正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

If I think about it, I’m saving money by not using the AC 🤔 which is basically the same as getting paid. Maybe boy math is onto something… girl math just has me spending more #homegym #homegymsetup

Misha Mai

166,325 subscribers

19,432 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

#homegym #homegymsetup

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

junhan 😭 🐰 i have an umbrella, i just like getting rained on that’s why i’m not using it 🐰 getting rained on feels so good. there’s something really freeing about getting rained on. but not the camera. protect the camera~

junhan 😭 🐰 i have an umbrella, i just like getting rained on that’s why i’m not using it 🐰 getting rained on feels so good. there’s something really freeing about getting rained on. but not the camera. protect the camera~

ten 🪐

27,267 次观看 • 3 个月前

I’m not surprised by the video I saw because this girl has shown me even crazier things than that. And this is the beginning of it.

I’m not surprised by the video I saw because this girl has shown me even crazier things than that. And this is the beginning of it.

Kojo Akosombo

1,196,584 次观看 • 2 个月前

I’m not sure what song this is, maybe if you give me the name I can figure it out. Can you name it?

I’m not sure what song this is, maybe if you give me the name I can figure it out. Can you name it?

Johnny Midnight ⚡️

12,976 次观看 • 7 个月前

Maguire: "Overall benefit spending as a share of the national economy is about where it was 10yrs ago. The fact [Robertson] has gone for benefits shows it as a highly political attack" And not only is it about the same as 10yrs ago, we spend less than most European countries

Maguire: "Overall benefit spending as a share of the national economy is about where it was 10yrs ago. The fact [Robertson] has gone for benefits shows it as a highly political attack" And not only is it about the same as 10yrs ago, we spend less than most European countries

Saul Staniforth

122,732 次观看 • 6 个月前

Benson This is pretty much same Rhythm gee! Trust me it’s not even about the guap you’re willing to put down and i’m not even here to troll.. It is just what it is.

Benson This is pretty much same Rhythm gee! Trust me it’s not even about the guap you’re willing to put down and i’m not even here to troll.. It is just what it is.

YOM🗣️

1,304,162 次观看 • 1 年前

🐯 i think that it’s more meaningful because it was junghwan who personally handed out (the trophy) 🐮 well for me, just being an mc is something that i’d think about until the day i die 🥺 now this mc path is much much more special to you, to the group, and to us as well 💙

🐯 i think that it’s more meaningful because it was junghwan who personally handed out (the trophy) 🐮 well for me, just being an mc is something that i’d think about until the day i die 🥺 now this mc path is much much more special to you, to the group, and to us as well 💙

화니편♡

14,393 次观看 • 4 个月前

Let’s consider the demographic situation of Western Civilization seriously. Its core demographic base is about 750 million people, with a fertility rate of about 1.3 children per woman. What that means a few generations out is terrifying – we are DYING OUT. I did the exercise for Poland, which is about one twentieth of that demographic base, with a fertility rate at about half of replacement. Four generations into the future, it gives us this👇🏻 – basically the end of the nation. Multiply it by 20 and you get the fate of the whole Civilization. You do the math… Our only hope is in the families with 3+ children, who are able to pass that tradition on to their children. They will inherit Our Civilization, if it survives. The rest will simply die out. (The same math that dooms the average saves the tail.)

Let’s consider the demographic situation of Western Civilization seriously. Its core demographic base is about 750 million people, with a fertility rate of about 1.3 children per woman. What that means a few generations out is terrifying – we are DYING OUT. I did the exercise for Poland, which is about one twentieth of that demographic base, with a fertility rate at about half of replacement. Four generations into the future, it gives us this👇🏻 – basically the end of the nation. Multiply it by 20 and you get the fate of the whole Civilization. You do the math… Our only hope is in the families with 3+ children, who are able to pass that tradition on to their children. They will inherit Our Civilization, if it survives. The rest will simply die out. (The same math that dooms the average saves the tail.)

Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱

1,850,418 次观看 • 2 个月前

Just because somebody does something different than you doesn’t make it wrong Bale grazing is done for the year so for the next week or so, the cows can work on brush encroachment By my math, the cow herd grazed for 275 days. Not bad. You can decide if we were starving them

Just because somebody does something different than you doesn’t make it wrong Bale grazing is done for the year so for the next week or so, the cows can work on brush encroachment By my math, the cow herd grazed for 275 days. Not bad. You can decide if we were starving them

Mitch Stuart

29,924 次观看 • 1 年前

3D maps in video games are hard to pull off, but I think DK BANANZA has the best one I’ve ever seen. Not only is it super detailed, but If you point the map at something it will zoom directly into the game at the same angle, making it so easy to know which way you are going.

3D maps in video games are hard to pull off, but I think DK BANANZA has the best one I’ve ever seen. Not only is it super detailed, but If you point the map at something it will zoom directly into the game at the same angle, making it so easy to know which way you are going.

Chad Concelmo

195,320 次观看 • 1 年前

Trump: Your team is very good. I would say the Greek is a seriously good player, do you agree? And tell me, who has more Greek in him? The Greek or me? I think we have about the same right?

Trump: Your team is very good. I would say the Greek is a seriously good player, do you agree? And tell me, who has more Greek in him? The Greek or me? I think we have about the same right?

Acyn

8,301,314 次观看 • 1 年前

“I’m not really a math guy” Since this has been trending lately, thought it would be fun to share some process. It went through many changes and I just might share some other versions later on ;) Thanks to the awesome supervisor ⁦Laurent Caneiro⁩ who helped me through it!

“I’m not really a math guy” Since this has been trending lately, thought it would be fun to share some process. It went through many changes and I just might share some other versions later on ;) Thanks to the awesome supervisor ⁦Laurent Caneiro⁩ who helped me through it!

Shir Baron

139,039 次观看 • 3 年前

I’m worried about 250,000 girls being raped by muslims. Piers Morgan is worried about using the right “terminology” They raped little girls out of her innocence, I could care less about addressing them correctly. We are NOT the same.

I’m worried about 250,000 girls being raped by muslims. Piers Morgan is worried about using the right “terminology” They raped little girls out of her innocence, I could care less about addressing them correctly. We are NOT the same.

Valentina Gomez

91,128 次观看 • 3 个月前

I am using Minimax M2.5 heavily without worrying about the usage limit The Plus plan is all you need It gives 300 prompts per 5 hours which is more than enough for me.

I am using Minimax M2.5 heavily without worrying about the usage limit The Plus plan is all you need It gives 300 prompts per 5 hours which is more than enough for me.

Karan

233,628 次观看 • 7 个月前

Grok Bot is getting pretty close to “just handle it for me.” Need the whole team working from the same files and workflows? Team Bot. Want to know where your money went or which subscriptions you forgot about? Connect Plaid. On a call and suddenly remember something from last week? Grok can search the chat while you’re still talking. This is less “ask the AI.” More “give it the job.” Grok SpaceXAI / Writer: Annette, Designer: Janné

Grok Bot is getting pretty close to “just handle it for me.” Need the whole team working from the same files and workflows? Team Bot. Want to know where your money went or which subscriptions you forgot about? Connect Plaid. On a call and suddenly remember something from last week? Grok can search the chat while you’re still talking. This is less “ask the AI.” More “give it the job.” Grok SpaceXAI / Writer: Annette, Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

24,130 次观看 • 12 天前

My first video game was master system sonic. but it is not about that. Me and xandrecos are using the same Patreon. I guess its a bit like become a YouTube studio or something. wish us luck

My first video game was master system sonic. but it is not about that. Me and xandrecos are using the same Patreon. I guess its a bit like become a YouTube studio or something. wish us luck

Golfinho yuri

42,974 次观看 • 1 年前

$YOUR BOT HAS A 70% WIN RATE AND IS STILL LOSING MONEY. This is more common than you think and the reason is always the same. Most people treat win rate like it's the only number that matters. It's not even close to the full picture. Here's the math nobody is putting together clearly: EV = (p × b) − (1 − p) P is your win probability, b is your payout multiplier. At a 70c entry your payout multiplier is roughly 0.43. That means even at 70% win rate your EV is basically zero. (0.70 × 0.43) − 0.30 = 0.001 You are grinding for fractions of a cent per trade while thinking you have an edge. Now look at what happens when you fix the entry price. Same 70% win rate, entry drops to 50c, payout multiplier jumps to 1.0. (0.70 × 1.0) − 0.30 = 0.40 EV per dollar. Same signal. Same win rate. Completely different business. This is why I keep saying win rate and entry price are one calculation not two. Your AI backtest never runs this math because it only looks at whether you won or lost. It does not care what you paid to enter. The fix is not finding a higher win rate signal, it almost never is. The fix is finding why your high win rate entries keep appearing at prices that make them unprofitable. That upstream reason is your real signal. Dig one layer deeper and build around that instead. I broke down the entry price math before and I broke down DCA before. But without understanding EV you are optimizing the wrong thing entirely. This logic is the only reason how my bot is sitting at $154k PnL. Public wallet: [ Run this formula on your last 100 live trades before you change a single line of signal logic. The answer is probably already there.$

