Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨If Lockheed Martin were openly talking about this 11 years ago, what do they have now? Embedding carbon nanotubes directly into aircraft skins so the structure itself carries power, data, and sensing. Materials that change shape on command, behaving like muscle. Aircraft that actively reconfigure their geometry mid flight....

581,699 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

"We Need to Employ $50 Trillion": Larry Fink on Why the Private Sector Must Lead the Green Transition "Well, if they don't get it done, then we are going to have more risk as societies, we're going to have more issues related to rising climate and importantly, which will create more societal issues." "Already we're seeing an impact in society right now from climate risk and climate change. are seeing insurance premiums going up 18 % a year right now. So we're seeing a real impact from what climate risk is doing from flooding, from fires. So we're seeing a big impact." "And so the faster that we could find ways to mitigating the rising temperatures, I would say the more just society could be. And so to me, we don't have much time. And this is why when I learned about catalyst and I learned about what Bill was doing was very clear to me why we needed to be a part of this, why we needed to invest the time and the money." "And the key is also the time because we need to be learning about these new the new technologies and how to move forward. And we need to then inform our investors ultimately where we think the next opportunities are going to be too as Bill in his book wrote about, we need to employ $50 trillion to get to a green world." "With the rising deficits that we see in governments, from our perspective, the 50 trillion is mostly going to have to come from the private sector. And I do believe that money will be well spent, well spent for returns. It will transform our economies. It will build new jobs. will build new cities and new opportunities." "So I look at this as an optimist. I don't look at this as a pessimist. But the key is to be that optimist. We have to jump on it now. We have to be investing today. We need to talk about it today, although much of the problems in the future but we're seeing more and more evidence of the problem today."

Camus

55,484 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

WAKE UP AMERICA YOU ARE UNDER ATTACK ⛔️ Latest update on the WEF Maui, Lahaina Fires, Hawaii 🔥🚨 ‌ Legislation Passed in Hawaii RIGHT BEFORE & Lockheed Martin is one of the biggest donors of American Red Cross, who is also developing Weapons D.E.W's (Direct Energy Weapons) for Military ‌ “Because when I look at it, when you get into these things and you look at the history, you have so many stories which have been rewritten and then told the different thing. And then if we look at two things with the things with the governor, stuff with the governor and the things that was happening with the governor. ‌ Governor was passing bills just before this so that they can change the zoning. Think about this. They wanted to change the zoning before the event. Then the event occurs and then all of a sudden the people are going to lose their land or have their land taken from them from FEMA. And that's what FEMA does. FEMA comes in there so that they can try to say they're going to save you, just like the Red Cross. ‌ Baloney. And they're trying to say that they're going to help you when they're on the other side. If you look at the largest donator or one of the largest donators on the red Cross, it's Lockheed Martin. ‌ Lockheed Martin, THEY CREATE DEWs, DEWs (Direct Energy Weapons). So if you think about this, if the people who create the weapons are funding the people who come in after the destruction, then do you see what happens? It goes back and forth. And then in the meantime, a new story, a new fairy tale, a new history, whatever you want to say is written. ‌ We start to see this and they take over and then the history is completely lost and all the heritage is gone. The culture is gone. And they slowly keep doing this. AND THEYmVE DONE THIS SO MANY TIMES ‌ Just to see this, just to see just to to feel this through, you could feel the feel through the screen. You could feel it. You could see the pictures and know that something is so wrong ⚠️ ‌ #Hawaii #MauiFires #Lahaina

Wall Street Apes

1,018,594 просмотров • 2 лет назад

David Friedberg: Michael Burry’s Datacenter Math is Wrong “I actually think Michael Burberry's got this wrong.” “What Michael Burry is saying is that all of these hyperscalers have extended their depreciation schedule or the useful life of their data centers by roughly 2x, which cuts the operating costs in half when they report it in earnings. And so it's making their earnings inflate.” “So he's claiming they're cooking the books. Google first made this change in Q1 of 2021, where they said the servers are now going from 3 to 4 years. Separately in 2021, Google took networking equipment from 3 to 5 years. And then in 2023, they took it from 5 to 6 years.” “And so this is a result of this effort where they went in and did an analysis. So what happened?” “What happened in the data centers is that the data centers transitioned from being primarily data storage and data transfer systems, where you would use hard drives and RAM and memory to store data and then transmit it back out, to being data processing centers because of the AI boom.” “So as AI became more important in the data center, more of the dollars that are going into data centers were allocated towards chips from data storage, which initially was hard drives.” “And then suddenly, when you put these processors in to process the data to do AI, the majority of the spend and the majority of the energy is going towards the processors.” “I made some calls and I checked around with some other friends, and everyone says the same thing: that these 7-8 year old TPUs and GPUs that are sitting in the data centers are still being used and they're being used at 100% utilization.” “So that actually justifies and validates the depreciation schedule being much longer versus shorter.”

The All-In Podcast

304,297 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад