Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

If this doesn't get your attention, your brain may not be working... Ben Davidson SpaceWeatherNews - Another Update On How The Galactic Current Sheet Is Impacting Our Solar System (September 4, 2026) See also: Ben Davidson On The Galactic Current Sheet (& Related Topics) What Happens When The Galactic...

12,221 просмотров • 16 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля PeterSticks
PeterSticks16 дней назад

@SunWeatherMan How high do we need to be?

Фото профиля David Sunfellow
David Sunfellow16 дней назад

@SunWeatherMan Depends on if a pole shift is headed our way or not -- and if it is, how intense it will be. Depends where you live. Depends on a lot of things. FYI: Global Disaster Stories, Maps & Resources

Фото профиля PeterSticks
PeterSticks16 дней назад

@SunWeatherMan This is amazing!! Thank you for putting this together!!!

Фото профиля Grey the beard
Grey the beard16 дней назад

@SunWeatherMan My property in the Ozarks is only 670 feet above sea level. I need an ark or something.

Фото профиля David Sunfellow
David Sunfellow16 дней назад

Maybe you need "an ark or something". Here you go... Roger Cunningham: Survival Crafts & Structures "If you positioned yourself with the right craft in the right ocean, you could end up with a survival formula. But you're going to have to be under the surface. The the surface keelboat that that was the ark in the Bible -- you know, those fanciful pictures of a keel boat, they've got the keel running down on on the stern and across the bottom and then up the bow and then all the animals are on the boat -- that wouldn't last one hour. That wouldn't last one hour in the in this scenario. A keel boat has too many hogging and rolling and sheer moments to survive." "A fixed platform is a roll of the dice because it depends on what the ocean displaces. My thought is that you should probably displace with the ocean because it's the hit that you take from the ocean that is the danger element. If you displace with the ocean then you accelerate with about the acceleration of an airliner sitting in an airplane seat. So it's not an acceleration to you experientially. And then you decelerate at that same rate as well. So it's somewhat of a gentler ride. And as long as that ocean that you're in, that particular segment of ocean that you're in doesn't happen to hit a mountain, then you're then you're going to be okay. But you're going to have to have a craft that is under the surface of the water. Not necessarily 400 feet down or a thousand feet down because you don't want to be too too near the bottom. But you do need to be out of what is called the surface effects of the ocean, the sea state of the ocean . . . And these waves would be 4 to 800 feet. So you'd need to be a little bit under the surface in what would be rightly termed a submarine. That's probably the most survivable craft. In fact, that's exactly what Utnapishtim survived in, in the epic of Gilgamesh. It was a very smart design. It was circular, radial, had ballast in the bottom, was four levels, and was equal on all sides. It was what I call a ballast bucket submarine. In other words, it kept the bottom of its craft down at all." "The second best place to survive is going to be somewhere above 2500 feet. Probably preferably more like 3,500 feet and under the ground . . . and place around you a fortification of stones that are well fitted together so that water cannot get in between the stones and force them apart. That's critical. So if you have a technology that allows you to take a large andesite or limestone stone and then meld it into the other stones around it so that the seam between them is paper thin or non-existent, that's the way to build a fortification wall at a high altitude. Inside that type of chamber -- which exists at Sacsayhuamán in Peru, that's near the Incan capital, the Incan Empire [and] Gunung Padang in Indonesia -- that's a construction of that nature. Those would be the second choice survival points. It's curious is that we see those two survival approaches in our mythology and our monuments. We have the tale of Utnapishtim developing that submarine and then we have the actual monuments themselves which are built to fortify whoever built them against a rather severe cataclysm."

Фото профиля Blank
Blank16 дней назад

@SunWeatherMan Still not sure what to do. Or if I want to try and survive. I am in the quake flood die zone now.

Фото профиля David Sunfellow
David Sunfellow16 дней назад

If a pole shift scenario becomes likely in our lifetime, we are all going to be faced with some very tough questions. Here's hoping you receive the answers you need so you and yours can pass through whatever changes come your way as gracefully as possible. And, in the meantime, you can live each day to the fullest.

Фото профиля Blank
Blank16 дней назад

@SunWeatherMan Thank you Always well thought out answers from you.

Фото профиля Cal
Cal16 дней назад

@SunWeatherMan There's 12.. you can only see tem

Похожие видео

Ben Davidson: The Two Main Differences Between His Pole Shift Scenario & The Ethical Skeptic's Excerpted from Observers Live #16 - Mountain Before You (streamed January 6, 2026) Upcoming conference featuring Ben Davidson SpaceWeatherNews and The Ethical Skeptic Ethical Skeptic ☀ Related Information: GROK, please compare The Ethical Skeptic’s ECDO hypothesis with Ben Davidson’s views on an imminent pole shift. Create a chart that lists where they agree and disagree. Excerpt: “In summary, they converge on an urgent, cyclic pole-related catastrophe rooted in core-mantle dynamics, backed by similar data, but split on the spark (Earth’s ‘hot core’ vs. Sun’s ‘micronova’). ECDO feels more Earth-centric and mechanics-focused, while Davidson’s is solar-systemic and electromagnetic. If either pans out, the overlaps mean shared prep advice: stock up, go high, and watch the poles…” View GROK’s chart and commentary here: The Ethical Skeptic Ethical Skeptic ☀ adds: “The core mechanics and micronova constructs are compatible. They each deal with separate elements in the same causal chain.” Source: Ben Davidson SpaceWeatherNews adds: “Wild how much we agree actually.” Source: Concerning GROK’s summary, Ben Davidson SpaceWeatherNews writes: “VERY CLOSE. Only thing it got wrong was that I say it’s 6000 years, with a multiplier harmonic at 12,000. Otherwise, accurate breakdown.” Source:

David Sunfellow

1,479,989 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Methuselah @EcdoPrep has created an interactive globe that illustrates ECDO evidence from around the world. That interactive globe is located here: His original YouTube introductory video is located here: His tweet introducing the new interactive globe is located here: To learn more about ECDO, go here: Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling - Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory (Ethical Skeptic ☀) Inversion — ECDO Theory (book) Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling - Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory Explained By AI Sam Dodson Explains The Master Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling – Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory (Green Eggs-n-Sam) Ben Davidson SpaceWeatherNews Provides Compelling Evidence Of Pole Shift Disaster Cycles Craig Stone's Eureka! Discovery: Groundtruth (The Earth Speaks) There Is Clear, Repeating Evidence In Both Fossils And Salt Deposits That Supports ECDO Theory The 3,000–5,000 BCE Y-DNA Culling Event Could Only Have Been Produced By A Global Cataclysm Unshattered Sands: Evidence Of A ~12,900-Year Cataclysmic Flood And Electrical Activity Driven By Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling Simple Summary of “Unshattered Sands” by Craig Stone (Craig Stone) Junho’s (Junho) Evidence Research Papers On The Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory So When, Exactly, Is The Pole Shift Going To Happen? Metronomes & Excursions: Current Evidence Suggests A Full Excursion Is Unlikely Stormy Patches Coming In The 2030s And 2040s... ECDO Moves From A Compelling But Speculative Framework Toward One With Robust, Modern Geodetic Support GEOSYNChronous Earth Rotation Monitoring System DRIFT Dashboard (Polar Motion Geometry And Context) Daily Pole-Step Bars From The Raw Earth Orientation Series Global Disaster Stories, Maps & Resources Wrong Conclusion, But Very Informative Video: The Dzhanibekov Effect Or Tennis Racket Theorem ECDOview - Ancient Site Alignment Verification Tool The Coming Pole Shift Ancient Civilizations & Earth Disaster Cycles Pole Shift Related Articles On X Scientists Who Believe The Earth Has Experienced Repeated, Sudden, Catastrophic Changes How To Still Storms & Walk On Water (Practical Advice For Dealing With Cataclysmic Scenarios)

David Sunfellow

14,707 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Using Grok build, now we were able to cross the magnetosphere data (from ACE and Solar-1 satellites) which shown the magnetic field lines of the Earth .... with the BOM (bureau of meteorology Australia) magnetopause feed ------ the BOM shows the standoff distance of the edge of the magnetosphere ----- the area called the "magnetopause". Now we get to see the buffeting blasts of solar wind and charged particles when they hit Earth (coming from the sun). This then perturbs the electromagnetic field lines of Earth shown by ACE and Solar-1 -- and that vibration is carried on down to the CORE OF THE EARTH! Also added in the ability to turn off Earth (transparent) so we can see inside Earth down to the calculations most people never even get to see -- and see it get vibrated , plucked like strings on a guitar! The BOM data, as well as the ACE, and Solar-1 data are all real time, and can be set to update every 1minute to every hour! The projected trail of the magnetic field around Earth is just an approximation, but it set to also vibrate along with the BOM data showing the magnetopause compression / expansion when strong solar winds, or large particle storms hit. Simply put, summed up, using Grok we were able to rebuild the old school Japanese NICT site, make it fully 3D interactive, and add in the BOM to make a new form of data observation where both the magnetopause, and magnetosphere data are combined into one, displayed on the same screen at the same time!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Both feeds can be toggled on / off so as to view one or the other as well if the user wishes! I will release this to the public for free along with the Solar and Earthquake programs very soon!

Dutchsinse

10,820 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Elon Musk: Everything is solar power. The rest is noise. “The sun is about 99.8% of the mass of the solar system. Jupiter's about 0.1% and everything else is in the remaining 0.1%, and we are much less than 0.1%. So, if you burnt all of the mass of the solar system, then the total energy produced by the sun would still round up to 100%. If you just burnt Earth, the whole planet, and burnt Jupiter, which is very big and quite challenging to burn, turn Jupiter into a thermonuclear reactor, the sun is 99.8% of the mass of the solar system and everything else is in the miscellaneous category. Basically, no matter what you do, total energy produced in our solar system rounds up to 100% from the sun. You could even throw another Jupiter in, so we're going to snag a Jupiter from somewhere else, you could teleport two more Jupiters into our solar system, burn them, and the sun would still round up to 100%. As long as you're at 99.6%, you're still rounding up to 100%. Maybe that gives some perspective of why solar is really the thing that matters. And, as soon as you start thinking about things at a grander scale, like Kardashev Scale 2 civilizations, it becomes very, very obvious. I'm not saying anything that's new, by the way. Anyone who studies physics has known this for a very long time. In fact, Kardashev, a Russian physicist who came up with this idea, I think, in the 1960s, just as a way to classify civilizations, where Kardashev Scale 1 would be, you've harnessed most of the energy of the planet, Kardashev Scale 2, you've harnessed most of the energy of your sun, Kardashev 3, you've harnessed most of the energy of a galaxy. Now we're only about 1% or a few percent of Kardashev Scale 1 right now, optimistically. But as soon as you go to Kardashev Scale 2, where you're talking about the power of the sun, then you're really just saying everything is solar power and the rest is in the noise. Like, the sun produces about a billion times, or call it well over a billion times more energy than everything on Earth combined.” All-In Podcast, October 31, 2025

ELON CLIPS

15,113,928 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад