Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

⚡️ 🎥 If they don't uphold their commitments in dialogue, we are ready for war / We consider the recent events in the Persian Gulf a violation of the ceasefire. Qalibaf in a televised interview with the people: 🔹 We consider the events happening these nights in the Persian... Gulf a violation of the understanding to end the war, and we will certainly react to it. In the latest ceasefire violation, US bases in Bahrain and Kuwait were targeted. 🔹 This process shows that we are insistent on implementing the agreement; we are currently in dialogue, and if they do not uphold their commitments in dialogue, we are ready for war. 🔹 The situation in Lebanon is different because the Zionist regime militarily occupies a part of southern Lebanon, and military clashes there have intensified. However, you saw that after the signing of the agreement, attacks in southern Lebanon significantly decreased. 🔹 In the realm of diplomacy, we are also pursuing dialogues to achieve the five conditions that should have been implemented immediately after the signing of the agreement or whose implementation process should have begun.show more

Middle East Observer

375,791 subscribers

15,313 views • 14 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

⚡️BREAKING Iran's Ghalibaf on the Possibility of the Americans violating the recent Deal: "In the latest ceasefire violation, American bases in Bahrain and Kuwait were struck This process shows that we are Serious about implementing the Memorandum of Understanding If they do not want to fulfill their commitments, we are ready for War"

⚡️BREAKING Iran's Ghalibaf on the Possibility of the Americans violating the recent Deal: "In the latest ceasefire violation, American bases in Bahrain and Kuwait were struck This process shows that we are Serious about implementing the Memorandum of Understanding If they do not want to fulfill their commitments, we are ready for War"

Iran Observer

125,893 views • 14 days ago

Iran’s MFA spokesman: Lebanon, and ending the war in Lebanon, is an inseparable part of the MoU to end the war. We have shown in the past that we are determined in this. Ending the war and the ceasefire in Lebanon were part of the ceasefire of April 8, and in practice we proved that we are serious about this. We will certainly monitor developments carefully, and wherever necessary, we will use all our tools to ensure that the other sides fulfill their commitments.

Iran’s MFA spokesman: Lebanon, and ending the war in Lebanon, is an inseparable part of the MoU to end the war. We have shown in the past that we are determined in this. Ending the war and the ceasefire in Lebanon were part of the ceasefire of April 8, and in practice we proved that we are serious about this. We will certainly monitor developments carefully, and wherever necessary, we will use all our tools to ensure that the other sides fulfill their commitments.

Arya Yadeghaar (Backup)

23,736 views • 29 days ago

⚡️ 🎦 Netanyahu: We will do whatever we want in Lebanon 🔹After the agreement between the Zionist regime and Lebanon, the prime minister of the Zionist regime spoke with a boastful tone about Tel Aviv's freedom of action to violate the territory of this Arab country. 🔹"If we need to enter Lebanon, we will enter Lebanon. If we need to act there with crushing force, we will do so."

⚡️ 🎦 Netanyahu: We will do whatever we want in Lebanon 🔹After the agreement between the Zionist regime and Lebanon, the prime minister of the Zionist regime spoke with a boastful tone about Tel Aviv's freedom of action to violate the territory of this Arab country. 🔹"If we need to enter Lebanon, we will enter Lebanon. If we need to act there with crushing force, we will do so."

Middle East Observer

19,008 views • 17 days ago

Pezeshkijan: What kind of negotiations are these where we have to adhere to obligations, but they do not? The President of Iran at a meeting with a group of anti-war activists in New York: 🔹"We were in the middle of negotiations when the Israeli regime attacked our country. 🔹When the nuclear agreement (JCPOA) was signed, the Islamic Republic of Iran respected it; who is the one that tore up the agreement? 🔹What kind of negotiations are these where we have to fulfill our obligations, but they do not fulfill theirs?"

