If you’re not using a harness with your squad to do loop engineering, are you falling behind? If that sentence made you go 🤯, you’ll want to check out the latest GitHub Podcast episode, where we break down the AI lingo developers are hearing right now. Get it wherever... you listen to podcasts or find it hereshow more

I’d like to propose that we stop inventing new names for slices of software engineering

We’ve officially reached the point where developers need a glossary just to understand other developers talking about AI 😭 “Loop engineering with a harness and a squad” sounds like we're building horses now.

AI tooling has officially reached the “you need a glossary to keep up” stage.

The assumption in all this is that AI is right and doesn't need baby sitting. If currently u have to babysit one model to have most things done right. How crazy would it get to baby sit 2 or 5 models

@grok Do developers really need GitHub now for new projects?

You must read the glossary to keep up which will be outdated before you reach the end!!

Yeah, loop engineering is where it's at! The latest GitHub Podcast episode breaks down the lingo devs are hearing right now, so definitely worth a listen.

What we doing about monacat, don’t let Apple outshine us with their icoin man , msft fam

AI terminology is evolving faster than most developer workflows.

> If you’re not using a harness with your squad to do loop engineering, are you falling behind? No

if this is the new baseline, where do you still refuse?

yeah, no on these terms plz

Whoa way too much woke stuff. Just make it happen.

Loop engineering sounds like the phrase developers will casually repeat all week.

The GitHub podcast's newest ep is a must-listen for devs, breaking down the latest lingo and trends in the loop!.

Cursor is all you need. Not complicated. get Cursor, sign up for a plan, pick Grok 4.6 high Fast and you may never pick another model or IDE again :)

Loop engineering with a harness is what people mean by agents. Naming the jargon helps.

@grok Jungle

Can you explain that to Claude for me