Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

If this turns out to be true and it can be proven with documentation, emails etc then it MUST be a resignation Issue. Rachel Reeves and the government claimed they had now choice but to bring in hefty tax rises due to a massive hole in public finances. It...

68,733 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

We now know the truth. Rachel Reeves spent the months leading up to the Budget claiming she would need to make difficult choices because of a downgrade in the economic forecasts that was not of her making. She even let it be known she was considering raising income tax rates. But as I pointed out in my letter to the Office for Budget Responsibility last week, Labour’s story did not add up. It was all a smokescreen. Labour knew all along that they did not need to raise taxes and break their promises. It was an active choice to do so, to fund a huge increase in welfare spending. The OBR have now made that very clear. It appears the country was deliberately misled to try to explain away Labour’s decision to spend billions more on welfare. Not only did the Chancellor let it be known that the OBR were forecasting lower productivity - forecasts which are meant to remain confidential until the Budget - but she failed to mention the fact that other changes to their forecasts “more than offset” the impact, in the OBR’s own words. As I raised in the House of Commons yesterday, and in my letter to the OBR, the briefings, the leaks and the Chancellor’s infamous ‘Cheerios’ press conference in Downing Street were totally unacceptable. I will also be following up my exchange of letters with the Treasury Permanent Secretary about the leaks and briefings. Some people may even have faced higher mortgage rates thanks to the impact on markets from Labour’s chaotic briefings. Rachel Reeves wanted us to believe she had no choice but to raise taxes on working people. But she did. She chose to raise taxes and break her manifesto so she could spend more on benefits. That’s the reality.

Mel Stride

192,072 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад