Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

If a guy is willing to wait, it is because he cannot afford not to. It is survivorship bias reframed as control narrative. The reality is most guys leave because you ain’t that hot compared to his other options - or you are not that pleasant to be with.... show more

French OG

26,365 subscribers

33,065 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Gesundheit & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"Be who you say you are... The guys are holding each other accountable. If somebody is not doing what they are supposed to or living up to a standard - be who you say you are." The standard is not spoken. It is lived.

"Be who you say you are... The guys are holding each other accountable. If somebody is not doing what they are supposed to or living up to a standard - be who you say you are." The standard is not spoken. It is lived.

The Winning Difference

12,112 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"Success is not a continuum. Success is momentary. If I don't keep doing the things that I have done to be successful, somebody is going to try and pass me up. Challenge yourself to be the best you can be, because the other guy is trying to beat you."

"Success is not a continuum. Success is momentary. If I don't keep doing the things that I have done to be successful, somebody is going to try and pass me up. Challenge yourself to be the best you can be, because the other guy is trying to beat you."

The Winning Difference

26,513 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Qullamaggie on How to Make 870% Returns In One Year “As a trader, if you wanna, if you want to make 800 per 870% return in one year, you can do it. There are two main ways to do it, okay? One is to go all in on your favorite stock or someone else’s favorite stock; the other is to use options with call options and hope the trade works out. Or, if you have an exploitable edge or several exploitable edges, you can aggressively exploit those edges. Those are the two ways of making returns like that. The problem is if you are in category 1, where you go all in one stock, on margin or options, you may be really lucky, right? You catch something big, the problem is you’re probably not gonna repeat it the next year or the year after or the year after that. While if you have an exploitable edge, you will exploit, you know. You can repeat it year after year after year until infinity. There is no upper limit; it all depends on you.”

Qullamaggie on How to Make 870% Returns In One Year “As a trader, if you wanna, if you want to make 800 per 870% return in one year, you can do it. There are two main ways to do it, okay? One is to go all in on your favorite stock or someone else’s favorite stock; the other is to use options with call options and hope the trade works out. Or, if you have an exploitable edge or several exploitable edges, you can aggressively exploit those edges. Those are the two ways of making returns like that. The problem is if you are in category 1, where you go all in one stock, on margin or options, you may be really lucky, right? You catch something big, the problem is you’re probably not gonna repeat it the next year or the year after or the year after that. While if you have an exploitable edge, you will exploit, you know. You can repeat it year after year after year until infinity. There is no upper limit; it all depends on you.”

Lone

75,591 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

298 I think you guys don't understand how hard it is to play so many tournaments back to back to back and still keeping it fresh. We are MkLeo fans because he plays with love, not because he is the guy that wins.

298 I think you guys don't understand how hard it is to play so many tournaments back to back to back and still keeping it fresh. We are MkLeo fans because he plays with love, not because he is the guy that wins.

Daily MkLeo clips

13,508 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

PARENTS IN WASHINGTON STATE: around 2:15am tonight your elected House Representatives just voted to take away your parental rights to be involved in your children’s education. ‼️ NOT ONLY THAT, first they voted NOT to let the decision go to the ballot, taking away your right to vote on it. YOU have to STOP electing these people. I just feel sorry for the parents that can’t homeschool or afford other school options because this is insane.

PARENTS IN WASHINGTON STATE: around 2:15am tonight your elected House Representatives just voted to take away your parental rights to be involved in your children’s education. ‼️ NOT ONLY THAT, first they voted NOT to let the decision go to the ballot, taking away your right to vote on it. YOU have to STOP electing these people. I just feel sorry for the parents that can’t homeschool or afford other school options because this is insane.

PNW Thistle

117,891 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jaemin really went serious when he had to answer if someone likes you but they are tired because they don’t have time, they missed him but they cannot see him so they broke up. Jaemin said if you love each other, you should support each other first and he thinks it’s the worst when someone tries to hold on to a relationship if the connection is not there anymore. “If you really need to let go, you need to do it quickly. There are people who are compatible with you and those who don’t . If there’s someone like no matter who it is, friends/acquaintances/lovers/etc), those people that are meant to leave will leave and those meant to stay will stay.”

Jaemin really went serious when he had to answer if someone likes you but they are tired because they don’t have time, they missed him but they cannot see him so they broke up. Jaemin said if you love each other, you should support each other first and he thinks it’s the worst when someone tries to hold on to a relationship if the connection is not there anymore. “If you really need to let go, you need to do it quickly. There are people who are compatible with you and those who don’t . If there’s someone like no matter who it is, friends/acquaintances/lovers/etc), those people that are meant to leave will leave and those meant to stay will stay.”

🐱🌸

80,988 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is the state of society today. A man thinks he has the right to access female-only spaces because his feelings were hurt by people not believing he is a woman. Is that not the object of the game? It is not a woman's burden that you have chosen to medicalise yourself, and it is not up to them to act as your human shield. Just stop. I had to edit out the ending of this video because a minor was on camera, and I do not allow that. I said: "I appreciate that, but women shouldn't have to feel uncomfortable for you to feel comfortable. If they continue to challenge you, advise them that you are male or speak to a member of staff." To see the full protest video, I have posted it on my Substack below. If you are interested in supporting me attending these protest please go to the link in the bio or subscribe to the substack.

This is the state of society today. A man thinks he has the right to access female-only spaces because his feelings were hurt by people not believing he is a woman. Is that not the object of the game? It is not a woman's burden that you have chosen to medicalise yourself, and it is not up to them to act as your human shield. Just stop. I had to edit out the ending of this video because a minor was on camera, and I do not allow that. I said: "I appreciate that, but women shouldn't have to feel uncomfortable for you to feel comfortable. If they continue to challenge you, advise them that you are male or speak to a member of staff." To see the full protest video, I have posted it on my Substack below. If you are interested in supporting me attending these protest please go to the link in the bio or subscribe to the substack.

MichaelDPUK 💜🦎

12,815 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

#WATCH | Chennai | On K Annamalai resigning from the BJP, Tamil Nadu BJP Spokesperson Narayanan Thirupathy says, “His contribution to the party in Tamil Nadu cannot be denied at all, but it does not mean that there will be no one else to contribute more… BJP is a party under the dynamic leadership of PM Modi so it will continue as Politics is a continuous process… BJP will not see anything as a loss. We welcome everyone to the party, but if someone decides to leave, it is their wish. It is not going to affect the party… You may have differences of opinion or differences, but you should try to fight within… If you choose to leave, it is up to you. We wish him good luck because he is a very good personality and an active and dynamic leader…”

#WATCH | Chennai | On K Annamalai resigning from the BJP, Tamil Nadu BJP Spokesperson Narayanan Thirupathy says, “His contribution to the party in Tamil Nadu cannot be denied at all, but it does not mean that there will be no one else to contribute more… BJP is a party under the dynamic leadership of PM Modi so it will continue as Politics is a continuous process… BJP will not see anything as a loss. We welcome everyone to the party, but if someone decides to leave, it is their wish. It is not going to affect the party… You may have differences of opinion or differences, but you should try to fight within… If you choose to leave, it is up to you. We wish him good luck because he is a very good personality and an active and dynamic leader…”

ANI

112,022 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

When he is HIV positive he will come back and want to have another child with you 😭 Marriage is not bad, but if you met with the wrong guy, leave him instead of trying to tell other people to join your personal fight

Sensitive content

When he is HIV positive he will come back and want to have another child with you 😭 Marriage is not bad, but if you met with the wrong guy, leave him instead of trying to tell other people to join your personal fight

SA🇿🇦 FIRST BEFORE AFRICA🌍

47,407 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Phillip: There is a literal mountain of information that is with under the control of the FBI, that Donald Trump does not want to be released. You know how I know that? Because he could have said release it, and he did not.

Phillip: There is a literal mountain of information that is with under the control of the FBI, that Donald Trump does not want to be released. You know how I know that? Because he could have said release it, and he did not.

Acyn

46,179 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"We are not a nation of immigrants, we are a nation with immigrants. There is a difference." "We welcome immigrants who want to be Americans, not the ones who want to be the exception to the rule." "Coming to America is NOT a right. Becoming an American is NOT a right." "You follow laws, you take an oath, you EARN your citizenship." "It is a privilege to become an American." "If you don't want to be an American, you do not need to be here, it is that simple." BASED!

"We are not a nation of immigrants, we are a nation with immigrants. There is a difference." "We welcome immigrants who want to be Americans, not the ones who want to be the exception to the rule." "Coming to America is NOT a right. Becoming an American is NOT a right." "You follow laws, you take an oath, you EARN your citizenship." "It is a privilege to become an American." "If you don't want to be an American, you do not need to be here, it is that simple." BASED!

AmericanPapaBear™

114,926 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

“You said Peller is not organized, but he bought you a Benz, and you accepted it. You always want to show the world that Peller is not a good man. If you know you can’t handle a man who isn’t good, then leave him for other girls” — Lady drags Jarvis

“You said Peller is not organized, but he bought you a Benz, and you accepted it. You always want to show the world that Peller is not a good man. If you know you can’t handle a man who isn’t good, then leave him for other girls” — Lady drags Jarvis

YabaLeftOnline

118,108 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

To Moderna and other drug companies: Is it morally acceptable to say, “I have a drug here that can cure you, save your life, but I’m sorry you cannot afford it?”

To Moderna and other drug companies: Is it morally acceptable to say, “I have a drug here that can cure you, save your life, but I’m sorry you cannot afford it?”

Sen. Bernie Sanders

386,554 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

A lady sent me this video. She was angry with what she heard. I checked the responses on IG, and women were not pleased. No wonder Ife didn't post this on X. I like to know what you think about the video. . . . I'll summarise their displeasure below. 1. Ethics. Just because you have money and audacity, does not make it ethical. Surrogacy exists as a means to help women going through fertility issues. It is not a way for rich women to shop for babies. There actually have to be a medical reason you are using surrogacy, to prevent abuse. To do otherwise could easily lead to exploitation and baby farming. 2. Economics of supply and demand. If surrogacy becomes something that only the rich can afford, the price would shoot up, and it would no longer be accessible to women who need it. Surrogacy is not a luxury item that the rich should buy just because... 3. She is 40 She intentionally skipped the part that she is 40 and geriatric. She is hiding the danger of her carrying pregnancy to term under "you dont owe anybody explanation. If you can afford it, do it. People hate that a woman can choose. They hate the audacity." This is a consolatory lie. Honesty is not that hard. The pregnancy is high risk, but she is desperately painting it as her choice. 4. Exploitation Women's womb should not be rented just because. It is a moral and ethical issue. The carrier need to feel she is helping out a family who cannot have kid of their own. It is a humanitarian issue, not business. If we agree that pregnancy itself can be life threatening if complications arise, then the least that should happen is that, it arose through empathy doing good for another woman, not something ticked off the market list of the bourgeoisie. . . . I'm just here to compare note. Do you agree it should be strictly business or regulated by ethics?

A lady sent me this video. She was angry with what she heard. I checked the responses on IG, and women were not pleased. No wonder Ife didn't post this on X. I like to know what you think about the video. . . . I'll summarise their displeasure below. 1. Ethics. Just because you have money and audacity, does not make it ethical. Surrogacy exists as a means to help women going through fertility issues. It is not a way for rich women to shop for babies. There actually have to be a medical reason you are using surrogacy, to prevent abuse. To do otherwise could easily lead to exploitation and baby farming. 2. Economics of supply and demand. If surrogacy becomes something that only the rich can afford, the price would shoot up, and it would no longer be accessible to women who need it. Surrogacy is not a luxury item that the rich should buy just because... 3. She is 40 She intentionally skipped the part that she is 40 and geriatric. She is hiding the danger of her carrying pregnancy to term under "you dont owe anybody explanation. If you can afford it, do it. People hate that a woman can choose. They hate the audacity." This is a consolatory lie. Honesty is not that hard. The pregnancy is high risk, but she is desperately painting it as her choice. 4. Exploitation Women's womb should not be rented just because. It is a moral and ethical issue. The carrier need to feel she is helping out a family who cannot have kid of their own. It is a humanitarian issue, not business. If we agree that pregnancy itself can be life threatening if complications arise, then the least that should happen is that, it arose through empathy doing good for another woman, not something ticked off the market list of the bourgeoisie. . . . I'm just here to compare note. Do you agree it should be strictly business or regulated by ethics?

Sir Dickson

604,482 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

Dustin

247,098 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

She is correct that the man who can coolly, casually walk away from a girl if she rejects him often receives a major attraction boost in that girl’s eyes. Though interestingly her attempt to explain WHY women get that attraction boost is way off! Anyway, the basics are: ➡️ When you approach, she does not know who you are and how you’ll react to being rejected ➡️ Her ASSUMPTION is that you are probably an ‘average guy’, like most guys, and will be a bit offended, a bit let down, or perhaps even not take “no” for an answer and hang around a bit trying to get her to change her mind ➡️ If instead you bow out in a graceful way and leave completely unflustered, she goes, “Oh. Wait. Maybe he is NOT some average guy. Is he actually a COOL guy?” The girl in the video tries to explain this attraction boost by saying the woman thinks, “Maybe he was actually interested in me?” But that is not what is going on. Both the guy who refuses to take “no” for an answer and the guy who coolly walks off might have been “actually interested” in her (or not, or whatever being “actually interested” even is supposed to mean). Instead, what is really happening is she is observing that the man is: • Not needy • Not butt-hurt • Socially savvy • In a word, COOL ❄️ … and immediately her brain starts going, “Oh wait; is he NOT average? He didn’t react like how an average guy does. Average guys get mad, or sad, or pushy. He was totally unaffected and cool and just left. Wait, why did I not affect him? Does he not think I’m pretty enough? But I affect other guys! Why is HE not affected?” At that point, her certainty is shattered, she is thrown into confusion, and she’s become very curious about this man. Not that that’s especially helpful if you’re cold approaching during the daytime… you’ll probably never see her again. But if you just approached a girl you see regularly, Or you approached a girl in a social venue, party, or event you’ll be circulating around in for a bit, Or any other context where you are likely to encounter the same girl MORE than once, Then this ‘walk away effect’ can absolutely work to your advantage. You will even notice that when you again bump into girls you coolly walked away from early on, they are often a lot WARMER and MORE ENTHUSIASTIC… a big part of why was simply just how you handled the rejection. Women’s attraction is fluid. It is behavior-based. A guy being unaffected by a woman rejecting him is a MAJOR flex. Most guys can’t do it. If you can, it immediately bolsters your attractiveness in women’s eyes.

She is correct that the man who can coolly, casually walk away from a girl if she rejects him often receives a major attraction boost in that girl’s eyes. Though interestingly her attempt to explain WHY women get that attraction boost is way off! Anyway, the basics are: ➡️ When you approach, she does not know who you are and how you’ll react to being rejected ➡️ Her ASSUMPTION is that you are probably an ‘average guy’, like most guys, and will be a bit offended, a bit let down, or perhaps even not take “no” for an answer and hang around a bit trying to get her to change her mind ➡️ If instead you bow out in a graceful way and leave completely unflustered, she goes, “Oh. Wait. Maybe he is NOT some average guy. Is he actually a COOL guy?” The girl in the video tries to explain this attraction boost by saying the woman thinks, “Maybe he was actually interested in me?” But that is not what is going on. Both the guy who refuses to take “no” for an answer and the guy who coolly walks off might have been “actually interested” in her (or not, or whatever being “actually interested” even is supposed to mean). Instead, what is really happening is she is observing that the man is: • Not needy • Not butt-hurt • Socially savvy • In a word, COOL ❄️ … and immediately her brain starts going, “Oh wait; is he NOT average? He didn’t react like how an average guy does. Average guys get mad, or sad, or pushy. He was totally unaffected and cool and just left. Wait, why did I not affect him? Does he not think I’m pretty enough? But I affect other guys! Why is HE not affected?” At that point, her certainty is shattered, she is thrown into confusion, and she’s become very curious about this man. Not that that’s especially helpful if you’re cold approaching during the daytime… you’ll probably never see her again. But if you just approached a girl you see regularly, Or you approached a girl in a social venue, party, or event you’ll be circulating around in for a bit, Or any other context where you are likely to encounter the same girl MORE than once, Then this ‘walk away effect’ can absolutely work to your advantage. You will even notice that when you again bump into girls you coolly walked away from early on, they are often a lot WARMER and MORE ENTHUSIASTIC… a big part of why was simply just how you handled the rejection. Women’s attraction is fluid. It is behavior-based. A guy being unaffected by a woman rejecting him is a MAJOR flex. Most guys can’t do it. If you can, it immediately bolsters your attractiveness in women’s eyes.

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

43,135 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Sadhguru Explains the Difference Between Killing in War and Killing for Revenge “Karma is not by action. Karma is by intention. You cannot go to battle and say, ‘I am a peaceful person. I will not shoot.’ You can’t do that. But will you shoot because there is something to be done which is in the larger interest? Or will you shoot because you have pleasure in shooting people? Every soldier can change this. If it is necessary, I will do what is needed. But it is not for my pleasure. It’s not for making that person suffer. It’s not because I think his life is less valuable than mine. His life is as much valuable to him as mine is to me.” Sadhguru

Sadhguru Explains the Difference Between Killing in War and Killing for Revenge “Karma is not by action. Karma is by intention. You cannot go to battle and say, ‘I am a peaceful person. I will not shoot.’ You can’t do that. But will you shoot because there is something to be done which is in the larger interest? Or will you shoot because you have pleasure in shooting people? Every soldier can change this. If it is necessary, I will do what is needed. But it is not for my pleasure. It’s not for making that person suffer. It’s not because I think his life is less valuable than mine. His life is as much valuable to him as mine is to me.” Sadhguru

Shawn Ryan

109,906 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

⚖️ It’s not time to leave because the relationship is hard. It’s time to leave when it becomes one-sided and your growth is no longer matched. You didn’t leave because you didn’t try, you left because they refused to meet you there.

⚖️ It’s not time to leave because the relationship is hard. It’s time to leave when it becomes one-sided and your growth is no longer matched. You didn’t leave because you didn’t try, you left because they refused to meet you there.

FlourishWithLaurin

12,429 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This Muslim is telling other Muslims to leave UK because it is not safe for them.

This Muslim is telling other Muslims to leave UK because it is not safe for them.

RadioGenoa

28,191 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

No matter how much the other side tries to divide and distract, the question New Yorkers face at the ballot box tomorrow is not “When did you arrive?” It is “Can you afford to stay?” For a city you can afford: Vote Darializa, Claire, and Brad.

No matter how much the other side tries to divide and distract, the question New Yorkers face at the ballot box tomorrow is not “When did you arrive?” It is “Can you afford to stay?” For a city you can afford: Vote Darializa, Claire, and Brad.

Zohran Kwame Mamdani

154,966 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat