Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨If you have a concealed carry permit, EVERY STATE should recognize it when you travel — just like a driver’s license. It’s time we pass my bipartisan H.R. 38 to ensure law-abiding Americans exercising their 2A rights are NOT made into criminals when crossing state lines.

Rep. Richard Hudson

32,688 subscribers

26,708 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von AverageAmerican🇺🇸⭐️⭐️⭐️

AverageAmerican🇺🇸⭐️⭐️⭐️vor 1 Jahr

Lol just repeal all federal gun laws period. Shall not be infringed is pretty clear.

Profilbild von Lea Barrett

Lea Barrettvor 1 Jahr

Thank you; although, if you actually believe in 2A, this seems ridiculous. Of course citizens can concealed carry.

Profilbild von Colorado Springs Liberty on the Rocks

Colorado Springs Liberty on the Rocksvor 1 Jahr

Constitutional Carry is the correct answer.

Profilbild von Tom

Tomvor 1 Jahr

Missouri has zero requirements to carry. Even kids. So basically anyone gets to carry anywhere. You guys are ridiculous

Profilbild von Dale B. Rideout

Dale B. Rideoutvor 1 Jahr

A permit is a privilege and revocable. Why don’t we just recognize our Right as a Right and move along.

Profilbild von Louis Mecka

Louis Meckavor 1 Jahr

You shouldn’t have to get a permit to exercise your rights

Profilbild von Rosa 🦅🇺🇸 🇮🇹

Rosa 🦅🇺🇸 🇮🇹vor 1 Jahr

YES!

Profilbild von Michael Donovan

Michael Donovanvor 1 Jahr

Thank you

Profilbild von Troy312

Troy312vor 1 Jahr

Let’s stick in non resident permits in that bill as well!

Profilbild von SargeOD95 ⚔️🛡🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

SargeOD95 ⚔️🛡🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

Or no permit, except the 2nd amendment. Pretty simple

Ähnliche Videos

The statist gun grabbers at Everytown attempt to make a video on the dangers of a bill that would make states recognize out of state concealed carry licenses (just like they already have to do for drivers licenses) but it just turns into an ad for why this bill should be passed. Essentially their argument is that Florida & Texas should have to recognize illegal invader "No Name Given"'s CDL and allow them to drive 80,000lb vehicles on busy highways but California & Massachusetts shouldn't have to recognize the Constitutional rights of out of state American citizens 🤡🌎 More freedom when traveling? Sounds great. Let's do that 🇺🇸 #2nd #2A #backfire #liberty #CivilRights

The statist gun grabbers at Everytown attempt to make a video on the dangers of a bill that would make states recognize out of state concealed carry licenses (just like they already have to do for drivers licenses) but it just turns into an ad for why this bill should be passed. Essentially their argument is that Florida & Texas should have to recognize illegal invader "No Name Given"'s CDL and allow them to drive 80,000lb vehicles on busy highways but California & Massachusetts shouldn't have to recognize the Constitutional rights of out of state American citizens 🤡🌎 More freedom when traveling? Sounds great. Let's do that 🇺🇸 #2nd #2A #backfire #liberty #CivilRights

Mrgunsngear

57,762 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Trump says he’s working on national reciprocity. Carry in all 50 states. And this is about to expose a lot of people. Because if your driver’s license works when you cross state lines… Why shouldn’t your carry permit? If you’re trusted to protect your life in Texas, why does that right disappear the second you land in New York, California, or New Jersey? An imaginary line on a map should not erase your right to defend yourself. And this is where the “I support the Second Amendment, but…” crowd always tells on themselves. Because national reciprocity is the easy one. This isn’t even the AR-15 fight. This isn’t the magazine fight. This is just saying: If you went through the process, got licensed, and followed the law, your permit should be recognized nationwide. That is actual common sense. So watch who fights this. Because the people who oppose national reciprocity were never defending the Second Amendment. They were defending control. Now be honest: Should your carry permit work in all 50 states like your driver’s license? Or should every state get to decide whether your right to protect yourself disappears at the border? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still says, “I support the 2A, but…”

Trump says he’s working on national reciprocity. Carry in all 50 states. And this is about to expose a lot of people. Because if your driver’s license works when you cross state lines… Why shouldn’t your carry permit? If you’re trusted to protect your life in Texas, why does that right disappear the second you land in New York, California, or New Jersey? An imaginary line on a map should not erase your right to defend yourself. And this is where the “I support the Second Amendment, but…” crowd always tells on themselves. Because national reciprocity is the easy one. This isn’t even the AR-15 fight. This isn’t the magazine fight. This is just saying: If you went through the process, got licensed, and followed the law, your permit should be recognized nationwide. That is actual common sense. So watch who fights this. Because the people who oppose national reciprocity were never defending the Second Amendment. They were defending control. Now be honest: Should your carry permit work in all 50 states like your driver’s license? Or should every state get to decide whether your right to protect yourself disappears at the border? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still says, “I support the 2A, but…”

Colion Noir

62,398 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Rep Rep. Paul Gosar, DDS is right, Arizona should NOT have two Democrats senators. We are a red state, it’s time to act like it.

Rep Rep. Paul Gosar, DDS is right, Arizona should NOT have two Democrats senators. We are a red state, it’s time to act like it.

Turning Point Action

60,622 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

NRA EVP & CEO Doug Hamlin joins Carl Higbie on NEWSMAX to underscore one simple truth: the Second Amendment empowers law-abiding Americans to protect themselves and others. “The difference between the international crowd and those of us here in the United States: we do have a Second Amendment.” “I’m a concealed carry permit holder in Virginia, but if I cross the Potomac River into the District of Columbia, I’m a felon. We stand with those law abiding citizens out there, our members, who are prepared to defend themselves, their families, their homes, and their businesses.”

NRA EVP & CEO Doug Hamlin joins Carl Higbie on NEWSMAX to underscore one simple truth: the Second Amendment empowers law-abiding Americans to protect themselves and others. “The difference between the international crowd and those of us here in the United States: we do have a Second Amendment.” “I’m a concealed carry permit holder in Virginia, but if I cross the Potomac River into the District of Columbia, I’m a felon. We stand with those law abiding citizens out there, our members, who are prepared to defend themselves, their families, their homes, and their businesses.”

NRA

36,730 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

HOLY SH*T 🚨 Secretary of State Marco Rubio just went Nuclear on NATO: Marco: “If NATO is just about US defending Europe if they are attacked but they DENY us basing rights when we need them thats not a good arrangement” IT’S TIME TO LEAVE NATO

HOLY SH*T 🚨 Secretary of State Marco Rubio just went Nuclear on NATO: Marco: “If NATO is just about US defending Europe if they are attacked but they DENY us basing rights when we need them thats not a good arrangement” IT’S TIME TO LEAVE NATO

MAGA Voice

45,874 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

IF YOU LIVE IN NEW YORK STATE/CITY YOU NEED TO LEAVE ASAP! 🚨🚨🚨 LISTEN to me closely New York, your state is now officially under FULL COMMUNIST RULE. Your Governor, Hochul just successfully appealed Rule 2.13 and it is now LAW. Rule 2.13 gives New Your authorities the ability to REMOVE YOU from the general population at ANY time if you have a “disease” either communicable or not as they see fit, and put you into a QUARANTINE CAMP. You heard that correctly… It gets WORSE… There are NO age limits. Children are not excluded. NO time limits for removal. They can leave you in there as along as they want. NO DUE PROCESS. You have NO recourse, and NO RIGHTS once you are placed into the camp. We HAVE seen this before throughout history, and believe me when I tell you this is NOT just for “sick” people. There is NO question in my mind that New York is planning something BIG. I’m not sure what it is, but to speculate seems TERRIFYING. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

IF YOU LIVE IN NEW YORK STATE/CITY YOU NEED TO LEAVE ASAP! 🚨🚨🚨 LISTEN to me closely New York, your state is now officially under FULL COMMUNIST RULE. Your Governor, Hochul just successfully appealed Rule 2.13 and it is now LAW. Rule 2.13 gives New Your authorities the ability to REMOVE YOU from the general population at ANY time if you have a “disease” either communicable or not as they see fit, and put you into a QUARANTINE CAMP. You heard that correctly… It gets WORSE… There are NO age limits. Children are not excluded. NO time limits for removal. They can leave you in there as along as they want. NO DUE PROCESS. You have NO recourse, and NO RIGHTS once you are placed into the camp. We HAVE seen this before throughout history, and believe me when I tell you this is NOT just for “sick” people. There is NO question in my mind that New York is planning something BIG. I’m not sure what it is, but to speculate seems TERRIFYING. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

The Patriot Voice

1,684,071 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨Doocy: "Is your message to people who have concealed-carry permits that if they're going to go to a protest, they should leave their gun in the car?" Noem: "My message is… you shouldn't be laying hands on law enforcement and getting in their faces."

🚨Doocy: "Is your message to people who have concealed-carry permits that if they're going to go to a protest, they should leave their gun in the car?" Noem: "My message is… you shouldn't be laying hands on law enforcement and getting in their faces."

Derrick Evans

353,261 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Thomas Massie

229,372 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Every state except CALIFORNIA has complied with U.S. Department of Transportation rules that you MUST speak English to have a trucking license. We hope they get ON BOARD now that we are withholding $40 MILLION from the state. This is not about politics, it’s about safety!

Every state except CALIFORNIA has complied with U.S. Department of Transportation rules that you MUST speak English to have a trucking license. We hope they get ON BOARD now that we are withholding $40 MILLION from the state. This is not about politics, it’s about safety!

Secretary Sean Duffy

594,576 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Hawaii tried to make your concealed carry permit basically worthless. You could have the permit. You could pass the process. You could legally carry. But the second you walked into a gas station, grocery store, restaurant, or parking lot on private property… Your gun became illegal unless the owner gave you permission first. That’s not a right. That’s a permission slip. The Supreme Court just struck it down 6–3. And this matters way beyond Hawaii. New York, New Jersey, Maryland, California — they’ve all been playing the same game: Give you the right on paper. Then make it illegal almost everywhere you’d actually use it. The Court just flipped the default back. You can carry unless the property owner says no. So here’s the question: Should your carry permit work by default… Or should you have to ask permission at every single door? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks these laws are about “safety.” America HAT:

Hawaii tried to make your concealed carry permit basically worthless. You could have the permit. You could pass the process. You could legally carry. But the second you walked into a gas station, grocery store, restaurant, or parking lot on private property… Your gun became illegal unless the owner gave you permission first. That’s not a right. That’s a permission slip. The Supreme Court just struck it down 6–3. And this matters way beyond Hawaii. New York, New Jersey, Maryland, California — they’ve all been playing the same game: Give you the right on paper. Then make it illegal almost everywhere you’d actually use it. The Court just flipped the default back. You can carry unless the property owner says no. So here’s the question: Should your carry permit work by default… Or should you have to ask permission at every single door? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks these laws are about “safety.” America HAT:

Colion Noir

41,029 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🇺🇸NEW🇺🇸 When our veterans seek to treat their pain, Congressman Hamadeh believes they should have access to safer alternatives to opioids. That's why he co-sponsored the bipartisan NOPAIN for Veterans Act. His team made a video to walk you through it! Read H.R.4509⤵️

🇺🇸NEW🇺🇸 When our veterans seek to treat their pain, Congressman Hamadeh believes they should have access to safer alternatives to opioids. That's why he co-sponsored the bipartisan NOPAIN for Veterans Act. His team made a video to walk you through it! Read H.R.4509⤵️

Office of Congressman Abe Hamadeh

29,934 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Big Tech companies have made it crystal clear they are incapable of regulating themselves. KOSA would set a product safety standard for the virtual space, just like we have for every other industry in the physical space. 86% of Americans agree it’s time to pass this.

Big Tech companies have made it crystal clear they are incapable of regulating themselves. KOSA would set a product safety standard for the virtual space, just like we have for every other industry in the physical space. 86% of Americans agree it’s time to pass this.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn

34,413 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Go Alabama!! A state FINALLY taking the right steps....only 49 left to go! Maybe. When they got a drivers license and it had a star on it. That is supposed to say you can vote. American citizens who are naturalized citizens show their voting card when they vote. The star on the card indicates eligibility to vote, but it’s also present on non-citizen driver’s licenses. Trish Regan

Go Alabama!! A state FINALLY taking the right steps....only 49 left to go! Maybe. When they got a drivers license and it had a star on it. That is supposed to say you can vote. American citizens who are naturalized citizens show their voting card when they vote. The star on the card indicates eligibility to vote, but it’s also present on non-citizen driver’s licenses. Trish Regan

GABRIEL 🪽

20,058 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 DONALD TRUMP NAILS IT: "They CHEAT like hell! That's what they do best. They cheat on elections. In all fairness to them, if they didn't cheat, it would be impossible to win!" "Think of it. We won every swing state, all 7...we won the electoral college in a LANDSLIDE. We won the POPULAR VOTE by MILLIONS." 🔥 "We won the popular vote the FIRST TIME too!" "You don't win when you have open borders, when you have men and women's sports, when you have the transgender."

🚨 DONALD TRUMP NAILS IT: "They CHEAT like hell! That's what they do best. They cheat on elections. In all fairness to them, if they didn't cheat, it would be impossible to win!" "Think of it. We won every swing state, all 7...we won the electoral college in a LANDSLIDE. We won the POPULAR VOTE by MILLIONS." 🔥 "We won the popular vote the FIRST TIME too!" "You don't win when you have open borders, when you have men and women's sports, when you have the transgender."

Eric Daugherty

20,866 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

California can run their state however they want — even if it turns into a banana republic. But it becomes my problem when they send people to Congress who may not have been legitimately elected. What happens in California affects Florida because I have to serve with them. That’s a violation of my constituents’ rights.

California can run their state however they want — even if it turns into a banana republic. But it becomes my problem when they send people to Congress who may not have been legitimately elected. What happens in California affects Florida because I have to serve with them. That’s a violation of my constituents’ rights.

Congressman Randy Fine

47,301 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Trump: "When you go to a voting booth, and you do it the right way, and you go to a state that runs it properly, you go in -- they even asked me, they asked me for my license plate. I said, 'I don't know if I have it.' They said, 'Sir, you have to have it.' I was very impressed actually."

Trump: "When you go to a voting booth, and you do it the right way, and you go to a state that runs it properly, you go in -- they even asked me, they asked me for my license plate. I said, 'I don't know if I have it.' They said, 'Sir, you have to have it.' I was very impressed actually."

Aaron Rupar

1,125,151 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr