Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

If you’ve ever heard that today’s climate change is natural—driven by changes in the Earth’s orbit, the sun, or even “space weather”—you’re not alone. These excuses show up everywhere, from comment sections of my Facebook page to dinner table conversations. On the surface, some of these sciencey-sounding arguments can... show more

Prof. Katharine Hayhoe

222,096 subscribers

12,886 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer, blows the "human-induced climate change" myth completely out of the water: "[Changes in climate] are driven by that great ball of heat in the sky, which we call 'the Sun'. A trace gas (CO2) has nothing to do with our climate." "If we get further away from the Sun, it gets cooler, and if we get closer to the Sun, it gets warmer. No legislation, from Canberra or from the UN, can change the orbit of the Earth." Source: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer, blows the "human-induced climate change" myth completely out of the water: "[Changes in climate] are driven by that great ball of heat in the sky, which we call 'the Sun'. A trace gas (CO2) has nothing to do with our climate." "If we get further away from the Sun, it gets cooler, and if we get closer to the Sun, it gets warmer. No legislation, from Canberra or from the UN, can change the orbit of the Earth." Source: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Wide Awake Media

787,866 views • 3 years ago

Australian geologist, Ian Plimer, effortlessly disposes of some of the popular myths perpetuated by the Net Zero cult. "[Changes in climate] are driven by that great ball of heat in the sky, which we call 'the Sun'. A trace gas (CO2) has nothing to do with our climate." "If we get further away from the Sun it gets cooler and if we get closer to the Sun it gets warmer. No legislation, from Canberra or from the UN, can change the orbit of the Earth." #ClimateHoax #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #Agenda21 #Agenda2030 #GreatReset

Australian geologist, Ian Plimer, effortlessly disposes of some of the popular myths perpetuated by the Net Zero cult. "[Changes in climate] are driven by that great ball of heat in the sky, which we call 'the Sun'. A trace gas (CO2) has nothing to do with our climate." "If we get further away from the Sun it gets cooler and if we get closer to the Sun it gets warmer. No legislation, from Canberra or from the UN, can change the orbit of the Earth." #ClimateHoax #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #Agenda21 #Agenda2030 #GreatReset

Wide Awake Media

373,550 views • 3 years ago

None of these fires or insane storms are natural climate change they are man made .. Good show at Jimmy Dore Dane Wigington Dane Wigington From the documentary “The Dimming” explains how this weather pattern right now is naturally not possible. Full episode.

None of these fires or insane storms are natural climate change they are man made .. Good show at Jimmy Dore Dane Wigington Dane Wigington From the documentary “The Dimming” explains how this weather pattern right now is naturally not possible. Full episode.

leilani dowding 🌸🚜 ☮️

36,327 views • 7 months ago

Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "In the complete history of planet Earth, we have had millions of climate changes, and not one of these we can identify was driven by a change in CO2 in the atmosphere." "We see no record of CO2 driving climate in the past, and there is therefore no logical reason to think that climate change in the present is driven by changes of CO2." Credit: ADH TV

Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "In the complete history of planet Earth, we have had millions of climate changes, and not one of these we can identify was driven by a change in CO2 in the atmosphere." "We see no record of CO2 driving climate in the past, and there is therefore no logical reason to think that climate change in the present is driven by changes of CO2." Credit: ADH TV

Wide Awake Media

119,842 views • 2 years ago

It’ll warm up in the south this weekend but probably not for long. The messy weather is set to continue to for most of the next week or so with a mix of cloud, sun and showers. Bringing you this 10 day weather forecast is Alex Deakin. Did you know you can also watch or listen in full on Spotify? 👇

It’ll warm up in the south this weekend but probably not for long. The messy weather is set to continue to for most of the next week or so with a mix of cloud, sun and showers. Bringing you this 10 day weather forecast is Alex Deakin. Did you know you can also watch or listen in full on Spotify? 👇

Met Office

18,262 views • 3 months ago

By now, you’ve probably seen some of the spicy clips (coarse jesting) from the Rift TV episode with Right Response Ministries. What Joel’s enemies won’t show you is the intro from the following episode, in which E and Pastor Joel addressed the controversy head-on. My view is that these conversations between men are essential for where we are at in our society, and they’re going to happen whether you like it or not. Personally, I’d prefer that a godly pastor like Joel be involved. That said, these streams aren’t meant for everyone. Women, children, and effeminate men should refrain from watching. The language is not sanitized or longhouse-approved. Get over it, or just don’t watch. Link:

Sensitive content

By now, you’ve probably seen some of the spicy clips (coarse jesting) from the Rift TV episode with Right Response Ministries. What Joel’s enemies won’t show you is the intro from the following episode, in which E and Pastor Joel addressed the controversy head-on. My view is that these conversations between men are essential for where we are at in our society, and they’re going to happen whether you like it or not. Personally, I’d prefer that a godly pastor like Joel be involved. That said, these streams aren’t meant for everyone. Women, children, and effeminate men should refrain from watching. The language is not sanitized or longhouse-approved. Get over it, or just don’t watch. Link:

Defiant Baptist

22,054 views • 1 year ago

These last few days have been some of the most amazing of my life. Out on strike, standing side by side in the blistering cold with my brothers and sisters as we fight for a better world. Amazon is coming to the table whether they like it or not. Our movement is unstoppable!

These last few days have been some of the most amazing of my life. Out on strike, standing side by side in the blistering cold with my brothers and sisters as we fight for a better world. Amazon is coming to the table whether they like it or not. Our movement is unstoppable!

Connor Spence - ALU

18,837 views • 1 year ago

One of the stranger claims I see online is that reducing CO₂ would somehow be “the end of humanity because we need CO2 to breathe.” In reality, the carbon we exhale (not inhale) is part of a short, natural cycle: plants take it in, we eat the plants (or animals that ate them), and we release that carbon back into the air within a year or so. What’s not natural is digging up fossil fuels—carbon that’s been locked underground for millions of years—and releasing it all at once. Watch more CO2-related comment section chaos by subscribing on Substack: or Patreon: #climatechange

One of the stranger claims I see online is that reducing CO₂ would somehow be “the end of humanity because we need CO2 to breathe.” In reality, the carbon we exhale (not inhale) is part of a short, natural cycle: plants take it in, we eat the plants (or animals that ate them), and we release that carbon back into the air within a year or so. What’s not natural is digging up fossil fuels—carbon that’s been locked underground for millions of years—and releasing it all at once. Watch more CO2-related comment section chaos by subscribing on Substack: or Patreon: #climatechange

Prof. Katharine Hayhoe

20,585 views • 7 months ago

This week I’m joined by some of the most brutally honest guests I’ve ever had on the podcast! Sh*t gets real. 😂😂 You can watch or listen to the full episode now! Spotify, YouTube, Apple… It’s up on all the platforms.🕺🏾😁 #WhatNowPodcast

This week I’m joined by some of the most brutally honest guests I’ve ever had on the podcast! Sh*t gets real. 😂😂 You can watch or listen to the full episode now! Spotify, YouTube, Apple… It’s up on all the platforms.🕺🏾😁 #WhatNowPodcast

Trevor Noah

136,977 views • 1 year ago

For a long time most Jewish organizations and Jewish leaders in the world treated these false claims against Israel and the Jewish people as absurd, and on their face, ridiculous. And so we ignored the claims, and we let them sort of lie and fester for a long time. And one of the big criticisms that I've heard about my book, Israel on Trial, especially from Jewish organizations, is, "Well, we shouldn't give these these allegations the time of day. We should ignore them. We shouldn't put Israel on trial, we should put Hamas on trial." All of that, I think, is fair. Hamas should be on trial. But the opposite is not necessarily true either. And I think the strategy we have taken over the last 20 or 30 years—of ignoring these claims—has proven to be a fatal mistake. And the reason for that is whether in the law or in sports or in politics, when you ignore the other side's argument, you lose. That's just how it is. No matter how flagrantly absurd the argument is. In the law, if the other side files a motion, it's an adversarial system, if you don't respond to it, the judge isn't going to delve deeply into the correctness of the motion. They've got 300 other motions to deal with. If there's an unobjected to motion, that motion is granted by what we call default. The same thing happens in sports. If one football team arrives on the field and the other team doesn't show up, they win by forfeit. And so in either case, not rebutting the arguments that you believe are frivolous has allowed these arguments really to spread like wildfire across our population, both in our young people and even now bleeding into people in their 30s, 40s, and 50s. It's a very dangerous game we've been playing, and we were wrong to play it. The point of my book is to be patient with these arguments, show people that we can engage these arguments, and that on the merits they are totally false and frivolous as a matter of fact and law.

For a long time most Jewish organizations and Jewish leaders in the world treated these false claims against Israel and the Jewish people as absurd, and on their face, ridiculous. And so we ignored the claims, and we let them sort of lie and fester for a long time. And one of the big criticisms that I've heard about my book, Israel on Trial, especially from Jewish organizations, is, "Well, we shouldn't give these these allegations the time of day. We should ignore them. We shouldn't put Israel on trial, we should put Hamas on trial." All of that, I think, is fair. Hamas should be on trial. But the opposite is not necessarily true either. And I think the strategy we have taken over the last 20 or 30 years—of ignoring these claims—has proven to be a fatal mistake. And the reason for that is whether in the law or in sports or in politics, when you ignore the other side's argument, you lose. That's just how it is. No matter how flagrantly absurd the argument is. In the law, if the other side files a motion, it's an adversarial system, if you don't respond to it, the judge isn't going to delve deeply into the correctness of the motion. They've got 300 other motions to deal with. If there's an unobjected to motion, that motion is granted by what we call default. The same thing happens in sports. If one football team arrives on the field and the other team doesn't show up, they win by forfeit. And so in either case, not rebutting the arguments that you believe are frivolous has allowed these arguments really to spread like wildfire across our population, both in our young people and even now bleeding into people in their 30s, 40s, and 50s. It's a very dangerous game we've been playing, and we were wrong to play it. The point of my book is to be patient with these arguments, show people that we can engage these arguments, and that on the merits they are totally false and frivolous as a matter of fact and law.

Roy K. Altman

14,998 views • 2 months ago

John Stamos: “I need you to put a video out of just the facts. Don’t make jokes about it, don’t bullshit about it, show video of [Trump], show real facts, show gas prices, take pictures of gas stations if you have to, go in grocery stores if you have to, but make it so undeniably true. Don’t fuck around with jokes, no opinion about it, so I can show my sister and the Republicans in my family and friends. The far-right is not gonna watch you or listen to you or Kimmel or Seth or these podcasters or these great guys, David Pakman’s one of my favorites, they’re not getting to the people that need to see this”

John Stamos: “I need you to put a video out of just the facts. Don’t make jokes about it, don’t bullshit about it, show video of [Trump], show real facts, show gas prices, take pictures of gas stations if you have to, go in grocery stores if you have to, but make it so undeniably true. Don’t fuck around with jokes, no opinion about it, so I can show my sister and the Republicans in my family and friends. The far-right is not gonna watch you or listen to you or Kimmel or Seth or these podcasters or these great guys, David Pakman’s one of my favorites, they’re not getting to the people that need to see this”

Marco Foster

1,380,404 views • 1 month ago

“There seems to be a clamour from those on the left of politics to shut down speech they don’t like — not by arguing against it, but by deeming it unsafe.” Watch Darren Grimes on our latest episode of That’s Debatable! Full episode available in the comments 👇

“There seems to be a clamour from those on the left of politics to shut down speech they don’t like — not by arguing against it, but by deeming it unsafe.” Watch Darren Grimes on our latest episode of That’s Debatable! Full episode available in the comments 👇

The Free Speech Union

12,362 views • 8 months ago

The impact of Rico on Usyk is even more impressive from our unseen camera angles 👏💥 Click our link in bio, or go to to watch the full episode of #UsykRico Fight Night RAW 🤝 #fightnightraw 🤳

The impact of Rico on Usyk is even more impressive from our unseen camera angles 👏💥 Click our link in bio, or go to to watch the full episode of #UsykRico Fight Night RAW 🤝 #fightnightraw 🤳

DAZN Boxing

35,187 views • 3 months ago

SECRETARY RUBIO: "From what I have been told by the Department of War, everything is on or ahead of schedule and proceeding on these objectives. We have every confidence in the world that these objectives will be achieved." "We're going to unleash Chang on these people in the next few hours and days. You're going to really begin to perceive a change in the scope and in the intensity of these attacks as frankly, the two most powerful air forces in the world take apart this terroristic regime and defang it." "This terroristic, radical, cleric-lead regime can not be ever allowed to have nuclear weapons."

SECRETARY RUBIO: "From what I have been told by the Department of War, everything is on or ahead of schedule and proceeding on these objectives. We have every confidence in the world that these objectives will be achieved." "We're going to unleash Chang on these people in the next few hours and days. You're going to really begin to perceive a change in the scope and in the intensity of these attacks as frankly, the two most powerful air forces in the world take apart this terroristic regime and defang it." "This terroristic, radical, cleric-lead regime can not be ever allowed to have nuclear weapons."

Fox News

140,563 views • 5 months ago

"It's the Sun." According to leading astrophysicist and geoscientist Dr. Willie Soon, the man-made climate change narrative is "completely nonsense" and has "no strong root or basis in science". He cites data showing natural carbon dioxide sources dwarf human emissions and argues that focusing narrowly on fossil fuels obfuscates the dominant roles of water vapour and solar energy in Earth's climate system. From the fifth episode of the new Wide Awake Media podcast. Full episode coming soon!

"It's the Sun." According to leading astrophysicist and geoscientist Dr. Willie Soon, the man-made climate change narrative is "completely nonsense" and has "no strong root or basis in science". He cites data showing natural carbon dioxide sources dwarf human emissions and argues that focusing narrowly on fossil fuels obfuscates the dominant roles of water vapour and solar energy in Earth's climate system. From the fifth episode of the new Wide Awake Media podcast. Full episode coming soon!

Wide Awake Media

79,603 views • 7 months ago

Elon Musk :The biggest source of energy by far is the sun. So nothing even comes close to the sun in terms of energy output The sun converts over 4 million tons of mass to energy per second. And it’s been doing that for a very long time, and will do that for many billions of years to come So, one of the ways you can think of the progress of any given civilization is on the Kardashev scale. And so, just a simple way of thinking about it is: ➝ You’re a Kardashev Level One if you’ve harnessed all the power of a planet ➝ You’re Two if you’ve harnessed all the power of a solar system ➝ And you’re Three if you’ve harnessed the power of a galaxy. We’re very far from Three, it’s safe to say. But even from One So when you think in Kardashev terms, it becomes very obvious that the sun is overwhelmingly the source of energy and everything else is tiny potatoes. Tiny potatoes are fine for now, but the sun is overwhelmingly the big potato. The humongous potato So it’s really harnessing the power of the sun that will lead us to the stars

Elon Musk :The biggest source of energy by far is the sun. So nothing even comes close to the sun in terms of energy output The sun converts over 4 million tons of mass to energy per second. And it’s been doing that for a very long time, and will do that for many billions of years to come So, one of the ways you can think of the progress of any given civilization is on the Kardashev scale. And so, just a simple way of thinking about it is: ➝ You’re a Kardashev Level One if you’ve harnessed all the power of a planet ➝ You’re Two if you’ve harnessed all the power of a solar system ➝ And you’re Three if you’ve harnessed the power of a galaxy. We’re very far from Three, it’s safe to say. But even from One So when you think in Kardashev terms, it becomes very obvious that the sun is overwhelmingly the source of energy and everything else is tiny potatoes. Tiny potatoes are fine for now, but the sun is overwhelmingly the big potato. The humongous potato So it’s really harnessing the power of the sun that will lead us to the stars

X Freeze

69,603 views • 9 months ago

Several videos claiming to show some kind of object and/or objects burning up while entering the Earth’s atmosphere tonight over Northern Kazakhstan have begun circulating on X, with evidence suggesting that it was likely either a satellite or space debris, not, as some have suggested, the failed launch of an RS-26 “Oreshnik” Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile by Russia against Ukraine.

Several videos claiming to show some kind of object and/or objects burning up while entering the Earth’s atmosphere tonight over Northern Kazakhstan have begun circulating on X, with evidence suggesting that it was likely either a satellite or space debris, not, as some have suggested, the failed launch of an RS-26 “Oreshnik” Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile by Russia against Ukraine.

OSINTdefender

209,002 views • 1 year ago

Leonardo DiCaprio endorsed Kamala Harris because the Hurricanes were Caused by “Climate Change” Translation—— I did things to little kids at those Diddy Parties and/or on Epstein Island, so I’m trying to save my ass… He says climate change is killing the earth and America must renter the Paris Climate Accord in order to save it… The truth is, the Paris Climate Accord is nothing but a scam to pilfer trillions of dollars out of America. America must foot the bill first and make all these changes first… but Countries like China, a country that generates the MOST pollution by far, won’t chip in until 2030-2035. Climate change is a damn scam.

Leonardo DiCaprio endorsed Kamala Harris because the Hurricanes were Caused by “Climate Change” Translation—— I did things to little kids at those Diddy Parties and/or on Epstein Island, so I’m trying to save my ass… He says climate change is killing the earth and America must renter the Paris Climate Accord in order to save it… The truth is, the Paris Climate Accord is nothing but a scam to pilfer trillions of dollars out of America. America must foot the bill first and make all these changes first… but Countries like China, a country that generates the MOST pollution by far, won’t chip in until 2030-2035. Climate change is a damn scam.

MJTruthUltra

2,723,462 views • 1 year ago

“The climate has always changed” is a common talking point to distract from recent-more rapid manmade climate change. Here’s a quick/simple explainer on natural CC. Natural climate change occurs over long term scales driven by predictable changes in sunlight reaching & absorbed by Earth. Over 10s of thousands of years Earth’s orbit, tilt and wobble cycles back and forth causing an ice age every ~100K years. Orbit: from more circular to more elliptical and back. Tilt: 22° to 24.5° and back. These cycles change the sunlight received/ absorbed. Over the past million years this means Earth cycles in and out of ice ages and interglacials. (Now we are between glacials) A surprising note… the global temperature difference between an ice age and warm period is only ~6°C/ 10°F, but that change takes 10K+ years to happen - until now. Over the past 150 years alone man has warmed Earth by 1.5°C/2.7°F - so about 1/4 of the amount which typically takes nature 10K+ years to accomplish. A super-charged acceleration due mainly to burning fossil fuels & forests! True: The climate has always changed. Also True: Humans are now a force of nature, super charging the natural warming rate.

“The climate has always changed” is a common talking point to distract from recent-more rapid manmade climate change. Here’s a quick/simple explainer on natural CC. Natural climate change occurs over long term scales driven by predictable changes in sunlight reaching & absorbed by Earth. Over 10s of thousands of years Earth’s orbit, tilt and wobble cycles back and forth causing an ice age every ~100K years. Orbit: from more circular to more elliptical and back. Tilt: 22° to 24.5° and back. These cycles change the sunlight received/ absorbed. Over the past million years this means Earth cycles in and out of ice ages and interglacials. (Now we are between glacials) A surprising note… the global temperature difference between an ice age and warm period is only ~6°C/ 10°F, but that change takes 10K+ years to happen - until now. Over the past 150 years alone man has warmed Earth by 1.5°C/2.7°F - so about 1/4 of the amount which typically takes nature 10K+ years to accomplish. A super-charged acceleration due mainly to burning fossil fuels & forests! True: The climate has always changed. Also True: Humans are now a force of nature, super charging the natural warming rate.

Jeff Berardelli

41,958 views • 7 months ago