YOUR BOT HAS A 70% WIN RATE AND IS STILL LOSING MONEY. This is more common than you think and the reason is always the same. Most people treat win rate like it's the only number that matters. It's not even close to the full picture. Here's the math nobody is putting together clearly: EV = (p × b) − (1 − p) P is your win probability, b is your payout multiplier. At a 70c entry your payout multiplier is roughly 0.43. That means even at 70% win rate your EV is basically zero. (0.70 × 0.43) − 0.30 = 0.001 You are grinding for fractions of a cent per trade while thinking you have an edge. Now look at what happens when you fix the entry price. Same 70% win rate, entry drops to 50c, payout multiplier jumps to 1.0. (0.70 × 1.0) − 0.30 = 0.40 EV per dollar. Same signal. Same win rate. Completely different business. This is why I keep saying win rate and entry price are one calculation not two. Your AI backtest never runs this math because it only looks at whether you won or lost. It does not care what you paid to enter. The fix is not finding a higher win rate signal, it almost never is. The fix is finding why your high win rate entries keep appearing at prices that make them unprofitable. That upstream reason is your real signal. Dig one layer deeper and build around that instead. I broke down the entry price math before and I broke down DCA before. But without understanding EV you are optimizing the wrong thing entirely. This logic is the only reason how my bot is sitting at $154k PnL. Public wallet: [ Run this formula on your last 100 live trades before you change a single line of signal logic. The answer is probably already there.

Punisher

11,034 次观看 • 3 个月前

HEAR ME OUT. THIS IS GETTING WORSE FOR GOLD. Gold just closed below the level it has held since 2023. Something extremely bad is about to happen. Draw your own conclusions.

HEAR ME OUT. THIS IS GETTING WORSE FOR GOLD. Gold just closed below the level it has held since 2023. Something extremely bad is about to happen. Draw your own conclusions.

Rekt Fencer

71,255 次观看 • 4 个月前

If you think this is just another silly demo made with AI, read this post. You might change your mind, because this demo is about MATH. What you see on the screen is not a render from Blender (obviously, it’s not that good). It’s a three.js app built with Toolcraft. Available on the web and rendered in real time(link in the comments). But Blender still has a lot to do with it. Blender has Geometry Nodes - a powerful node-based system for creating and manipulating procedural geometry. In other words, it’s math. And math is a universal language. And who do you think is pretty good at math? >>> AI. Now you can download or buy Blender files from marketplaces, and when they contain Geometry Nodes for procedural animations, objects, surfaces, or effects, you can transfer that logic to the web. Make it real-time, make it interactive. Materials are a separate story, of course. They can still suck unless you use the right tricks: PBR, HDRIs, material blending, displacement, and faked surface relief. So why is Blender important here? Blender is open source, and many tools around it are open source too. An AI trained on their code. That means it can translate the math from one environment to another quite accurately. If you’ve been struggling to reproduce some idea with AI that you had in your head or seen in some references, and it has something to do with Geometry Nodes, and you can find that idea or a close one in the Blender ecosystem - it means you can transfer it to the web. Thank me later.

If you think this is just another silly demo made with AI, read this post. You might change your mind, because this demo is about MATH. What you see on the screen is not a render from Blender (obviously, it’s not that good). It’s a three.js app built with Toolcraft. Available on the web and rendered in real time(link in the comments). But Blender still has a lot to do with it. Blender has Geometry Nodes - a powerful node-based system for creating and manipulating procedural geometry. In other words, it’s math. And math is a universal language. And who do you think is pretty good at math? >>> AI. Now you can download or buy Blender files from marketplaces, and when they contain Geometry Nodes for procedural animations, objects, surfaces, or effects, you can transfer that logic to the web. Make it real-time, make it interactive. Materials are a separate story, of course. They can still suck unless you use the right tricks: PBR, HDRIs, material blending, displacement, and faked surface relief. So why is Blender important here? Blender is open source, and many tools around it are open source too. An AI trained on their code. That means it can translate the math from one environment to another quite accurately. If you’ve been struggling to reproduce some idea with AI that you had in your head or seen in some references, and it has something to do with Geometry Nodes, and you can find that idea or a close one in the Blender ecosystem - it means you can transfer it to the web. Thank me later.

Alex Barashkov

28,300 次观看 • 2 个月前