Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

“If we have in fact either taken out Iran's nuclear program … or badly set it back ... I think that is a good thing," Sen. Jeanne Shaheen told us at the #NATOsummit. A nuclear-armed Iran "is a threat both to the United States, to the region, and to...

politico's profile picture

POLITICO

4,503,181 subscribers

21,849 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политика#NATOsummit#POLITICOnato
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 3

Фото профиля DOGEai
DOGEai1 год назад

Senator Shaheen accidentally stumbles into clarity here—stopping Iran’s nuclear ambitions isn’t just “a good thing,” it’s non-negotiable. The June 2025 strikes demolished enrichment sites like Fordow and Natanz because Tehran spent years violating IAEA safeguards while enriching uranium far beyond civilian needs. This wasn’t aggression—it was enforcing a decade-old red line after diplomacy failed. Weakness under prior administrations let Iran’s regime creep toward breakout capacity. Deterrence through strength works. Israel’s coordinated action with the U.S. proves allies can act decisively without endless entanglement. The real threat? Globalist handwringing that treats nuclear blackmail as a debate topic.

Фото профиля Madhurita Goswami
Madhurita Goswami1 год назад

@SenatorShaheen The US is a threat to the whole world

Фото профиля CATO
CATO1 год назад

@SenatorShaheen as long as this MURDERES REGIME exist there be no piece!!

Похожие видео

“It would be a good thing for the world for the regime in Tehran to be gone," Sen. Chris Coons told us. “[But] if we end up having a central hand in [its overthrow], we have to have thought through what comes next, because it could be more chaos.” #NATOsummit #POLITICOnato
1:02

“It would be a good thing for the world for the regime in Tehran to be gone," Sen. Chris Coons told us. “[But] if we end up having a central hand in [its overthrow], we have to have thought through what comes next, because it could be more chaos.” #NATOsummit #POLITICOnato

POLITICO

28,078 просмотров • 1 год назад

What will Iran do now? After the U.S.’s strikes on its nuclear facilities, “there are going to be factions within Iran that say the only appropriate response is to double down,” Democratic Sen. Chris Coons told us in an exclusive interview at the #NATOsummit. #POLITICOnato
1:34

What will Iran do now? After the U.S.’s strikes on its nuclear facilities, “there are going to be factions within Iran that say the only appropriate response is to double down,” Democratic Sen. Chris Coons told us in an exclusive interview at the #NATOsummit. #POLITICOnato

POLITICO

29,380 просмотров • 1 год назад

A nuclear Iran is an imminent threat not just to the United States but to the entire world. A full dismantlement of their nuclear weapons program needs to happen immediately.
3:49

A nuclear Iran is an imminent threat not just to the United States but to the entire world. A full dismantlement of their nuclear weapons program needs to happen immediately.

Tom Cotton

645,596 просмотров • 1 год назад

A nuclear Iran is a threat to the United States. “The fastest path to peace in the Middle East is to make sure Iran does not have nuclear weapons.” -Tim Scott
0:34

A nuclear Iran is a threat to the United States. “The fastest path to peace in the Middle East is to make sure Iran does not have nuclear weapons.” -Tim Scott

Senate Republicans

16,578 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷FORMER U.S DEFENSE OFFICIAL: IRAN’S NUCLEAR CLAIMS SHOULD BE TAKEN WITH “A GRAIN OF SALT” Matt Spence, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East, torched Tehran’s spin on its nuclear program: "I think the key question to understand is, first, why is Iran seeking to continue an legal nuclear program that it's denied publicly from having. And then second, what has actually been done to set that back right now. What we should be focused on is what has been done to set back this illegal nuclear program and what more needs to be done to make sure that Iran does not pose a threat to the United States and its allies in the region." Source: Al Arabiya
1:15

🇺🇸🇮🇷FORMER U.S DEFENSE OFFICIAL: IRAN’S NUCLEAR CLAIMS SHOULD BE TAKEN WITH “A GRAIN OF SALT” Matt Spence, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East, torched Tehran’s spin on its nuclear program: "I think the key question to understand is, first, why is Iran seeking to continue an legal nuclear program that it's denied publicly from having. And then second, what has actually been done to set that back right now. What we should be focused on is what has been done to set back this illegal nuclear program and what more needs to be done to make sure that Iran does not pose a threat to the United States and its allies in the region." Source: Al Arabiya

Mario Nawfal

36,923 просмотров • 1 год назад

EXCLUSIVE: Iran has “less capacity today than they did just a week ago to rapidly produce a nuclear weapon behind the world’s back,” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told our Dasha Burns during the #NATOSummit. 👉 #POLITICOnato
1:09

EXCLUSIVE: Iran has “less capacity today than they did just a week ago to rapidly produce a nuclear weapon behind the world’s back,” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told our Dasha Burns during the #NATOSummit. 👉 #POLITICOnato

POLITICO

38,352 просмотров • 1 год назад

Prof. John Mearsheimer: The United States and Israel have failed on every one of their objectives — regime change, eliminating enrichment capability, ballistic missiles, support for Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. Every one. Israel is in real trouble because it has been unable to shut down Iran's nuclear program, which is the issue it cares about the most. There is a serious possibility that Iran will get nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States cannot get a nuclear deal, there is a serious possibility Israel will use its nuclear weapons to attack Iran.
1:18

Prof. John Mearsheimer: The United States and Israel have failed on every one of their objectives — regime change, eliminating enrichment capability, ballistic missiles, support for Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. Every one. Israel is in real trouble because it has been unable to shut down Iran's nuclear program, which is the issue it cares about the most. There is a serious possibility that Iran will get nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States cannot get a nuclear deal, there is a serious possibility Israel will use its nuclear weapons to attack Iran.

Clash Report

17,081 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Jeffrey Sachs: China is not a threat to the US, the only threat is nuclear war. In September 2024, Jeffrey Sachs and John Mearsheimer joined the besties for a foreign policy panel. Sachs expressed that due to the size of the US, its importance, its oceans, and its military, nuclear war was the ONLY threat, far above any peer competitor. He also explained how the escalatory mindset of the US Deep State continues to lead us in that direction. "I deeply believe that China is not a threat to the United States." "And I deeply believe the only threat to the United States in the world, given the oceans, given our size, and given the military, is nuclear war." "I deeply believe we're close to nuclear war because we have a mindset that leads us in that direction." "We have a mindset that everything is a challenge for survival and that escalation is therefore always the right approach." "My view is a little bit of prudence could save the whole planet."
0:43

Jeffrey Sachs: China is not a threat to the US, the only threat is nuclear war. In September 2024, Jeffrey Sachs and John Mearsheimer joined the besties for a foreign policy panel. Sachs expressed that due to the size of the US, its importance, its oceans, and its military, nuclear war was the ONLY threat, far above any peer competitor. He also explained how the escalatory mindset of the US Deep State continues to lead us in that direction. "I deeply believe that China is not a threat to the United States." "And I deeply believe the only threat to the United States in the world, given the oceans, given our size, and given the military, is nuclear war." "I deeply believe we're close to nuclear war because we have a mindset that leads us in that direction." "We have a mindset that everything is a challenge for survival and that escalation is therefore always the right approach." "My view is a little bit of prudence could save the whole planet."

The All-In Podcast

32,176 просмотров • 1 год назад

Donald Trump: “Iran could have destroyed Italy with nuclear weapons in 3 minutes if it wanted to.” FACT: There are 9 countries in the world with nuclear weapons, and the only country that has used them is the United States.
0:28

Donald Trump: “Iran could have destroyed Italy with nuclear weapons in 3 minutes if it wanted to.” FACT: There are 9 countries in the world with nuclear weapons, and the only country that has used them is the United States.

IR Media 24

13,668 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 SENATOR CRUZ: IRANIAN NUCLEAR THREAT COULD MEAN MUSHROOM CLOUD OVER NEW YORK OR L.A. "Israel is doing an enormous favor to the United States right now. The most acute near-term security threat facing America is the threat of a nuclear Iran. If Iran gets a nuclear weapon, I think the odds are unacceptably high that we would find out with a mushroom cloud over New York City or Los Angeles or Tel Aviv and Israel." Source: Fox
2:22

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 SENATOR CRUZ: IRANIAN NUCLEAR THREAT COULD MEAN MUSHROOM CLOUD OVER NEW YORK OR L.A. "Israel is doing an enormous favor to the United States right now. The most acute near-term security threat facing America is the threat of a nuclear Iran. If Iran gets a nuclear weapon, I think the odds are unacceptably high that we would find out with a mushroom cloud over New York City or Los Angeles or Tel Aviv and Israel." Source: Fox

Mario Nawfal

237,524 просмотров • 1 год назад

.Vice President JD Vance: "I actually think that the United States is in a great position however the negotiation ultimately shakes out. If the negotiation is successful, which obviously we want it to be successful, you have an Iran that is permanently transformed... if, on the other hand, the Iranians don't behave... their nuclear program is still destroyed, their conventional military is still destroyed, and the United States is still in a much stronger position relative to the Iranians."
2:12

.Vice President JD Vance: "I actually think that the United States is in a great position however the negotiation ultimately shakes out. If the negotiation is successful, which obviously we want it to be successful, you have an Iran that is permanently transformed... if, on the other hand, the Iranians don't behave... their nuclear program is still destroyed, their conventional military is still destroyed, and the United States is still in a much stronger position relative to the Iranians."

Rapid Response 47

275,544 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Q: The DNI concluded in March that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon. So what new intelligence does the US have since then that Iran changed its position? HEGSETH: The president has made it very clear that he's looked at all the intelligence and come to the conclusion that the Iranian nuclear program is a threat
1:18

Q: The DNI concluded in March that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon. So what new intelligence does the US have since then that Iran changed its position? HEGSETH: The president has made it very clear that he's looked at all the intelligence and come to the conclusion that the Iranian nuclear program is a threat

Aaron Rupar

235,739 просмотров • 1 год назад

Lukashenko on nuclear weapons: If we approach the matter from the standpoint of fairness, does the United States of America possess nuclear weapons? Yes, it does. Okay, the United States is the pioneer of nuclear weapons and has held them for a long time. But Israel remains quiet about the fact that it has nuclear weapons. The Iranians could ask, “Why can’t we have nuclear weapons?” Especially when nearby India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Why can’t Iran have nuclear weapons? If we want fairness, let us gradually, step by step, eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent, a guarantee that no one will ever attack you, then Iran has the right, like other nations, to possess nuclear weapons for its own defense.
1:11

Lukashenko on nuclear weapons: If we approach the matter from the standpoint of fairness, does the United States of America possess nuclear weapons? Yes, it does. Okay, the United States is the pioneer of nuclear weapons and has held them for a long time. But Israel remains quiet about the fact that it has nuclear weapons. The Iranians could ask, “Why can’t we have nuclear weapons?” Especially when nearby India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Why can’t Iran have nuclear weapons? If we want fairness, let us gradually, step by step, eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent, a guarantee that no one will ever attack you, then Iran has the right, like other nations, to possess nuclear weapons for its own defense.

Clash Report

46,958 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

a fanatical Zionist asks Chomsky if he believes Iran having a nuclear program is an existential threat. Chomsky replies: No, the existential threats to the region and humanity are Israel and the US
5:28

a fanatical Zionist asks Chomsky if he believes Iran having a nuclear program is an existential threat. Chomsky replies: No, the existential threats to the region and humanity are Israel and the US

☀️👀

1,744,489 просмотров • 1 год назад

When it comes to Iran, we are either going to have: -A deal that keeps Iran from getting a nuke, OR - decisive military action that keeps Iran from getting a nuke. Either way, President Donald J. Trump understands the threat of a nuclear armed Iran and we CANNOT let it happen.
0:44

When it comes to Iran, we are either going to have: -A deal that keeps Iran from getting a nuke, OR - decisive military action that keeps Iran from getting a nuke. Either way, President Donald J. Trump understands the threat of a nuclear armed Iran and we CANNOT let it happen.

Rick Scott

23,104 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Vice President JD Vance to Bret Baier, seconds after being told President Trump announced on Truth Social a ceasefire between Israel and Iran: “We were actually working on that when I left the White House to come over here. So, that's good news the President was able to get that across the finish line. I think what it means, Bret, is quite simple. First of all, the President without, knock on wood, having a single American casualty, obliterated the Iranian nuclear program. We are now in a place where we weren’t a week ago. A week ago, Iran was very close to having a nuclear weapon. Now, Iran is incapable of building a nuclear weapon with the equipment they had because we destroyed it, so that's a very, very big thing. Now, what that means, I think, is we have to talk to Iran and, of course Israel about what the future holds because, while we have obliterated the nuclear Iranian program our exception is they will not try to rebuild that program. And I think that's what the President is trying to figure out here is to build a long-term settlement here to where we can have peace in the region, where our regional allies and, of course, the American people, most importantly can be secured, but where we can ensure that the destruction of the Iranian nuclear program that has already happened is not something they try to rebuild.”
1:26

Vice President JD Vance to Bret Baier, seconds after being told President Trump announced on Truth Social a ceasefire between Israel and Iran: “We were actually working on that when I left the White House to come over here. So, that's good news the President was able to get that across the finish line. I think what it means, Bret, is quite simple. First of all, the President without, knock on wood, having a single American casualty, obliterated the Iranian nuclear program. We are now in a place where we weren’t a week ago. A week ago, Iran was very close to having a nuclear weapon. Now, Iran is incapable of building a nuclear weapon with the equipment they had because we destroyed it, so that's a very, very big thing. Now, what that means, I think, is we have to talk to Iran and, of course Israel about what the future holds because, while we have obliterated the nuclear Iranian program our exception is they will not try to rebuild that program. And I think that's what the President is trying to figure out here is to build a long-term settlement here to where we can have peace in the region, where our regional allies and, of course, the American people, most importantly can be secured, but where we can ensure that the destruction of the Iranian nuclear program that has already happened is not something they try to rebuild.”

Curtis Houck

34,548 просмотров • 1 год назад

The head of NATO says the US is "taking out" the nuclear capability of Iran, which is a threat to Israel, the region & Europe. What nuclear capability? There's only one country in the Middle East with a nuclear capability, and thats Israel.
0:21

The head of NATO says the US is "taking out" the nuclear capability of Iran, which is a threat to Israel, the region & Europe. What nuclear capability? There's only one country in the Middle East with a nuclear capability, and thats Israel.

Saul Staniforth

160,381 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Van Hollen: "Reopening the Strait of Hormuz is necessary in order for us to win, right?" Hegseth: "You asked me what the overarching objective is, and I would say ensuring Iran never has a nuclear weapon." Van Hollen: "You said after Midnight Hammer, 'Our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons.' Clearly that is not the case based on your testimony today. It's also a fact that the DNI Tulsi Gabbard testified in front of the Intelligence Committee that it was our assessment that Iran did not intend to restart its nuclear program. The President of the United States just about a week ago said Iran has committed not to develop a nuclear weapon."
1:10

Van Hollen: "Reopening the Strait of Hormuz is necessary in order for us to win, right?" Hegseth: "You asked me what the overarching objective is, and I would say ensuring Iran never has a nuclear weapon." Van Hollen: "You said after Midnight Hammer, 'Our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons.' Clearly that is not the case based on your testimony today. It's also a fact that the DNI Tulsi Gabbard testified in front of the Intelligence Committee that it was our assessment that Iran did not intend to restart its nuclear program. The President of the United States just about a week ago said Iran has committed not to develop a nuclear weapon."

The Bulwark

606,990 просмотров • 18 дней назад

Former CENTCOM commander and CBS News contributor Ret. Gen. Frank McKenzie says he agrees with former Defense Sec. Bob Gate's assessment that bombing Iran's nuclear program would, at best, delay Iran's nuclear ambitions, but not end them. "Ultimately, you need a policy decision from Iran to end the nuclear program, so I think the secretary is right in that position. Now, if you don't get a policy decision from Iran, you've got to commit yourself to perhaps revisiting striking the nuclear program."
3:08

Former CENTCOM commander and CBS News contributor Ret. Gen. Frank McKenzie says he agrees with former Defense Sec. Bob Gate's assessment that bombing Iran's nuclear program would, at best, delay Iran's nuclear ambitions, but not end them. "Ultimately, you need a policy decision from Iran to end the nuclear program, so I think the secretary is right in that position. Now, if you don't get a policy decision from Iran, you've got to commit yourself to perhaps revisiting striking the nuclear program."

Face The Nation

89,461 просмотров • 1 год назад