Pezeshkijan: What kind of negotiations are these where we have to adhere to obligations, but they do not? The President of Iran at a meeting with a group of anti-war activists in New York: 🔹"We were in the middle of negotiations when the Israeli regime attacked our country. 🔹When the nuclear agreement (JCPOA) was signed, the Islamic Republic of Iran respected it; who is the one that tore up the agreement? 🔹What kind of negotiations are these where we have to fulfill our obligations, but they do not fulfill theirs?"

Sprinter Press News

37,701 views • 9 months ago

🇮🇷 Araghchi: If we had not resisted in the 12-day war, a stain of shame would have remained forever in Iran's history that Iran easily surrenders. 🔹Those (Trump) who tweeted about "unconditional surrender" on the 3rd day of the war sent the message "unconditional ceasefire" on the 12th day, because we stood firm. 🔹Even now, the enemy's military formation does not scare us; we are people of diplomacy and also people of war.

🇮🇷 Araghchi: If we had not resisted in the 12-day war, a stain of shame would have remained forever in Iran's history that Iran easily surrenders. 🔹Those (Trump) who tweeted about "unconditional surrender" on the 3rd day of the war sent the message "unconditional ceasefire" on the 12th day, because we stood firm. 🔹Even now, the enemy's military formation does not scare us; we are people of diplomacy and also people of war.

Sprinter Press

55,311 views • 5 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Sec. Rubio on Iran: "If ships are moving, then that's what we are gonna react to. If the ships don't move, then that's a violation of the agreement, and we are gonna have a problem with it." That's right, when are you going to say something to Israel about the attacks in Lebanon? Iran has made it very clear that there must be peace in Lebanon for the MoU to be finalized. Writer: Samuel

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Sec. Rubio on Iran: "If ships are moving, then that's what we are gonna react to. If the ships don't move, then that's a violation of the agreement, and we are gonna have a problem with it." That's right, when are you going to say something to Israel about the attacks in Lebanon? Iran has made it very clear that there must be peace in Lebanon for the MoU to be finalized. Writer: Samuel

Mario Nawfal

122,725 views • 19 days ago

Interesting video from then Speaker of Parliament Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani in 1987, in response to a question from a foreign reporter about Iran closing the Strait of Hormoz after Kuwait asked the US Navy to get involved in the ongoing tanker war: "We never said we're just going to casually go and close the Strait of Hormoz. We would prefer the Strait of Hormoz is not closed. If the Strait of Hormoz is closed it causes us harm too. We will also suffer damage. We have always emphasized that we will close the Strait of Hormoz when the Persian Gulf cannot be used by us. If the Persian Gulf cannot be used by us then we will also make the Persian Gulf not usable for others. This is our policy. The people that have deprived us from that Gulf, they must also be deprived. And if we reach that day our threat is firm and we will close it, but we hope the world is wise enough not to bring that day and we consider it quite unlikely that day will happen."

Interesting video from then Speaker of Parliament Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani in 1987, in response to a question from a foreign reporter about Iran closing the Strait of Hormoz after Kuwait asked the US Navy to get involved in the ongoing tanker war: "We never said we're just going to casually go and close the Strait of Hormoz. We would prefer the Strait of Hormoz is not closed. If the Strait of Hormoz is closed it causes us harm too. We will also suffer damage. We have always emphasized that we will close the Strait of Hormoz when the Persian Gulf cannot be used by us. If the Persian Gulf cannot be used by us then we will also make the Persian Gulf not usable for others. This is our policy. The people that have deprived us from that Gulf, they must also be deprived. And if we reach that day our threat is firm and we will close it, but we hope the world is wise enough not to bring that day and we consider it quite unlikely that day will happen."

Alireza Talakoubnejad

22,341 views • 2 months ago

⭕️ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the Lebanon Agreement: 🔹“The most important point is that Israel will remain in the security zone in southern Lebanon. This is a major achievement, and we will maintain our presence there as long as Hezbollah is not disarmed and as long as there is a threat to the State of Israel.” 🔹”This is also a major blow to Iran. Iran has been trying to force us to withdraw from southern Lebanon through pressure. In effect, Israel, Lebanon, and the United States are telling them: this is none of your business. You have no role in Lebanon…” 🔹”We are allowing the Lebanese Army to begin deploying and taking control of territory. We are implementing two pilot zones, both recommended by the IDF: One is entirely outside the security zone, south of the Litani River, and the other is north of the Litani. A small part of that lies within the expanded security zone that we secured over the past two weeks, and which the IDF has made clear it no longer needs.” 🔹”We will continue to maintain the original security zone… We will not allow Hezbollah or civilians to enter it. That remains unchanged.” 🔹”Most importantly, Israel is making one thing clear: our security comes before everything else.”

⭕️ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the Lebanon Agreement: 🔹“The most important point is that Israel will remain in the security zone in southern Lebanon. This is a major achievement, and we will maintain our presence there as long as Hezbollah is not disarmed and as long as there is a threat to the State of Israel.” 🔹”This is also a major blow to Iran. Iran has been trying to force us to withdraw from southern Lebanon through pressure. In effect, Israel, Lebanon, and the United States are telling them: this is none of your business. You have no role in Lebanon…” 🔹”We are allowing the Lebanese Army to begin deploying and taking control of territory. We are implementing two pilot zones, both recommended by the IDF: One is entirely outside the security zone, south of the Litani River, and the other is north of the Litani. A small part of that lies within the expanded security zone that we secured over the past two weeks, and which the IDF has made clear it no longer needs.” 🔹”We will continue to maintain the original security zone… We will not allow Hezbollah or civilians to enter it. That remains unchanged.” 🔹”Most importantly, Israel is making one thing clear: our security comes before everything else.”

Drop Site

219,710 views • 18 days ago

#WATCH | Delhi: Dr Mohammad Fatahli, Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran to India, says, "...We, as Iran and India, have a common interest. And now, in these difficult times, we have good relations..." "In this (Islamabad) negotiation, they (the US) had unlawful demands. We have announced that if they accept our conditions, we are ready for negotiation. And also, we announced that we are ready for war." On the opening of the Strait of Hormuz, he says, "I think that it depends on the situation...Iran believes and is committed to international law and freedom of navigation. We announced that in the near future, we will provide the mechanism and announce it to all the countries..."

#WATCH | Delhi: Dr Mohammad Fatahli, Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran to India, says, "...We, as Iran and India, have a common interest. And now, in these difficult times, we have good relations..." "In this (Islamabad) negotiation, they (the US) had unlawful demands. We have announced that if they accept our conditions, we are ready for negotiation. And also, we announced that we are ready for war." On the opening of the Strait of Hormuz, he says, "I think that it depends on the situation...Iran believes and is committed to international law and freedom of navigation. We announced that in the near future, we will provide the mechanism and announce it to all the countries..."

ANI

65,475 views • 3 months ago

Iran’s FM Araghchi: "In our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and strength" If it is assumed that Iran has attacked its neighbors, that assumption is wrong; we have not attacked our neighbors. - We have targeted American bases and facilities that unfortunately are located in the territories of our neighboring countries. Therefore, we have not targeted our neighbors; we target the Americans who have attacked us. We are responding. We were not the ones who started the war; it was the United States that started the war against us, and we are simply defending ourselves. It is clear that our missiles do not reach American soil. What we can do is target American bases and facilities around us that unfortunately are located in the territories of neighboring countries. - First, in our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and strength. Second, he apologized to the people of the region for the problems caused as a result of the US aggression and our response. In fact, it is the President of the United States who should apologize to the people of the region and to the people of Iran for the killings and destruction they have caused.

Iran’s FM Araghchi: "In our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and strength" If it is assumed that Iran has attacked its neighbors, that assumption is wrong; we have not attacked our neighbors. - We have targeted American bases and facilities that unfortunately are located in the territories of our neighboring countries. Therefore, we have not targeted our neighbors; we target the Americans who have attacked us. We are responding. We were not the ones who started the war; it was the United States that started the war against us, and we are simply defending ourselves. It is clear that our missiles do not reach American soil. What we can do is target American bases and facilities around us that unfortunately are located in the territories of neighboring countries. - First, in our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and strength. Second, he apologized to the people of the region for the problems caused as a result of the US aggression and our response. In fact, it is the President of the United States who should apologize to the people of the region and to the people of Iran for the killings and destruction they have caused.

True Promise - الوعد الصادق ✪🇮🇷

19,518 views • 4 months ago

⚡️ 🎦 We are your comrades in Lebanon, we sacrifice our lives for Iran 🔹 The people of Rezvanshahr did not forget the people of Lebanon in tonight's gatherings

⚡️ 🎦 We are your comrades in Lebanon, we sacrifice our lives for Iran 🔹 The people of Rezvanshahr did not forget the people of Lebanon in tonight's gatherings

Middle East Observer

19,011 views • 3 months ago

🇮🇷🇱🇧 Baha'is: We still emphasize that a ceasefire in Lebanon is an integral part of any final agreement to end the war.

🇮🇷🇱🇧 Baha'is: We still emphasize that a ceasefire in Lebanon is an integral part of any final agreement to end the war.

Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸

74,926 views • 1 month ago

🇮🇷🇺🇸⚡️– Iranian FM Araqchi on wether it is a mistake to attack neighbouring countries and Iranian President apologozing: "We have targeted American bases and facilities, which are unfortunately located in the soil of our neighboring countries. So we have not targeted our neighbors; we are targeting Americans who have attacked us. We are responding. It was not us who started the war; it was America that started the war against us and we are simply defending ourselves. Firstly, in our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and power. Secondly, they apologized to the people of the region for the problems that have been created as a result of America's aggression and our response. In fact, it is the President of the United States who should apologize to the people of the region and to the people of Iran for the massacres and destruction they have caused."

🇮🇷🇺🇸⚡️– Iranian FM Araqchi on wether it is a mistake to attack neighbouring countries and Iranian President apologozing: "We have targeted American bases and facilities, which are unfortunately located in the soil of our neighboring countries. So we have not targeted our neighbors; we are targeting Americans who have attacked us. We are responding. It was not us who started the war; it was America that started the war against us and we are simply defending ourselves. Firstly, in our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and power. Secondly, they apologized to the people of the region for the problems that have been created as a result of America's aggression and our response. In fact, it is the President of the United States who should apologize to the people of the region and to the people of Iran for the massacres and destruction they have caused."

MonitorX

24,541 views • 4 months ago

Residents of southern Lebanon expressed scepticism that hostilities would end after the US and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding to end the war. Israeli officials said they are in talks with the US over continuing Israel’s deployment in southern Lebanon.

Residents of southern Lebanon expressed scepticism that hostilities would end after the US and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding to end the war. Israeli officials said they are in talks with the US over continuing Israel’s deployment in southern Lebanon.

Al Jazeera English

13,945 views • 26 days ago

🚨BREAKING: ZELENSKYY - "COALITION OF THE WILLING", WILL ONLY SEND IT'S CONTINGENT AFTER A CEASEFIRE OR THE END OF THE WAR Q: Which countries are ready to send their contingents to Ukraine - France, Britain, Germany, Austria, or others? "Regarding the protection contingent in the sky, at sea, and on land, as I mentioned, we have agreements with partners. Some small details remain. In principle, we have the coalition framework, but signing it and deploying any personnel or resources will only happen after a ceasefire. The "Coalition of the Willing", will only begin operating at the moment of ceasefire, - either a ceasefire or the end of the war. All details about which countries and what they're ready for, are there (in the agreement). As I've already said, 30 countries are in our Coalition of the Willing. Details will come later", - Zelenskyy said to the journalist on Fri, Dec 26, 2025

🚨BREAKING: ZELENSKYY - "COALITION OF THE WILLING", WILL ONLY SEND IT'S CONTINGENT AFTER A CEASEFIRE OR THE END OF THE WAR Q: Which countries are ready to send their contingents to Ukraine - France, Britain, Germany, Austria, or others? "Regarding the protection contingent in the sky, at sea, and on land, as I mentioned, we have agreements with partners. Some small details remain. In principle, we have the coalition framework, but signing it and deploying any personnel or resources will only happen after a ceasefire. The "Coalition of the Willing", will only begin operating at the moment of ceasefire, - either a ceasefire or the end of the war. All details about which countries and what they're ready for, are there (in the agreement). As I've already said, 30 countries are in our Coalition of the Willing. Details will come later", - Zelenskyy said to the journalist on Fri, Dec 26, 2025

Kateryna Lisunova

24,995 views • 6 months ago

⚡️ 🎦 Qalibaf: Before the Islamabad negotiations, we announced that the issue of Lebanon and the release of blocked funds should be the focus of the talks. 🔹When I saw Vance's statements about Lebanon as he was boarding the plane, I tweeted before the flight and at the airport that we would not start negotiations until the situation in Lebanon was clear. 🔹When we arrived in Pakistan, we discussed Lebanon for two and ahalf hours with Asim Munir and the Pakistani Foreign Minister as mediators. Later, I learned that Vance had also discussed Lebanon for almost the same amount of time after arriving at the airport. Before the negotiations began, Asim Munir told me that they had spoken with Vance about Lebanon, and in the trilateral meeting, the issue of Lebanon was raised at the outset. Ultimately, Vance accepted our position. 🔹Now, based on the memorandum of understanding, clauses 4, 5, 10, and 11, and now I emphasize clause 1, must be prioritized for implementation before we proceed to the other clauses of the memorandum.

⚡️ 🎦 Qalibaf: Before the Islamabad negotiations, we announced that the issue of Lebanon and the release of blocked funds should be the focus of the talks. 🔹When I saw Vance's statements about Lebanon as he was boarding the plane, I tweeted before the flight and at the airport that we would not start negotiations until the situation in Lebanon was clear. 🔹When we arrived in Pakistan, we discussed Lebanon for two and ahalf hours with Asim Munir and the Pakistani Foreign Minister as mediators. Later, I learned that Vance had also discussed Lebanon for almost the same amount of time after arriving at the airport. Before the negotiations began, Asim Munir told me that they had spoken with Vance about Lebanon, and in the trilateral meeting, the issue of Lebanon was raised at the outset. Ultimately, Vance accepted our position. 🔹Now, based on the memorandum of understanding, clauses 4, 5, 10, and 11, and now I emphasize clause 1, must be prioritized for implementation before we proceed to the other clauses of the memorandum.

Middle East Observer

15,285 views • 27 days ago

Most important takeaway from Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf’s interview with State TV, “We made progress in the Islamabad negotiations, but the gaps are wide and some fundamental points remain.” MBG covered several topics in what could be described as a message before a turning point, tone was explanatory, less rhetorical, carried both political and strategic messages. Here are points I found interesting: 📌 It is clear that the enemy was defeated, but this is different from saying that we destroyed their army. When the enemy does not achieve its goals, it means it has been defeated 📌The enemy intended to bring counter-revolutionaries into the country from our western and eastern borders to create chaos inside, but it did not succeed and was defeated. 📌All the enemy's effort was to impose their demands on us, and it is important that we assert our rights; therefore, negotiation is a method of struggle here. 📌Securing the nation's rights must be our main goal, and rest assured that there will be no surrender in the diplomatic arena. 📌I emphasize that we have always sought to normalize transit through the Strait of Hormuz and still do; if it has stopped now, it is because the ceasefire was not fully established in Lebanon. 📌If we were negotiating with the US at the time Trump said so, then why were there so many ultimatums? Why were they threatening to strike our infrastructure? 📌 We did not conduct any negotiations until 48 hours before the ceasefire. Trump is a master of lying and psychological warfare. Yesterday he posted 8 tweets, 7 of which were lies. 📌 Our negotiations began on Saturday when we arrived in Pakistan, and before that, only in the last 48 hours of the war leading to the ceasefire, messages were exchanged through Pakistan. 📌Our approach was that our entry into the 10-point negotiation framework would be when the Lebanon ceasefire was established and Iran's frozen assets were released. 📌Basically, our first meeting with Mr. Asim Munir as a mediator lasted 2 hours and 15 minutes in Islamabad, focusing on the Lebanon ceasefire. His first meeting with the Americans was also on this subject. From there, we saw their efforts to pursue the ceasefire begin, and they implemented the ceasefire incompletely. 📌Currently, we also have disagreements on several issues related to the nuclear matter and the Strait of Hormuz. Of course, the essence of negotiation is for understanding, but we have our principles. 📌The Zionist regime and America have constantly had a cycle of war - ceasefire - peace, and this cycle must be broken, and sustainable peace must be established with guarantees that war will not happen again. 📌We have reached conclusions on some issues, but not on others, and other proposals have been made; we are still far from a final discussion. 📌We insist on some issues which are non-negotiable for us, and their number is one or two, and the other side also has similar points. 📌In summary, we made progress in the Islamabad negotiations, but the gaps are wide and some fundamental points remain. 📌We have tried to follow the experiences of past periods and the distrust towards the U.S., and (in case of agreement) our policy will also be step-by-step action; it should not be that we fulfill our commitments but they do not; in case of agreement, we take one step and they must also take one step.

Most important takeaway from Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf’s interview with State TV, “We made progress in the Islamabad negotiations, but the gaps are wide and some fundamental points remain.” MBG covered several topics in what could be described as a message before a turning point, tone was explanatory, less rhetorical, carried both political and strategic messages. Here are points I found interesting: 📌 It is clear that the enemy was defeated, but this is different from saying that we destroyed their army. When the enemy does not achieve its goals, it means it has been defeated 📌The enemy intended to bring counter-revolutionaries into the country from our western and eastern borders to create chaos inside, but it did not succeed and was defeated. 📌All the enemy's effort was to impose their demands on us, and it is important that we assert our rights; therefore, negotiation is a method of struggle here. 📌Securing the nation's rights must be our main goal, and rest assured that there will be no surrender in the diplomatic arena. 📌I emphasize that we have always sought to normalize transit through the Strait of Hormuz and still do; if it has stopped now, it is because the ceasefire was not fully established in Lebanon. 📌If we were negotiating with the US at the time Trump said so, then why were there so many ultimatums? Why were they threatening to strike our infrastructure? 📌 We did not conduct any negotiations until 48 hours before the ceasefire. Trump is a master of lying and psychological warfare. Yesterday he posted 8 tweets, 7 of which were lies. 📌 Our negotiations began on Saturday when we arrived in Pakistan, and before that, only in the last 48 hours of the war leading to the ceasefire, messages were exchanged through Pakistan. 📌Our approach was that our entry into the 10-point negotiation framework would be when the Lebanon ceasefire was established and Iran's frozen assets were released. 📌Basically, our first meeting with Mr. Asim Munir as a mediator lasted 2 hours and 15 minutes in Islamabad, focusing on the Lebanon ceasefire. His first meeting with the Americans was also on this subject. From there, we saw their efforts to pursue the ceasefire begin, and they implemented the ceasefire incompletely. 📌Currently, we also have disagreements on several issues related to the nuclear matter and the Strait of Hormuz. Of course, the essence of negotiation is for understanding, but we have our principles. 📌The Zionist regime and America have constantly had a cycle of war - ceasefire - peace, and this cycle must be broken, and sustainable peace must be established with guarantees that war will not happen again. 📌We have reached conclusions on some issues, but not on others, and other proposals have been made; we are still far from a final discussion. 📌We insist on some issues which are non-negotiable for us, and their number is one or two, and the other side also has similar points. 📌In summary, we made progress in the Islamabad negotiations, but the gaps are wide and some fundamental points remain. 📌We have tried to follow the experiences of past periods and the distrust towards the U.S., and (in case of agreement) our policy will also be step-by-step action; it should not be that we fulfill our commitments but they do not; in case of agreement, we take one step and they must also take one step.

Ali Hashem علي هاشم

160,911 views • 2 months ago