'If this trial had collapsed because I, or anyone else, had revealed crucial details, then this vile individual would have walked away a free man.' Sir Keir Starmer defends his government's decision to withhold crucial information on Axel Rudakubana.

Misinformation, ay? Come and get me then, big boy. Nothing I have published or tweeted ahead of the trial has proved to be false. I honoured the contempt of court, which is why you didn't come to get me. I knew about failed attack on his old school back in September. I kept my mouth shut for the sake of your precious trial. I wish I hadn't. You needed to be exposed. Citizen journalists and counter-cultural commentators - shunnded media outlets like GBN - are a thorn in the Establishment's side but I for one am not going away! The UK contempt of court laws are not fit for purpose.

No judge in the UK would have let this monster walk free.. He was caught literally red handed. Stop fucking lying to the country you useless wanker.

Complete and utter nonsense. The evidence against Rudakubana was overwhelming and he had zero chance of being acquitted no matter what facts had been released. Starmer, Cooper & Kennedy lied in an attempt to hide the Islamist terror connection. The end.

So whilst you released picture after picture of the people who protested for the children this monster murdered. You plastered MSM with child pictures of this dirty murdering scum. This wasn't about protecting justice. This was a cover-up on a grand scale @Keir_Starmer

Hiding behind the law as usual. He could easily have prevented the protests by not inflaming tensions and calming down his own rhetoric. Calling angry citizens far right was the catalyst for the anger we still feel towards him in this country. He still won’t accept he got it wrong. Those who speculated online about it being a possible terror attack need to be released from prison now. Also we need to know where did he get the ricin and who else is connected to the Southport murderer? Still so much to be established.

It wasn't that though was it. He stood before the nation and told us it was not terror related then locked people up who said it was branding them all far-right thugs!

If any trial, where the perpetrator is obvious, with overwhelming evidence, can collapse because people are talking online, then there is something seriously wrong with the process itself. This individual was never walking free.

"When Frank Stein grew concerned for his elderly neighbor's safety, he called the police. But nothing prepared him for what was hidden behind her garage door.":

So if the perpetrator is guilty, admits their guilty, there are witnesses of the crime and substantial evidence but you and your merry men say something about the trial then the perpetrator walks free? well if that isn't a broken justice system then I don't know what is!

He's lying, the reason he didnt tell people the truth was because it would have justified the concerns that people have & then he would have had to admit he needed to address the problem. Not only did he lie, he made it worse by implying that the concerned public were the actual danger, he called them far-right and then went a step further by offering extra protection for muslims & mosques. He was responsible for causing all the unrest and violence that happened

Is there anybody left in the U.K. that believes a word Starmer says? I doubt it.