Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

If you count it as cheating, then... #cheatingcaptions #cheating #cheat #cuckoldcaptions #cuckold #cucked #cuck #captions #caption #nsfw #hotwife #wife #GF #Girlfriend #unfaithful #ntr #netorare #story #sph #humiliation #ruinedorgasm

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🎙️ Can They Manipulate Bitcoin? Jeff Booth ⚡️ on You’re The Voice | Podcast by Efrat Fenigson "Let's say #bitcoin fell by 95%. You're gonna sell or buy? Buy. Of course. So now let's say the existing system, imagine, just let's play game theory, imagine the system that the BlackRock and everything consolidate enough coins, and then they start to try to make self custody illegal, and these things are coordinated, and then they start shorting bitcoin to drive price down. There are too many people that know, and they will just take all the bitcoin into self custody. And so it keeps it decentralized and secure. And what would happen in that case is as they tried to manipulate Bitcoin, I'm not saying they will, but if they tried to do that and manipulate price down, then you would have a major financial party get liquidated, completely liquidated. It would look like FTX, but JP Morgan or BlackRock. And that would take down the entire system if that happened. So will these games happen? Of course they're gonna happen. People are going to try to cheat because human beings have always tried to cheat. So that's totally logical that they will. But human beings have tried to cheat on a system that allowed cheating. Try to cheat a system that won't allow cheating and eventually you're gonna get liquidated and bring it on. It doesn't touch anybody that self custodies. It doesn't touch you at all. Like were you hurt by FTX? Nothing." Watch full episode, like, share & support >>

Efrat Fenigson

135,387 次观看 • 2 年前

Interviewer: "Men cheating is way worse than women cheating." First Woman: "Men cheating is way worse than women cheating." Interviewer: "False. Why?" First Woman: "A man cheats without a reason. A woman always has a reason." Man in Mesh Top: "When a man cheats, it's because he's thinking about one thing and that's all it is. A woman has to be fed up, tired, done, before she emotionally even gets close enough to a man for her to want to cheat with him." Third Speaker (Guy in street): "Men and women cheat for different reasons. Men cheat because they're impulsive James J. Sexton: "I mean, I got to tell you, I don't like the phrasing of it, but I can't argue with the concept." Host: "Really? I thought you were going to disagree with that one. James J. Sexton: "No, I mean, look, I don't think the way they parsed it is correct, which is that women never like, men, it's always an impulsive act, and women, it's never an impulsive act. Because I think sometimes alcohol gets involved, and sometimes people make bad decisions. But I will say that, yeah, I mean, I have had a lot more women I've dealt with a lot of, I've had a lot of clients that have cheated that were male, a lot of clients that have cheated that were women, okay? And have been caught, or who left for the paramour or whatever it might be. So I've seen this from every angle. I represent the cheater and the cheated-on. I've really been through all of the permutations of this." "A lot of the men, by an order of magnitude, say, 'Yeah, this had nothing to do with my wife. This was just like, yeah, I was just distracted. It was like a shiny object and I went after it. Like it really was like a moment of weakness.' Or it was like, 'Yeah, I just like, I don't know, I wasn't getting enough s*x, and I didn't have the courage to have the conversation about that, so I just ended up meeting my needs outside of...' Host: "But isn't that a reason?" James J. Sexton: "Of course! I mean, there's a chapter in my book called 'Go Without or Go Elsewhere.'" Host: "Yeah." James J. Sexton: "Which basically says like, if your partner's not meeting your needs sexually, you either have to go without which no one likes or go elsewhere, which always ends in bad things. So the goal should be to try to keep your relationship in a place where you don't ever have to go without or go elsewhere, where you can share with your partner what it is that you need s*xually, and openly and honestly have discussions about how you can meet each other's sexual needs, especially if you've decided, 'We are going to only sleep with each other'bwhich you don't have to decide! But you've decided that. So if you've decided that, and you've said, 'You're the only person allowed to do this job,' then take the job seriously and try to be good at it. Because if you're the only person if you're saying to me,'The only person I'm allowed to sleep with is you,' then you have to sleep with me. That's how that works! Because otherwise, we're going to delegate that responsibility to somebody else. Because the other option is just 'go without,' and nobody wants to go without."
3:12

