If the Texas hit on Arizona State isn’t targeting then targeting doesn’t exist.

The refs were consistent, didn’t call this one either

Completely can see your point, but when I watch it from the play start, it appears to me he ran upgright and through the guy. Textbook tackle. AU fan here, but that is how it looked to me.

Arizona Wildcats Shirt of the Month Get new officially-licensed Arizona Wildcats T-shirts, long-sleeves & hoodies monthly

Head was up, didn’t lower the crown. NOT TARGETING

Tackled with his head up, didn’t lower his head and lead with crown not targeting

Too bad Clay wasn’t so upset about this one but I guess you have to actually win a CFP game for targeting calls to matter.

You’re wrong.

He did none of these.

Face mask to face mask, feet on ground, no crouch, no explosion. Text book tackle with incidental contact. Now explain away the hit on the TX WR on the INT that included all of the above

If the guy doesn’t get knocked out they don’t give it a second look. It was results oriented. Not even close to targeting.