If UAP represent alien technology, we should be careful at downing them for both ethical and safety reasons. If their intention is benign, there is no reason to engage with them aggressively. Moreover, intelligent beings could retaliate and harm us after we engage in an offensive act. The wise... response to unrecognized visitors is to first figure out their intent and capabilities. This can be done passively by collecting data about them.show more

Maybe the most embarrassing first-contact story imaginable is: “We saw something vastly more advanced than us… so naturally, we tried to shoot it down.”

You should probably look into the claims of abductions. If that's actually going on, and the intelligence that we're encountering is tied to that...I say: Shoot 'em down.

The problem starts with the word "If"

Finally, some words of wisdom 👍The idea that we could shoot down beings capable of traveling at the speed of light using our own capabilities is incredibly arrogant

I agree, Professor. If we are dealing with genuinely unknown technology, firing first is both scientifically reckless and potentially dangerous. Observation, intent assessment and passive data collection should come before aggression. You don’t learn what an unknown intelligence is by destroying the evidence or turning a possible encounter into a hostile one unless, of course, governments already know far more than they publicly acknowledge and have developed a substantial taxonomy of these objects, their capabilities and perhaps even their intent. Food for thought!

Stop being disingenuous and team up with David Grusch to investigate the craft already retrieved. The wise response is to stop lying about what we have have already discovered. please

All of this is already known by the secret UFO program. We're not interested in starting from the beginning with you.

80 years ago, this would have been the correct response-but it's a little late now as everything you mentioned has already happened.

Yes. The incredible arrogance of being aggressive with no idea of what this would trigger is, well, stupid.

Agreed. We need to be mindful in our approach.

I can’t help it, but somehow this feels more like a real debate - or a serious appeal to the president - than a hypothetical speculation. 🤔

Exactly, Our Imeediate actions, and indeed all of our actions, represent our cumulative maturity as a species, they may not take the time to differentiate between Military and Everyone Else. -Dragon

😎👽

The Visitors are not the enemy! Do not listen to him. The Visitors are more scared of you. They watch how you treat your children of the earth. How you hate.

80 years and game theory says aliens already know we're dumb so a few more shouldn't mean war, maybe just sanctions. And to be honest, I am impressed with the patience of such visitors - we are hardly this patient with ourselves. Patience is a new signal of intelligence

We are not dealing with physical aliens from other galaxies; we are dealing with principalities and powers in heavenly places. The push to interact peacefully with these entities is an open door to demonic deception.

Leading with the big "if," when there's no reasonable evidence for it, is a weird approach to both policy and science.

I couldn't disagree more. Intelligent beings can put on their big-boy pants and explain to humanity what they're doing & why. Omly retarded beings do this cat & mouse thing that UAPs are doing. I'm over it. Shoot 'em down until they can be civil.

Agreed. Shoot first and ask questions later is a policy best avoided.

#UAPs ask #Grok #AI: Humans are the only animals (other than ants) which exhibit "insect-like" tendencies to form aggressive war groups numbering in the thousands. Why is that?

they will let it crash, some of the stuff is alive but not in the way we understand

Australia will open your eyes.

Watch anyone catch a spider in a jar instead of stamping on it. That instinct, don't destroy what you don't understand, is the same one this fear points at. If something out there is genuinely more advanced, it did not get here by being reckless. Firing first tells you far more about the shooter than the visitor, and it forecloses the one thing worth having, which is finding out what they actually want…. Patience here is not weakness. Watching, listening, waiting to see intent, that is what a mind does when it already knows it is not the strongest thing in the room and has decided to act wisely anyway.

⭐ Been There, Done That: United States Air Force, 1952: ⭐

Con subtítulos en español Para subtítulos/traducciones, etiqueta @TranslateMom + idioma. Para descargar videos, etiqueta también @TranslateMom. La app TranslateMom ya está en iPhone.

Your intention is benign. You aren't telling the truth that I came forward needing help with Pentagon RF jamming my device. I don't understand why you continue to grift knowing that you know that a human (me) has alien tech & needs to speak with government officials. You scam

They'd be impervious.

Simply the wrong approach

Why are we acting like Iike its 1950 again? We're past the play nice to them stage. Grusch and others have said we've captured live creatures, not welcomed them. Some are good, some not. Get that info out to people, accept it, and progress. Avi is rehashing old news.

Great! Since PURSUE is able to take whistleblower statements and allow them to violate their NDA we expect you and your team to interview Grush, Lue, Lakatski, Putoff and then tell us what they said. What are you waiting for? AARO?

see where our ai algorithm leads if we don't like it quit feeding it, until we care that the aliens are users as well this whole monetary thing becomes distorted and unaligned, in other words read the reality stabilize it and find out more, especially about THEM period.

Totally agree with that!

Don’t you think kidnapping people and doing things without permission needs to stop,or are we without any rights in any world.