Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

If the Texas hit on Arizona State isn’t targeting then targeting doesn’t exist.

229,933 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Mike McCabe's profile picture
Mike McCabe1 year ago

The refs were consistent, didn’t call this one either

Brandon Ethridge's profile picture
Brandon Ethridge1 year ago

Completely can see your point, but when I watch it from the play start, it appears to me he ran upgright and through the guy. Textbook tackle. AU fan here, but that is how it looked to me.

College Shirt Clubs by The Fan Stop's profile picture
College Shirt Clubs by The Fan Stop2 years ago

Arizona Wildcats Shirt of the Month Get new officially-licensed Arizona Wildcats T-shirts, long-sleeves & hoodies monthly

Dan Keller's profile picture
Dan Keller1 year ago

Head was up, didn’t lower the crown. NOT TARGETING

Nick Ladd's profile picture
Nick Ladd1 year ago

Tackled with his head up, didn’t lower his head and lead with crown not targeting

Trey Day 🤘's profile picture
Trey Day 🤘1 year ago

Too bad Clay wasn’t so upset about this one but I guess you have to actually win a CFP game for targeting calls to matter.

Rufio's profile picture
Rufio1 year ago

You’re wrong.

Darrel Blakely's profile picture
Darrel Blakely1 year ago

He did none of these.

Tennessee Bourbon's profile picture
Tennessee Bourbon1 year ago

Face mask to face mask, feet on ground, no crouch, no explosion. Text book tackle with incidental contact. Now explain away the hit on the TX WR on the INT that included all of the above

FaintnGoat's profile picture
FaintnGoat1 year ago

If the guy doesn’t get knocked out they don’t give it a second look. It was results oriented. Not even close to targeting.

Related Videos