正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT FROM SOUTH SUDAN WALKS ONTO SCHOOL GROUNDS ARMED WITH HAMMER, HATCHET, KNIFE AND PETROL!! This is the reality of failed border control. A South Sudanese man who had no right to be in Britain walked around a school in Greater Manchester carrying a hammer, a hatchet, a...

52,221 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🔴Just Now. Henry Nowak’s father’s full family statement. This is both heartbreaking and utterly harrowing. Should be watched until the end and shared everywhere. “The police did not believe him, he was dragged across the gravel, handcuffed and arrested.” “He told the police 4 times he had been stabbed. One police officer said ‘I don’t think you have mate’. He told the police he couldn’t breathe, 9 times” “Instead of being treated like a victim, police arrested him for assault and read him his rights. That was the last thing he heard. Henry did not die with dignity. He was not believed.” “The way he was treated was inhumane and degrading” ** “His murderer however WAS afforded decency. He WAS believed. He was NOT handcuffed when arrested. He was NOT handcuffed when transported to the police station. As far as we understand, he was NEVER handcuffed AT ALL. And while under arrest for Henry’s murder, police even took him to the kitchen so he could choose what he would like to eat. … the contrast is unbearable” ** “This is not a case about Sikhism, this is not a case about racism. This is a case about murder. People should be able to walk openly through the streets of Britain carrying a 21cm blade.” “Today Henry was believed” ** His murderer has just been sentenced to 21 years in prison. My heart broke in two listening to this. There must be a full investigation into the Police misconduct. Rest in peace Henry. May his memory be a blessing. Sending love and prayers to the family.

Kosher

47,303 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨ICE deported a U.S. born citizen. Brian Morales is a U.S. citizen, born in a hospital in Denver, Colorado, with documentation to prove it… And yet, after a traffic stop in Texas, he was taken into custody and deported to Mexico with no charges, no conviction, and no due process. Morales repeatedly told officers he was a citizen and had proof, but instead of verifying that, he was threatened with fraud charges, and prison time, if he didn’t comply. He was ultimately pressured into signing removal paperwork out of fear… which is coercion, and illegal. There is no law in the United States that allows the government to deport a U.S. citizen. Citizenship is not something ICE can ignore because they don’t believe you, and it’s not something that can be stripped through intimidation. If you are born here, you belong here… period. DHS claims he admitted to being undocumented… even though he had proof he was not… and we’re expected to accept that version without questioning how that “admission” was obtained in the first place. This also didn’t happen at the border, it happened after a routine traffic stop in Texas, which means the standard here wasn’t immigration enforcement at the border, it was treating citizenship like it’s conditional, and revocable, on the spot. If citizenship can be ignored, if proof can be dismissed, and if people can be threatened into signing away their rights, then due process is being bypassed entirely… and if this can happen to Brian Morales, it can happen to anyone.

Jesus Freakin Congress

195,099 次观看 • 4 个月前

Jen Stancombe is the mother of Elsie Dot Stancombe, who, at just 7 years old, was stabbed 85 times by Axel Rudakubana in 2024. Elsie should still be here. Her parents, her sister, her extended family, friends and wider community should not have to grieve her loss. Her little sister should be able to feel safe and not worry that the “bad man” who killed Elsie is going to come for her too. Her mum should not have to reassure her that he’s being guarded by “200 policemen” and explain to her little girl that her sister is gone forever and is never coming back. She shouldn’t have to deal with adult worries, she should be able to listen and sing along to Taylor Swift and wear bracelets, without it being an awful reminder that her sister was brutally murdered whilst doing both those things. Her father shouldn’t have to live his life restless because he wasn’t able to protect his little girl. Her parents shouldn’t have to live the rest of their lives in survival mode, they should be able to send her on school trips and to extracurricular activities, without crippling anxiety. Axel’s parents should not have been able to come from Rwanda to seek asylum in Britain. They should not have been eligible to become British citizens. After bringing a knife to school on countless occasions, and returning after his expulsion to break a pupil’s arm with a hockey stick, their son should have been imprisoned. He was referred to government’s Prevent counter-extremism programme by his teachers three times between December 2019 and April 2021 for concerns about carrying knives and an obsession with extreme violence, genocide, mass killings, beheadings and graphic material and having researched school shootings, historical atrocities. Each time the case was closed without progression. This should have been escalated. The staff responsible for not progressing these concerns, whose job it is to prevent terrorist attacks, should have been sacked and faced charges for failing in their duty of care to protect the general public. A week before the Southport attack he tried to take a taxi to his former school, but was stopped by his father, Alphonse, who was aware of his intent to seriously harm others. He should have contacted the police immediately and told them what his son was intending to do. On the 29th of July 2024, Axel ordered a taxi to a dance studio where a Taylor Swift-themed dance workshop for young children was taking place. He took a kitchen knife he had bought days earlier. Wearing a mask, he went upstairs to the studio and began systematically stabbing children as they sat making friendship bracelets and singing Taylor Swift songs, one of whom was Elsie Dot. He also murdered Bebe King, just 6 years old, stabbing her 122 times and Alice da Silva Aguiar, only 9 years old, as well as seriously injuring 8 other children and 2 adults. He was arrested at the scene and expressed pleasure that the children were dead. After the Southport attack, police found a sealed box containing ricin at the family home, along with production equipment. Packages of material had been ordered online. Alphonse said that he was aware. Axel pleaded guilty to its production and also admitted possessing an al-Qaeda terrorist training manual. He should not have been allowed access to the internet to procure any of these materials. On the 23rd of January 2025 he was sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court to custody for life with a minimum term of 52 years. He should not have been allowed to live. We should not have to live in fear that such heinous acts can happen to our loved ones or any one of us at any moment. You can help support Elsie’s family to make a difference to the lives of other children in her name here:

Kirbs

27,168 次观看 • 1 个月前

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Hopewell Chin’ono

67,842 次观看 • 9 个月前

Axel Rudakubana's parents repaid our country's kindness, and the generosity of the Southport community, whose Rotary Clubs raised money for their son Dion's wheelchair, by raising an anti-white child killer. They should be made to answer for their failures as parents and deported back to Rwanda. They knew their son was remorseless, sadistic, and violent. But when he broke into the school he was excluded from for carrying a knife, and broke a student's wrist with a hockey stick, his father Alphonse tried to hide it from the authorities. In a WhatsApp message to a Lancashire Council social worker, Alphonse said he expected a "high degree of confidentiality and sensitivity", and not "to record or share some information with others that can turn our family upside down" with the authorities "in charge of punishing Axel". He asked why the Council's youth offending team were writing an assessment for Axel, and said "Please don't involve them any more." Alphonse said, it's "Not to say that there is something sinister, but because it is not necessary." The headteacher of Acorns School, from which Axel was expelled, Joanne Hodson, did think there was something "sinister", but was told to remove that word, and that he is "cold and calculating", from her report on him because social workers accused her of racially profiling "a black boy with a knife." If we were more "racist", by these failed institutions' standards, then Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe, and Alice da Silva Aguiar would still be alive. At every stage, Axel's family resisted interventions by the state. They tried to hide his evil nature from the public and the authorities. Alphonse knew his son was ordering suspicious Amazon packages to neighbours' home, including the knife he used to commit the murders and materials to make ricin in his bedroom, presumably using the family's account and credit card, and did nothing. He stopped his son from taking a taxi to his old school to commit an attack a week before the Southport murders, but did not refer him to the authorities or have him sectioned. They bought Axel the tablet and paid for the broadband that he used to research mass murderers, school shootings, ISIS bombings, and genocides. If he mentioned this obsession to teachers, and told his classmates he wanted "white genocide", are we to believe he never told his parents? They created this monster. They raised him in squalor in a social housing property they bought when Alphonse's bric-a-brac resale businesses was making just a few thousand pounds in profit. Alphonse and Laetitia were granted asylum in Britain eight years after the Rwandan genocide ended, despite living safely in Uganda. Alphonse fought for Paul Kagame's Rwandan Patriotic Front army, and Laetitia is related to a government minister. On what grounds were they given asylum? And why in Britain? Their presence in our country as asylum seekers, in social housing, and now in witness protection has been funded by the taxpayer. Their son now sits in a cell that we pay for, because they raised a killer. We shouldn't have to pay for this ungrateful, negligent family any more. Get answers to our questions, and then send them back to Rwanda. They should never have been here in the first place. Stop importing people from failed states who hate us and want to kill our children. Save us the money and grief.
8:42

Sensitive content

Axel Rudakubana's parents repaid our country's kindness, and the generosity of the Southport community, whose Rotary Clubs raised money for their son Dion's wheelchair, by raising an anti-white child killer. They should be made to answer for their failures as parents and deported back to Rwanda. They knew their son was remorseless, sadistic, and violent. But when he broke into the school he was excluded from for carrying a knife, and broke a student's wrist with a hockey stick, his father Alphonse tried to hide it from the authorities. In a WhatsApp message to a Lancashire Council social worker, Alphonse said he expected a "high degree of confidentiality and sensitivity", and not "to record or share some information with others that can turn our family upside down" with the authorities "in charge of punishing Axel". He asked why the Council's youth offending team were writing an assessment for Axel, and said "Please don't involve them any more." Alphonse said, it's "Not to say that there is something sinister, but because it is not necessary." The headteacher of Acorns School, from which Axel was expelled, Joanne Hodson, did think there was something "sinister", but was told to remove that word, and that he is "cold and calculating", from her report on him because social workers accused her of racially profiling "a black boy with a knife." If we were more "racist", by these failed institutions' standards, then Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe, and Alice da Silva Aguiar would still be alive. At every stage, Axel's family resisted interventions by the state. They tried to hide his evil nature from the public and the authorities. Alphonse knew his son was ordering suspicious Amazon packages to neighbours' home, including the knife he used to commit the murders and materials to make ricin in his bedroom, presumably using the family's account and credit card, and did nothing. He stopped his son from taking a taxi to his old school to commit an attack a week before the Southport murders, but did not refer him to the authorities or have him sectioned. They bought Axel the tablet and paid for the broadband that he used to research mass murderers, school shootings, ISIS bombings, and genocides. If he mentioned this obsession to teachers, and told his classmates he wanted "white genocide", are we to believe he never told his parents? They created this monster. They raised him in squalor in a social housing property they bought when Alphonse's bric-a-brac resale businesses was making just a few thousand pounds in profit. Alphonse and Laetitia were granted asylum in Britain eight years after the Rwandan genocide ended, despite living safely in Uganda. Alphonse fought for Paul Kagame's Rwandan Patriotic Front army, and Laetitia is related to a government minister. On what grounds were they given asylum? And why in Britain? Their presence in our country as asylum seekers, in social housing, and now in witness protection has been funded by the taxpayer. Their son now sits in a cell that we pay for, because they raised a killer. We shouldn't have to pay for this ungrateful, negligent family any more. Get answers to our questions, and then send them back to Rwanda. They should never have been here in the first place. Stop importing people from failed states who hate us and want to kill our children. Save us the money and grief.

Connor Tomlinson

94,131 次观看 • 10 个月前

Claim: Lazar Can't Show Us Why He Attended MIT Because He Doesn't Want to Risk Prison "[Lazar] had said he was at MIT, and that he was at Caltech." ~Dolan (No, Lazar said he had DEGREES from both. Surprised Dolan (Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure) downplayed that.) Luigi Venditelli (LV): "As far as things that I can say, [Lazar] shared with me, shared it also with my team, and also shared it with Joe Rogan in the past, in regards to his education...because that's something that I think a lot of people really attack Bob Lazar on, and rightfully so. Because if he doesn't have a paper to bring out, they can attack him. It's an easy, it's a low-hanging fruit attack for somebody who doesn't believe the story. "In regards to the MIT component, the only thing I can say is that there were national security issues there, okay?" (No, what you can say is that Lazar CLAIMED there were national security issues there. Unless you have proof that you're not sharing?) Dolan: "For people who don't know this, we'll just explain: Bob had said he was at MIT, and that he was at Caltech and no one was able to find or get any kind of confirmation that he was at those schools." (Lazar didn't just claim that he was AT those schools. He claimed he had degrees from both. This is from the 1993 Lazar Q&A at Rachel, Nevada near Area 51. Lazar: "As far as electronic technology, my degree there is from Caltech and physics is from MIT. [MIT] was a master's degree.") ~ LV: "Correct. Now, what's also important to note, specifically about MIT, is the one I wanna highlight, is that he said, 'I wasn't alone in this.' So, the government itself - he was at Los Alamos National Labs when this happened - he was sent to MIT." (Again, if LV wants to come across as unbiased and trying to get to the truth, he should be saying, "Lazar CLAIMS he was at Los Alamos and was then sent to MIT.") LV: "Now, the reason why this is important is because, and he also said, 'Not everything the government does or was doing was legal.' Okay? So there were things that were actually not necessarily legal, and they needed some scientists to go and learn certain things at MIT, and that's the reason why he was there. And there were other people there. "He said to me, 'Look, for me to bring this out, I would be revealing things that would, potentially, put other people in a compromising situation.' This had nothing...signed papers, something to do with national security. And he says, 'There's no reason for me to ruin other people's lives just to satisfy a small percentage of people who are constantly bickering about my education.'" (I don't think it's a small percentage. OK, so Bob, supposedly, says/claims he doesn't want to talk about the government allegedly sending him to MIT because he doesn't want to put other people in a compromising situation.) LV: "So, I understand that part. It's frustrating that it cannot be mentioned, but it it's also something that I understood, and it made perfect sense to me." (So Lazar can't mention any of it but LV can?) LV: "Now, I know it's frustrating to all of those who say we should still have something. Well, unfortunately, he's not gonna want to go to jail just to satisfy you." (So first it was: He doesn't want to "bring this out" because it would put people in a compromising situation and now it's: He doesn't want to risk prison. Which is it? How about we get that directly from Lazar instead of second hand?) LV: "And he would not be the only person ever to have been implicated in national security programs that were sending scientists to MIT. So that's a very important thing to also look into for history."

Joe Murgia

32,323 次观看 • 4 个月前