the campaign trail, when I am president, I will bring that war to a close. Watch. Before I even arrive at the Oval Office shortly after I win the presidency, I will have the war between Russia and Ukraine settled. I'll do it in 24 hours. It's not tough to do. That's easy compared to, that's easy compared to a lot of things. Well, he's right. It actually is easy compared to a lot of things. Now, you'll often hear the foreign policy establishment, the experts, people in DC, the State Department will tell you, no, it's very, very complicated. Well, it's actually not that complicated because Ukraine as a nation no longer exists. American policymakers have basically genocided the entire population of the country. More than a million people have died. Now being sent to the front in handcuffs to certain death. Apparently, that's part of the reason we're doing this. It gets very dark very fast when you start to think about it. But Ukraine itself could never prosecute a war against Russia because, well, for one thing, Russia has more than 100 million more people. So the whole thing is absurd. There is no war between Russia and Ukraine. And in practical terms, the United States, through its intel agencies, provides the targeting information for Ukrainian missiles and drones. So the war would, the war would end tomorrow if the US were actually to withdraw that support. And Trump could do that with one phone call. Hey, Director of Central Intelligence. Hey, NSA Director. No mas. Anyone caught running the war for the Ukrainians will be fired and brought up on charges. And that would end the war. And yes, Russia would wind up with a chunk of eastern Ukraine. That's going to happen no matter what. And it might be better for Ukraine to stop sending its next generation, in fact, middle-aged men and people with Down syndrome into the meat grinder. That's the only option. And Trump could do that, but he hasn't, not for two years. Now, why? Well, it's really simple. Because the same people who pushed Trump into war with Iran are pushing him to continue the war against Russia, against Putin. Now, why is that? Now, that's a really interesting question that someone ought to write a book about. Why would the same people who pushed the US into war with Iran be pushing the United States to war with Russia?

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

44,950 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce