If we treated every crime like sexual assault.

this would have been funny if it wasnt so true that its sad

"Try to move on" "And him?" "He already did" Yeah, insanely on point.

This kid nails it!

For those who are saying it is not good analogy: pay attention to the rethoric. You can't just park your car everywhere, right?

People who pick apart analogies aren’t trying to understand the point that’s being made and they think pointing out a poor analogy (right or wrong) is an argument against the point. But even the worst analogy in the world doesn’t make a thing not true.

Prisons would be empty.

This is a really good joke, because consent (to the use of an owned object) actually does preclude theft, and the primary evidence that consent was not given (which is not assumed) actually is witness testimony from the victim. The analogy tracks very well.

"He said you wanted him to take it." It's your word against his. Somebody kidnapped your child? He said you wanted the child to go with him. Somebody burglarized your house? He said you told him to break the window and take what he wanted 🤷🏾‍♀️

If it’s a rich criminal, they do

Are you sure he didn't think you were giving it to him?

My fellow Americans, we live in hell.

Tracey Ullman did it better obvi

He makes the point BRILLIANTLY

as a woman this is a perfect analogy

the sad part, this is already how it goes

spot on

Haha destroyed by grok

False equivalence fallacy

Only if you think that kind of treatment is fine when reporting a rape. This was not saying the two crimes are equivalent, and pointing out false equivalence here reveals a whole lot about you.

Rape and robbery are different crimes and need to be treated differently

in this thread, people who always blame the woman for getting raped.

This is a retarded skit the absence of the car and video evidence is proof enough that the crime happened. In sexual assault if you have video proof or multiple eye witness accounts it’s a pretty slam dunk case. I don’t know what this video is talking about

This is fucking stupid and leftists are immature children who can't understand things like evidence or burden of proof

EXACTLY!!!!

Literally what happened with all the men who molested and groomed me as a child

It isn't the same, in a rape allegation one side argue that it was with consent and the other argue it was rape!!! You have to sides how can be right. It more complicated then a regular crime.

This is very very good.

It's more like: Him: "Can I borrow your car?" Her: "Yes." Borrows the car. While driving, he gets stopped by the police and arrested for stealing the car. Him: "But she let me borrow it." Police: "She says she didn't. Therefore, you are guilty until you can prove otherwise."

It should say female police department in the background

None of this made any sense

Mugging is a better analogy, but I love that he so clearly gets it !

@FlynnUnbound exactly like I said about the house

Violating/thieving an inanimate object = raping and exploiting for your own gratification someone in a vulnerable state, which can get them pregnant or diseased.... Got it.

THIS!!!

The better analogy here would be when someone gives someone else their car, there’s proof you said you’d give you them your car, then a year later uou regret giving it to them so you accuse them of stealing it.