Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

If Reconciliation Matters, Why Doesn’t It Apply to Thomas Markle? A pointed question for the so-called royal experts, commentators and journalists: Why does the endless conversation about “reconciliation” revolve almost exclusively around Prince Harry and the Royal Family, while Meghan Markle’s estrangement from her own father and much of... her family is treated as a non-issue that barely deserves mention? If reconciliation is the noble, compassionate cause so many claim it is, why has there been virtually zero sustained pressure on Meghan to address the years of public pain from Thomas Markle? Thomas Markle has repeatedly and openly expressed his desire to see his daughter and grandchildren, even while battling serious health challenges. Yet his situation is simply ignored. Harry and Meghan have made grave accusations against the Royal Family: racism, failing to support Meghan’s mental health, briefing against them, leaking stories, failing to shield them from media scrutiny, and making them feel trapped. If those claims are as serious as they insist, why is reconciliation with that same institution relentlessly pushed as the moral imperative while any reconciliation with Meghan’s own father is barely acknowledged, let alone demanded? Why has Harry never been seriously pressed on his apparent lack of effort to build or repair a relationship with his father-in-law? Why is Thomas Markle’s perspective so completely written out of the story? It raises an uncomfortable question: Reconciliation only generates relentless headlines, speculation, sympathy, relevance and attention when it involves the Crown, global prestige, wealth and institutional power. Reconciliation with Thomas Markle offers none of those things so it is treated as disposable. Every few weeks we get another round of “Will Harry reconcile with the King? Will he return? Will the family heal?” Yet the equally legitimate questions about Meghan’s side of the family meet only silence. The Sussex-aligned commentators and journalists who keep recycling this one-sided reconciliation narrative owe the public some answers. Why is one fractured family endlessly expected to forgive and forget, while the other is never expected to confront or heal anything at all? The selective silence is not accidental. It reveals exactly which relationships are considered valuable and which ones are treated as disposable. A genuine reality check is long overdue. If reconciliation is truly about accountability, forgiveness and healing, the principle must apply equally to both sides. Otherwise, it isn’t a principle. It’s just selective PR.show more

Queen Esther

20,359 subscribers

36,509 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Kunst Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

It’s remarkable how every royal journalist seems determined to write the same Harry-and-Charles reconciliation story on an endless loop. Every article is about healing, forgiveness, family reunions, olive branches, and restoring ties with the Royal Family. But where are the headlines about Thomas Markle? Meghan spent years telling the world what a wonderful father he was. She praised his sacrifices, credited him for her opportunities, and held him up as an example of parental devotion. Then, the moment he became inconvenient, he was erased from the narrative. Thomas is elderly, has suffered serious health setbacks, and has spent years publicly expressing the hope that he might one day hear from his daughter again. Yet the media’s obsession with reconciliation never seems to extend in his direction. If Harry and Meghan truly believe family relationships are worth repairing, perhaps they could start with the father Meghan once couldn’t stop praising instead of continually demanding access to everyone else’s family. The endless lectures about compassion, forgiveness and reconciliation would carry a lot more weight if they were practised at home first. Funny how “family is everything” only seems to matter when the family happens to be royal.🙄

It’s remarkable how every royal journalist seems determined to write the same Harry-and-Charles reconciliation story on an endless loop. Every article is about healing, forgiveness, family reunions, olive branches, and restoring ties with the Royal Family. But where are the headlines about Thomas Markle? Meghan spent years telling the world what a wonderful father he was. She praised his sacrifices, credited him for her opportunities, and held him up as an example of parental devotion. Then, the moment he became inconvenient, he was erased from the narrative. Thomas is elderly, has suffered serious health setbacks, and has spent years publicly expressing the hope that he might one day hear from his daughter again. Yet the media’s obsession with reconciliation never seems to extend in his direction. If Harry and Meghan truly believe family relationships are worth repairing, perhaps they could start with the father Meghan once couldn’t stop praising instead of continually demanding access to everyone else’s family. The endless lectures about compassion, forgiveness and reconciliation would carry a lot more weight if they were practised at home first. Funny how “family is everything” only seems to matter when the family happens to be royal.🙄

Queen Esther

87,579 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The Duke and Duchess of Shameless: Expecting a Royal Welcome After Years of Public Attacks The greatest irony is watching the people who applauded every attack on the Royal Family now demand that it embrace Harry and Meghan with open arms. For years, Harry and Meghan’s supporters applauded every interview, every documentary, every podcast, every accusation and every public grievance. They insisted the Royal Family was toxic, racist, abusive, uncaring and beyond redemption. They celebrated every bridge being burned, mocked every royal engagement and insisted Harry and Meghan were “finally free.” So what changed? If the institution was truly as cruel and irredeemable as they claimed, why is there now such desperation for a royal reunion? Why is the King suddenly expected to welcome back the very people who accused his family on the world stage? The irony is impossible to ignore. These are the same supporters who insisted Harry and Meghan didn’t need the monarchy, didn’t want the monarchy and were happier without it. They mocked those who said the couple would eventually seek a way back. Yet today, many of those same voices are demanding invitations, reconciliations and royal acceptance. If they truly believed everything Harry and Meghan alleged, shouldn’t they be encouraging them to stay as far away from the Royal Family as possible? And then there’s Harry & Meghan themselves. They built an entire brand on criticizing the Royal Family, publicly accusing relatives, exposing private conversations, commercialising family disputes and publishing deeply personal claims in a self-serving memoir. But every time there is declining public interest, disappointing business news or another setback, suddenly there are whispers of olive branches, private meetings or hopes of rebuilding relationships. You cannot repeatedly profit from family conflict while expecting that same family to pretend none of it happened. Trust is not restored because the headlines change. Respect is not something you demand after spending years undermining it. The loudest outrage now seems to come from people who cannot accept one simple reality: the Royal Family is under no obligation to restore the status Harry and Meghan willingly walked away from. Leaving was their choice. The interviews were their choice. The documentaries were their choice. The memoir was their choice. The endless public criticism was their choice. Actions have consequences. The King can love his son while still recognizing that trust has been repeatedly broken. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. Families can forgive without returning to the relationship exactly as it was. Boundaries are not cruelty. They are often the natural consequence of repeated breaches of trust. Yesterday the monarchy was supposedly irrelevant, outdated and oppressive. Today, Archie and Lili meeting their grandpa.🙄 If Harry and Meghan were truly happier outside royal life, there would be no need for constant speculation about returning, no expectation of public welcomes and no outrage over being kept at arm’s length. You cannot spend years insisting you wanted out, then spend years trying to get back in. And those demanding that the Royal Family simply forget everything that has happened are asking something they would never accept in their own lives. No family is expected to erase years of public accusations, broken confidence and repeated betrayals overnight simply because the people responsible now want reconciliation. The title that fits this entire saga isn’t Duke and Duchess of Sussex. It is Duke and Duchess of Shameless. Because after everything that has been said, written, filmed and monetized, expecting a triumphant return isn’t an act of reconciliation. It’s an extraordinary display of entitlement.

Queen Esther

44,216 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

BBC NEWS speak to media Katie Razzall editor who seems a bit of a royalist as her focus at the end is how awkward it is for Prince Harry to be suing a newspaper that the Royal Family work with. Why do royalists expect a person not to pursue justice against an abuser (The Daily Fail) because their abusive family who has worked with that abuser against them is still collaborating with that abuser and it might get in the way of a reconciliation? A reconciliation with an abusive family that is still dealing with the abuser that helped break up their relationship is unlikely to be genuine or lasting anyway. At this point Harry needs to prioritise justice over his everlasting toxic family.

BBC NEWS speak to media Katie Razzall editor who seems a bit of a royalist as her focus at the end is how awkward it is for Prince Harry to be suing a newspaper that the Royal Family work with. Why do royalists expect a person not to pursue justice against an abuser (The Daily Fail) because their abusive family who has worked with that abuser against them is still collaborating with that abuser and it might get in the way of a reconciliation? A reconciliation with an abusive family that is still dealing with the abuser that helped break up their relationship is unlikely to be genuine or lasting anyway. At this point Harry needs to prioritise justice over his everlasting toxic family.

Glow Lee

20,532 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry love pushing the narrative that they’re constantly hounded by paparazzi, that the media intrusion is unbearable, and that it’s far too dangerous for Meghan and the children which is why Harry says he’ll never bring them back to the UK. But let’s deal in facts. Even at the height of their popularity, they couldn’t produce genuine footage of paparazzi hounding them. They had to borrow clips from other people to sell their victim story. Look at the crowds during their Australia tour or the recent Geneva appearance. Beyond the group travelling with them, their own media team, and their security, there was virtually no public frenzy and certainly no wall of international press demanding access. The interest they constantly claim simply isn’t there. What’s worse is the hypocrisy. They repeatedly accuse the royal family of leaking and planting stories, yet they’re the ones briefing the media weeks in advance about their UK plans even floating details like Harry potentially taking the children to Diana’s grave. If the royals are the ones supposedly leaking everything, are they also the ones planting these stories on Harry and Meghan’s behalf? The truth is simpler: they know there’s little genuine interest left, so they dangle the children as bait to manufacture headlines and relevance just as they’ve done for years. They accuse others of the very tactics they openly rely on. Funny how the institution they blame never seems to suffer the same “leaks” when Harry and Meghan aren’t involved. It’s almost as if the biggest leaker moved in with them. The desperation is staggering. And the ones who suffer most are the children. No child should have to learn to turn certain ways so their parents can get the right photo. No child should grow up so isolated, constantly used as a prop for PR narratives and headlines. The desperation is staggering. And the ones who suffer most are the children. No child should be used as a prop in an endless battle for attention, headlines, and relevance. The children deserve better than being treated as part of a media strategy. They deserve to be protected, not promoted. The children deserve far better parents. Shame on Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry love pushing the narrative that they’re constantly hounded by paparazzi, that the media intrusion is unbearable, and that it’s far too dangerous for Meghan and the children which is why Harry says he’ll never bring them back to the UK. But let’s deal in facts. Even at the height of their popularity, they couldn’t produce genuine footage of paparazzi hounding them. They had to borrow clips from other people to sell their victim story. Look at the crowds during their Australia tour or the recent Geneva appearance. Beyond the group travelling with them, their own media team, and their security, there was virtually no public frenzy and certainly no wall of international press demanding access. The interest they constantly claim simply isn’t there. What’s worse is the hypocrisy. They repeatedly accuse the royal family of leaking and planting stories, yet they’re the ones briefing the media weeks in advance about their UK plans even floating details like Harry potentially taking the children to Diana’s grave. If the royals are the ones supposedly leaking everything, are they also the ones planting these stories on Harry and Meghan’s behalf? The truth is simpler: they know there’s little genuine interest left, so they dangle the children as bait to manufacture headlines and relevance just as they’ve done for years. They accuse others of the very tactics they openly rely on. Funny how the institution they blame never seems to suffer the same “leaks” when Harry and Meghan aren’t involved. It’s almost as if the biggest leaker moved in with them. The desperation is staggering. And the ones who suffer most are the children. No child should have to learn to turn certain ways so their parents can get the right photo. No child should grow up so isolated, constantly used as a prop for PR narratives and headlines. The desperation is staggering. And the ones who suffer most are the children. No child should be used as a prop in an endless battle for attention, headlines, and relevance. The children deserve better than being treated as part of a media strategy. They deserve to be protected, not promoted. The children deserve far better parents. Shame on Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.

Queen Esther

59,184 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is the same Robert Jobson who knows and admitted all of this, about Charles’ betrayal of young Prince Harry. And it’s the same Robert Jobson who, now wants Prince Harry’s young son to be dangled over the Buckingham palace balcony. What is completely, always ignored, is that just like the royal family, royalists don’t see a spare’s humanity. To them, as it is to the royal family, a spare is not a full human being, but something that belongs to the heir and to the monarchy. That’s why they’re still going after Prince Harry. In their eyes, a spare has no right to have a life of his own, to be fulfilled. That’s why they don’t see his children as children, but as things to dangle to destroy. That’s why they hate Meghan, because she showed Prince Harry his worth.

This is the same Robert Jobson who knows and admitted all of this, about Charles’ betrayal of young Prince Harry. And it’s the same Robert Jobson who, now wants Prince Harry’s young son to be dangled over the Buckingham palace balcony. What is completely, always ignored, is that just like the royal family, royalists don’t see a spare’s humanity. To them, as it is to the royal family, a spare is not a full human being, but something that belongs to the heir and to the monarchy. That’s why they’re still going after Prince Harry. In their eyes, a spare has no right to have a life of his own, to be fulfilled. That’s why they don’t see his children as children, but as things to dangle to destroy. That’s why they hate Meghan, because she showed Prince Harry his worth.

Carmella

18,449 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough. One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence. What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.” Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is. Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline. Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there. Talk about overcompensating. 🤭 That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has. And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately? The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle. I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough. One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence. What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.” Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is. Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline. Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there. Talk about overcompensating. 🤭 That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has. And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately? The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle. I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.

Queen Esther

142,297 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GREAT CALL FROM TONY!!!! On Prince Harry and Meghan’s Netflix. “WE ARE BEING MANIPULATED BY THE MEDIA TO HATE (PRINCE) HARRY AND MEGHAN.” This caller said ♦️The media dangerously manipulated the public to hate Diana like they’re trying to do with the Sussexes. ♦️H&M have a bigger audience than the media and the royal want us to think. ♦️He calls out Channel 5 for its royal documentaries against Harry and Meghan and but so Pro Royal family. ♦️He suspects the Royal family have done a deal with Channel 5 for Pro royal coverage and anti Sussex coverage. Well done to Marvyn Harrison for pointing out that Prince Harry can monetise his own story. Why is Dawn Neesom okay with media and royal reporters monetising Harry’s story as their whole career and having the royal family/ palace brief private matters about Harry to them? Typical media and royalist gaslighting!

GREAT CALL FROM TONY!!!! On Prince Harry and Meghan’s Netflix. “WE ARE BEING MANIPULATED BY THE MEDIA TO HATE (PRINCE) HARRY AND MEGHAN.” This caller said ♦️The media dangerously manipulated the public to hate Diana like they’re trying to do with the Sussexes. ♦️H&M have a bigger audience than the media and the royal want us to think. ♦️He calls out Channel 5 for its royal documentaries against Harry and Meghan and but so Pro Royal family. ♦️He suspects the Royal family have done a deal with Channel 5 for Pro royal coverage and anti Sussex coverage. Well done to Marvyn Harrison for pointing out that Prince Harry can monetise his own story. Why is Dawn Neesom okay with media and royal reporters monetising Harry’s story as their whole career and having the royal family/ palace brief private matters about Harry to them? Typical media and royalist gaslighting!

Glow Lee

46,257 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

STEALING THE SPOTLIGHT????? NORMALISE THE ROYAL FAMILY NOT HAVING A CLAIM ON EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK AGAINST PRINCE HARRY AND DUCHESS MEGHAN. What the Royal PR machine seeks to do is to put some kind of claim on any day of the week so that any time Harry and Meghan do something they can be accused of being demonic or manipulative because it was on a certain day or just before or after a certain day. PLEASE DO NOT LET ROYAL REPORTERS CHANGE YOUR SENSE OF MORALITY OR THINK THAT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT THE ROYAL FAMILY GETTING FIRST & ONLY RIGHTS TO A DAY. ♦️Day claiming shows the continued ARROGANCE OF THE ROYAL INSTITUTION and what a toxic entitlement it has. ♦️Meghan Markle launched her new business #AmericanRivieraOrchard on instagram on her and Harry’s SUSSEX FREEDOM DAY (14th March) - 4 year anniversary. This day is important to them. (See video👇). The day is not owned by anyone. ♦️PRINCESS DIANA would probably love this launch release day choice as she sought to be free too. Obviously the Royal would not love it as they do not support or celebrate the idea of the Sussexes being free and happy and neither do their reporters. ♦️There is nothing wrong with more than one event or occurrence happening on one day. It will happen many more times. Each can be covered by the press. It happens all the time with celebrities. The same applies to royals. But it’s ONLY A PROBLEM WHEN IT’S HARRY & MEGHAN because of the hate incitement campaign of the royals and their reporters. ♦️Harry and Meghan were held back from doing things they wanted while in the team of working royals. Now THEY ARE INDEPENDENT FROM THE ROYAL INSTITUTION’S programme. The whole point of this is freedom of planning and choices. Yet it seems they are still expected to hold themselves back and be at the beckon call, demands of the institution. ♦️The royals and their team have an ongoing desire to control and restrict Harry and Meghan even though they are now independent. But sorry because THEY CAN NOW DEVISE THEIR SCHEDULE ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN DESIRED TIMETABLE and should not have to change it if they become aware of a clash with another royal. ♦️The royals do not need to and do not change their schedule because of Harry and Meghan. So ditto! ♦️Often Prince William and Kate Middleton have heard announcements of the Sussexes fewer and far between events well in advance and (I believe) purposefully scheduled an event to clash as they benefit from being tagged on to the disproportionately higher global reporting on H&Ms event compared. THIS IS PR HIJACKING and their royal rota really take up that opportunity to tag them in. ♦️Why do people not accuse the Royals of being manipulative or demonic when they clash with a Sussex event announced ages ago? It’s because the reporters try to programme us to think they have a right to dominate and override. The institution’s sheep. 🐑🐏 ♦️WHAT’S THE PROBLEM? Why should it be a concern that Harry and Meghan do something on the same day as the royals who are a powerful institution and ‘apparently’ have more backing, support and clout anyway. Apparently!!! ♦️THE ROYALS & THEIR TEAM ARE LACKING IN SELF ESTEEM if they’re worried, bothered and complaining about schedule clashes with Harry and Meghan in another country and appealing to a different audience. Saturday morning comment piece over. 🙂

STEALING THE SPOTLIGHT????? NORMALISE THE ROYAL FAMILY NOT HAVING A CLAIM ON EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK AGAINST PRINCE HARRY AND DUCHESS MEGHAN. What the Royal PR machine seeks to do is to put some kind of claim on any day of the week so that any time Harry and Meghan do something they can be accused of being demonic or manipulative because it was on a certain day or just before or after a certain day. PLEASE DO NOT LET ROYAL REPORTERS CHANGE YOUR SENSE OF MORALITY OR THINK THAT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT THE ROYAL FAMILY GETTING FIRST & ONLY RIGHTS TO A DAY. ♦️Day claiming shows the continued ARROGANCE OF THE ROYAL INSTITUTION and what a toxic entitlement it has. ♦️Meghan Markle launched her new business #AmericanRivieraOrchard on instagram on her and Harry’s SUSSEX FREEDOM DAY (14th March) - 4 year anniversary. This day is important to them. (See video👇). The day is not owned by anyone. ♦️PRINCESS DIANA would probably love this launch release day choice as she sought to be free too. Obviously the Royal would not love it as they do not support or celebrate the idea of the Sussexes being free and happy and neither do their reporters. ♦️There is nothing wrong with more than one event or occurrence happening on one day. It will happen many more times. Each can be covered by the press. It happens all the time with celebrities. The same applies to royals. But it’s ONLY A PROBLEM WHEN IT’S HARRY & MEGHAN because of the hate incitement campaign of the royals and their reporters. ♦️Harry and Meghan were held back from doing things they wanted while in the team of working royals. Now THEY ARE INDEPENDENT FROM THE ROYAL INSTITUTION’S programme. The whole point of this is freedom of planning and choices. Yet it seems they are still expected to hold themselves back and be at the beckon call, demands of the institution. ♦️The royals and their team have an ongoing desire to control and restrict Harry and Meghan even though they are now independent. But sorry because THEY CAN NOW DEVISE THEIR SCHEDULE ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN DESIRED TIMETABLE and should not have to change it if they become aware of a clash with another royal. ♦️The royals do not need to and do not change their schedule because of Harry and Meghan. So ditto! ♦️Often Prince William and Kate Middleton have heard announcements of the Sussexes fewer and far between events well in advance and (I believe) purposefully scheduled an event to clash as they benefit from being tagged on to the disproportionately higher global reporting on H&Ms event compared. THIS IS PR HIJACKING and their royal rota really take up that opportunity to tag them in. ♦️Why do people not accuse the Royals of being manipulative or demonic when they clash with a Sussex event announced ages ago? It’s because the reporters try to programme us to think they have a right to dominate and override. The institution’s sheep. 🐑🐏 ♦️WHAT’S THE PROBLEM? Why should it be a concern that Harry and Meghan do something on the same day as the royals who are a powerful institution and ‘apparently’ have more backing, support and clout anyway. Apparently!!! ♦️THE ROYALS & THEIR TEAM ARE LACKING IN SELF ESTEEM if they’re worried, bothered and complaining about schedule clashes with Harry and Meghan in another country and appealing to a different audience. Saturday morning comment piece over. 🙂

Glow Lee

147,431 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Meghan Markle: “I wasn’t just being thrown to the wolves. I was being fed to the wolves.” Also Meghan Markle: here’s our Oprah interview, here’s our Netflix documentary, here’s Harry’s memoir, here’s our podcasts, here’s our magazine interviews, and here’s another anonymous source briefing the media. Sorry, but do people really believe everything these two say? Even listening to their story in their own words, it comes across as an incredibly self-serving narrative. We’re supposed to believe a love story that began with Harry seeing Meghan on Instagram with a dog filter and asking, “Who is that?” I swear he himself doesn’t even believe what he is saying. Then we’re told they wanted to take things slowly, yet the relationship moved at breakneck speed. And then there’s Meghan talking about how she had her life, her path, her career until she met H. A career doing what exactly, Meghan Markle? The way she tells it, you’d think she was a global superstar at the height of her profession. The reality was a lot less dramatic. The constant rewriting of history is exhausting. And the complete lack of self-awareness. They spent years accusing the Royal Family of leaking and briefing the press while making a career out of telling their very self serving side of every private family disagreement. Even now, we’re getting stories weeks before Harry’s supposed UK trip about possibly bringing Archie and Lili, visiting Diana’s grave, and all sorts of personal family details. If privacy is so important, why is any of that being briefed to the media in the first place? Nobody has revealed more private family conversations, more family grievances, or more personal details than Harry and Meghan themselves. Yet somehow we’re still expected to believe they’re the victims of leaks and briefings. Harry and Meghan demand privacy while constantly managing a public narrative. Most people who want privacy simply live their lives. They don’t announce every grievance, every family dispute, every visit, every plan and every emotion through interviews, books, documentaries and briefings.

Meghan Markle: “I wasn’t just being thrown to the wolves. I was being fed to the wolves.” Also Meghan Markle: here’s our Oprah interview, here’s our Netflix documentary, here’s Harry’s memoir, here’s our podcasts, here’s our magazine interviews, and here’s another anonymous source briefing the media. Sorry, but do people really believe everything these two say? Even listening to their story in their own words, it comes across as an incredibly self-serving narrative. We’re supposed to believe a love story that began with Harry seeing Meghan on Instagram with a dog filter and asking, “Who is that?” I swear he himself doesn’t even believe what he is saying. Then we’re told they wanted to take things slowly, yet the relationship moved at breakneck speed. And then there’s Meghan talking about how she had her life, her path, her career until she met H. A career doing what exactly, Meghan Markle? The way she tells it, you’d think she was a global superstar at the height of her profession. The reality was a lot less dramatic. The constant rewriting of history is exhausting. And the complete lack of self-awareness. They spent years accusing the Royal Family of leaking and briefing the press while making a career out of telling their very self serving side of every private family disagreement. Even now, we’re getting stories weeks before Harry’s supposed UK trip about possibly bringing Archie and Lili, visiting Diana’s grave, and all sorts of personal family details. If privacy is so important, why is any of that being briefed to the media in the first place? Nobody has revealed more private family conversations, more family grievances, or more personal details than Harry and Meghan themselves. Yet somehow we’re still expected to believe they’re the victims of leaks and briefings. Harry and Meghan demand privacy while constantly managing a public narrative. Most people who want privacy simply live their lives. They don’t announce every grievance, every family dispute, every visit, every plan and every emotion through interviews, books, documentaries and briefings.

Queen Esther

114,634 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Unpopular opinion: King Charles needs to stop believing he can have it both ways. He cannot keep trying to reconcile with Harry in private while expecting it not to become another public spectacle. Every opening becomes another round of headlines, speculation, and Palace drama. Every gesture of goodwill is followed by another controversy, another round of competing narratives, and another attempt to drag the monarchy into a public family dispute. Yet the Palace keeps acting as though one more invitation or one more accommodation will somehow change the outcome. It won’t. I understand Charles is a father, but he is also the King. His first duty is to protect the Crown, not keep giving opportunities for the institution to be pulled back into the same crisis over and over again. Good intentions don’t matter if the result is always the same. Harry made his choice when he stepped away from royal duties and repeatedly took private family matters into the public domain. Charles now has to make his. Either accept that Harry is a private family member and keep those relationships entirely separate from the institution, or stop expecting different results from the same approach. The current strategy isn’t compassionate. It’s ineffective. Every half-measure creates another opening for speculation, pressure, and public drama. At some point, the King has to stop managing the symptoms and deal with the problem. Firm boundaries aren’t punishment. They’re leadership.

Unpopular opinion: King Charles needs to stop believing he can have it both ways. He cannot keep trying to reconcile with Harry in private while expecting it not to become another public spectacle. Every opening becomes another round of headlines, speculation, and Palace drama. Every gesture of goodwill is followed by another controversy, another round of competing narratives, and another attempt to drag the monarchy into a public family dispute. Yet the Palace keeps acting as though one more invitation or one more accommodation will somehow change the outcome. It won’t. I understand Charles is a father, but he is also the King. His first duty is to protect the Crown, not keep giving opportunities for the institution to be pulled back into the same crisis over and over again. Good intentions don’t matter if the result is always the same. Harry made his choice when he stepped away from royal duties and repeatedly took private family matters into the public domain. Charles now has to make his. Either accept that Harry is a private family member and keep those relationships entirely separate from the institution, or stop expecting different results from the same approach. The current strategy isn’t compassionate. It’s ineffective. Every half-measure creates another opening for speculation, pressure, and public drama. At some point, the King has to stop managing the symptoms and deal with the problem. Firm boundaries aren’t punishment. They’re leadership.

Queen Esther

47,743 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

As Prince William appears to have briefed against King Charles as pay back and a warning to him for attempting ‘peace talks’ with Prince Harry (which I think is just to rehab his image legacy as a bad dad /Grandfather to the Archie and Lilibet) this message from Prince Harry is poignant. 👇 “I WANT A FAMILY. NOT AN INSTITUTION.” Prince Harry Let’s be honest, the family he doesn’t recognise have not and will not change. They will collaborate with the media anonymously to get what they want, to attack each other and put each other in their place like they did and do with Harry and Meghan. THE FAMILY WILL NOT CHANGE. THEY CANNOT HELP IT.

As Prince William appears to have briefed against King Charles as pay back and a warning to him for attempting ‘peace talks’ with Prince Harry (which I think is just to rehab his image legacy as a bad dad /Grandfather to the Archie and Lilibet) this message from Prince Harry is poignant. 👇 “I WANT A FAMILY. NOT AN INSTITUTION.” Prince Harry Let’s be honest, the family he doesn’t recognise have not and will not change. They will collaborate with the media anonymously to get what they want, to attack each other and put each other in their place like they did and do with Harry and Meghan. THE FAMILY WILL NOT CHANGE. THEY CANNOT HELP IT.

Glow Lee

34,031 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is why people call Prince Harry and Meghan Markle “FUCKING GRIFTERS.” Meghan Markle sat with Oprah and raised claims about discussions surrounding Archie’s skin colour in an interview that ignited worldwide accusations of racism against the Royal Family. The media ran with it. People condemned them. Reputations were dragged through the mud. This happened while Prince Philip was seriously ill and Queen Elizabeth was in her final years. Then years later Harry said: “We never said the Royal Family was racist. The British press said that.” Read that again. They received awards connected to fighting racism, stayed silent while the world condemned the Royal Family as racist, accepted the praise and sympathy that followed… and years later Harry says, “We never said the Royal Family was racist. The British press said that.” So which was it? Because you do not get to benefit from the implication, collect the rewards, then later blame everyone else for understanding exactly what was implied. You cannot drop something that explosive into the public domain, stay silent while the world interprets it exactly as many did, then years later act as though everyone misunderstood or pretend the meaning changed? That isn’t misunderstanding. That’s manipulation. And the hypocrisy never stops. The same people who accuse the Royal Family of cruelty, leaking and exploitation continue trading on royal titles, royal links and royal status because without that connection, what exactly is left? What’s funny is the “leaking” apparently packed its bags and moved to Montecito with Harry and Meghan. Because according to them, the problem was always the Royal Family and the institution… yet somehow the interviews, complaints, anonymous sources, documentaries, books and endless revelations never stopped. Strange how the leaking didn’t stay behind. The endless victim narrative seems to be collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions and more people are finally seeing it for what it is. Maybe that’s why the failures keep piling up, the isolation keeps growing and trust keeps disappearing. Because sooner or later people get tired of selective truths and watching blame be thrown at everyone except the ones holding the microphone. You can fool people for a while. You can reshape stories. You can monetise grievances. But eventually the story starts shifting and that’s the problem with lies… the details keep changing because fiction needs maintenance while truth doesn’t. And that’s the thing about the internet. It remembers. And unlike carefully curated narratives, receipts don’t age.

This is why people call Prince Harry and Meghan Markle “FUCKING GRIFTERS.” Meghan Markle sat with Oprah and raised claims about discussions surrounding Archie’s skin colour in an interview that ignited worldwide accusations of racism against the Royal Family. The media ran with it. People condemned them. Reputations were dragged through the mud. This happened while Prince Philip was seriously ill and Queen Elizabeth was in her final years. Then years later Harry said: “We never said the Royal Family was racist. The British press said that.” Read that again. They received awards connected to fighting racism, stayed silent while the world condemned the Royal Family as racist, accepted the praise and sympathy that followed… and years later Harry says, “We never said the Royal Family was racist. The British press said that.” So which was it? Because you do not get to benefit from the implication, collect the rewards, then later blame everyone else for understanding exactly what was implied. You cannot drop something that explosive into the public domain, stay silent while the world interprets it exactly as many did, then years later act as though everyone misunderstood or pretend the meaning changed? That isn’t misunderstanding. That’s manipulation. And the hypocrisy never stops. The same people who accuse the Royal Family of cruelty, leaking and exploitation continue trading on royal titles, royal links and royal status because without that connection, what exactly is left? What’s funny is the “leaking” apparently packed its bags and moved to Montecito with Harry and Meghan. Because according to them, the problem was always the Royal Family and the institution… yet somehow the interviews, complaints, anonymous sources, documentaries, books and endless revelations never stopped. Strange how the leaking didn’t stay behind. The endless victim narrative seems to be collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions and more people are finally seeing it for what it is. Maybe that’s why the failures keep piling up, the isolation keeps growing and trust keeps disappearing. Because sooner or later people get tired of selective truths and watching blame be thrown at everyone except the ones holding the microphone. You can fool people for a while. You can reshape stories. You can monetise grievances. But eventually the story starts shifting and that’s the problem with lies… the details keep changing because fiction needs maintenance while truth doesn’t. And that’s the thing about the internet. It remembers. And unlike carefully curated narratives, receipts don’t age.

Queen Esther

98,581 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

1/3. Royston talking about Vickers' book. In this part Royston talks about and acknowledges how cruel the Oprah interview was, and how hard it would've been for the Royal family. And that if someone had treated Harry and Markle the way they treated Harry's family Harry and Markle would never accept it. 💁🏻‍♀️ what Royston is saying is all very interesting (and correct) I guess, but the main reason I'm sharing is because what has stood out to me over the last few years is the ability of some people (reporters, commentators, the public) to point out isolated reports of how terrible and hypocritical they are, but still not be able to see the bigger picture of how that impacted those early years (and why William and Catherine and others have set very firm boundaries). I don't know how anyone can see these two as anything but toxic. full ep

1/3. Royston talking about Vickers' book. In this part Royston talks about and acknowledges how cruel the Oprah interview was, and how hard it would've been for the Royal family. And that if someone had treated Harry and Markle the way they treated Harry's family Harry and Markle would never accept it. 💁🏻‍♀️ what Royston is saying is all very interesting (and correct) I guess, but the main reason I'm sharing is because what has stood out to me over the last few years is the ability of some people (reporters, commentators, the public) to point out isolated reports of how terrible and hypocritical they are, but still not be able to see the bigger picture of how that impacted those early years (and why William and Catherine and others have set very firm boundaries). I don't know how anyone can see these two as anything but toxic. full ep

mrc 🦇

13,698 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

THE INHERENT CRUELTY OF THE MONARCHY!! “They (Prince Harry and Meghan) are enormously appealing to the public….and are very good at it. What a pity it is they’ve gone….I think they (the Royal Family) needed Harry and Meghan” The same reporters that recognised that Harry and Meghan were the jewel in the crown for the Royal Family are the same ones that cyber bullied them daily for shit, giggles and clicks making it seem like they were God awful while having this green light by the family to do this. A family that also recognised Harry and Meghan were doing good things for the monarchy but targeted them out of jealousy. There is something fundamentally cruel about the monarchy that expect spares and royal wives to suffer. But its arrogance is that they don’t expect their victims to be able to escape, and when they try, just like King Charles did, they blackmail them with more cruelty - taking away security, evicting them from secure homes gifted to them- ramping up the media abuse from their reporters. The monarchy is a hierarchical system built not on service but ego, cruelty and pain. Thanks for the vid Carmella #TinaBrown #CruelMonarchy #RoyalFamilyIsACult

THE INHERENT CRUELTY OF THE MONARCHY!! “They (Prince Harry and Meghan) are enormously appealing to the public….and are very good at it. What a pity it is they’ve gone….I think they (the Royal Family) needed Harry and Meghan” The same reporters that recognised that Harry and Meghan were the jewel in the crown for the Royal Family are the same ones that cyber bullied them daily for shit, giggles and clicks making it seem like they were God awful while having this green light by the family to do this. A family that also recognised Harry and Meghan were doing good things for the monarchy but targeted them out of jealousy. There is something fundamentally cruel about the monarchy that expect spares and royal wives to suffer. But its arrogance is that they don’t expect their victims to be able to escape, and when they try, just like King Charles did, they blackmail them with more cruelty - taking away security, evicting them from secure homes gifted to them- ramping up the media abuse from their reporters. The monarchy is a hierarchical system built not on service but ego, cruelty and pain. Thanks for the vid Carmella #TinaBrown #CruelMonarchy #RoyalFamilyIsACult

Glow Lee

25,183 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

So let me get this straight. According to reports, Meghan Markle wasn’t happy after Poh referred to her as “royalty” on MasterChef Australia. Isn’t this the same Meghan Markle whose own house manager announced, “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex,” when she walked into her Harper’s Bazaar interview… even though it was just her and the writer in the room? Maybe it wasn’t “royalty” that bothered her. Maybe it was Poh opening with, “We’ve had royalty before.” That immediately reminds everyone she’s not the only royal connection the show has had. It takes the spotlight off her and reminds viewers she’s not the first. If there’s one thing Meghan Markle has never been able to tolerate anyone or anything is taking the attention away from her. The second the spotlight shifts, it becomes a problem. So maybe that was the part that didn’t sit well? And if simply being referred to as “royalty” was enough to offend her, why has she spent years making sure every interview, business venture and public appearance is tied to the Duchess of Sussex title? She’s slapped that Duchess title on almost everything she’s touched since leaving the Royal Family. Netflix, podcasts, interviews, business ventures… the title is always front and centre because it’s the one thing that still makes her marketable. Imo Meghan is just acting offended so she can pretend she’s above it while still sucking the life out of the title. The woman who has herself announced as “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” to a reporter sitting alone, or sends gift baskets signed “HRH The Duchess of Sussex” to a so-called friend, is not someone who gets offended when addressed as royalty. She loves the title when it benefits her. She’s just reinforcing the narrative that everyone else is obsessed with the royal connection while she’s supposedly moved on. Her own actions completely undermine that story. Or maybe it’s time the public respected her privacy and also stopped using the royal titles so we don’t offend her again. 🙄 And while we’re at it, Poh didn’t exactly help herself either. The way she rolled out, “The Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle!” like she was announcing a head of state was pure overkill. It came off desperate and embarrassing. She’s a guest judge on a cooking show, not a visiting monarch. Hopefully she learned there’s no need to try to elevate someone with that kind of introduction. This is exactly why people end up believing their own press. The title isn’t a personality.

So let me get this straight. According to reports, Meghan Markle wasn’t happy after Poh referred to her as “royalty” on MasterChef Australia. Isn’t this the same Meghan Markle whose own house manager announced, “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex,” when she walked into her Harper’s Bazaar interview… even though it was just her and the writer in the room? Maybe it wasn’t “royalty” that bothered her. Maybe it was Poh opening with, “We’ve had royalty before.” That immediately reminds everyone she’s not the only royal connection the show has had. It takes the spotlight off her and reminds viewers she’s not the first. If there’s one thing Meghan Markle has never been able to tolerate anyone or anything is taking the attention away from her. The second the spotlight shifts, it becomes a problem. So maybe that was the part that didn’t sit well? And if simply being referred to as “royalty” was enough to offend her, why has she spent years making sure every interview, business venture and public appearance is tied to the Duchess of Sussex title? She’s slapped that Duchess title on almost everything she’s touched since leaving the Royal Family. Netflix, podcasts, interviews, business ventures… the title is always front and centre because it’s the one thing that still makes her marketable. Imo Meghan is just acting offended so she can pretend she’s above it while still sucking the life out of the title. The woman who has herself announced as “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” to a reporter sitting alone, or sends gift baskets signed “HRH The Duchess of Sussex” to a so-called friend, is not someone who gets offended when addressed as royalty. She loves the title when it benefits her. She’s just reinforcing the narrative that everyone else is obsessed with the royal connection while she’s supposedly moved on. Her own actions completely undermine that story. Or maybe it’s time the public respected her privacy and also stopped using the royal titles so we don’t offend her again. 🙄 And while we’re at it, Poh didn’t exactly help herself either. The way she rolled out, “The Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle!” like she was announcing a head of state was pure overkill. It came off desperate and embarrassing. She’s a guest judge on a cooking show, not a visiting monarch. Hopefully she learned there’s no need to try to elevate someone with that kind of introduction. This is exactly why people end up believing their own press. The title isn’t a personality.

Queen Esther

55,914 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

The Ugly, Cruel Truth of Meghan Markle Isolating Prince Harry from the Rest of the World Everyone needs people in their life who will tell them the truth. Friends who aren’t afraid to disagree. Family who can offer perspective. People who knew you long before the fame, the money, the interviews and the endless public drama. Yet one by one, those people seem to have disappeared from Harry’s life. What happens when you cut off family, lose old friends, fall out with former colleagues, and surround yourself only with people who reinforce the same beliefs? You stop looking inward. Every problem becomes someone else’s fault. Every criticism becomes an attack. Every failed venture becomes sabotage. Every disagreement becomes proof of persecution. That is exactly what we have watched for years. The blame is always on the Royal Family. The press. Former staff. Former friends. The public. Social media. Anyone and everyone except the two people at the centre of the drama. What is remarkable is that many of the people being blamed today haven’t been part of Harry and Meghan’s lives for years. Some have had little or no contact with them, yet somehow they remain responsible for every setback, every criticism and every disappointment. That is why isolation is so powerful. Without trusted friends and family offering guidance, challenging assumptions, and providing reality checks, it becomes much easier to believe that everyone else is the problem. Harry is responsible for the choices he made. He chose to burn many of those bridges. But the end result has been a world where accountability disappears and blame is constantly redirected outward. And that has become the foundation of the Sussex brand. Because the Meghan Markle brand depends on a story. A story in which she is perpetually misunderstood, mistreated, targeted, betrayed, and held back by others. That story requires villains. The Royal Family. The media. Former staff. Former friends. Critics. Commentators. There always has to be someone else to blame. The problem is that people with history can challenge that story. Old friends can challenge it. Family can challenge it. Former colleagues can challenge it. People who were actually there can challenge it. Isolation removes those voices. And once those voices are gone, there is nobody left to say, “That’s not what happened.” Nobody left to challenge the narrative. Nobody left to point out that not every criticism is persecution, not every disagreement is abuse, and not every setback is someone else’s fault. Instead, the same cycle continues. New villains are found. Old grievances are recycled. Blame is redirected outward. That is why isolation works. Not because it helps Harry. Because it helps keep the story alive.

Queen Esther

84,490 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

60 min Australia has a new documentary out tomorrow titled "What sort of King will Prince William be?"🔥 This question has been asked time and time again since Prince William was a teenager and more so now in adulthood. And we have yet to get a clear answer. why? because despite being born and raised in the spotlight for over 4 decades, the world still knows very little about the Man; about what he thinks, what he will do next, or what type of King he will be. Unlike his father and brother who have been very open with the press on what they think and will do next, Prince William has remained a great enigma and has always played his cards very close to the chest🔥 Prince William has given some interesting interviews thoughout the years but he has mastered the art of answering Questions without revealing much of what is truly going on behind the scene🤭 So to the Press and the World, he has remained "the great known unknown", as Journalist Stephen Bates coined, after an interview with the Prince🔥 This in essence is why the world continues to be facsinated by him and his family and why the Question continues to be asked in documentaries after documentaries "What type of King will Prince William be?" Well, to better understand the Man, these documentaries get former staff who worked closely with him for years, such as his Private secretary Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton or in this case, Jason Knauf who made a name for himself after exposing the Bullying of staff by Meghan markle inside the palace🔥 Jason Knauf is a Texan-born former corporate affairs executive who worked for a range of institutions, from the office of the New Zealand prime minister, to HM Treasury and the Royal Bank of Scotland; before joining the royal household. This American became the communications secretary to Prince Willam, Catherine and Prince Harry in 2015. Then, after Harry married, Jason led the press team for Meghan and Harry; which is how he witnessed firsthand, her bullying of staff and decided to expose her to his senior boss, Prince William. After ejecting H&M from Kensington Palace, William then made Knauf, a senior adviser to Catherine and him. Following that, Knauf also served as CEO of the Royal foundation and helped with bringing Earthshot to life. In 2023, Prince William awarded him an LVO for his outstanding work and dedication to the royal household🤩 Therefore, This documentary will be the first time ever, Jason is on Record giving an insight about his former boss and I am quite piked to hear what he has to say. One thing Jason stated in the preview is that When it comes to Prince William, "What you see is what you get"; Indeed, Prince William walks the talk quietly👏🏽 The Prince has stated that his family will be his priority and he has done just that over the years; He has stated his loyalty to the crown and has done just that and never hesitated to protect the crown against his own brother; He has stated that his private life is his business and he has done exactly that protecting it; He is a said to be "Alllegic to drama" and indeed has stayed away from any type of provocations or drama. So yes, We have definitely seen William throughout the years walk the talk, and his quiet consistency in his Royal work and family life is excatly why he is so respected on the world stage as a leader by many❤️ In that Jason is right, One of the Main attributes of a Strong Leader is that he stands by his words and keep his promises, regardless of challenges🔥1/2 📹60 minutesAustralia

60 min Australia has a new documentary out tomorrow titled "What sort of King will Prince William be?"🔥 This question has been asked time and time again since Prince William was a teenager and more so now in adulthood. And we have yet to get a clear answer. why? because despite being born and raised in the spotlight for over 4 decades, the world still knows very little about the Man; about what he thinks, what he will do next, or what type of King he will be. Unlike his father and brother who have been very open with the press on what they think and will do next, Prince William has remained a great enigma and has always played his cards very close to the chest🔥 Prince William has given some interesting interviews thoughout the years but he has mastered the art of answering Questions without revealing much of what is truly going on behind the scene🤭 So to the Press and the World, he has remained "the great known unknown", as Journalist Stephen Bates coined, after an interview with the Prince🔥 This in essence is why the world continues to be facsinated by him and his family and why the Question continues to be asked in documentaries after documentaries "What type of King will Prince William be?" Well, to better understand the Man, these documentaries get former staff who worked closely with him for years, such as his Private secretary Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton or in this case, Jason Knauf who made a name for himself after exposing the Bullying of staff by Meghan markle inside the palace🔥 Jason Knauf is a Texan-born former corporate affairs executive who worked for a range of institutions, from the office of the New Zealand prime minister, to HM Treasury and the Royal Bank of Scotland; before joining the royal household. This American became the communications secretary to Prince Willam, Catherine and Prince Harry in 2015. Then, after Harry married, Jason led the press team for Meghan and Harry; which is how he witnessed firsthand, her bullying of staff and decided to expose her to his senior boss, Prince William. After ejecting H&M from Kensington Palace, William then made Knauf, a senior adviser to Catherine and him. Following that, Knauf also served as CEO of the Royal foundation and helped with bringing Earthshot to life. In 2023, Prince William awarded him an LVO for his outstanding work and dedication to the royal household🤩 Therefore, This documentary will be the first time ever, Jason is on Record giving an insight about his former boss and I am quite piked to hear what he has to say. One thing Jason stated in the preview is that When it comes to Prince William, "What you see is what you get"; Indeed, Prince William walks the talk quietly👏🏽 The Prince has stated that his family will be his priority and he has done just that over the years; He has stated his loyalty to the crown and has done just that and never hesitated to protect the crown against his own brother; He has stated that his private life is his business and he has done exactly that protecting it; He is a said to be "Alllegic to drama" and indeed has stayed away from any type of provocations or drama. So yes, We have definitely seen William throughout the years walk the talk, and his quiet consistency in his Royal work and family life is excatly why he is so respected on the world stage as a leader by many❤️ In that Jason is right, One of the Main attributes of a Strong Leader is that he stands by his words and keep his promises, regardless of challenges🔥1/2 📹60 minutesAustralia

Canellecitadelle

29,628 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The US celebrity/political/media machine, with its partisan manipulation and narrative control, is very obvious and (clearly) problematic. Again, everything Harry and Markle accuse others of doing they do themselves. The 'symbiotic' relationship they accused the British monarchy of having with the British media and establishment is exactly what has existed in the USA for decades - and it's a relationship Harry and Markle 𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘵 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮. To date, their only successful product has been Royal related - either cosplaying royals or selling negative stories about them. Nothing else has been successful, as a brand or financially. They profited from their accusations, and from the public's negative views of the royal family. Harry said👇🏽the royal family were jealous of the media coverage he and Markle recieved because royals needed media front pages to get donations for their charities. Think about that 🤔 Who would he be talking about? Can't be William and Catherine, who shared the Royal Foundation with Harry until mid 2019. That doesn't make sense. Yes, King Charles has had many charitable interests over the years, but front page media attention wasn't 'needed' for donations, and there had been many occasions he wasn't getting front page coverage. Also personal 'royal charities' are a side gig, not the standard 'work' of the royal family. So it's an odd claim 🤷🏻‍♀️ And Christmas parties for the media? (🤨) The accusations Harry and Markle made are seen as 'how and why' the royal family would wage a smear campaign against them. 𝗕𝘂𝘁, those circumstances apply to Harry and Markle's current situation • they need positive media for charitable donations (hello Gavin) • they have a transactional and symbiotic relationship with celebrity and news media (🤨) • and their institution survives on public perception, so there's some control (hello 'Hollywood') • Christmas parties? 🎭 I was planning on doing a bit of a Ken Sunshine/Sachs #throwback thread to prove my point, but it's become bigger than one thread. There will be many threads over time, all probably very boring. On Sunshine Sachs, their clients, celebrity humanitarianism, celebrity media, involvement of politics...and other random things. 😂 it's just me sharing receipts in a public way.

mrc 🦇

11,510 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

1/2. Matt Wilkinson, Sarah Hewson and JJ Anisiobi on Royal Exclusive, talking about 'what's needed for the celebrities to return'. Few thoughts... Seeing as William was correct in his initial assessment of Harry and Markle's relationship, and of US celebrity Markle's fame ambition and suitability for the British institution of monarchy, and seeing as nothing has changed - by all reports Harry still enables, protects and participates in Markle's poor behaviour, - Harry still has personal grievances and publicly shared issues with William and with his place in the hierarchy (and William's place will only increase in seniority), - and Markle is just as ruthlessly fame hungry as she was, and considering the fact that thanks to Harry and Markle's actions, things are now a lot worse than they were 𝗮𝗹𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗴𝗼, why would William, at this time in his and his wife and children's lives, expel time and energy into them returning? All things considered, why would he risk it, either for himself, his family, or the institution? With the precarious position the institution is in, and the instability and untrustworthiness of the US celebrities, who in their right mind would risk it? And also, on JJ's comments that all it would take is 'Catherine to publicly support Markle', I disagree. I wouldn't support their return, regardless of what William and Catherine said or did. full ep

1/2. Matt Wilkinson, Sarah Hewson and JJ Anisiobi on Royal Exclusive, talking about 'what's needed for the celebrities to return'. Few thoughts... Seeing as William was correct in his initial assessment of Harry and Markle's relationship, and of US celebrity Markle's fame ambition and suitability for the British institution of monarchy, and seeing as nothing has changed - by all reports Harry still enables, protects and participates in Markle's poor behaviour, - Harry still has personal grievances and publicly shared issues with William and with his place in the hierarchy (and William's place will only increase in seniority), - and Markle is just as ruthlessly fame hungry as she was, and considering the fact that thanks to Harry and Markle's actions, things are now a lot worse than they were 𝗮𝗹𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗴𝗼, why would William, at this time in his and his wife and children's lives, expel time and energy into them returning? All things considered, why would he risk it, either for himself, his family, or the institution? With the precarious position the institution is in, and the instability and untrustworthiness of the US celebrities, who in their right mind would risk it? And also, on JJ's comments that all it would take is 'Catherine to publicly support Markle', I disagree. I wouldn't support their return, regardless of what William and Catherine said or did. full ep

mrc 🦇

12,505 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten