正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

If the president — working with U.S. intelligence and allied nations — concludes it’s now or never, that matters. When a hostile regime is nearing a nuclear breakout, building ballistic missiles we can’t defend against, and following the North Korea model of surprise nuclear escalation, you don’t wait. We’ve... show more

Mark R. Levin

5,033,467 subscribers

54,150 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Today on Liberty's Voice EP008 If we leave Iran alone, they get nuclear warheads and long-range ICBMs — backed by China and Russia. I don’t subscribe to the naïve “Fortress America” theory that says we wait until the mushroom cloud is imminent. When there’s a narrow strategic window to stop a regime that was this close to a nuclear breakout, you act. The June strike prevented a nuclear-armed Iran — something the Obama deal effectively subsidized. This is about prudence, deterrence, and peace through strength. To watch the ENTIRE EPISODE, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Today on Liberty's Voice EP008 If we leave Iran alone, they get nuclear warheads and long-range ICBMs — backed by China and Russia. I don’t subscribe to the naïve “Fortress America” theory that says we wait until the mushroom cloud is imminent. When there’s a narrow strategic window to stop a regime that was this close to a nuclear breakout, you act. The June strike prevented a nuclear-armed Iran — something the Obama deal effectively subsidized. This is about prudence, deterrence, and peace through strength. To watch the ENTIRE EPISODE, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

18,963 次观看 • 5 个月前

What do you do when a regime tells you it can build nuclear weapons in days? Pretend you didn’t hear it—or act before it’s too late? I walk through the logic of prudence in foreign policy: negotiations fail, Iran keeps pushing toward nuclear weapons, and history shows regimes like North Korea will lie to buy time. This is about Iran’s nuclear ambitions, peace through strength, and the hard reality of dealing with dangerous regimes. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

What do you do when a regime tells you it can build nuclear weapons in days? Pretend you didn’t hear it—or act before it’s too late? I walk through the logic of prudence in foreign policy: negotiations fail, Iran keeps pushing toward nuclear weapons, and history shows regimes like North Korea will lie to buy time. This is about Iran’s nuclear ambitions, peace through strength, and the hard reality of dealing with dangerous regimes. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

49,935 次观看 • 4 个月前

I’m breaking down the real strategy—and the real risk—when it comes to Iran. The president made a decision based on intelligence: target Iran’s military capabilities, their nuclear program, and their ballistic missiles. That’s about national security and preventing a far greater threat. But the bigger question is what comes next. Do you negotiate? Do you escalate? Can you even trust a regime that has violated agreements for decades and openly embraces deception as strategy? This is about Iran, nuclear weapons, U.S. foreign policy, military strategy, and the reality of dealing with a terrorist regime. Follow Liberty’s Voice with Mark Levin on YouTube and Rumble for more on Iran, geopolitics, national security, and America’s role in the world. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

I’m breaking down the real strategy—and the real risk—when it comes to Iran. The president made a decision based on intelligence: target Iran’s military capabilities, their nuclear program, and their ballistic missiles. That’s about national security and preventing a far greater threat. But the bigger question is what comes next. Do you negotiate? Do you escalate? Can you even trust a regime that has violated agreements for decades and openly embraces deception as strategy? This is about Iran, nuclear weapons, U.S. foreign policy, military strategy, and the reality of dealing with a terrorist regime. Follow Liberty’s Voice with Mark Levin on YouTube and Rumble for more on Iran, geopolitics, national security, and America’s role in the world. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

46,271 次观看 • 4 个月前

Pro North Korea group Nodutdol was in the streets earlier today protesting the capture of Nicolás Maduro and his wife, calling it a U.S. “invasion.” They claim the U.S. is lying about narco trafficking and “narco terrorism,” and insist the real goal is “to seize the country’s resources, the country’s oil.” “We’ve seen this playbook happen before from Korea to Palestine and now in Venezuela.” Translation: any U.S. action against an allied socialist or communist regime gets reframed as the same imperial resource grab. The villains are never the dictators, it’s always America. Are they worried Delta Force is headed to Pyongyang next to pay Kim a visit?

Pro North Korea group Nodutdol was in the streets earlier today protesting the capture of Nicolás Maduro and his wife, calling it a U.S. “invasion.” They claim the U.S. is lying about narco trafficking and “narco terrorism,” and insist the real goal is “to seize the country’s resources, the country’s oil.” “We’ve seen this playbook happen before from Korea to Palestine and now in Venezuela.” Translation: any U.S. action against an allied socialist or communist regime gets reframed as the same imperial resource grab. The villains are never the dictators, it’s always America. Are they worried Delta Force is headed to Pyongyang next to pay Kim a visit?

Stu Smith

13,169 次观看 • 7 个月前

Reporter: In March, the office of DNI concluded “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear programs he suspended in 2003.” So what new intelligence does the U.S have since then that the Iranians have changed their position on nuclear weapons? And does this new intelligence come from U.S. Sources and methods, or are we getting this information from other countries?

Reporter: In March, the office of DNI concluded “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear programs he suspended in 2003.” So what new intelligence does the U.S have since then that the Iranians have changed their position on nuclear weapons? And does this new intelligence come from U.S. Sources and methods, or are we getting this information from other countries?

Acyn

986,734 次观看 • 1 年前

U.S. CONFIRMS IRAN NOT BUILDING NUCLEAR WEAPONS: March 25, 2025 the Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified that the IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003. The IC is closely monitoring if Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program. Netanyahu is lying and here is the proof.

U.S. CONFIRMS IRAN NOT BUILDING NUCLEAR WEAPONS: March 25, 2025 the Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified that the IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003. The IC is closely monitoring if Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program. Netanyahu is lying and here is the proof.

Truth Justice ™

1,019,797 次观看 • 1 年前

The strategic objective was always clear: Iran cannot be the next North Korea. Period. That means no nuclear program, no ballistic missile program, and no more proxy wars. President Trump’s critics keep acting like Iran has time on its side. They don’t. Their economy is in shambles because our blockade is working and we have persistent eyes and targeting options on everything they do. That is called escalation dominance. For 47 years, Iran’s regime relied on the assumption that America will hesitate, overthink, and eventually concede to a bad deal. That assumption changed. Yes, the Strait of Hormuz matters. But the main strategic objective is much bigger. Defend the homeland and protect our allies. So, no, Iran is not “winning.” America holds all the cards.

The strategic objective was always clear: Iran cannot be the next North Korea. Period. That means no nuclear program, no ballistic missile program, and no more proxy wars. President Trump’s critics keep acting like Iran has time on its side. They don’t. Their economy is in shambles because our blockade is working and we have persistent eyes and targeting options on everything they do. That is called escalation dominance. For 47 years, Iran’s regime relied on the assumption that America will hesitate, overthink, and eventually concede to a bad deal. That assumption changed. Yes, the Strait of Hormuz matters. But the main strategic objective is much bigger. Defend the homeland and protect our allies. So, no, Iran is not “winning.” America holds all the cards.

Dan Crenshaw

19,170 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨🇮🇱 ISRAEL UN AMBASSADOR: “IRAN’S MISSILE PROGRAM IS A NUCLEAR-LEVEL THREAT” Israel at the UN Danny Danon 🇮🇱 דני דנון: "Everybody speaks about the nuclear threat. But if you have enough ballistic missiles, it's equal to a nuclear bomb. And we found out the Iranians had a plan to produce thousands of ballistic missiles every year, to compete with Russia and the U.S."

🚨🇮🇱 ISRAEL UN AMBASSADOR: “IRAN’S MISSILE PROGRAM IS A NUCLEAR-LEVEL THREAT” Israel at the UN Danny Danon 🇮🇱 דני דנון: "Everybody speaks about the nuclear threat. But if you have enough ballistic missiles, it's equal to a nuclear bomb. And we found out the Iranians had a plan to produce thousands of ballistic missiles every year, to compete with Russia and the U.S."

Mario Nawfal

125,830 次观看 • 1 年前

South Korean President Lee Jae Myung: As for U.S.-North Korea dialogue, President Trump seemed frustrated. He wants to have dialogue with North Korea. He appeared to believe that now is the time to engage Kim Jong Un in talks again. But he was frustrated about how exactly to proceed. He even asked me, 'What is the solution?' What I told him was that, in the end, this is about the North Korean nuclear issue and the issue of regime security. The current approach is not working. Sanctions and pressure are no longer effective.

South Korean President Lee Jae Myung: As for U.S.-North Korea dialogue, President Trump seemed frustrated. He wants to have dialogue with North Korea. He appeared to believe that now is the time to engage Kim Jong Un in talks again. But he was frustrated about how exactly to proceed. He even asked me, 'What is the solution?' What I told him was that, in the end, this is about the North Korean nuclear issue and the issue of regime security. The current approach is not working. Sanctions and pressure are no longer effective.

Clash Report

31,753 次观看 • 1 个月前

JUST IN AND UNUSUAL North Korea has enshrined in law an automatic nuclear response to any threat to Kim Jong Un's life. The new constitution states that "if the state's nuclear force management system is threatened by attacks from hostile forces, a nuclear strike will be launched automatically and immediately." These changes were reportedly introduced following the assassinations of Iranian leaders and the kidnapping of President Maduro.

JUST IN AND UNUSUAL North Korea has enshrined in law an automatic nuclear response to any threat to Kim Jong Un's life. The new constitution states that "if the state's nuclear force management system is threatened by attacks from hostile forces, a nuclear strike will be launched automatically and immediately." These changes were reportedly introduced following the assassinations of Iranian leaders and the kidnapping of President Maduro.

China pulse 🇨🇳

39,866 次观看 • 2 个月前

Why would anyone give Iran the benefit of the doubt on nuclear weapons? This is a regime with decades of terrorism, American blood on its hands, and a clear track record of deception. We’re not talking about theory—we’re talking about real-world consequences. If you’re wrong about Iran’s intentions, the cost isn’t political—it’s catastrophic. This is about Iran’s nuclear ambitions, terrorism, and the reality of dealing with a regime that has spent years targeting the United States and its allies. Follow Liberty’s Voice with Mark Levin on YouTube and Rumble for more on Iran, national security, and global threats. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Why would anyone give Iran the benefit of the doubt on nuclear weapons? This is a regime with decades of terrorism, American blood on its hands, and a clear track record of deception. We’re not talking about theory—we’re talking about real-world consequences. If you’re wrong about Iran’s intentions, the cost isn’t political—it’s catastrophic. This is about Iran’s nuclear ambitions, terrorism, and the reality of dealing with a regime that has spent years targeting the United States and its allies. Follow Liberty’s Voice with Mark Levin on YouTube and Rumble for more on Iran, national security, and global threats. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

149,682 次观看 • 4 个月前

Q: The DNI concluded in March that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon. So what new intelligence does the US have since then that Iran changed its position? HEGSETH: The president has made it very clear that he's looked at all the intelligence and come to the conclusion that the Iranian nuclear program is a threat

Q: The DNI concluded in March that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon. So what new intelligence does the US have since then that Iran changed its position? HEGSETH: The president has made it very clear that he's looked at all the intelligence and come to the conclusion that the Iranian nuclear program is a threat

Aaron Rupar

235,739 次观看 • 1 年前

BREAKING: JD Vance says that the goal of Trump is to ensure that Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapon and he wants to accomplish that through diplomacy or other means. Reminder: Trump tore up the diplomacy in his first term when he tore up the Obama Nuclear deal. That was the solution. He bailed out of it. “We have to get to a position where Iran can’t threaten the world with nuclear terrorism. We can’t let the craziest and worst regime in the world to have nuclear weapons. That is what the President is accomplishing. That’s what the President has set as our goal.”

BREAKING: JD Vance says that the goal of Trump is to ensure that Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapon and he wants to accomplish that through diplomacy or other means. Reminder: Trump tore up the diplomacy in his first term when he tore up the Obama Nuclear deal. That was the solution. He bailed out of it. “We have to get to a position where Iran can’t threaten the world with nuclear terrorism. We can’t let the craziest and worst regime in the world to have nuclear weapons. That is what the President is accomplishing. That’s what the President has set as our goal.”

Ed Krassenstein

52,701 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨WATCH: IDF spokesman in an interview with ABC: "Israel's goal is NOT to overthrow the regime in Iran. We do not plan to change the regime there. Our goals are to neutralize the threat that the Iranian nuclear program and its missiles pose to Israel. Our military goal is to remove the threat of a nuclear bomb over Israel, their ballistic missiles, and the spread of terrorism in the region. This is a defensive operation aimed at neutralizing military threats, not political interference in the regime of a sovereign state. That is, until Iran decides to change its course independently; we will not interfere with the political change there.

🚨WATCH: IDF spokesman in an interview with ABC: "Israel's goal is NOT to overthrow the regime in Iran. We do not plan to change the regime there. Our goals are to neutralize the threat that the Iranian nuclear program and its missiles pose to Israel. Our military goal is to remove the threat of a nuclear bomb over Israel, their ballistic missiles, and the spread of terrorism in the region. This is a defensive operation aimed at neutralizing military threats, not political interference in the regime of a sovereign state. That is, until Iran decides to change its course independently; we will not interfere with the political change there.

Raylan Givens

15,038 次观看 • 1 年前

Q: "In March, the ODNI released their threat assessment concluding Iran is not building a nuclear weapon...What new intelligence does the U.S. have since then?" Hegseth: "The president has made it very clear, he's looked at all of this, all of the intelligence, all of the information, and come to the conclusion that the Iranian nuclear program is a threat and was willing to take this precision. operation to neutralize that threat in order to advance American national interests."

Q: "In March, the ODNI released their threat assessment concluding Iran is not building a nuclear weapon...What new intelligence does the U.S. have since then?" Hegseth: "The president has made it very clear, he's looked at all of this, all of the intelligence, all of the information, and come to the conclusion that the Iranian nuclear program is a threat and was willing to take this precision. operation to neutralize that threat in order to advance American national interests."

The Bulwark

40,809 次观看 • 1 年前

.Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 Do you realize that the video you posted shows the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you are now saying after President Trump called you out? You testified to Congress and said, “the IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khamenei.ir has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.” Not only is what you said here different than what you are saying now, but he also never suspended the program. Iran has always been working toward a nuclear weapon. We cannot afford to have a DNI Director who gets its wrong, and can’t admit she is wrong. See video below 👇🏻

.Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 Do you realize that the video you posted shows the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you are now saying after President Trump called you out? You testified to Congress and said, “the IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khamenei.ir has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.” Not only is what you said here different than what you are saying now, but he also never suspended the program. Iran has always been working toward a nuclear weapon. We cannot afford to have a DNI Director who gets its wrong, and can’t admit she is wrong. See video below 👇🏻

Laura Loomer

489,203 次观看 • 1 年前

When I worked in the White House in 2022, my dad called me and said, “Talk to the man you work for because I can’t fill up my truck.” That man is still saying that today!! So when we talk about Iran, yes, the missiles matter. The nuclear threat matters. The wider regional conflict matters. But that is not how most Americans process this. And in moments like this, the president needs to be a clear communicator. Right now, he is not.

When I worked in the White House in 2022, my dad called me and said, “Talk to the man you work for because I can’t fill up my truck.” That man is still saying that today!! So when we talk about Iran, yes, the missiles matter. The nuclear threat matters. The wider regional conflict matters. But that is not how most Americans process this. And in moments like this, the president needs to be a clear communicator. Right now, he is not.

Yemisi Egbewole

18,184 次观看 • 1 个月前

This isn’t abstract. This is about stopping the deadly Iranian regime before it’s too late. I lay out exactly what we’re dealing with—a regime that has spent decades slaughtering its own people, exporting terrorism, and targeting innocent lives across the region. A regime that has openly threatened the United States and Israel—and is actively pursuing nuclear weapons. So the question is simple: if you know what they intend to do—and they’ve told you—do you wait? This is about preventative action, not aggression. When a regime is responsible for mass death, terror, and instability across places like Lebanon, Yemen, Gaza, and Iraq, and is racing toward nuclear capability, the cost of inaction becomes unthinkable. If you can stop it—if you can prevent even greater destruction—shouldn’t you? To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

This isn’t abstract. This is about stopping the deadly Iranian regime before it’s too late. I lay out exactly what we’re dealing with—a regime that has spent decades slaughtering its own people, exporting terrorism, and targeting innocent lives across the region. A regime that has openly threatened the United States and Israel—and is actively pursuing nuclear weapons. So the question is simple: if you know what they intend to do—and they’ve told you—do you wait? This is about preventative action, not aggression. When a regime is responsible for mass death, terror, and instability across places like Lebanon, Yemen, Gaza, and Iraq, and is racing toward nuclear capability, the cost of inaction becomes unthinkable. If you can stop it—if you can prevent even greater destruction—shouldn’t you? To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

113,354 次观看 • 3 个月前

🇺🇸 INTERVIEW: “THE IDEA THAT AMERICA IS UNTOUCHABLE IS A MYTH” U.S. Army Colonel Daniel Davis Deep Dive , Defense Analyst “It’s always been a myth. In the past, the Atlantic and Pacific oceans provided a sense of protection. But once nuclear weapons became widespread, that illusion vanished. The ocean protects you from ships, not ballistic missiles. There’s no defense against a barrage of intercontinental ballistic missiles, not even the older ones. Forget about the new ones. If we ever did develop the technology for a perfect missile shield, China and Russia would see it as an existential threat and act before we finished it. That wouldn’t make us safer. It would make the world even more dangerous.”

🇺🇸 INTERVIEW: “THE IDEA THAT AMERICA IS UNTOUCHABLE IS A MYTH” U.S. Army Colonel Daniel Davis Deep Dive , Defense Analyst “It’s always been a myth. In the past, the Atlantic and Pacific oceans provided a sense of protection. But once nuclear weapons became widespread, that illusion vanished. The ocean protects you from ships, not ballistic missiles. There’s no defense against a barrage of intercontinental ballistic missiles, not even the older ones. Forget about the new ones. If we ever did develop the technology for a perfect missile shield, China and Russia would see it as an existential threat and act before we finished it. That wouldn’t make us safer. It would make the world even more dangerous.”

Mario Nawfal

35,696 次观看 • 9 个月前

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte PRAISES President Trump for decisive action in Iran, calling it “CRUCIAL” for the entire world if reports that Iran can strike as far as Diego Garcia are confirmed. RUTTE: “We are looking into that. But if this would be true, it is the more evidence what the president is doing here, taking out the ballistic missile capability, taking out the nuclear capability from Iran, is crucial.” “And exactly as the ambassador just said, Ambassador Waltz, we have seen with North Korea if we negotiate for too long, you might pass the moment when you can still get things done and North Korea now has the nuclear capability.” “If Iran would have the nuclear capability including together with missile capability, it would be a direct threat to Israel and to the region and to Europe and to the stability in the world.” “So the president doing this is crucial.” “And I have seen the polling. But I really hope the American people will be with him because he is doing this to make the whole world safer.”

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte PRAISES President Trump for decisive action in Iran, calling it “CRUCIAL” for the entire world if reports that Iran can strike as far as Diego Garcia are confirmed. RUTTE: “We are looking into that. But if this would be true, it is the more evidence what the president is doing here, taking out the ballistic missile capability, taking out the nuclear capability from Iran, is crucial.” “And exactly as the ambassador just said, Ambassador Waltz, we have seen with North Korea if we negotiate for too long, you might pass the moment when you can still get things done and North Korea now has the nuclear capability.” “If Iran would have the nuclear capability including together with missile capability, it would be a direct threat to Israel and to the region and to Europe and to the stability in the world.” “So the president doing this is crucial.” “And I have seen the polling. But I really hope the American people will be with him because he is doing this to make the whole world safer.”

Overton

49,983 次观看 • 4 个月前