Sensitive content

Interviewer: "Men cheating is way worse than women cheating." First Woman: "Men cheating is way worse than women cheating." Interviewer: "False. Why?" First Woman: "A man cheats without a reason. A woman always has a reason." Man in Mesh Top: "When a man cheats, it's because he's thinking about one thing and that's all it is. A woman has to be fed up, tired, done, before she emotionally even gets close enough to a man for her to want to cheat with him." Third Speaker (Guy in street): "Men and women cheat for different reasons. Men cheat because they're impulsive James J. Sexton: "I mean, I got to tell you, I don't like the phrasing of it, but I can't argue with the concept." Host: "Really? I thought you were going to disagree with that one. James J. Sexton: "No, I mean, look, I don't think the way they parsed it is correct, which is that women never like, men, it's always an impulsive act, and women, it's never an impulsive act. Because I think sometimes alcohol gets involved, and sometimes people make bad decisions. But I will say that, yeah, I mean, I have had a lot more women I've dealt with a lot of, I've had a lot of clients that have cheated that were male, a lot of clients that have cheated that were women, okay? And have been caught, or who left for the paramour or whatever it might be. So I've seen this from every angle. I represent the cheater and the cheated-on. I've really been through all of the permutations of this." "A lot of the men, by an order of magnitude, say, 'Yeah, this had nothing to do with my wife. This was just like, yeah, I was just distracted. It was like a shiny object and I went after it. Like it really was like a moment of weakness.' Or it was like, 'Yeah, I just like, I don't know, I wasn't getting enough s*x, and I didn't have the courage to have the conversation about that, so I just ended up meeting my needs outside of...' Host: "But isn't that a reason?" James J. Sexton: "Of course! I mean, there's a chapter in my book called 'Go Without or Go Elsewhere.'" Host: "Yeah." James J. Sexton: "Which basically says like, if your partner's not meeting your needs sexually, you either have to go without which no one likes or go elsewhere, which always ends in bad things. So the goal should be to try to keep your relationship in a place where you don't ever have to go without or go elsewhere, where you can share with your partner what it is that you need s*xually, and openly and honestly have discussions about how you can meet each other's sexual needs, especially if you've decided, 'We are going to only sleep with each other'bwhich you don't have to decide! But you've decided that. So if you've decided that, and you've said, 'You're the only person allowed to do this job,' then take the job seriously and try to be good at it. Because if you're the only person if you're saying to me,'The only person I'm allowed to sleep with is you,' then you have to sleep with me. That's how that works! Because otherwise, we're going to delegate that responsibility to somebody else. Because the other option is just 'go without,' and nobody wants to go without."

Hecto Crypto | NetLink ⛓

232,051 次观看 • 16 天前

So I wanted to talk about some of the differences between The Boyz television adaption vs the original comics: -In the comics Homelander is benevolent (but increasingly jaded) it turns out Black Noir was manipulating him into doing the worst of things. -Butcher is not a cuck, in the comics the supe baby lasers out of his pregnant wife and kills her, he proceeds to smash Homelander's bastard son with a heavy candle holder. -In the comics both Homelander and Butcher die because Vought is so powerful they had the power to kill both the entire time and were pulling everyone's strings from the very start—overwhelming victory. (it was all for nothing) As you can see the original comic is a very different animal/beast, Homelander is far more compelling, Black Noir is the real monster manipulating Homelander (notice the overlaid transition), Butcher is not a cuck ("his wife's son" gets a late-term abortion) and in the end [Vought wins] the game was rigged from the very start. It says a lot that this ending (which is considered contraversial/bleak) is infinitely better than the "I'll suck your dick and eat shit" (which is out of character) humiliation ritual for Homelander that the show gave us—not because it made the ending good, but because it made the writer feel like he could "own those right wing chuds one last time" even if it completely destroyed the ending/anything good about the show just like The Joker 2 did for the Joker. Eric Kripke is a hack and a failure of a writer, newsflash Eric Kripke all the memes recreating your ending are not positive memes, people are literally MOCKING the scene (because it sucks), this is what happens when you put your politics/identity before staying consistent or sticking to the rules YOU established. You broke a Cardinal Sin of writing—you didn't want a "gay to die" or "muh tropes" (idfk what you even mean) so you had her survive the fall somehow. Honestly—you Butchered (cucked) (he's a cuck) the show and ruined it all because you are butthurt that Homelander was so popular and beloved. You destroyed the ending of your own show so you could "win the argument" on Twitter, X. You're a failure of a writer—your ending is absolute garbage.

MR. OBVIOUS

25,964 次观看 • 2 个月前

Counter Strike hacking is one of my guilty pleasures. This is a video of an AI tool built into one of the most popular HvH cheats on the market. HvH (Hack vs. Hack) is a game mode where everyone in the lobby is cheating. “If everyone is cheating, then how is it fun?” The game becomes something entirely different in this mode. Instead of focusing on physical reaction time, aim, and movement skills, players must concentrate on the quality of their cheats compared to those used by their opponents. The game essentially turns into a sandbox for software optimization, where cheaters compete against each other to see who has the better-written code and configuration. Players must use every tool available to keep up with everyone else in the scene. My favorite cheat, Anti-Aim (AA), is used to help protect players from getting shot by cleverly exploiting the game mechanics to fake the angle of their hitbox. It works by choking abs yaw packets to exploit a coding error in the game, causing your model’s position to appear bugged to other players. The server processes each command sent by the client in the order it receives them, then it updates animations for each command. After this, the server takes the latest information it has and sends it to other players. If you choke packets, you will essentially send all of your choked commands at the same time. Again, the server will look at what’s latest and send that to other players. Now, you should see the issue clearly: the client is missing loads of information and will start updating animations with incorrect information. This will lead to numerous inaccuracies in their animation state, most importantly their abs yaw (m_flGoalFeetyaw), which indicates where their feet are pointing. The creation of Anti-aim techniques significantly disrupted gameplay, giving users an extra unfair advantage. This compelled players to devise a solution— Resolvers are used to counter anti-aim by determining where the player’s hitbox actually is. One commonly used type of resolver is the old angle resolver. Old angle resolvers work by storing the previous angles from when the player wasn’t faking their position and later shooting at them. —forcing both sides—Anti-Aim developers and Resolver developers—to continuously improve their code and technique. HvH is an ever-evolving arms race where staying ahead is as much about innovation as it is about execution. Code rules all, and hitting p is the only goal. That’s what keeps me coming back. (Video: @peter2b2t, YouTube)

nv🐎

285,298 次观看 • 2 年前

Frank Edoho’s voice call with Titi where he said Chike had a girlfriend called Precious. I met Chike and told him, if my wife was foolish enough to cheat on her husband, why would you encourage it?” According to Frank, Chike responded by asking, “Is that what she told you?” Frank said he replied that if his wife still meant as much to him as she did before all the drama started, he could have seriously harmed Chike and left him in a wheelchair. But instead, he begged him to leave his wife alone because they had two sons together and he still wanted to save his family. He revealed that Chike even sent him an apology text at some point, but despite that, the relationship allegedly continued. Frank said he still doesn’t understand what he did to deserve the situation. He also explained how he supported his ex-wife from the beginning. According to him, he sent her to school around 2010/2011, and when she returned and wanted to start working, he encouraged her to start a business instead. She reportedly mentioned skincare and interior decor, and he advised her to focus on interior decor. Frank claimed he helped her build the business from scratch, found her first carpenter, handled a lot of the setup, and even spent years learning interior design photography just to support her work. He said he dedicated his time, energy, and resources to helping her grow. According to him, problems started after she became more successful, and that was when the alleged affair with Chike began. He said no matter how much he begged her to leave Chike, she refused. Frank also revealed that at one point, he left the house and stayed in a hotel for three months. He claimed his wife later found him, cried, and begged him to return home, but only two weeks after he returned, things allegedly went back to how they were before. He added that while he was trying to move on emotionally, his ex-wife eventually saw him with another woman, became upset, and then filed for divorce. Frank ended by explaining that when people talk about the “malice” issue, they misunderstand the context. According to him, he wasn’t just keeping malice for no reason, but reacting to pain from someone he genuinely loved.

Idanssssssss

108,478 次观看 • 2 个月前

THE LASTING DAMAGE OF A “CHEAT” AT THE FIRST BRAZIL DLC! Worlds invites should be earned with skill and INTEGRITY. It’s already abysmal that the World Champion does not get an invite to Continentals. This is the previous World Champion… should they not be able to defend their title? I hate to glaze but when that same champ keeps performing, making top cut in almost every event, always getting close, and then finally, when he is one win away in the last round, he loses to a player who was caught on camera earlier that day “cheating”… it really is tragic. I understand you cannot always prove intent. Mistakes happen, and I do not think prizing should be stripped from someone over one situation. However, a Worlds invite should be held to a different standard. That is where the best of the best are supposed to meet. A Worlds invite should not just be about event placement, it should also represent competitive integrity. Frederico ending up with a booster box prize instead of a Golden Mickey… Him/DKP were directly impacted by that loss, and when the difference is that massive, “here’s a box” feels like a terrible consolation prize. At the very least, they should be properly compensated and invite retroactively passed down. If there is documented cheating, or even a major competitive blunder that directly impacted the result, that Worlds invite should be voided and passed down accordingly. Not because of hate. Not because of bias. Because consistency matters. This is what puts Ravensburger and tournament organizers in such an awkward position. Either they were overly harsh and specifically targeted Clement for the angle shot incident in Australia by banning him from Worlds, or they stay consistent and apply that same standard here. You cannot punish one player for a documented competitive issue and then look the other way when it happens somewhere else just because the situation is inconvenient. I am not going to sit here and argue whether the double ink was intentional or not. As an Amber Steel player, I know a lot of decisions run through your head in those moments. But this looked like a very simple hand. The extra ink directly contributed to the win, and the sequence was fast, clean, and immediate. There was not much hesitation there to strongly sell simple forgetfulness. - he went back and flipped the ink … paused and inked again fast …. Change of pace, body language - counting and situation all suspicious …. Keep Lorcana safe, judges … lore guides … whatever they call those spectators with authority - lock in !!!!…2 stream judges spectating and nothing called out ?!? Maybe let the chat/casters be able to engage a judge call to prevent these mistakes from having lasting effects. But bottom line, damage is done! If integrity matters, then the Worlds invite should be voided. Otherwise punishments stop being about fairness and start looking like cherry-picking and selective enforcement. #cheating #lorcana #TCG

Elias Abdulahad

26,766 次观看 • 3 个月前

It has been about 45 days since I was laid off at my 6 figure gamedev/engineering job. Here's what I've accomplished since going full time indie gamedev. - Happiness is at all time highs.. The creative excitement I've felt everyday has been amazing! For about 15 days I kind of dabbled around different areas to figure out what I wanted to work on and sink myself into. - I dabbled with VFX authoring in Three.js - I built the basis of an MMO engine in Rust Language and rendered it in Three.js I then decided I wanted to focus on something realistic and get a game out the door that could turn me from wanting to be a full time indie gamedev, to actually doing it, because realistically none of those projects are going to make me a living. I settled on building a Roblox game because I felt I like I could make something pretty unique and cool with a built in userbase. I chose roblox because it has a good platform of discovery for new games, which I think is pretty crucial for indie devs. - I then ported Plume my threejs library for Niagra like VFX to Roblox. - completed the full gameloop for my roblox game. What's featured in the video - Several menu types for kind of figuring out the direction and some placeholder menus - Cross server guilds/parties/queing - Itemization - Loot Tables - Inventory - Character Equipment - Item Upgrading/Leveling - Some interaction polishing - 1 Completed class with actions, unique boss drops, vfx/sfx - Boss State Machines / Encounter Systems - 1 Boss encounter - Everything is server authorative to prevent cheating. - Sound system Over the next 45 days my focus is on finish the last of the systems that will make up the game(solo quest/mission(story) content, monster codex, move raid board/social from the isolated menu you see in the video to the newer full screen menus, leaderboards. Once those systems are complete it will be time to then focus on just creating content so hopefully a few of you out there will come join and play! If any of this looks interesting or you want to follow the journey of trying to make it as a solo indie developer, follow along! #gamedev #indiedev #robloxdev

Forge

20,107 次观看 • 2 个月前

Story from our Vishnu purana Things we get to learn from our puranas A proof for “ Bhakti is Shakthi” The boy Dhruva, out of hurt humiliation and determination, rose through devotion and became immortal in the skies as Dhruva, symbol of steadfast devotion. •Dhruva was the son of King Uttānapāda and his first wife Sunīti. •The king, however, loved his younger wife Suruci more, and he often neglected Sunīti and her son. •One day, little Dhruva (just five years old) tried to sit on his father’s lap. But Suruci, out of jealousy, stopped him harshly. •She told Dhruva: “If you wish to sit on the throne, you must be born from my womb. Only then will you deserve the king’s lap.” •The words deeply hurt Dhruva, and he ran to his mother Sunīti in tears. ⸻ Mother’s Guidance •Sunīti, though sorrowful, guided Dhruva towards God. •She said: “My child, it is only by worshipping Lord Nārāyaṇa that all desires and sorrows can be removed. Seek Him, for He is the true father and protector of all.” •Inspired, Dhruva decided to leave the palace and go to the forest to meditate upon Lord Viṣṇu. ⸻ Meeting Sage Nārada •On the way, Sage Nārada met him and tried to dissuade him, saying he was too young for such austerities. •But Dhruva’s determination was unshakable: “I seek a kingdom greater than my father’s. I will not give up.” •Seeing his resolve, Nārada taught him the sacred mantra: “Om Namo Bhagavate Vāsudevāya” and instructed him in meditation and worship of Lord Viṣṇu. ⸻ Dhruva’s Tapas •Dhruva performed intense penance in Madhuvana forest on the banks of Yamunā. •He gradually reduced his intake—first fruits, then leaves, then water, then even air—until he stood motionless like a pillar, meditating only on Lord Viṣṇu. •His austerity shook the three worlds, and the gods went to Lord Viṣṇu requesting Him to appear. ⸻ Lord Viṣṇu’s Darshan •At last, Lord Viṣṇu appeared before Dhruva, radiant and holding conch, discus, mace, and lotus. •Dhruva, overwhelmed, forgot his desires. He wanted to praise the Lord but was speechless. •Lord Viṣṇu touched his cheek with His conch, giving him divine wisdom. •Dhruva then offered beautiful prayers (known as Dhruva Stuti). ⸻ Dhruva’s Boon •The Lord was pleased and asked Dhruva what he desired. •Dhruva said: “I came seeking land and kingdom, but now I desire only You, the eternal treasure.” •Still, Lord Viṣṇu blessed him: •He would rule the earth for 36,000 years with prosperity. •After his reign, he would attain a place in the heavens as the Dhruva Nakṣatra (the Pole Star), shining eternally, a guide for all beings.

Annapurna Astro / Swati🚩

24,425 次观看 • 10 个月前

Kevin Kelly is one of the most influential tech writers of the last half-century. He's published 14 books, founded Wired magazine, and maybe even traveled to more places in Asia than anybody in human history. Here are 28 of his best maxims for writing: 1. Don't aim to be the best. Be the only. 2. Don’t create things to make money; make money so you can create things. 3. The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing. 4. Always demand a deadline. Doing so weeds out the superfluous and prevents you from insisting on perfection (which will limit you as a writer). 5. To write about something hard to explain, write a detailed letter to a friend about why it is so hard to explain, and then remove the initial “Dear Friend” part and you’ll have a great first draft. 6. The work on any worthy piece of writing is endless and infinite. Since you cannot limit the work, you must limit your hours. 7. Books are never finished, only abandoned. 8. When you are stuck, sleep on it. Give your subconscious an assignment while you sleep. You’ll have an answer in the morning or by the next time you sit down to write. 9. A multitude of bad ideas is necessary for one good idea. 10. The greatest teacher is called “doing.” 11. Efficiency is highly overrated; goofing off is highly underrated. 12. If you have a good idea, write it down. Don't assume you'll remember it. 13. Writing is not selfish; it's for the rest of us. If you don't do your thing and share your writing, you are cheating us. 14. Most articles and stories are improved significantly if you delete the first page of the manuscript. Start with the action. 15. The best way to learn anything is to teach what you know (and you can do it at scale by writing). 16. Productivity is often a distraction. Don't aim for better ways to get through your tasks as quickly as possible. Instead, look for writing projects that you never want to stop doing. 17. Occasionally your first idea is best, but usually it’s the fifth idea. You need to get all the obvious ideas out of the way. Try to surprise yourself. 18. Pay attention to what you pay attention to. 19. To be interesting just tell your own story with uncommon honesty. 20. Ironically, the best time to write a book is once you're done with the speaking tour for the book. 21. Read the books that your favorite authors once read. 22. When you find something you really enjoy, do it slowly. 23. The main reason to write something every day is that you must throw away a lot of good work to reach the great stuff. To let it all go easily you need to be convinced that there is “more where that came from.” You get that in steady production, which comes from a steady writing habit. 24. Habits are far more dependable than inspiration. Make progress by making habits. Don't focus on becoming a better writer. Focus on becoming the kind of person who never misses a writing session. 25. The quality of a piece of writing hinges on its structure. Nail the structure and the ideas will fall into place. You'll know the structure is good when the reader doesn't even notice it. 26. To write something good, just do it. To write something great, just redo it, redo it, redo it. The secret to publishing great writing is to spend a lot of time rewriting. 27. When in doubt, retreat to honesty. Say more of what you really think and feel instead of trying to sound smart. 28. Principles like what you see here are not laws. They're like a hat. If one doesn't fit, try another. Many of these maxims are directly from Kevin Kelly's book: Excellent Advice for Living, while others are from the interview I just published with him about his approach to writing. I've linked to our full conversation in the tweet below.

David Perell

370,607 次观看 • 2 年前

Allow me to share a story. A story of America. In 1973, a boy named Hung Cao arrived in America, a refugee from Vietnam, his family carrying very little beyond hope. They had no land, no lineage, no luxury in America. No pedigree, no property, no "privilege." He learned English in Fairfax County, Va., from "Mr. T" and the voices of the "A-Team," the flickering television screen his classroom. In 1985, he earned his place, by merit, in the first class of Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology in Alexandria, Va., a school started in a public-private partnership for the brightest minds in the area to help make America competitive against the Soviets. In 1986, President Ronald Reagan visited the school. He told the students: "Whatever path you choose, if it follows the light of hope, it will lead you confidently into the future." Hung Cao graduated in the TJ Class of 1989. In 1996, he graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy, deploying later to Afghanistan and beyond. In 2021, after years of service, he laid down his uniform, his wife, April, and children beside him. In 2022, he stood on a different type of battlefield for America's future, this time on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court, beside parents, many immigrants like his own, who had arrived with nothing but hopes to realize the American Dreams. Their cause was his own: defending the right to merit, the right to rise without facing prejudice. Two years earlier, in 2020, in the year of an explosion of polices called "diversity, equity and inclusion," the school board in Fairfax County had stripped away the merit-only admissions test that had once given a refugee boy his ticket to a school that became America's No. 1 high school. They said there were too many Asian students at the school. By then, there were about seven of 10 kids at TJ of Asian descent. They didn't count in the kind of "diversity" the school board demanded. The school board said they wanted something called "racial balancing." The school superintendent accused the Asian kids of cheating their way into the school. The state's education secretary compared test preparation to athletes "doping." Asian kids started changing their names to hide their ethnic ancestry. A group of determined parents had created a kitchen-table group, Coalition for TJ #FightingForMerit, and led the parent's movement against backward school board policies, taking their fight to America's courts. They had won. A federal judge in the Fourth Circuit, appointed by Reagan, had ruled that the school board had discriminated against Asian students, boys and girls like Hung Cao's younger self. Then, the parents had lost on appeal. They had pressed on, taking their case to the highest court in the land. Thus, in 2022, Hung Cao stood with them—standing for the child he had once been. The Supreme Court didn't hear the parent's case, but U.S. voters elected a president—Donald Trump—who arrived in 2025 and issued as one of his first orders a demand that school systems stop prejudice in education in the name of "diversity, equity and inclusion" and reinstate merit. Now, the arc of that refugee boy's story takes him to the White House. President Donald Trump has named Hung Cao to be the United States’ Undersecretary of the Navy. His response: "Thank you, Mr. President. It's time to get to work." His story is the American Dream realized. A story of hard work. English learned watching "Mr. T." A story of merit. A story of resilience. A story of America.

Asra Nomani

129,943 次观看 • 1 年前

Let's address the outlying issue first. The problem people are having are these things: 1. Treating 47 as a lone term. 2. Treating everything as real time, not pre-planned, Strategic as the 2017 to present day Laws and Orders invoked outline. 3. Don't believe or know 45 - 47 is a WHOLE Operation to be viewed as | 45 - 47 |. 4. Don't believe, know, or have read, studied, or sought to comprehend the 45 - 47 has unique Laws and Orders that support its goals, objectives, missions, battles, and overall war which is draining the swamp. The 45 - 47 is to be viewed as | 45 - 47 | The Nation functions and operates on Laws and Orders. Yes, every single one of you over 40 witnessed a lifetime of gaslighting and manipulation of 'Laws and Orders'... But the WHOLE point of PJDT is to reset the 'Laws and Orders' back on her Foundation as prescribed in the Declaration of Independence and to drain the Swamp from the gaslighters, manipulators, and crooks who benefited from such. The PROBLEM is the majority of Americans cannot name the 3 Branches of Government, but want an opinion and want to whine, fuss, complain, and gripe about something they know NOTHING about. IF PDJT was not working with Laws and Orders, there would not be a difference with him and the past. There clearly is or the Libtards wouldn't trash him as much as they do and have. To answer what majority of Americans 'THINK' took place yesterday is very simple, but only if you seek to comprehend the 45 - 47 PLUS the Law and Order that applies to it. Now, for those with this whole 'Yes for 50.' First and foremost, as the host asked Pelosi, "Arnold Schwarzenegger who's against Proposition 50, who helped put independent redistricting, has suggested instead of changing the rules, you should outperform Trump, don't outcheat Trump, that why do you have to change the rules in the middle of this, Democrats should be competitive as is, how do you respond to this concept that this is like cheating?" P: "I always say to people who are no longer in the game, 'enjoy your retirement.' We're in the fight, and this is how we're gonna win." Host: "But what about the Merits of what he's talking about?" P: "I don't think it has any Merit." H: "How is that good for democracy?" P: "The fact is the President wanted to rig the system because he knew he would lose. People said, 'well two wrongs don't make a right," we don't like redistricting make that decade, we don't think that that's right. But the fact is, we have self-defense for democracy, because this is a president who's doing what he's doing to reinforce abolishing the House of Representatives and getting rid of the beauty, the exquisite beauty of the Constitution." "She" goes on to say... "Our Founders did not want"... then mumbles on and never says anything. And says the word 'Democracy' 3 times in the interview... Says: "He's the President of the United States and does not honor the Constitution of the United States." One. Anyone who puts 'Democracy' and 'Constitution' in the same sentence, paragraph, or conversation is an enemy to the Republic or a moron. Probably both. Article 4 Section 4 of the CONSTITUTION outlines we are a REPUBLICAN Form of Government. The AUTHOR of the CONSTITUTION, the Bill of Rights, and 26 of the Federalist Papers (sole author), 29 co-authored, wrote in #10 and #14 how 'pure democracies' are dangerous. Two. In order to know what's a violation of the Constitution, one might need to know what the Constitution says, reads, and outlines. PDJT has more than carried out his duties of Article II of the Constitution to a 'T' which is the Executive Branch. Three, many other states are redistricting right now, not just California. But just because... IF something PDJT did was 'cheating', if one had any integrity, the Merit would be to beat him outright, not redraw lines and/or “out-cheat” to beat him. 👉🏻 ——— 👉🏻 | 45———47 |🫡♠️🇺🇸

Derek Johnson

12,320 次观看 • 9 个月前